Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
So WHAT is Obama hiding?
On Nov 1, 10:17*pm, Harry K wrote:
On Nov 1, 1:05*pm, SenatorPork wrote: Harry K wrote: On Nov 1, 7:00 am, SenatorPork wrote: Harry K wrote: On Oct 31, 9:47 pm, z wrote: On Oct 29, 10:31 pm, BobR wrote: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 WorldNetDaily Exclusive Obama's birth certificate sealed by Hawaii governor Says Democratic senator must make request to obtain original document Posted: October 26, 2008 9:54 pm Eastern By Jerome R. Corsi WorldNetDaily HONOLULU, Hawaii – Although the legitimacy of Sen. Barack Obama's birth certificate has become a focus of intense speculation – and even several lawsuits – WND has learned that Hawaii's Gov. Linda Lingle has placed the candidate's birth certificate under seal and instructed the state's Department of Health to make sure no one in the press obtains access to the original document under any circumstances. The governor's office officially declined a request made in writing by WND in Hawaii to obtain a copy of the hospital-generated original birth certificate of Barack Obama. "It does not appear that Dr. Corsi is within any of these categories of persons with a direct and tangible interest in the birth certificate he seeks," wrote Roz Makuala, manager of constituent services in the governor's office, in an e-mailed response to a WND request seeking the information. Those listed as entitled to obtain a copy of an original birth certificate include the person born, or "registrant" according to the legal description from the governor's office, the spouse or parent of the registrant, a descendant of the registrant, a person having a common ancestor with the registrant, a legal guardian of the registrant, or a person or agency acting on behalf of the registrant. (Story continues below) WND was told the official reason for denial of access to Obama's birth certificate would be authority granted pursuant to Section 338-18 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, a provision the anonymous source claimed was designed to prevent identity theft. Still, the source told WND confidentially the motivation for withholding the original birth certificate was political, although the source refused to disclose whether there was any information on the original birth certificate that would prove politically embarrassing to Obama. Get the book that started it all, Jerome Corsi's "The Obama Nation," autographed by the author, exclusively from WND's online store for the amazing low price of just $4.95. The source also refused to answer WND's question whether the original document on file with the Department of Health was a hospital- generated birth certificate or a registration of birth that may have been filed subsequent to the birth. The anonymous source made clear the Hawaii Department of Health would immediately release Obama's original birth certificate, provided Obama requested the document be released, but the Department of Heath has received no such request from the senator or from anyone acting officially on his behalf. WND also found on microfilm in the Honolulu downtown public library a notice published under the "Births, Marriages, Deaths" section of the Honolulu Sunday Advertiser for August 13, 1961, on page B-6, noting: "Mr. and Mrs. Barack II Obama. 6085 Kalanianaole-Hwy, son, Aug. 4.." In searching through the birth notices of the Honolulu Advertiser for 1961, WND found many birth notices were published between one and two weeks after the date of birth listed. The notice in the Honolulu Advertiser does not list the hospital where the Obama son was born or the doctor who delivered the baby. In a startling development, Obama's Kenyan grandmother has reportedly alleged she witnessed Obama's birth at the Coast Provincial Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. Friday, U.S. Federal judge Richard Barclay Surrick, a Clinton appointee, dismissed a lawsuit brought by Pennsylvania attorney Phillip J. Berg who alleged Obama was not a U.S. "natural born" citizen and therefore ineligible for the presidency under the specifications of the U.S. Constitution, under Article II, Section 1. Berg told WND last week he does not have a copy of a Kenyan birth certificate for Obama that he alleges exists. In Kenya, WND was told by government authorities that all documents concerning Obama were under seal until after the U.S. presidential election on November 4. The Obama campaign website entitled ";Fight the Smears" posts a state of Hawaii "Certificate of Live Birth" which is obviously not the original birth certificate generated by the hospital where Obama reportedly was born. "Fight the Smears" declares, "The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America." Although the Obama campaign could immediately put an end to all the challenges by simply producing the candidate's original birth certificate, it has not done so. And the "Fight the Smears" website offers no explanation as to why Obama has refused to request, and make public, an original hospital-generated birth certificate which the Hawaii Department of Health may possess. in fact, do we have any evidence that obama was born at all? not that i've seen, it's just hearsay.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, I see him way too often on the TV so that proves he was either born or someone is faking a live person very well You can look up his BC on Obama's page or at http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html Which would prove he was born as much as your BC does. Harry K yea but where?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - In Hawaii as all but the kooks know. Harry K then why not release the original birth cert?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I believe that quesstion was adequately answere in the cites I gave. Besides, if it were, you wold just claim it is anothe forgery. *Kooks never give up. Harry K- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - he's probably an alien. not the illegal kind; the space kind. klaatu barada nikto; that's almost an anagram of barack obama. |
#122
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Palin unqualified [was: So WHAT is Obama hiding?]
|
#123
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
So WHAT is Obama hiding?
