Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair,alt.solar.thermal
|
|||
|
|||
swimming pool solar covers vs. "pills"
" wrote in message oups.com... The wind is howling outside like a winter storm, but some day it's going to warm up and I'll want to open my in-ground swimming pool. In order to extend the season (I live in Maryland), I'm thinking about either a solar blanket or a "pill". The former appear to be made out of the same bubble wrap you see in packing, and require a reel to take them off the pool. The latter is apparently a substance that slows down evaporation, which presumably is the main form of head loss. The pills are not supposed to be as efficient as the blankets (perhaps the blankets have a slight insulating value, and at a guess they're better at retarding evaporation); the ad claims 60% of a blanket's efficiency. On the other hand, a blanket plus reel for my size pool (22x44) costs a minimum of $700 and are warranted for 6-8 years, while the "pills" cost maybe $30 for a four-pack and last "up to" 30 days (I'd need two at a time for my size pool). So figure four to six per season (a month or so at beginning and end of season). And the blanket looks like a lot of hassle to put on and take off, and to store when it gets hot out, and in the winter. Presumably the chemical from pill doesn't feel oily when you're swimming. Thoughts? Given the difference, I'm leaning towards the pill, but I'm skeptical about how well they work. And it's hard for me to do a scientific comparison, since I only have one pool :-). Mike Maxwell i don't know about the pills... but i have a blanket and it's worth every penny to me.. the reduced evaporation and increase in temps make it worth the hassle.. i have a solar heating array as well and the combination extends my swimming season by at least 3 months |
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair,alt.solar.thermal
|
|||
|
|||
swimming pool solar covers vs. "pills"
On Apr 18, 6:42 pm, "TheDoc" wrote:
" wrote in message oups.com... The wind is howling outside like a winter storm, but some day it's going to warm up and I'll want to open my in-groundswimmingpool. In order to extend the season (I live in Maryland), I'm thinking about either a solar blanket or a "pill". The former appear to be made out of the same bubble wrap you see in packing, and require a reel to take them off thepool. The latter is apparently a substance that slows down evaporation, which presumably is the main form of head loss. The pills are not supposed to be as efficient as the blankets (perhaps the blankets have a slight insulating value, and at a guess they're better at retarding evaporation); the ad claims 60% of a blanket's efficiency. On the other hand, a blanket plus reel for my sizepool (22x44) costs a minimum of $700 and are warranted for 6-8 years, while the "pills" cost maybe $30 for a four-pack and last "up to" 30 days (I'd need two at a time for my sizepool). So figure four to six per season (a month or so at beginning and end of season). And the blanket looks like a lot of hassle to put on and take off, and to store when it gets hot out, and in the winter. Presumably the chemical from pill doesn't feel oily when you're swimming. Thoughts? Given the difference, I'm leaning towards the pill, but I'm skeptical about how well they work. And it's hard for me to do a scientific comparison, since I only have onepool:-). Mike Maxwell i don't know about the pills... but i have a blanket and it's worth every penny to me.. the reduced evaporation and increase in temps make it worth the hassle.. i have a solar heating array as well and the combination extends myswimming season by at least 3 months I have a 27,000 gallon pool and I am using solar pills in addition to heating with 24x12 feet of solar panels (about 40% of the area of the pool surface, less than the 50% or more recommended) and without the I feel that the solar panels heat about 8-10 degrees more than pools around here without a heater, and with the pill it's another 3-5 degrees according to my very unscientific tests. I hope to do some real accurate tests, as each day is a little different and I could have been using the pill on a hotter day. Hmmmm, time for two buckets of water, one with a cc of drops from the pill and one without. But I can say that the pill is inexpensive ($10 or so retail at beginning of season) and very convenient, no blank to mess with. I would strongly recommend the solar heaters though. Check out my web site that I'm creating (http://www.mypoolkit.com) for pictures of the solar panels, they are well worth the money at about $1000 invested. If I have the heat going to my spill-over spa only, it heats up to 105 degrees in no time! Kent http://mypoolkit.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
swimming pool solar covers vs. "pills" | Home Repair | |||
swimming pool solar covers vs. "pills" | Home Repair | |||
swimming pool solar covers vs. "pills" | Home Repair | |||
swimming pool solar covers vs. "pills" | Home Repair | |||
swimming pool solar covers vs. "pills" | Home Repair |