John-Del wrote:


---------------
Phil Allison wrote:


Best way to hide a fake semi is to make them look good and sell
at standard going prices.



They do with with DLP lamps. OEM bulbs over here generally cost $80 U.S. give or take. People started buying ebay and Amazon lamps for a third of the cost of OEM and finding out they were either crapping out immediately or within a few months. They generally are not as bright as well. People started avoiding the cheap lamps.

A few sellers have been selling counterfeit Philips bulbs at prices just below what Philips lamps sell for - seems like a great deal on Philips brand bulbs but it's the same old crappy lamp at a lot more money.


** Reminds me of the old trick used by many dealers in second hand furniture.

If they have an largish item that has been taking up space for a while with no sale - they put it out the front with a sign:

" Today's Special "

With double the previous asking price.


.... Phil

In article ,
says...

** Reminds me of the old trick used by many dealers in second hand furniture.

If they have an largish item that has been taking up space for a while with no sale - they put it out the front with a sign:

" Today's Special "

With double the previous asking price.




People are funny about things.

I know a man that sells cantalopes and other items at a farmers market.

He had them for $ .25 each and not selling. He took that sign and
marked through it and made it 3 for $ 1. Sold most of them at the higher
price. People did not do the simple math and see that they were paying
about 8 cents more for each one.

On 2019/11/18 7:08 a.m., Ralph Mowery wrote:
In article ,
says...

** Reminds me of the old trick used by many dealers in second hand furniture.

If they have an largish item that has been taking up space for a while with no sale - they put it out the front with a sign:

" Today's Special "

With double the previous asking price.




People are funny about things.

I know a man that sells cantalopes and other items at a farmers market.

He had them for $ .25 each and not selling. He took that sign and
marked through it and made it 3 for $ 1. Sold most of them at the higher
price. People did not do the simple math and see that they were paying
about 8 cents more for each one.


Here in Canada, on our national radio station CBC, we get a fellow named
Terry O'Reilley on the air with a show called "Under the Influence" -
which is all about advertising. Where this story is leading is he had a
great show on pricing where he talked about the above subject and
people's perception of prices and what influences them.

The episode is: S3E02 (Archive) - The Psychology of Price

Listen to it he

http://cbc.mc.tritondigital.com/CBC_...0110_46407.mp3

Or go to the main page at and track down S3E02:

https://www.cbc.ca/radio/podcasts/ar...the-influence/

I've been listening to him for years, lots of great info on how
advertising (both good and bad) influences us.

John :-#)#

On Saturday, 16 November 2019 23:46:52 UTC, John-Del wrote:
On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 5:05:47 AM UTC-5, wrote:

'lytic caps go bad eventually. After removing the caps for testing you've already run the risk of damaging the board.


Anyone who would ruin a board by removing a cap isn't a professional and shouldn't be playing with it. There is ZERO chance of damaging even a multi-layer board.

I'm interested to hear how you remove caps from paper based boards with zero board damage rate. Early paper PCBs are somewhat notorious for tracks coming off when heated.


NT

On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 3:14:44 PM UTC-5, wrote:

I'm interested to hear how you remove caps from paper based boards with zero board damage rate. Early paper PCBs are somewhat notorious for tracks coming off when heated.

A very hot iron wetted with fresh eutectic solder, together with expeditious use of a solder-sucker will pull the solder and loosen the lead without damage. It is the sustained heat that causes the traces to lift.

Horses for courses.

Peter Wieck
Melroes Park, PA

On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 3:17:43 PM UTC-5, wrote:

Takes me about 10 seconds. I like to know whether I've found a fault or need to keep looking.

Takes me about 10 seconds with the ESR meter, containing a 12 volt battery. Takes a bit longer on the big checker that operates at up to 550 VDC.

Which do yo think will give the more reliable results?

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA

On 11/21/19 2:14 PM, wrote:
I'm interested to hear how you remove caps from paper
based boards with zero board damage rate. Early paper
PCBs are somewhat notorious for tracks coming off when
heated.