On Nov 3, 1:01*am, z wrote:
On Nov 1, 10:17*pm, Harry K wrote: On Nov 1, 1:05*pm, SenatorPork wrote: Harry K wrote: On Nov 1, 7:00 am, SenatorPork wrote: Harry K wrote: On Oct 31, 9:47 pm, z wrote: On Oct 29, 10:31 pm, BobR wrote: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 WorldNetDaily Exclusive Obama's birth certificate sealed by Hawaii governor Says Democratic senator must make request to obtain original document Posted: October 26, 2008 9:54 pm Eastern By Jerome R. Corsi WorldNetDaily HONOLULU, Hawaii – Although the legitimacy of Sen. Barack Obama's birth certificate has become a focus of intense speculation – and even several lawsuits – WND has learned that Hawaii's Gov. Linda Lingle has placed the candidate's birth certificate under seal and instructed the state's Department of Health to make sure no one in the press obtains access to the original document under any circumstances. The governor's office officially declined a request made in writing by WND in Hawaii to obtain a copy of the hospital-generated original birth certificate of Barack Obama. "It does not appear that Dr. Corsi is within any of these categories of persons with a direct and tangible interest in the birth certificate he seeks," wrote Roz Makuala, manager of constituent services in the governor's office, in an e-mailed response to a WND request seeking the information. Those listed as entitled to obtain a copy of an original birth certificate include the person born, or "registrant" according to the legal description from the governor's office, the spouse or parent of the registrant, a descendant of the registrant, a person having a common ancestor with the registrant, a legal guardian of the registrant, or a person or agency acting on behalf of the registrant. (Story continues below) WND was told the official reason for denial of access to Obama's birth certificate would be authority granted pursuant to Section 338-18 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, a provision the anonymous source claimed was designed to prevent identity theft. Still, the source told WND confidentially the motivation for withholding the original birth certificate was political, although the source refused to disclose whether there was any information on the original birth certificate that would prove politically embarrassing to Obama. Get the book that started it all, Jerome Corsi's "The Obama Nation," autographed by the author, exclusively from WND's online store for the amazing low price of just $4.95. The source also refused to answer WND's question whether the original document on file with the Department of Health was a hospital- generated birth certificate or a registration of birth that may have been filed subsequent to the birth. The anonymous source made clear the Hawaii Department of Health would immediately release Obama's original birth certificate, provided Obama requested the document be released, but the Department of Heath has received no such request from the senator or from anyone acting officially on his behalf. WND also found on microfilm in the Honolulu downtown public library a notice published under the "Births, Marriages, Deaths" section of the Honolulu Sunday Advertiser for August 13, 1961, on page B-6, noting: "Mr. and Mrs. Barack II Obama. 6085 Kalanianaole-Hwy, son, Aug. 4." In searching through the birth notices of the Honolulu Advertiser for 1961, WND found many birth notices were published between one and two weeks after the date of birth listed. The notice in the Honolulu Advertiser does not list the hospital where the Obama son was born or the doctor who delivered the baby. In a startling development, Obama's Kenyan grandmother has reportedly alleged she witnessed Obama's birth at the Coast Provincial Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. Friday, U.S. Federal judge Richard Barclay Surrick, a Clinton appointee, dismissed a lawsuit brought by Pennsylvania attorney Phillip J. Berg who alleged Obama was not a U.S. "natural born" citizen and therefore ineligible for the presidency under the specifications of the U.S. Constitution, under Article II, Section 1. Berg told WND last week he does not have a copy of a Kenyan birth certificate for Obama that he alleges exists. In Kenya, WND was told by government authorities that all documents concerning Obama were under seal until after the U.S. presidential election on November 4. The Obama campaign website entitled ";Fight the Smears" posts a state of Hawaii "Certificate of Live Birth" which is obviously not the original birth certificate generated by the hospital where Obama reportedly was born. "Fight the Smears" declares, "The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America." Although the Obama campaign could immediately put an end to all the challenges by simply producing the candidate's original birth certificate, it has not done so. And the "Fight the Smears" website offers no explanation as to why Obama has refused to request, and make public, an original hospital-generated birth certificate which the Hawaii Department of Health may possess. in fact, do we have any evidence that obama was born at all? not that i've seen, it's just hearsay.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, I see him way too often on the TV so that proves he was either born or someone is faking a live person very well You can look up his BC on Obama's page or at http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html Which would prove he was born as much as your BC does. Harry K yea but where?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - In Hawaii as all but the kooks know. Harry K then why not release the original birth cert?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I believe that quesstion was adequately answere in the cites I gave. Besides, if it were, you wold just claim it is anothe forgery. *Kooks never give up. Harry K- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - he's probably an alien. not the illegal kind; the space kind. klaatu barada nikto; that's almost an anagram of barack obama.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - OMG! You're right! Harry K |
#125
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Palin unqualified [was: So WHAT is Obama hiding?]
On 3 Nov 2008 14:13:18 GMT, Jim Yanik wrote:
[...] Palin has far more experience than Obama,and she's only the *VP candidate*. [...] Damn straight! You want experience? Palin outstrips g Obama in the crucial areas: Can Obama field-strip a moose? Did he ever win a high-school beauty contest? What's his record on the ice? Bet he does't know a hockey puck from a ... (stop me before I...) Did he ever get exorcised by a kinda witchdoctor in church? (pix available on You Tube) Will he teach his daughters how well "abstinence only" works with your high-school boyfriend? And if they get knocked up via rape or incest or lack of parental involvement, pop out the kid anyway. And proudly display the result to the adoring public.. Has he been found ON THE RECORD guilty of abusing his office to get a family "enemy" fired from a job he always performed correctly and efficiently? Did he hint to the Chicago librarian that "certain books" should not be carried -- screw the First Amendment. Did his wife Michelle belong to a splinter political organization that advocates Illinois withdrawing from the Union? Did Obama accept $150,000 worth of designer clothes (which OF COURSE are "going to charity"* after the campaign) and guy-type make up for the cameras? ( * hey, can't you just see the homeless ladies rushing the thrift shops for those $2,000 and up outfits...) Did Obama ever demand "earmarks" AKA pork for a "bridge to nowhere" (and then take the money anyway for discretionary use when the public revolted? No, it's obvious from the incomplete list above that Obama totally lacks the experience required to qualify even for the second spot on the ticket. |
#126
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Palin unqualified [was: So WHAT is Obama hiding?]
