![]() |
Access to this group
Hi;
I have just been informed that AOL is dropping support for newsgroups. Those with BYOA can get it through their real ISP, but AOL DSL is my primary ISP. They said that dialup customers won't get it. This leads me to believe that setting up Outlook using nntp.aol.com is not going to work, if it ever would have. It might not have, AOL seems to handle newsgroups differently, for one you can't send a link to a message in their viewer to anyone but an AOL member. I really don't want to use Google, but now I wonder, even though my primary logon is with AOL, this is AOL DSL powered by SBC. Whaddya think my odds are of being able to use nntp.sbc.com, or net ? What's more I want to figure out how to continue to post in my own name. For better or worse I'm not a name changer. By that I mean those of you who are familiar with me know my technical ability, but also my arrogance at times, and my politically incorrect views. Actually if I can do something other than go through Google or whatever I can make the transition. AOLs reader sucks anyway, and of late has been way off timing. Seems like the posts are not sorted in any particular order. Mozilla has been mentioned, anyone know if it's any good ? What are my best options here ? I gotta do something or I won't be here. I did express my dismay to AOL that the highest priced end user ISP (or ICP) now lacks a feature important to me. This is not likely to get me anywhere I suspect because probably so few AOL users use Usenet. Thanks in advance, and thanks for your time. JURB (hopefully will stay JURB) |
JURB6006 wrote:
What's more I want to figure out how to continue to post in my own name. For better or worse I'm not a name changer. By that I mean those of you who are familiar with me know my technical ability, but also my arrogance at times, and my politically incorrect views. I don't know how AOL behaves with third party news servers, but you could try registering from *free* access to the news.individual.net news server: http://www.news.individual.net/index.html and set up outlook, thunderbird or whatever. You will require a valid email address to register, so of course you can use the one you currently have. I use this server for text groups because my own ISP's server is somewhat unreliable. Lee -- Email address is valid, but is unlikely to be read. |
But if you have SBC DSL get rid of the AOL part of it. SBC has the wire to
your house, will they do it w/o AOL. I thinks it's BS that they would think about dropping the news groups! "JURB6006" wrote in message ... Hi; I have just been informed that AOL is dropping support for newsgroups. Those with BYOA can get it through their real ISP, but AOL DSL is my primary ISP. They said that dialup customers won't get it. This leads me to believe that setting up Outlook using nntp.aol.com is not going to work, if it ever would have. It might not have, AOL seems to handle newsgroups differently, for one you can't send a link to a message in their viewer to anyone but an AOL member. I really don't want to use Google, but now I wonder, even though my primary logon is with AOL, this is AOL DSL powered by SBC. Whaddya think my odds are of being able to use nntp.sbc.com, or net ? What's more I want to figure out how to continue to post in my own name. For better or worse I'm not a name changer. By that I mean those of you who are familiar with me know my technical ability, but also my arrogance at times, and my politically incorrect views. Actually if I can do something other than go through Google or whatever I can make the transition. AOLs reader sucks anyway, and of late has been way off timing. Seems like the posts are not sorted in any particular order. Mozilla has been mentioned, anyone know if it's any good ? What are my best options here ? I gotta do something or I won't be here. I did express my dismay to AOL that the highest priced end user ISP (or ICP) now lacks a feature important to me. This is not likely to get me anywhere I suspect because probably so few AOL users use Usenet. Thanks in advance, and thanks for your time. JURB (hopefully will stay JURB) |
"JURB6006" wrote in message ... Hi; I have just been informed that AOL is dropping support for newsgroups. Those with BYOA can get it through their real ISP, but AOL DSL is my primary ISP. They said that dialup customers won't get it. (snip extra stuff) Thanks in advance, and thanks for your time. JURB (hopefully will stay JURB) I've just been informed that AOL intends to discontinue their news group service for their "dial-up" customers (which is a majority). This little trick doesn't surprise me. Maybe now is the time for AOL dial-up members to get themselves a "real" ISP (Internet Service Provider). There are many of them out there which offer a much better service than AOL. I highly recommend "Earthlink." Be sure to check out and see what your area has to offer for various ISP's. All of the ISP's provide you with free software that is self-installing, and extremely easy to use. If you desire to stay with AOL (although, I can't imagine why), then you'll have to get a web-based news group provider. I know of three of them: 1. EasyNews. Go to: http://www.easynews.com EasyNews charges $9.98 per month for 10 gigabytes of uploads/downloads. As much as I upload, I don't even use 10 gigs per month. 2. SuperNews. Go to: http://www.supernews.com SuperNews has various monthly plans. Their 10 gigs a month plan is $10.95. 3. GigaNews. Go to: http://www.giganews.com GigaNews has three different plans. Their 10 gigs a month plan is $11.99. Be sure to check them all out - I might have forgotten something. |
I'm using a text based news reader (tin) from my ISP. They happen to give
me a Linux shell. I subscribe to flashnewsgroups.com text only service for about five bucks/month and that way, I can use threading and keep track of what I've already read vs. using a web based newsreader (which don't tend to have those functions). I can also rlogin to their server from anywhere (even through firewalls) and read news. Works great. My GF has AOL and as others have mentioned, they are a pretty bad ISP and tend to cater to the technologically inept (my grandmother loves them). There are *so many* good ISPs out there that I wonder why people continue w/AOL. My ISP also dumped Usenet because out of over a thousand users, only two read news via Usenet. It cost them about 200/month for their service. However, they were nice about it and reduced my monthly fee to compensate for my cost of the news service. I must say they have earned my respect with that move. barry |