If you lack the skills to do this, you're a hack.
It's that simple.
I've been doing this for 50 years now.
I don't lift traces, or break off terminals unsoldering
things.


--
"I am a river to my people."
Jeff-1.0
WA6FWi
http:foxsmercantile.com

On Thursday, 21 November 2019 20:47:02 UTC, wrote:
On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 3:17:43 PM UTC-5, tabby wrote:

Takes me about 10 seconds. I like to know whether I've found a fault or need to keep looking.

Takes me about 10 seconds with the ESR meter, containing a 12 volt battery. Takes a bit longer on the big checker that operates at up to 550 VDC.

Which do yo think will give the more reliable results?

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA

550v will tell you more about leakage, not more about ESR.


NT

On Thursday, 21 November 2019 21:53:26 UTC, Fox's Mercantile wrote:
On 11/21/19 2:14 PM, tabbypurr wrote:

I'm interested to hear how you remove caps from paper
based boards with zero board damage rate. Early paper
PCBs are somewhat notorious for tracks coming off when
heated.

If you lack the skills to do this, you're a hack.
It's that simple.
I've been doing this for 50 years now.
I don't lift traces, or break off terminals unsoldering
things.

lol. You can't help yourself can you. I didn't even mention what I do or can do.

On Friday, November 22, 2019 at 6:29:36 AM UTC-5, wrote:
On Thursday, 21 November 2019 21:53:26 UTC, Fox's Mercantile wrote:
On 11/21/19 2:14 PM, tabbypurr wrote:

I'm interested to hear how you remove caps from paper
based boards with zero board damage rate. Early paper
PCBs are somewhat notorious for tracks coming off when
heated.

If you lack the skills to do this, you're a hack.
It's that simple.
I've been doing this for 50 years now.
I don't lift traces, or break off terminals unsoldering
things.

lol. You can't help yourself can you. I didn't even mention what I do or can do.


Sure you did. You asked *me* "...how you (meaning me) remove caps from paper based boards with zero board damage rate."

This indicates you can't.

On Friday, 22 November 2019 12:07:15 UTC, John-Del wrote:
On Friday, November 22, 2019 at 6:29:36 AM UTC-5, tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 21 November 2019 21:53:26 UTC, Fox's Mercantile wrote:
On 11/21/19 2:14 PM, tabbypurr wrote:

I'm interested to hear how you remove caps from paper
based boards with zero board damage rate. Early paper
PCBs are somewhat notorious for tracks coming off when
heated.

If you lack the skills to do this, you're a hack.
It's that simple.
I've been doing this for 50 years now.
I don't lift traces, or break off terminals unsoldering
things.

lol. You can't help yourself can you. I didn't even mention what I do or can do.


Sure you did. You asked *me* "...how you (meaning me) remove caps from paper based boards with zero board damage rate."

This indicates you can't.

yawn

On 11/23/19 3:38 AM, wrote:
On Friday, 22 November 2019 12:07:15 UTC, John-Del wrote:
On Friday, November 22, 2019 at 6:29:36 AM UTC-5, tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 21 November 2019 21:53:26 UTC, Fox's Mercantile wrote:
On 11/21/19 2:14 PM, tabbypurr wrote:

I'm interested to hear how you remove caps from paper
based boards with zero board damage rate. Early paper
PCBs are somewhat notorious for tracks coming off when
heated.

If you lack the skills to do this, you're a hack.
It's that simple.
I've been doing this for 50 years now.
I don't lift traces, or break off terminals unsoldering
things.

lol. You can't help yourself can you. I didn't even mention what I do or can do.


Sure you did. You asked *me* "...how you (meaning me) remove caps from paper based boards with zero board damage rate."

This indicates you can't.

yawn


To a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
To a hack, everything looks like a can't.


--
"I am a river to my people."
Jeff-1.0
WA6FWi
http:foxsmercantile.com

On Saturday, 23 November 2019 14:18:09 UTC, Fox's Mercantile wrote:
On 11/23/19 3:38 AM, tabbypurr wrote:
On Friday, 22 November 2019 12:07:15 UTC, John-Del wrote:
On Friday, November 22, 2019 at 6:29:36 AM UTC-5, tabby wrote:
On Thursday, 21 November 2019 21:53:26 UTC, Fox's Mercantile wrote:
On 11/21/19 2:14 PM, tabbypurr wrote:

I'm interested to hear how you remove caps from paper
based boards with zero board damage rate. Early paper
PCBs are somewhat notorious for tracks coming off when
heated.

If you lack the skills to do this, you're a hack.
It's that simple.
I've been doing this for 50 years now.
I don't lift traces, or break off terminals unsoldering
things.

lol. You can't help yourself can you. I didn't even mention what I do or can do.


Sure you did. You asked *me* "...how you (meaning me) remove caps from paper based boards with zero board damage rate."

This indicates you can't.

yawn


To a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
To a hack, everything looks like a can't.

life's too short for this much childishness. Sorry.

On 11/24/19 10:59 AM, wrote:
life's too short for this much childishness. Sorry.

And yet you persist.

--
"I am a river to my people."
Jeff-1.0
WA6FWi
http:foxsmercantile.com

On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 08:59:55 -0800, tabbypurr wrote:

life's too short for this much childishness. Sorry.

The idiot's a troll. Look back at his previous interactions with others
here and elsewhere and there's an unmistakable picture that emerges. I've
KF'd him. You can waste *so* much time on pricks like that if you're not
careful.



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

On 11/24/19 6:28 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 08:59:55 -0800, tabbypurr wrote:

life's too short for this much childishness. Sorry.

The idiot's a troll. Look back at his previous interactions with others
here and elsewhere and there's an unmistakable picture that emerges. I've
KF'd him. You can waste *so* much time on pricks like that if you're not
careful.

Oh dear, I've been kill filed by a hack. What ever shall I do?



--
"I am a river to my people."
Jeff-1.0
WA6FWi
http:foxsmercantile.com

On Monday, 25 November 2019 00:28:56 UTC, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 08:59:55 -0800, tabbypurr wrote:

life's too short for this much childishness. Sorry.

The idiot's a troll. Look back at his previous interactions with others
here and elsewhere and there's an unmistakable picture that emerges. I've
KF'd him. You can waste *so* much time on pricks like that if you're not
careful.

he's aping slowman.

On 11/25/19 12:10 AM, wrote:
On Monday, 25 November 2019 00:28:56 UTC, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 08:59:55 -0800, tabbypurr wrote:

life's too short for this much childishness. Sorry.

The idiot's a troll. Look back at his previous interactions with others
here and elsewhere and there's an unmistakable picture that emerges. I've
KF'd him. You can waste *so* much time on pricks like that if you're not
careful.

he's aping slowman.


Get a room you two.


--
"I am a river to my people."
Jeff-1.0
WA6FWi
http:foxsmercantile.com

On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 22:10:44 -0800, tabbypurr wrote:

he's aping slowman.

Just plain aping. I find it impossible to believe that anyone could
*genuinely* be that stupid. Hence my deduction he's a troll - and now one
of the very few posters I've felt it necessary to perma-plonk. Just think
of all that valuable future time I've saved myself by avoiding further
futile and infantile exchanges from him. :-}



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

On 11/25/19 4:12 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 22:10:44 -0800, tabbypurr wrote:

he's aping slowman.

Just plain aping. I find it impossible to believe that anyone could
*genuinely* be that stupid. Hence my deduction he's a troll - and now one
of the very few posters I've felt it necessary to perma-plonk. Just think
of all that valuable future time I've saved myself by avoiding further
futile and infantile exchanges from him. :-}

I guess you lied about kill filing me.



--
"I am a river to my people."
Jeff-1.0
WA6FWi
http:foxsmercantile.com