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:33:28 -0500, wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:28:19 -0700, wrote: The example of the past 8 years, when Cheney, the REAL president, worked behind the scenes, as well as openly, to transform the Executive Branch into "the "unitary Presidency"-- aka a virtual dictatorship -- should terrify us all. The whores in Congress and the sheep in the electorate just let it happen. Actually it all boils down to the electorate. ALL problems in government are voted in by them. The politicians are not the problem in this country, the electorate is. As long as selfish, short sighted and ignorant people vote, we will always have the same problems, no matter what party is running the show. You are, in large part, absolutely right. (climbs up on soapbox) It all begins in the home. If parents, who haven't a clue what critical thinking is, don't teach their children early on to analyze input, the kids will grow up so gullible that they actually believe the propaganda put out on behalf of an empty suit like corporate-serf Bush II (to name only the most egregious of recent liar-presidents). The kids will grow up believing the propaganda pushed at them from TV and other pop media. Their values will, thus, be defined by "more, more, more" rather than "better". And their ignorance of history -- thanks to a dysfunctional public school system -- will make them even easier to exploit by those who have their own interests rather than the national interests at heart. No offense to reasonable believers, but it seems appropriate also to indict extremist belief systems (religions) that favor blind faith over rigorous analysis. How did that work during the Dark Ages -- before the Renaissance began to free human minds? How is it working now, in those death-worshipping, frustrated, unproductive elements of a certain belief system that is (still) trying to take over the world by violence Somebody earlier mentioned "snake oil". QED. |
#127
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Palin unqualified [was: So WHAT is Obama hiding?]
|
#128
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Palin unqualified [was: So WHAT is Obama hiding?]
wrote in news:0fGPk.246750$6p1.66223@en-nntp-
07.dc1.easynews.com: On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:33:28 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:28:19 -0700, wrote: The example of the past 8 years, when Cheney, the REAL president, worked behind the scenes, as well as openly, to transform the Executive Branch into "the "unitary Presidency"-- aka a virtual dictatorship -- should terrify us all. The whores in Congress and the sheep in the electorate just let it happen. Actually it all boils down to the electorate. ALL problems in government are voted in by them. The politicians are not the problem in this country, the electorate is. As long as selfish, short sighted and ignorant people vote, we will always have the same problems, no matter what party is running the show. You are, in large part, absolutely right. (climbs up on soapbox) It all begins in the home. If parents, who haven't a clue what critical thinking is, don't teach their children early on to analyze input, the kids will grow up so gullible that they actually believe the propaganda put out on behalf of an empty suit like corporate-serf Bush II (to name only the most egregious of recent liar-presidents). The kids will grow up believing the propaganda pushed at them from TV and other pop media. Their values will, thus, be defined by "more, more, more" rather than "better". And their ignorance of history -- thanks to a dysfunctional public school system -- will make them even easier to exploit by those who have their own interests rather than the national interests at heart. No offense to reasonable believers, but it seems appropriate also to indict extremist belief systems (religions) that favor blind faith over rigorous analysis. How did that work during the Dark Ages -- before the Renaissance began to free human minds? How is it working now, in those death-worshipping, frustrated, unproductive elements of a certain belief system that is (still) trying to take over the world by violence Somebody earlier mentioned "snake oil". QED. DemocRATs obviously lack that "critical thinking",as they accepted Obama,an unknown guy from nowhere,with a hidden past,spotty record as junior legislator,and associations with many distasteful people; felons,communists,terrorists. It's no wonder all of America's enemies support Obama. and how about that "blind faith" in what Obama preaches,or that people call him "The Messiah" or "The One"? One has to drink a lot of Kool-aid to accept what Obama says.And to ignore all Obama's lies. "Ayers? he's just a guy who lives in my neighborhood..." "I support the Second Amendment" (Man,what a WHOPPER!) "I challenge the other candidates to accept only public campaign financing;I will if they do." (ah shoot,McCain accepted.Well,I'll just take private contributions anyways...) -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#129
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Palin unqualified [was: So WHAT is Obama hiding?]
On Nov 3, 9:13 am, Jim Yanik wrote:
Nate Nagel wrote : Jim Yanik wrote: Nate Nagel wrote in : Jim Yanik wrote: Nate Nagel wrote in : Jim Yanik wrote: Nate Nagel wrote in : Jim Yanik wrote: wrote in news On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:47:28 -0500, The Daring Dufas wrote: wrote: On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:42:00 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:32:30 -0700 (PDT), wrote: And if there is NOTHING at all behind it, then why doesn't BO just say he wants any and all records related to his birth released, in particular the original birth certificate from the hospital? Hmmm. I dunno - why are BOTH Palin and McCain refusing to release their medical records? Just how extensively has Palin been trested for Mental problems in the past 20 years, and what medications are she taking? How about McCains Cancer situation. How about HIS mental health? His anger management issues are pretty public, but we don't know if he has had any treatment to try and improve it. Those years as a POW left some pretty deep mental wounds. Those are some pretty important issues that require the same or greater level of disclosure. I swore I wouldn't post on this election -- couldn't hold out g Anybody notice that Palin is not only massively ignorant and a major, major liar , basically a total phony, but -- most dangerous of all -- a blindly ideological religious fanatic . Why the media have ignored this facet of her persona is troubling. If by some malign fate, she became President in McCain's incapacity, she would **** all over the U.S. Constitution, which mandates separation of CHURCH AND STATE! Our Constitution, which has been a light unto the world, was devised by the greatest minds of this or any time -- the Founders, who well understood the dangers of breaching the wall between church and state. THEY read history; THEY knew that theocracies were, by definition, totalitarian states. My God, people on both sides believe that a US president has unlimited power and are terrified. The sorry state of the education system in my country is now quite apparent. I don't believe the president has unlimited power, but I AM terrified. The example of the past 8 years, when Cheney, the REAL president, worked behind the scenes, as well as openly, to transform the Executive Branch into "the "unitary Presidency"-- aka a virtual dictatorship -- should terrify us all. The whores in Congress and the sheep in the electorate just let it happen. derangement syndrome.... I see you have no real response. Go ahead, vote for McCain, we don't give a ****. (well, actually, we do, but your one vote won't make a difference.) nate I see you never read the articles I posted a link to. So much for your claiim to be a "centrist","conservative",or any possibility you might be open-minded. I've had a rough week at work and have not had the free time to do more than speed read the NG's and a few forums and actually do things that I needed to do online. That said, you have yet to provide a shred of evidence that a) Palin is not insultingly unqualified She's more qualified that OBAMA.Obama's never run anything. Obama can at least fake it and sound like a president. Palin sounds like a suburban soccer mom, and I don't mean that as a compliment. WHO CARES if somebody -sounds- "Presidential"? (or can "fake it"..WTF???) umm... other world leaders, with whom we have to interact? Oh,like they would respect a clown like Obama...all talk and no action. and a known LIAR. Awful harsh words when you have no proof. Let's say that McCain gets elected (it won't happen, but humor me.) He dies in office. Palin finishes out his term. She's a ****ing joke - nobody would take her seriously; her style is that of a whiny mom at a PTA meeting, not the leader of a major world power. It's not an acting job.It one of the most SERIOUS jobs in the world. (and folk like you would elect an inexperienced,no-achiever to the position because he talks a good game.) You'd vote for an inexperienced, no-achiever who can't even appear to fit the job. Palin has far more experience than Obama,and she's only the *VP candidate*. Balls. I'd like to see a candidate with more experience, granted, but Palin's credentials suck. (so did Bush's for that matter.) and b) that TDD isn't exactly correct about Bush/Cheney and their unique ideas about executive power. Hey,Obama is NOT running against Bush/Cheney. Of course he is. Shows how irrational you are;neither is a candidate in this election. Obama is running against McCain. Who is doing NOTHING to distance himself from the neocon-controlled current administration. Despite railing against them back in Y2K. So yes, Obama is in effect running against the failed policies of B/C. And until the Republican party publicly breaks with them, he SHOULD (and so should Barr and that crazy woman.) nate so,you're STILL operating in ignorance. See, this is why people don't take your posts seriously. You take something that is obviously, commonly known to be true and call people who state the obvious "ignorant." The obvious explanation is of course that *you* are the one that is ignorant... nate Nate,you professed to care deeply about the Constitution,yet don't have the time to read information highly pertinent to protecting the Constitution and the Judicial system of the US.You blindly accept whatever the MSM puts out despite their well-known bias and left-leaning,but will not check out anything else.You professed to be "centrist" or "conservative",but everything you post is way left of center and nothing more than DemocRAT talking points. Either you are in denial about anything that is contrary to your beliefs,or you're full of BS.(and ignorant.) Neither. I just understand that Bush and Cheney are the greatest threats to the Constitution that we've ever seen, so pretty much everyone else is a lesser evil. nate Still haven't READ the articles,I see. You are no "centrist",nor a "conservative",and you don't give a crap about the Constitution. You've been suckered by the Mainstream media;another "useful idiot". The MSM has been far too kind to Bush and Cheney. DAGS for "unitary executive." nate |
#130
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Palin unqualified [was: So WHAT is Obama hiding?]
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 09:09:28 -0800, wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:33:28 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:28:19 -0700, wrote: The example of the past 8 years, when Cheney, the REAL president, worked behind the scenes, as well as openly, to transform the Executive Branch into "the "unitary Presidency"-- aka a virtual dictatorship -- should terrify us all. The whores in Congress and the sheep in the electorate just let it happen. Actually it all boils down to the electorate. ALL problems in government are voted in by them. The politicians are not the problem in this country, the electorate is. As long as selfish, short sighted and ignorant people vote, we will always have the same problems, no matter what party is running the show. You are, in large part, absolutely right. I need to qualify my earlier reply, below, with the following caveats, based on the infamous 2000 campaign, and to a lesser, but still invidious extent,on the 2004 campaign as well. (Whether the damage will be so severe this election, even with swarms of lawyers on site to help voters illegally turned away -- is in the lap of the gods.) There are cases when even an enlightened and involved electorate, which alas we do not have, would have been helpless. When the party in power breaks the law repeatedly and recklessly by outsourcing crucial election operations to a bought&sold outfit like the Bush campaign did in 2000, voters are helpless until the truth emerges long after the fact. When the party in power sends young Senate interns to important states to break into and disrupt vote counts (yes, it's on the record) what to do? Touch screen voting machines can be -- and were - opened and hacked undetectably within minutes. The Secretary of State, in charge of elections, is at the same time the head of the Florida Republican party, and uses her office illegally, how do voters challenge in the heat of battle? Same happened in Ohio (Blackwell) 2004 The deliberate and unlawful disenfranchisement of enough minority voters to have swung the state to Gore several times over. What can a voter do when the Supreme Court -- violating its own policy of "stare decisis" - literally "let it stand" -- meaning deference to precedent -- intervenes on the side of one party. For a blow-by-blow account of how the Supremes handed the 2000 election to Bush, there's no better account than Alan Dershowitz' "Supreme Injustice: How the Supreme Court Hijacked the 2000 Election". He takes you carefully through the b.g. of each Justice, showing how, in the 2000 election case, the reactionary Justices did a 180 from their usual POV. It's convincing -- and terrifying. The scary part is that the Court SPECIFIED " this is a one-time decision, not to be applied in future.". Incredible chutzpah...that saddled us with eight ruinous years that we may never recover from. (climbs up on soapbox) It all begins in the home. If parents, who haven't a clue what critical thinking is, don't teach their children early on to analyze input, the kids will grow up so gullible that they actually believe the propaganda put out on behalf of an empty suit like corporate-serf Bush II (to name only the most egregious of recent liar-presidents). The kids will grow up believing the propaganda pushed at them from TV and other pop media. Their values will, thus, be defined by "more, more, more" rather than "better". And their ignorance of history -- thanks to a dysfunctional public school system -- will make them even easier to exploit by those who have their own interests rather than the national interests at heart. No offense to reasonable believers, but it seems appropriate also to indict extremist belief systems (religions) that favor blind faith over rigorous analysis. How did that work during the Dark Ages -- before the Renaissance began to free human minds? How is it working now, in those death-worshipping, frustrated, unproductive elements of a certain belief system that is (still) trying to take over the world by violence Somebody earlier mentioned "snake oil". QED. |
#131
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
So WHAT is Obama hiding?