I agree with Lee, I have used http://www.news.individual.net/index.html for
a few years and have found them to be very reliable. They do not carry any alt. newsgroups. I used to use them with Outlook Express when I had NetZero dialup and it worked fine. As long as you have an internet connection it will work. And it is free! -- Tony Marsillo Nutmeg Repair ----------------------------------------------------------------- "Lee" wrote in message ... JURB6006 wrote: What's more I want to figure out how to continue to post in my own name. For better or worse I'm not a name changer. By that I mean those of you who are familiar with me know my technical ability, but also my arrogance at times, and my politically incorrect views. I don't know how AOL behaves with third party news servers, but you could try registering from *free* access to the news.individual.net news server: http://www.news.individual.net/index.html and set up outlook, thunderbird or whatever. You will require a valid email address to register, so of course you can use the one you currently have. I use this server for text groups because my own ISP's server is somewhat unreliable. Lee -- Email address is valid, but is unlikely to be read. |
if you have SBC DSL get rid of the AOL part of it
Unfortunately AOL is my primary ISP. This might have to change. JURB |
I've just been informed that AOL intends to discontinue their news group service for their "dial-up" customers (which is a majority). This little trick doesn't surprise me. If AOL says you don't need newsgroups, then you don't need newsgroups. End of discussion. It's going to be kinda quiet around here though... Actually, I believe SBC DSL is the best bargain for your dollar. $26.95 per month for broadband internet access; I think AOL charges almost that much for dial-up service Alan Harriman |
On 25 Jan 2005 22:35:20 GMT (JURB6006) wrote in Message
id: : What are my best options here ? http://www.individual.net/ Free. I'd recommend http://www.forteinc.com/main/homepage.php for a newsreader, if you don't wish to buy the full version, after 30 days it reverts to a free version which doesn't support kill filtering. Good luck! |
I have SBC, but they have no timeframe when DSL will be put in my rural area.
AOL is only dropping it for dial up customers. |
wbsearch posted:
I have SBC, but they have no timeframe when DSL will be put in my rural area. AOL is only dropping it for dial up customers. There is nothing in the AOL announcement that says they are dropping newsgroups only for dialup customers. My access is via Comcast cable, and each time I access one of the boards, I get the AOL service elimination message. I only retained AOL for so long because their newsgroup access was so easy, but other aspects of their service that were useful to me have already gone to hell and this is the last straw. I wouldn't stay with AOL if they changed their plan. So in a week or so I will be ready to dump my AOL account and I'm glad to be rid of them. As for why are they dumping newsgroups..... I think it has something to do with a deal they have with google. I'm glad I unloaded my shares in AOL a few years ago. Don |
"Dbowey" wrote in message ... I only retained AOL for so long because their newsgroup access was so easy, but other aspects of their service that were useful to me have already gone to hell and this is the last straw. I wouldn't stay with AOL if they changed their plan. See also news:alt.free.newsservers -- N |
Dbowey ) writes: wbsearch posted: I have SBC, but they have no timeframe when DSL will be put in my rural area. AOL is only dropping it for dial up customers. There is nothing in the AOL announcement that says they are dropping newsgroups only for dialup customers. My access is via Comcast cable, and each time I access one of the boards, I get the AOL service elimination message. I think AOL's words are misleading. I read that message to mean that you won't get newsgroups from AOL. But since some people access the internet through other means (broadband, or a really cheap ISP that has local dial in but little more), and pay for AOL on top of that, they are saying that you may not need AOL for newsgroups since your ISP may supply them. AOL won't be supplying newsgroups for people with high speed access, but the high speed access supplier may supply newsgroups. The bit about dial up is on the level of their line about how you can access newsgroups with a newsreader. In fact, the newsreader won't help unless you have access to a newsserver, be it a free one or one you pay for. In both cases, the wording seems to try to keep AOL's importance high. You don't need AOL, especially if you are dialing in somewhere else. But in reality, if you've got internet access somewhere else, the only reason you need AOL, especially now that the newsgroups are gone, is for any AOL specific things (such as forums and chat rooms or whatever they are called and assuming they continue). But I don't think they want people to know that. Michael I only retained AOL for so long because their newsgroup access was so easy, but other aspects of their service that were useful to me have already gone to hell and this is the last straw. I wouldn't stay with AOL if they changed their plan. So in a week or so I will be ready to dump my AOL account and I'm glad to be rid of them. As for why are they dumping newsgroups..... I think it has something to do with a deal they have with google. I'm glad I unloaded my shares in AOL a few years ago. Don |
"Tony Marsillo" wrote:
I agree with Lee, I have used http://www.news.individual.net/index.html for a few years and have found them to be very reliable. They do not carry any alt. newsgroups. That is blatantly incorrect. They most certainly *do* carry the alt.* hierarchy, although as a text-only news server, they obviously do not carry any alt.binaries.* groups. In case you haven't heard, most groups in the alt.* hierarchy are *not* binary groups. And stop top-posting you twit. Jon A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter