In the early 20th century, can faux marble be more expensive than real marble?
 

alt.home.repair:
In the early 20th century, can faux marble be more expensive than real
marble?

About 25 years ago I toured the Vanderbilt mansion, on the Hudson
River, somehwere near Tarrytown.

The tour guide pointed to the banister, and maybe the bottom of the
beside the stairs, and maybe some other part of the staircase, and
said they were faux marble, painted wood, and that at the time, this
was more expensive than real marble.

I found that hard to believe at the time and still do.

What I thought was that even Cornelius Vanderbilt didn't like to spend
more money than necessary, and someone, maybe Mrs. Vanderbilt started
this story that it was more expensive. Maybe she told her friends or
her kids. I figure something like that might account for all this.

In the early 20th century, can faux marble be more expensive than real marble?
 

On Feb 14, 11:39�pm, mm wrote:
alt.home.repair:
In the early 20th century, can faux marble be more expensive than real
marble?

About 25 years ago I toured the Vanderbilt mansion, on the Hudson
River, somehwere near Tarrytown.

The tour guide pointed to the banister, and maybe the bottom of the
beside the stairs, and maybe some other part of the staircase, and
said they were faux marble, painted wood, and that at the time, this
was more expensive than real marble.

I found that hard to believe at the time and still do.

What I thought was that even Cornelius Vanderbilt didn't like to spend
more money than necessary, and someone, maybe Mrs. Vanderbilt started
this story that it was more expensive. *Maybe she told her friends or
her kids. *I figure something like that might account for all this.

Dunno about the faux marble- I've only walked the grounds, I think,
can't recall if I ever went inside. But it's in Hyde Park, near
Roosevelt place. Tarrytown has Phillipse Manor, where they're rather
more frank than they used to be about the fact that he(Philipse) owned
and traded slaves. Sort of the Rockefeller of his era. Their place is
nearby also- Kykuit.

In the early 20th century, can faux marble be more expensive than real marble?
 

On 14 Feb 2007 20:50:20 -0800, "Sev" wrote:

On Feb 14, 11:39?pm, mm wrote:
alt.home.repair:
In the early 20th century, can faux marble be more expensive than real
marble?

About 25 years ago I toured the Vanderbilt mansion, on the Hudson
River, somehwere near Tarrytown.

The tour guide pointed to the banister, and maybe the bottom of the
beside the stairs, and maybe some other part of the staircase, and
said they were faux marble, painted wood, and that at the time, this
was more expensive than real marble.

I found that hard to believe at the time and still do.

What I thought was that even Cornelius Vanderbilt didn't like to spend
more money than necessary, and someone, maybe Mrs. Vanderbilt started
this story that it was more expensive.
aybe she told her friends or
her kids. figure something like that might account for all this.

Dunno about the faux marble- I've only walked the grounds, I think,
can't recall if I ever went inside. But it's in Hyde Park, near
Roosevelt place. Tarrytown has Phillipse Manor, where they're rather
more frank than they used to be about the fact that he(Philipse) owned
and traded slaves.

I havent been there. Was it open to the public 24 years ago?

By "near Tarrytown", I"m afraid I mean any place north of NYC on the
east side of the Hudson, and south of Albany. I think all this is
actually south of the Tappan Zee Bridge, and I'm 99% sure it was the
Vanderbilt mansion. If not that, then Franklin Roosevelt's place, but
I don't think so.

I think I"ve been to Washington Irving's house also, but I can't
remember what it is called. Isn't that in Tarrytown, or Sleepy
Hollow?

Sort of the Rockefeller of his era. Their place is
nearby also- Kykuit.

Don't remember Rockefeller's house being open to the public 24 years
ago.

In the early 20th century, can faux marble be more expensive than real marble?
 

"mm" wrote in message
...
alt.home.repair:
In the early 20th century, can faux marble be more expensive than real
marble?



Yes it can be. You have to think of it as art, not a replacement for the
real thing.

In the early 20th century, can faux marble be more expensive than real marble?
 

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:15:50 GMT, "Cliff Hartle"
wrote:

"mm" wrote in message
.. .
alt.home.repair:
In the early 20th century, can faux marble be more expensive than real
marble?



Yes it can be. You have to think of it as art, not a replacement for the
real thing.

It's hard for me to think of it as art, but at least I can think the
tour guide wasn't goofy. Thanks.