On Nov 1, 8:53*am, Harry K wrote:
On Oct 31, 9:47*pm, z wrote: On Oct 29, 10:31*pm, BobR wrote: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 WorldNetDaily Exclusive Obama's birth certificate sealed by Hawaii governor Says Democratic senator must make request to obtain original document Posted: October 26, 2008 9:54 pm Eastern By Jerome R. Corsi WorldNetDaily HONOLULU, Hawaii – Although the legitimacy of Sen. Barack Obama's birth certificate has become a focus of intense speculation – and even several lawsuits – WND has learned that Hawaii's Gov. Linda Lingle has placed the candidate's birth certificate under seal and instructed the state's Department of Health to make sure no one in the press obtains access to the original document under any circumstances. The governor's office officially declined a request made in writing by WND in Hawaii to obtain a copy of the hospital-generated original birth certificate of Barack Obama. "It does not appear that Dr. Corsi is within any of these categories of persons with a direct and tangible interest in the birth certificate he seeks," wrote Roz Makuala, manager of constituent services in the governor's office, in an e-mailed response to a WND request seeking the information. Those listed as entitled to obtain a copy of an original birth certificate include the person born, or "registrant" according to the legal description from the governor's office, the spouse or parent of the registrant, a descendant of the registrant, a person having a common ancestor with the registrant, a legal guardian of the registrant, or a person or agency acting on behalf of the registrant. (Story continues below) WND was told the official reason for denial of access to Obama's birth certificate would be authority granted pursuant to Section 338-18 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, a provision the anonymous source claimed was designed to prevent identity theft. Still, the source told WND confidentially the motivation for withholding the original birth certificate was political, although the source refused to disclose whether there was any information on the original birth certificate that would prove politically embarrassing to Obama. Get the book that started it all, Jerome Corsi's "The Obama Nation," autographed by the author, exclusively from WND's online store for the amazing low price of just $4.95. The source also refused to answer WND's question whether the original document on file with the Department of Health was a hospital- generated birth certificate or a registration of birth that may have been filed subsequent to the birth. The anonymous source made clear the Hawaii Department of Health would immediately release Obama's original birth certificate, provided Obama requested the document be released, but the Department of Heath has received no such request from the senator or from anyone acting officially on his behalf. WND also found on microfilm in the Honolulu downtown public library a notice published under the "Births, Marriages, Deaths" section of the Honolulu Sunday Advertiser for August 13, 1961, on page B-6, noting: "Mr. and Mrs. Barack II Obama. 6085 Kalanianaole-Hwy, son, Aug. 4." In searching through the birth notices of the Honolulu Advertiser for 1961, WND found many birth notices were published between one and two weeks after the date of birth listed. The notice in the Honolulu Advertiser does not list the hospital where the Obama son was born or the doctor who delivered the baby. In a startling development, Obama's Kenyan grandmother has reportedly alleged she witnessed Obama's birth at the Coast Provincial Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. Friday, U.S. Federal judge Richard Barclay Surrick, a Clinton appointee, dismissed a lawsuit brought by Pennsylvania attorney Phillip J. Berg who alleged Obama was not a U.S. "natural born" citizen and therefore ineligible for the presidency under the specifications of the U.S. Constitution, under Article II, Section 1. Berg told WND last week he does not have a copy of a Kenyan birth certificate for Obama that he alleges exists. In Kenya, WND was told by government authorities that all documents concerning Obama were under seal until after the U.S. presidential election on November 4. The Obama campaign website entitled ";Fight the Smears" posts a state of Hawaii "Certificate of Live Birth" which is obviously not the original birth certificate generated by the hospital where Obama reportedly was born. "Fight the Smears" declares, "The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America." Although the Obama campaign could immediately put an end to all the challenges by simply producing the candidate's original birth certificate, it has not done so. And the "Fight the Smears" website offers no explanation as to why Obama has refused to request, and make public, an original hospital-generated birth certificate which the Hawaii Department of Health may possess. in fact, do we have any evidence that obama was born at all? not that i've seen, it's just hearsay.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, I see him way too often on the TV so that proves he was either born or someone is faking a live person very well You can look up his BC on Obama's page or at http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html Which would prove he was born as much as your BC does. Harry K- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - i think the folks who want to see obama's birth certificate should have to prove that they are citizens, presumably by providing their own birth certificates; otherwise they have no legal standing to contest the question. |
#132
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Palin unqualified [was: So WHAT is Obama hiding?]
On Nov 3, 1:10*pm, N8N wrote:
Hey,Obama is NOT running against Bush/Cheney. Of course he is. Shows how irrational you are;neither is a candidate in this election. Obama is running against McCain. Who is doing NOTHING to distance himself from the neocon-controlled current administration. *Despite railing against them back in Y2K. Nothing? Let's review the facts: McCain openly criticized Bush's Iraq strategy years ago. He said we needed more troops BEFORE Bush ever endorsed the surge strategy. BTW, had we listened to Obama a year or two ago, we would have left in defeat, Iraq would be in chaos, and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's would be dead in a civil war. Iraq is going so well now that guys like you don't even bring it up anymore. And Joe Biden, the plagarist, voted FOR the Iraq war at the beginning, then against the surge. He was wrong twice and if we had listened to him, we would also have left in defeat. Apparently that record is to be cherished, while putting down Palin. Makes sense McCain openly criticized Bush on his enemy combatant detention and interrogation policies. McCain openly disagrees with Bush on global warming. Obviously, you're just another uninformed voter, who's quick to pass judgement, but ignorant of even basic facts. |
#133
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Palin unqualified [was: So WHAT is Obama hiding?]
On Nov 3, 6:19*pm, wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 09:09:28 -0800, wrote: On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:33:28 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:28:19 -0700, wrote: The example of the past 8 years, when Cheney, the REAL president, worked behind the scenes, as well as openly, to transform the Executive Branch into "the "unitary Presidency"-- aka a virtual dictatorship -- *should terrify us all. *The whores in Congress and the sheep in the electorate just let it happen. * Actually it all boils down to the electorate. *ALL problems in government are voted in by them. *The politicians are not the problem in this country, the electorate is. *As long as selfish, short sighted and ignorant people vote, we will always have the same problems, no matter what party is running the show. You are, in large part, absolutely right. I need to qualify my earlier reply, below, with the following caveats, based on the infamous 2000 campaign, and to a lesser, but still invidious extent,on the 2004 campaign as well. *(Whether the damage will be so severe this election, even with swarms of lawyers on site to help voters illegally turned away -- is in the lap of the gods.) There are cases when even an enlightened and involved electorate, which alas we do not have, *would have been helpless. When the party in power breaks the law repeatedly and recklessly by outsourcing crucial election operations to a bought&sold outfit like the Bush campaign did in 2000, voters are helpless until the truth emerges long after the fact. When the party in power sends young Senate interns to important states to break into and disrupt vote counts (yes, it's on the record) what to do? Touch screen voting machines can be -- and were - opened and hacked undetectably within minutes. The Secretary of State, in charge of elections, is at the same time the head of the Florida Republican party, and uses her office illegally, how do voters challenge in the heat of battle? *Same happened in Ohio (Blackwell) 2004 The deliberate and unlawful disenfranchisement of enough minority voters to have swung the state to Gore several times over. What *can a voter do when the Supreme Court -- violating its own policy of "stare decisis" - literally "let it stand" -- meaning deference to precedent -- intervenes on the side of one party. For a blow-by-blow account of how the Supremes handed the 2000 election to Bush, there's no better account than Alan Dershowitz' "Supreme Injustice: *How the Supreme Court Hijacked the 2000 Election". * He takes you carefully through the b.g. of each Justice, showing how, in the 2000 election case, the reactionary Justices did a 180 from their usual POV. *It's convincing -- and terrifying. The scary part is that the Court SPECIFIED " this is a one-time decision, not to be applied in future.". *Incredible chutzpah...that saddled us with eight ruinous years that we may never recover from. (climbs up on soapbox) It all begins in the home. *If parents, who haven't a clue what critical thinking is, *don't teach their children early on to analyze input, the kids will grow up so gullible that they actually believe the propaganda put out on behalf of an empty suit like corporate-serf Bush II *(to name only the most egregious of recent liar-presidents). The kids will grow up believing the propaganda pushed at them from TV and other pop media. *Their values will, thus, be defined by "more, more, more" rather than "better". And their ignorance of history -- thanks to a dysfunctional public school system -- will make them even easier to exploit by those who have their own interests rather than the national interests at heart. No offense to reasonable believers, but it seems appropriate also to indict extremist belief systems (religions) that favor blind faith over rigorous analysis. *How did that work during the Dark Ages *-- before the Renaissance began to free human minds? *How is it working now, in those death-worshipping, frustrated, unproductive elements of a certain belief system that is (still) trying to take over the world by violence Somebody earlier mentioned "snake oil". *QED.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Obviously one of the misfits that's still sore because Bush won in 2000. Despite the fact that after the fact, reputable news organizations went back and counted the FL ballots and determined that under any reasonable and fair count, Bush won. |
#134
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
So WHAT is Obama hiding?
On Nov 3, 9:46*pm, z wrote:
On Nov 1, 8:53*am, Harry K wrote: On Oct 31, 9:47*pm, z wrote: On Oct 29, 10:31*pm, BobR wrote: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 WorldNetDaily Exclusive Obama's birth certificate sealed by Hawaii governor Says Democratic senator must make request to obtain original document Posted: October 26, 2008 9:54 pm Eastern By Jerome R. Corsi WorldNetDaily HONOLULU, Hawaii – Although the legitimacy of Sen. Barack Obama's birth certificate has become a focus of intense speculation – and even several lawsuits – WND has learned that Hawaii's Gov. Linda Lingle has placed the candidate's birth certificate under seal and instructed the state's Department of Health to make sure no one in the press obtains access to the original document under any circumstances. The governor's office officially declined a request made in writing by WND in Hawaii to obtain a copy of the hospital-generated original birth certificate of Barack Obama. "It does not appear that Dr. Corsi is within any of these categories of persons with a direct and tangible interest in the birth certificate he seeks," wrote Roz Makuala, manager of constituent services in the governor's office, in an e-mailed response to a WND request seeking the information. Those listed as entitled to obtain a copy of an original birth certificate include the person born, or "registrant" according to the legal description from the governor's office, the spouse or parent of the registrant, a descendant of the registrant, a person having a common ancestor with the registrant, a legal guardian of the registrant, or a person or agency acting on behalf of the registrant. |
#135
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
So WHAT is Obama hiding?
:
Why isn't it better to have full disclosure on this straightforward issue now, rather than a potential Consitutional crisis 6 months from now, or a president left demolished, untrusted, and unable to govern because something finally comes out. Because it isn't your job, or the media's job, to verify his birth record. We already pay people to do that and they already have. |
#136
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
So WHAT is Obama hiding?
On Nov 4, 7:50*am, BobR wrote:
On Nov 3, 9:46*pm, z wrote: On Nov 1, 8:53*am, Harry K wrote: On Oct 31, 9:47*pm, z wrote: On Oct 29, 10:31*pm, BobR wrote: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 WorldNetDaily Exclusive Obama's birth certificate sealed by Hawaii governor Says Democratic senator must make request to obtain original document Posted: October 26, 2008 9:54 pm Eastern By Jerome R. Corsi WorldNetDaily HONOLULU, Hawaii – Although the legitimacy of Sen. Barack Obama's birth certificate has become a focus of intense speculation – and even several lawsuits – WND has learned that Hawaii's Gov. Linda Lingle has placed the candidate's birth certificate under seal and instructed the state's Department of Health to make sure no one in the press obtains access to the original document under any circumstances. The governor's office officially declined a request made in writing by WND in Hawaii to obtain a copy of the hospital-generated original birth certificate of Barack Obama. "It does not appear that Dr. Corsi is within any of these categories of persons with a direct and tangible interest in the birth certificate he seeks," wrote Roz Makuala, manager of constituent services in the governor's office, in an e-mailed response to a WND request seeking the information. Those listed as entitled to obtain a copy of an original birth certificate include the person born, or "registrant" according to the legal description from the governor's office, the spouse or parent of the registrant, a descendant of the registrant, a person having a common ancestor with the registrant, a legal guardian of the registrant, or a person or agency acting on behalf of the registrant. (Story continues below) WND was told the official reason for denial of access to Obama's birth certificate would be authority granted pursuant to Section 338-18 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, a provision the anonymous source claimed was designed to prevent identity theft. Still, the source told WND confidentially the motivation for withholding the original birth certificate was political, although the source refused to disclose whether there was any information on the original birth certificate that would prove politically embarrassing to Obama. Get the book that started it all, Jerome Corsi's "The Obama Nation," autographed by the author, exclusively from WND's online store for the amazing low price of just $4.95. The source also refused to answer WND's question whether the original document on file with the Department of Health was a hospital- generated birth certificate or a registration of birth that may have been filed subsequent to the birth. The anonymous source made clear the Hawaii Department of Health would immediately release Obama's original birth certificate, provided Obama requested the document be released, but the Department of Heath has received no such request from the senator or from anyone acting officially on his behalf. WND also found on microfilm in the Honolulu downtown public library a notice published under the "Births, Marriages, Deaths" section of the Honolulu Sunday Advertiser for August 13, 1961, on page B-6, noting: "Mr. and Mrs. Barack II Obama. 6085 Kalanianaole-Hwy, son, Aug. 4.." In searching through the birth notices of the Honolulu Advertiser for 1961, WND found many birth notices were published between one and two weeks after the date of birth listed. The notice in the Honolulu Advertiser does not list the hospital where the Obama son was born or the doctor who delivered the baby. In a startling development, Obama's Kenyan grandmother has reportedly alleged she witnessed Obama's birth at the Coast Provincial Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. Friday, U.S. Federal judge Richard Barclay Surrick, a Clinton appointee, dismissed a lawsuit brought by Pennsylvania attorney Phillip J. Berg who alleged Obama was not a U.S. "natural born" citizen and therefore ineligible for the presidency under the specifications of the U.S. Constitution, under Article II, Section 1. Berg told WND last week he does not have a copy of a Kenyan birth certificate for Obama that he alleges exists. In Kenya, WND was told by government authorities that all documents concerning Obama were under seal until after the U.S. presidential election on November 4. The Obama campaign website entitled ";Fight the Smears" posts a state of Hawaii "Certificate of Live Birth" which is obviously not the original birth certificate generated by the hospital where Obama reportedly was born. "Fight the Smears" declares, "The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America." Although the Obama campaign could immediately put an end to all the challenges by simply producing the candidate's original birth certificate, it has not done so. And the "Fight the Smears" website offers no explanation as to why Obama has refused to request, and make public, an original hospital-generated birth certificate which the Hawaii Department of Health may possess. in fact, do we have any evidence that obama was born at all? not that i've seen, it's just hearsay.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, I see him way too often on the TV so that proves he was either born or someone is faking a live person very well You can look up his BC on Obama's page or at http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html Which would prove he was born as much as your BC does. Harry K- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - i think the folks who want to see obama's birth certificate should have to prove that they are citizens, presumably by providing their own birth certificates; otherwise they have no legal standing to contest the question.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Even though I am not running for President, I wouldn't have any reservations about providing my Birth Certificate it that is what it took to provide a legal standing. *In fact, I wouldn't provide it but would instruct the Hospital and State where I was born to provide it so as to remove any and all doubts about the source. *So why is it such an issue for a Presidential candidate?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Perhaps because what has already been verified and released is sufficient to prove he is a citizen. that the kooks don't want to believe it is not his problem. Posting the full document would accomplish nothing anyhow as the idiots would just claim _it_ is a forgery. Harry K |
#137
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
So WHAT is Obama hiding?
On Oct 30, 12:48*pm, "SteveB" toquerville@zionvistas wrote:
"BobR" wrote in message ... On Oct 30, 12:01 am, "sanity" wrote: "BobR" wrote in message .... Wednesday, October 29, 2008 WorldNetDaily Exclusive Obama's birth certificate sealed by Hawaii governor Says Democratic senator must make request to obtain original document Posted: October 26, 2008 9:54 pm Eastern By Jerome R. Corsi WorldNetDaily snip Get the book that started it all, Jerome Corsi's "The Obama Nation," autographed by the author, exclusively from WND's online store for the amazing low price of just $4.95. Sounds like someone is plugging a book. You getting paid per copy sold? Obamas birth certificate has been proven a true and original document by the highest sources but the losing Repubs won't stop at anything to create doubt and fear. A bunch of LOSERS Name those sources! Purple lips himself? Steve- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - First, the certification of live birth is proof that Obama was born in Hawaii. It is not necessary for him to show a birth certificate because the certification is a legal document showing that the birth certificate exists in the files. It is like a bank book, which proved that you had money in the bank. The certification has now been accepted by at least one court. Then, IF Obama had been born in Kenya, there would be a record of his mother arriving in Kenya in the archives of the Kenya government. The critics of Obama, who allege that he was born in Kenya, have not shown anything like this. All they would have to do is to go to those files in Kenya and show that Obama’s mother had been in Kenya in 1961. But they have nothing. I listened to the tape, and it is not clear that Obama’s grandmother understood the question. The translator (who is also apparently a relative) says repeatedly that Obama was born in Hawaii. In any case, it is not evidence. She could be referring to Barak Obama senior, Obama’s father, who certainly was born in Kenya. The officials in Hawaii say he was born in Hawaii. They have seen his birth certificate in his file. They are thus confirming the certification. And, they have no reason to lie. The certificate (or certification, whatever) of live birth has been accepted as legal proof of Obama’s birth in Hawaii by a court in Virginia. (Monday. See: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2123806/posts) After Berg, several other cases against Obama on the natural born citizen issue were brought in other states. While most of them just did what the Berg case did, which was to rule that Berg had no standing to sue, some of the others looked at the “evidence” - and concluded that the stuff was absurd. In Ohio, for example the judge (magistrate) said: “(Neal) presented no witnesses but himself. From that testimony, it is abundantly clear that the allegations in [Neal]’s complaint concerning “questions” about Senator Obama’s status as a “natural born citizen” are derived from Internet sources, the accuracy of which has not been demonstrated to either Defendant Brunner or this Magistrate … Given the paucity of evidence… this Magistrate cannot conclude that Defendant Brunner has abused her discretion in failing to launch an investigation into Senator Obama’s qualifications to hold the office of President of the United States. ” See: http://www.oxfordpress.com/hp/conten...obamasuit.html In Virginia, which was just ruled on Monday, the judge went further and said that the certificate of live birth was good proof that Obama was born in Hawaii, and there was NO proof presented that he was born anywhere else. Here is a report from a web posting that is not official, of course, but it seems accurate mainly because the fellow who posted it was AGAINST Obama. He is disappointed, but accepts the ruling. You can find this post at : ( http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2123806/posts) (Note that sometimes the author correctly puts COLB correctly and sometimes he types it as CLOB, but he means certificate of live birth throughout.) Quotes: The Court made the following findings: 1. The Certification of Live Birth presented to the court is unquestionably authentic. The court noted that the certification had a raised seal from the state of Hawaii, had a stamp bearing the signature of the registrar of vital statistics. The court found “wholly unpersuasive” any of the internet claims that the birth certificate was altered in any way. Furthermore, the document itself was accompanied by an affidavit from the State Health Director (of Hawaii) verifying that the document is an authentic certification of live birth. The court held that there could be no doubt that the document was authentic unless one believed that the state of Hawaii’s health department were in on an elaborate and complex conspiracy – and that there is not a shred of evidence that this is the case. 2. The Certification of Live Birth establishes that Mr. Obama is a natural born citizen. The affidavit of the State Health Director states that the information on the CLOB is identical to the information on the “vault” copy of the birth certificate, and that both documents establish that Mr. Obama was born in Honolulu. The Court noted that the CLOB is valid for all citizenship purposes. The court noted our argument that the COLB is not valid for determining citizenship, but referred us to Hawaiian law that states otherwise. “There is no difference between a certificate and a certification of live birth in the eyes of the state. For instance, either can be used to confirm U.S. citizenship to obtain a passport or state ID.” The court found that Hawaiian law makes the COLB valid for all purposes with the exception of determining native Hawaiian heritage for certain state and federal benefits. The court held that if Mr. Obama were born elsewhere and the birth registered in Hawaii, the “place of birth” line on the COLB would reflect that fact. The court stated that there could be no doubt that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii and that any argument to the contrary was fanciful and relied on completely unsubstantiated internet rumors. 3. For that reason, 8 U.S.C. §1401(g), which at the relevant time provided as follows: “The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: ***(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years:….. is irrelevant to this matter, as Mr. Obama was conclusively born in Hawaii. 4. Mr. Obama did hold dual citizenship in the U.S. and Kenya until he became an adult. When Barack Obama Jr. was born Kenya was a British colony. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.’s children: “British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth.” In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UK. Obama’s UK citizenship became an Kenyan citizenship on Dec. 12, 1963, when Kenya formally gained its independence from the United Kingdom. The court noted that Chapter VI, Section 87 of the Kenyan Constitution specifies that: 1. Every person who, having been born in Kenya, is on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person shall become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963… 2. Every person who, having been born outside Kenya, is on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person shall, if his father becomes, or would but for his death have become, a citizen of Kenya by virtue of subsection (1), become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963. Thus the court held that as a citizen of the UK who was born in Kenya, Obama’s father automatically received Kenyan citizenship via subsection (1). So given that Obama qualified for citizen of the UK status at birth and given that Obama’s father became a Kenyan citizen via subsection (1), thus Obama did in fact have Kenyan citizenship in 1963. However, the court further held that the Kenyan Constitution prohibits dual citizenship for adults. Kenya recognizes dual citizenship for children, but Kenya’s Constitution specifies that at age 21, Kenyan citizens who possesses citizenship in more than one country automatically lose their Kenyan citizenship unless they formally renounce any non-Kenyan citizenship and swear an oath of allegiance to Kenya. The court held that there was no evidence that Mr. Obama has ever renounced his U.S. citizenship or sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4, 1982. The court held that there was no legal requirement that Mr. Obama renounce his Kenyan citizenship or affirm his U.S. citizenship in order to maintain his status as a natural born citizen. 5. Mr. Obama did not lose his U.S. Citizenship based on the acts of his parents, including adoption by an Indonesian citizen. The Court held that no action taken by the parents of an American child can strip that child of his citizenship. The court cited to the 1952 Immigration & Nationality Act, Title III, Chapter 3, Sections 349 and 355, which was in effect in the late 1960s when Obama went to Indonesia, and which stated that a minor does not lose his US citizenship upon the naturalization of his parents or any other actions of his parents, so long as the minor returns to the US and establishes permanent US residency before the age of 21. Thus the adoption of Obama did not serve to strip him of his U.S. citizenship. The fact that Indonesian law does not allow dual citizenship is irrelevant, as U.S. law controls. Furthermore, the Court held that traveling on a foreign passport does not strip an American of his citizenship. The Court noted first that there was no evidence that Mr. Obama traveled on an Indonesian passport (Mr. Berg and others we reached out to for evidence never provided any evidence of this claim or any other of the claims we could have used some proof of.) Nonetheless, the court held that such travel does not divest an American of his citizenship. The Court makes other holdings and findings that I won’t bother you with here. Needless to say, the decision is wholly against us. The court finds the claims against Mr. Obama’s citizenship “wholly unpersuasive and bordering on the frivolous, especially in light of the complete absence of any first-hand evidence on any critical issue” and further classifies it as “conspiracy theory of the lowest sort, fueled by nothing than internet rumor and those who truly want to believe egging each other on.” I like the part about “conspiracy theory of the lowest sort.” Repeat: “The court held that if Mr. Obama were born elsewhere and the birth registered in Hawaii, the “place of birth” line on the COLB would reflect that fact. The court stated that there could be no doubt that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii and that any argument to the contrary was fanciful and relied on completely unsubstantiated internet rumors.” |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hiding aggregate in concrete pour | Home Repair | |||
Basement: hiding 4' ducts | Home Repair | |||
Hiding shower curtains! | UK diy | |||
Hiding Drawer Lines? | Woodworking | |||
trex-hiding screws | Woodworking |