Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
'allo, I built this 'ere pc from components (my 3rd build), but the world of "Consumer Electronics" has been grinding out stuff for which I have no use for years and years. So I got no celly-phone, no Xbox, no Blackberry, no GPS, etc. And no quadraphonic sound (or whatever they call it nowadaze). What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver in my little home that has powered 5 sets of speakers for about 20 years. Such receiver appears to be rolling over and dying (tons of static and can't balance the 2 stereo channels). What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver (other than another 198x model from Ebay that might not last long)? Are there any good, reasonably priced -stereo- receivers presently on the market? Fancy-Dancy new receivers effectively supporting old-style stereo?? I admit ignorance of most all "current" developments in the home audio market: haven't had time to follow any of it. Any/all help/info etc much appreciated. Cheers, Puddin' Pease pudding hot, Pease pudding cold, Pease pudding in the pot Nine days old ... |
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
AS you surmise, new is not always better. don't discount ebay, find the
seller 'capeannaudio', he specializes in good quality stereo gear from the 80's and 90's ][and older] and can usually find you a good deal on a real stereo. My ~2000 receiver had no more power than my 1978 20 watt and sounded worse. I bought a replacement from him and love it. Puddin' Man wrote: 'allo, I built this 'ere pc from components (my 3rd build), but the world of "Consumer Electronics" has been grinding out stuff for which I have no use for years and years. So I got no celly-phone, no Xbox, no Blackberry, no GPS, etc. And no quadraphonic sound (or whatever they call it nowadaze). What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver in my little home that has powered 5 sets of speakers for about 20 years. Such receiver appears to be rolling over and dying (tons of static and can't balance the 2 stereo channels). What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver (other than another 198x model from Ebay that might not last long)? Are there any good, reasonably priced -stereo- receivers presently on the market? Fancy-Dancy new receivers effectively supporting old-style stereo?? I admit ignorance of most all "current" developments in the home audio market: haven't had time to follow any of it. Any/all help/info etc much appreciated. Cheers, Puddin' Pease pudding hot, Pease pudding cold, Pease pudding in the pot Nine days old ... |
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
"Puddin' Man" wrote in message ... 'allo, I built this 'ere pc from components (my 3rd build), but the world of "Consumer Electronics" has been grinding out stuff for which I have no use for years and years. So I got no celly-phone, no Xbox, no Blackberry, no GPS, etc. And no quadraphonic sound (or whatever they call it nowadaze). What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver in my little home that has powered 5 sets of speakers for about 20 years. Such receiver appears to be rolling over and dying (tons of static and can't balance the 2 stereo channels). What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver (other than another 198x model from Ebay that might not last long)? Are there any good, reasonably priced -stereo- receivers presently on the market? Fancy-Dancy new receivers effectively supporting old-style stereo?? You can still find stereo receiver amplifier combos that should serve your needs. |
#4
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
Do you still use a turntable occasionally? If so you need one with a phono
input. Most new ones have dropped this. Might check out Craigslist and find someone who would let you try theirs before buying it. Good luck "yourname" wrote in message news:ngyoh.2132$Br.477@trndny08... AS you surmise, new is not always better. don't discount ebay, find the seller 'capeannaudio', he specializes in good quality stereo gear from the 80's and 90's ][and older] and can usually find you a good deal on a real stereo. My ~2000 receiver had no more power than my 1978 20 watt and sounded worse. I bought a replacement from him and love it. Puddin' Man wrote: 'allo, I built this 'ere pc from components (my 3rd build), but the world of "Consumer Electronics" has been grinding out stuff for which I have no use for years and years. So I got no celly-phone, no Xbox, no Blackberry, no GPS, etc. And no quadraphonic sound (or whatever they call it nowadaze). What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver in my little home that has powered 5 sets of speakers for about 20 years. Such receiver appears to be rolling over and dying (tons of static and can't balance the 2 stereo channels). What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver (other than another 198x model from Ebay that might not last long)? Are there any good, reasonably priced -stereo- receivers presently on the market? Fancy-Dancy new receivers effectively supporting old-style stereo?? I admit ignorance of most all "current" developments in the home audio market: haven't had time to follow any of it. Any/all help/info etc much appreciated. Cheers, Puddin' Pease pudding hot, Pease pudding cold, Pease pudding in the pot Nine days old ... |
#5
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
"Puddin' Man" wrote in message
... 'allo, I built this 'ere pc from components (my 3rd build), but the world of "Consumer Electronics" has been grinding out stuff for which I have no use for years and years. So I got no celly-phone, no Xbox, no Blackberry, no GPS, etc. And no quadraphonic sound (or whatever they call it nowadaze). What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver in my little home that has powered 5 sets of speakers for about 20 years. Such receiver appears to be rolling over and dying (tons of static and can't balance the 2 stereo channels). What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver (other than another 198x model from Ebay that might not last long)? Are there any good, reasonably priced -stereo- receivers presently on the market? Fancy-Dancy new receivers effectively supporting old-style stereo?? I admit ignorance of most all "current" developments in the home audio market: haven't had time to follow any of it. Any/all help/info etc much appreciated. Call around to some actual stereo stores, not the big box idiots. Tell them what you want, and what you DON'T want. These things still exist. I believe NAD and Onkyo still make simple 2 channel receivers, for instance. Example: http://www.us.onkyo.com/model.cfm?m=...s=Receiver&p=i Does your old receiver have rotary controls? Does it seem like they might just need cleaning? If so, head to Radio Shack for a spray can of tuner cleaner, pop off the receiver's cover, and drench those controls with the spray. You have to shoot it into the tiny hole on each control. Tuck a clean rag under the controls so the stuff's not dripping onto your table. |
#6
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Puddin' Man" wrote in message ... 'allo, I built this 'ere pc from components (my 3rd build), but the world of "Consumer Electronics" has been grinding out stuff for which I have no use for years and years. So I got no celly-phone, no Xbox, no Blackberry, no GPS, etc. And no quadraphonic sound (or whatever they call it nowadaze). What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver in my little home that has powered 5 sets of speakers for about 20 years. Such receiver appears to be rolling over and dying (tons of static and can't balance the 2 stereo channels). What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver (other than another 198x model from Ebay that might not last long)? Are there any good, reasonably priced -stereo- receivers presently on the market? Fancy-Dancy new receivers effectively supporting old-style stereo?? I admit ignorance of most all "current" developments in the home audio market: haven't had time to follow any of it. Any/all help/info etc much appreciated. Call around to some actual stereo stores, not the big box idiots. Tell them what you want, and what you DON'T want. These things still exist. I believe NAD and Onkyo still make simple 2 channel receivers, for instance. Example: http://www.us.onkyo.com/model.cfm?m=...s=Receiver&p=i Does your old receiver have rotary controls? Does it seem like they might just need cleaning? If so, head to Radio Shack for a spray can of tuner cleaner, pop off the receiver's cover, and drench those controls with the spray. You have to shoot it into the tiny hole on each control. Tuck a clean rag under the controls so the stuff's not dripping onto your table. I believe places like "Best Buy " still have the sort of thing you are after. |
#7
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
"Puddin' Man" wrote in message ... 'allo, I built this 'ere pc from components (my 3rd build), but the world of "Consumer Electronics" has been grinding out stuff for which I have no use for years and years. So I got no celly-phone, no Xbox, no Blackberry, no GPS, etc. And no quadraphonic sound (or whatever they call it nowadaze). What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver in my little home that has powered 5 sets of speakers for about 20 years. Such receiver appears to be rolling over and dying (tons of static and can't balance the 2 stereo channels). What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver (other than another 198x model from Ebay that might not last long)? Are there any good, reasonably priced -stereo- receivers presently on the market? Fancy-Dancy new receivers effectively supporting old-style stereo?? I admit ignorance of most all "current" developments in the home audio market: haven't had time to follow any of it. Any/all help/info etc much appreciated. Old stereo receivers are often available at thrift shops and garage sales, or are available free or cheap via freecycle or craigslist for your area. Bob |
#8
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
Puddin' Man wrote:
.... What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver [that] ...appears to be ...dying...... What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver .... Besides the other suggestions, look for local audio shop. Most any larger locality will have one and likely will either do repair or can direct you to person(s) who can. Depending on the model, they may or may not want to mess with it, but it's worth looking into. Had my old Kenwood that is nearly 30 now (next year, if memory serves) totally refurbed two years ago -- new lights, new output power transistors (one of them died was final causation), replaced a bunch of caps that were weak or suspect, cleaned it all out, etc., etc., ... It should go on for another significant lifetime. |
#10
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
wrote in message
oups.com... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Puddin' Man" wrote in message ... 'allo, I built this 'ere pc from components (my 3rd build), but the world of "Consumer Electronics" has been grinding out stuff for which I have no use for years and years. So I got no celly-phone, no Xbox, no Blackberry, no GPS, etc. And no quadraphonic sound (or whatever they call it nowadaze). What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver in my little home that has powered 5 sets of speakers for about 20 years. Such receiver appears to be rolling over and dying (tons of static and can't balance the 2 stereo channels). What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver (other than another 198x model from Ebay that might not last long)? Are there any good, reasonably priced -stereo- receivers presently on the market? Fancy-Dancy new receivers effectively supporting old-style stereo?? I admit ignorance of most all "current" developments in the home audio market: haven't had time to follow any of it. Any/all help/info etc much appreciated. Call around to some actual stereo stores, not the big box idiots. Tell them what you want, and what you DON'T want. These things still exist. I believe NAD and Onkyo still make simple 2 channel receivers, for instance. Example: http://www.us.onkyo.com/model.cfm?m=...s=Receiver&p=i Does your old receiver have rotary controls? Does it seem like they might just need cleaning? If so, head to Radio Shack for a spray can of tuner cleaner, pop off the receiver's cover, and drench those controls with the spray. You have to shoot it into the tiny hole on each control. Tuck a clean rag under the controls so the stuff's not dripping onto your table. I believe places like "Best Buy " still have the sort of thing you are after. They might, but there's a 50% chance you'll run into someone who has no idea what you mean, and will drool on your shoes. Same with Circuit City. A friend of mine does sales training for companies like these. (A very frustrating job). Sometimes, before he sets up training sessions, he does brief phone surveys of the stores to see how they handle customers. At one CC store, he asked if they carried a certain Harmon Kardon receiver. The salesperson on the phone told him they didn't carry HK, and gave him the name of another store that did. Very funny. At that time, CC had carried the HK line for quite a while. Luckily for the salesman, my friend got his name, and before the training sessions began, he took him aside to suggest that he either come a few minutes early to work and familiarize himself with what they sell, or keep looking over his shoulder in case his manager was walking by. |
#11
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:51:33 GMT, Puddin' Man
wrote: 'allo, I built this 'ere pc from components (my 3rd build), but the world of "Consumer Electronics" has been grinding out stuff for which I have no use for years and years. So I got no celly-phone, no Xbox, no Blackberry, no GPS, etc. And no quadraphonic sound (or whatever they call it nowadaze). What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver in my little home that has powered 5 sets of speakers for about 20 years. Such receiver appears to be rolling over and dying (tons of static and can't balance the 2 stereo channels). What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver (other than another 198x model from Ebay that might not last long)? Are there any good, reasonably priced -stereo- receivers presently on the market? Fancy-Dancy new receivers effectively supporting old-style stereo?? I admit ignorance of most all "current" developments in the home audio market: haven't had time to follow any of it. Any/all help/info etc much appreciated. Cheers, Don't replace it. The static and balance problem you are having is most likely dirty potentiometers. Go to Radio Shack and purchase an aerosol can of contact cleaner. Open the case of the stereo and with the unit unplugged spray into the cracks and holes of the various pots. Turn them back and forth while spraying. |
#12
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
On 8 Jan 2007 14:27:40 -0800, "dpb" wrote:
Puddin' Man wrote: ... What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver [that] ...appears to be ...dying...... What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver ... Besides the other suggestions, look for local audio shop. Most any larger locality will have one and likely will either do repair or can direct you to person(s) who can. Depending on the model, they may or may not want to mess with it, but it's worth looking into. Had my old Kenwood that is nearly 30 now (next year, if memory serves) totally refurbed two years ago -- new lights, new output power transistors (one of them died was final causation), replaced a bunch of caps that were weak or suspect, cleaned it all out, etc., etc., ... It should go on for another significant lifetime. Yeah, but how much did it cost? I am "financially challenged". :-) I've actually got a backup unit in the basement, but it won't hold a preset after power down for a few hours. Got it from Ebay mostly for the remote: looks like it's had some rough use. Thx, P "A truly good birddawg, even if you never, ever hunt her, is a Precious, Precious Thing! Mayhap ruin ya for homo sapiens ..." |
#13
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
|
#14
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:09:48 GMT, "Jeff" wrote:
Do you still use a turntable occasionally? How'd you know? :-) If so you need one with a phono input. Which I entirely forgot about ... Most new ones have dropped this. Mighta figgered. Might check out Craigslist and find someone who would let you try theirs before buying it. Makes it a bit trickier. Thx, P "yourname" wrote in message news:ngyoh.2132$Br.477@trndny08... AS you surmise, new is not always better. don't discount ebay, find the seller 'capeannaudio', he specializes in good quality stereo gear from the 80's and 90's ][and older] and can usually find you a good deal on a real stereo. My ~2000 receiver had no more power than my 1978 20 watt and sounded worse. I bought a replacement from him and love it. Puddin' Man wrote: 'allo, I built this 'ere pc from components (my 3rd build), but the world of "Consumer Electronics" has been grinding out stuff for which I have no use for years and years. So I got no celly-phone, no Xbox, no Blackberry, no GPS, etc. And no quadraphonic sound (or whatever they call it nowadaze). What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver in my little home that has powered 5 sets of speakers for about 20 years. Such receiver appears to be rolling over and dying (tons of static and can't balance the 2 stereo channels). What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver (other than another 198x model from Ebay that might not last long)? Are there any good, reasonably priced -stereo- receivers presently on the market? Fancy-Dancy new receivers effectively supporting old-style stereo?? I admit ignorance of most all "current" developments in the home audio market: haven't had time to follow any of it. Any/all help/info etc much appreciated. Cheers, Puddin' "A truly good birddawg, even if you never, ever hunt her, is a Precious, Precious Thing! Mayhap ruin ya for homo sapiens ..." |
#15
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
Puddin' Man wrote: On 8 Jan 2007 14:27:40 -0800, "dpb" wrote: Puddin' Man wrote: ... What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver [that] ...appears to be ...dying...... What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver ... Besides the other suggestions, look for local audio shop. Most any larger locality will have one and likely will either do repair or can direct you to person(s) who can. Depending on the model, they may or may not want to mess with it, but it's worth looking into. Had my old Kenwood that is nearly 30 now (next year, if memory serves) totally refurbed two years ago -- new lights, new output power transistors (one of them died was final causation), replaced a bunch of caps that were weak or suspect, cleaned it all out, etc., etc., ... It should go on for another significant lifetime. Yeah, but how much did it cost? I am "financially challenged". :-) .... About $100 altogether (this was an individual who does it for a sideline rather than through the audio shop he works at). The bare minimum to make it work again would probably have been half that. BTW, "sliders" is linear potentiometer and it's quite possible a cleaner could help. Of course, there may also be dead spots, too, but it's certainly worth a shot if it is static-y kind of noise when controls are moved. Same as for volume which I would assume is a kuh-nob? And tuner is, too, not digital??? |
#16
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
"Puddin' Man" wrote in message
... On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:58:12 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:51:33 GMT, Puddin' Man wrote: 'allo, I built this 'ere pc from components (my 3rd build), but the world of "Consumer Electronics" has been grinding out stuff for which I have no use for years and years. So I got no celly-phone, no Xbox, no Blackberry, no GPS, etc. And no quadraphonic sound (or whatever they call it nowadaze). What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver in my little home that has powered 5 sets of speakers for about 20 years. Such receiver appears to be rolling over and dying (tons of static and can't balance the 2 stereo channels). What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver (other than another 198x model from Ebay that might not last long)? Are there any good, reasonably priced -stereo- receivers presently on the market? Fancy-Dancy new receivers effectively supporting old-style stereo?? I admit ignorance of most all "current" developments in the home audio market: haven't had time to follow any of it. Any/all help/info etc much appreciated. Cheers, Don't replace it. The static and balance problem you are having is most likely dirty potentiometers. Go to Radio Shack and purchase an aerosol can of contact cleaner. Open the case of the stereo and with the unit unplugged spray into the cracks and holes of the various pots. Turn them back and forth while spraying. Potentiometers are "sliders"? My Technics SA-R210 stereo receiver has buttons for all but the graphic eq. which has sliders. Does it still sound like contact cleaner would help? Yes. Go buy it immediately and report back with your results. Keep in mind that these controls often need to be FLOODED with the stuff to get all the dust out. When you're done, you will walk away for 10 minutes to be sure the cleaner has evaporated. Then, you'll try the stereo. |
#17
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Puddin' Man" wrote in message ... On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:58:12 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:51:33 GMT, Puddin' Man wrote: 'allo, I built this 'ere pc from components (my 3rd build), but the world of "Consumer Electronics" has been grinding out stuff for which I have no use for years and years. So I got no celly-phone, no Xbox, no Blackberry, no GPS, etc. And no quadraphonic sound (or whatever they call it nowadaze). What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver in my little home that has powered 5 sets of speakers for about 20 years. Such receiver appears to be rolling over and dying (tons of static and can't balance the 2 stereo channels). What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver (other than another 198x model from Ebay that might not last long)? Are there any good, reasonably priced -stereo- receivers presently on the market? Fancy-Dancy new receivers effectively supporting old-style stereo?? I admit ignorance of most all "current" developments in the home audio market: haven't had time to follow any of it. Any/all help/info etc much appreciated. Cheers, Don't replace it. The static and balance problem you are having is most likely dirty potentiometers. Go to Radio Shack and purchase an aerosol can of contact cleaner. Open the case of the stereo and with the unit unplugged spray into the cracks and holes of the various pots. Turn them back and forth while spraying. Potentiometers are "sliders"? My Technics SA-R210 stereo receiver has buttons for all but the graphic eq. which has sliders. Does it still sound like contact cleaner would help? Yes. Go buy it immediately and report back with your results. Keep in mind that these controls often need to be FLOODED with the stuff to get all the dust out. When you're done, you will walk away for 10 minutes to be sure the cleaner has evaporated. Then, you'll try the stereo. I don't know about "flooding" the controls, but it does help to move the limit-to-limit several times after application. Bob |
#18
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
Potentiometers are "sliders"? My Technics SA-R210 stereo receiver has buttons for all but the graphic eq. which has sliders. Does it still sound like contact cleaner would help? Yes. Many older receivers have better specs than the present day receivers. Try to repair it. |
#19
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
"Bob F" wrote in message
. .. "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Puddin' Man" wrote in message ... On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:58:12 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:51:33 GMT, Puddin' Man wrote: 'allo, I built this 'ere pc from components (my 3rd build), but the world of "Consumer Electronics" has been grinding out stuff for which I have no use for years and years. So I got no celly-phone, no Xbox, no Blackberry, no GPS, etc. And no quadraphonic sound (or whatever they call it nowadaze). What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver in my little home that has powered 5 sets of speakers for about 20 years. Such receiver appears to be rolling over and dying (tons of static and can't balance the 2 stereo channels). What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver (other than another 198x model from Ebay that might not last long)? Are there any good, reasonably priced -stereo- receivers presently on the market? Fancy-Dancy new receivers effectively supporting old-style stereo?? I admit ignorance of most all "current" developments in the home audio market: haven't had time to follow any of it. Any/all help/info etc much appreciated. Cheers, Don't replace it. The static and balance problem you are having is most likely dirty potentiometers. Go to Radio Shack and purchase an aerosol can of contact cleaner. Open the case of the stereo and with the unit unplugged spray into the cracks and holes of the various pots. Turn them back and forth while spraying. Potentiometers are "sliders"? My Technics SA-R210 stereo receiver has buttons for all but the graphic eq. which has sliders. Does it still sound like contact cleaner would help? Yes. Go buy it immediately and report back with your results. Keep in mind that these controls often need to be FLOODED with the stuff to get all the dust out. When you're done, you will walk away for 10 minutes to be sure the cleaner has evaporated. Then, you'll try the stereo. I don't know about "flooding" the controls, but it does help to move the limit-to-limit several times after application. Bob Well, some controls, usually cheaper ones, will actually deteriorate inside, and if that's the case, the cleaner spray will do nothing. For dust, using not enough spray will sometimes just relocate the dust. Keep in mind that most people NEVER open up stereos (or computers) to vacuum out the dust. |
#20
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
On 8 Jan 2007 16:12:06 -0800, "dpb" wrote:
Puddin' Man wrote: On 8 Jan 2007 14:27:40 -0800, "dpb" wrote: Puddin' Man wrote: ... What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver [that] ...appears to be ...dying...... What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver ... Besides the other suggestions, look for local audio shop. Most any larger locality will have one and likely will either do repair or can direct you to person(s) who can. Depending on the model, they may or may not want to mess with it, but it's worth looking into. Had my old Kenwood that is nearly 30 now (next year, if memory serves) totally refurbed two years ago -- new lights, new output power transistors (one of them died was final causation), replaced a bunch of caps that were weak or suspect, cleaned it all out, etc., etc., ... It should go on for another significant lifetime. Yeah, but how much did it cost? I am "financially challenged". :-) ... About $100 altogether (this was an individual who does it for a sideline rather than through the audio shop he works at). The bare minimum to make it work again would probably have been half that. Thanks. BTW, "sliders" is linear potentiometer and it's quite possible a cleaner could help. Of course, there may also be dead spots, too, but it's certainly worth a shot if it is static-y kind of noise when controls are moved. I've not even noticed a problem when controls are moved. The static is sometimes left, sometimes right channel, and sometimes absent altogether. But I've not noticed it at all when sound comes from tv monitor. I can get the speakers to balance for tv sound, and when I tune to radio, balance becomes skewed to the right speaker, where sound is staticy-distorted. They had to do a bunch of board-soldering to fix it about 10 years ago. I ferget the symptoms. Same as for volume which I would assume is a kuh-nob? And tuner is, too, not digital??? No kuh-nob. Mea Culpa, I shoulda mentioned up front the unit is digital. Puddin' "A truly good birddawg, even if you never, ever hunt her, is a Precious, Precious Thing! Mayhap ruin ya for homo sapiens ..." |
#21
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Bob F" wrote in message . .. "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Puddin' Man" wrote in message ... On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:58:12 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:51:33 GMT, Puddin' Man wrote: 'allo, I built this 'ere pc from components (my 3rd build), but the world of "Consumer Electronics" has been grinding out stuff for which I have no use for years and years. So I got no celly-phone, no Xbox, no Blackberry, no GPS, etc. And no quadraphonic sound (or whatever they call it nowadaze). What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver in my little home that has powered 5 sets of speakers for about 20 years. Such receiver appears to be rolling over and dying (tons of static and can't balance the 2 stereo channels). (snip) Well, some controls, usually cheaper ones, will actually deteriorate inside, and if that's the case, the cleaner spray will do nothing. For dust, using not enough spray will sometimes just relocate the dust. Keep in mind that most people NEVER open up stereos (or computers) to vacuum out the dust. Chuckle. Dust or anything else. Most of my stereo/TV equipment came out of the dumpsters at the apartments I used to live at, and the rest came from garage sales or ebay. The dumpster stuff usually got peed in by a cat or a drunk, and blasting the motherboard with contact cleaner brought it right back. Sometimes I had to replace fuses that gave their lives protecting the unit from dead shorts. I even made some money selling a few salvaged receivers at my sister's garage sale a couple years ago. I doubt I have more than 200 bucks in the 2 complete stereo setups I currently have, including some nice speakers. Don't forget, for most people, electronics is PFM, and it would never occur to them to open the cases. I'm no engineer or electronics expert, but I am willing to degunk and fix trivial/cheap stuff. I wouldn't pay a bench fee, but for a nice piece, I'll spend an hour or two putzing around before I give up. aem sends... |
#22
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
"Puddin' Man" wrote in message
... They had to do a bunch of board-soldering to fix it about 10 years ago. I ferget the symptoms. You had some sort of intermittent symptoms because of cracks in the circuit board, or cold solder joints. Some Technics home audio stuff had serious problems like that. It's called "Sanyo Syndrome". Panasonic woke up and improved things a bit, eventually. |
#23
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
wrote in message
... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Bob F" wrote in message . .. "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Puddin' Man" wrote in message ... On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:58:12 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:51:33 GMT, Puddin' Man wrote: 'allo, I built this 'ere pc from components (my 3rd build), but the world of "Consumer Electronics" has been grinding out stuff for which I have no use for years and years. So I got no celly-phone, no Xbox, no Blackberry, no GPS, etc. And no quadraphonic sound (or whatever they call it nowadaze). What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver in my little home that has powered 5 sets of speakers for about 20 years. Such receiver appears to be rolling over and dying (tons of static and can't balance the 2 stereo channels). (snip) Well, some controls, usually cheaper ones, will actually deteriorate inside, and if that's the case, the cleaner spray will do nothing. For dust, using not enough spray will sometimes just relocate the dust. Keep in mind that most people NEVER open up stereos (or computers) to vacuum out the dust. Chuckle. Dust or anything else. Most of my stereo/TV equipment came out of the dumpsters at the apartments I used to live at, and the rest came from garage sales or ebay. The dumpster stuff usually got peed in by a cat or a drunk, and blasting the motherboard with contact cleaner brought it right back. Sometimes I had to replace fuses that gave their lives protecting the unit from dead shorts. I even made some money selling a few salvaged receivers at my sister's garage sale a couple years ago. I doubt I have more than 200 bucks in the 2 complete stereo setups I currently have, including some nice speakers. Don't forget, for most people, electronics is PFM, and it would never occur to them to open the cases. I'm no engineer or electronics expert, but I am willing to degunk and fix trivial/cheap stuff. I wouldn't pay a bench fee, but for a nice piece, I'll spend an hour or two putzing around before I give up. aem sends... I just did that with a Panasonic cordless phone whose keypad stopped working. It made absolutely NO sense. Most Panasonic stuff's pretty well made, and this phone was never mistreated. I opened it up and found a layer of something like bacon grease between the soft pushbutton pad and the circuit board, which contained the pressure sensitive dots. WTF? The phone lived nowhere near the kitchen. I cleaned the bejeezus out of it with isopropyl alcohol and it's a new phone all over again. |
#24
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:58:59 GMT, yourname wrote:
AS you surmise, new is not always better. don't discount ebay, find the seller 'capeannaudio', he specializes in good quality stereo gear from the 80's and 90's ][and older] and can usually find you a good deal on a real stereo. My ~2000 receiver had no more power than my 1978 20 watt and sounded worse. I bought a replacement from him and love it. I bought a Technics receiver, dual cassette deck, and surround sound from about 1988, for 10 dollars on Sunday. Probably sold for more than 600 dollars originally. His parents had moved out of state and the house was sold and he had until the 18th to get rid of everythign. On another occaions I passed up a Marantz receiver and some other device (cassette?) for 10 dollars, because I didn't need it, but I regretted it so I bought these. Puddin' Man wrote: 'allo, I built this 'ere pc from components (my 3rd build), but the world of "Consumer Electronics" has been grinding out stuff for which I have no use for years and years. So I got no celly-phone, no Xbox, no Blackberry, no GPS, etc. And no quadraphonic sound (or whatever they call it nowadaze). What I've got is a little 20-yr-old Technics stereo receiver in my little home that has powered 5 sets of speakers for about 20 years. Such receiver appears to be rolling over and dying (tons of static and can't balance the 2 stereo channels). What might I be able to do in terms of replacing the stereo receiver (other than another 198x model from Ebay that might not last long)? Are there any good, reasonably priced -stereo- receivers presently on the market? Fancy-Dancy new receivers effectively supporting old-style stereo?? I admit ignorance of most all "current" developments in the home audio market: haven't had time to follow any of it. Any/all help/info etc much appreciated. Cheers, Puddin' Pease pudding hot, Pease pudding cold, Pease pudding in the pot Nine days old ... |
#25
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
Puddin' Man wrote:
I've not even noticed a problem when controls are moved. The static is sometimes left, sometimes right channel, and sometimes absent altogether. But I've not noticed it at all when sound comes from tv monitor. I can get the speakers to balance for tv sound, and when I tune to radio, balance becomes skewed to the right speaker, where sound is staticy-distorted. Why don't you get a can of contact cleaner, unplug the amp, remove the knobs and then spray the bejeezus out of them while you work them back and forth from one side to the other? I've fixed plenty of noisy pots with contact cleaner spray. Cheap, too. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#26
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
Here's how I see this, as I used to sell home stereos a few years back
when I was in college (at best buy, no less)... Information gathered from observation and talking to every tom, dick and harry who visited best buy to **** on our equipment... Look at the THD number on a new reciever... the less the better, this is the real bottom line spec as I understand it. THD = Total Harmonic Distortion. This number increases exponentially as the volume is raised...both numbers will be in the "specs sheet" for the new reciever. You can ask at best buy for these documents because they have one for each piece of equipment they sell...be polite but assertive, you can get anything done. Also, when you go to buy a reciever, feel how heavy it is. You WANT heavy receivers. The advent of 'switching power supplies' (the things they run computers off of, and almost everything else now) have kinda taken over most consumer electronics, but you can find some receivers that still use the big, heavy 'transformer' that it replaced... you can tell if it has a transformer by how heavy the unit is near the power cord. Onkyo, Yamaha, and Technics until they got bought out by Matsu****a/Panasonic around the millinium all had the transformers. Don't worry about a phono input if you have a record player...you'll never find a set of pre-amped inputs anymore... just buy a $30 pre-amp if you have a turntable, it will degrade the sound quality, but IT'S A PIECE OF VINYL, with little pits in it that creates sound... it's got horrible quality anyhow. Now, a few notes... a decent 2-channel (handles 2 speakers at once, call it stereo for you old timers) is gonna run you almost the same as a decent Dolby 5.1 which has the ability to not only run your basic two speakers with the same power, but hook up another 3 and a subwoofer for a real home theater experience. You can switch between 2 channel and 5.1 on every reciever I've seen...but you'll actually have to read the manual with a 5.1 reciever, they get kinda complex compared to the plug and they work 2-channel deals. Technics ain't technics any more...don't buy anything made after the late 90's with the technics brand expecting the same quality at your older models...same for Pioneer, I have a pioneer that is really nice, but it's definitely cheaply made. Their car equipment is still good, but home stereos are...cheap seeming. sound is good though. good luck... let me know if you've got any more questions or need info on how to hook something up, that stuff gets complicated quickly. |
#27
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Replacement for stereo receiver??
On 10 Jan 2007 06:11:14 -0800, " wrote:
Here's how I see this, as I used to sell home stereos a few years back when I was in college (at best buy, no less)... Information gathered from observation and talking to every tom, dick and harry who visited best buy to **** on our equipment... Look at the THD number on a new reciever... the less the better, this is the real bottom line spec as I understand it. THD = Total Harmonic Distortion. This number increases exponentially as the volume is raised...both numbers will be in the "specs sheet" for the new reciever. You can ask at best buy for these documents because they have one for each piece of equipment they sell...be polite but assertive, you can get anything done. Also, when you go to buy a reciever, feel how heavy it is. You WANT heavy receivers. The advent of 'switching power supplies' (the things they run computers off of, and almost everything else now) have kinda taken over most consumer electronics, but you can find some receivers that still use the big, heavy 'transformer' that it replaced... you can tell if it has a transformer by how heavy the unit is near the power cord. Onkyo, Yamaha, and Technics until they got bought out by Matsu****a/Panasonic around the millinium all had the transformers. Don't worry about a phono input if you have a record player...you'll never find a set of pre-amped inputs anymore... just buy a $30 pre-amp if you have a turntable, it will degrade the sound quality, but IT'S A PIECE OF VINYL, with little pits in it that creates sound... it's got horrible quality anyhow. Now, a few notes... a decent 2-channel (handles 2 speakers at once, call it stereo for you old timers) is gonna run you almost the same as a decent Dolby 5.1 which has the ability to not only run your basic two speakers with the same power, but hook up another 3 and a subwoofer for a real home theater experience. You can switch between 2 channel and 5.1 on every reciever I've seen...but you'll actually have to read the manual with a 5.1 reciever, they get kinda complex compared to the plug and they work 2-channel deals. Technics ain't technics any more...don't buy anything made after the late 90's with the technics brand expecting the same quality at your older models...same for Pioneer, I have a pioneer that is really nice, but it's definitely cheaply made. Their car equipment is still good, but home stereos are...cheap seeming. sound is good though. good luck... let me know if you've got any more questions or need info on how to hook something up, that stuff gets complicated quickly. -That- was a very interesting rundown of the market in the last, what?, 20 years? Much thanks. LIttle update: I fiddled this n' that, vacuumed some boards, and the old Technics digital rec. sounds much better. For how much longer I dunno. I've had 5 pairs of speakers connected (via some little Radio Shack box) for about 20 years now. A "decent Dolby 5.1" rec. would similarly support such insanity in 2-channel mode? Thanks, Puddin' "A truly good birddawg, even if you never, ever hunt her, is a Precious, Precious Thing! Mayhap ruin ya for homo sapiens ..." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HandK stereo receiver repair | Electronics Repair | |||
OT?: AM stereo receiver hookup | Home Repair | |||
Scott stereo receiver | Electronics Repair | |||
Kenwood 4070 Stereo Receiver | Electronics Repair | |||
fisher stereo receiver | Electronics Repair |