Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
Has anyone encountered fake TA7317P devices?
I've just replaced one in an Electro Voice 81PMX powered mixer but the output relay still doesn't turn on. Meter readings after replacement made no sense but an oscilloscope showed high frequency oscillation at pin 6 of the replacement device which I presume were confusing the meter. Before anyone asks, the unit works perfectly when pin 6 is connected to ground to turn the relay on and the output is only mV away from ground with no signal. The schematic of the unit I'm trying to repair can be found by googling ElectroVoice-61_81PMX pwrmix.pdf And the TA7317P data sheet can be similarly found. Before I replaced the chip I checked the voltage at all pins as follows. 1. -0.7 2. 0.7 3. 0.1 4. 0 5. -0.8 6. 76.5 7. 0 8. 0.6 9. 3.2 I concluded that The 0.7V at pin 2 must be coming from within the chip because there is near 0V at the other end of the series resistor on that pin. After replacing the TA7317P, meter readings show only 1.8 V at pin 9. There is high (higher than my old 20MHz oscilloscope can show) frequency oscillation at pin 6. So I think that either the replacement TA7317P is duff or fake. I'm going to fit some socket strip when I take the replacement out again. I have three more TA7317P from the same source (I bought four). I think I'll test the remaining devices with a power supply, a series resistor to pin 9 and pin 4 grounded, and see what is on pin 9. Unless anyone can suggests other tests to confirm whether or not the replacement parts I bought really are TA7317P. Thanks for any suggestions. old guy |
#2
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
John Smith wrote in message
... Has anyone encountered fake TA7317P devices? I've just replaced one in an Electro Voice 81PMX powered mixer but the output relay still doesn't turn on. Meter readings after replacement made no sense but an oscilloscope showed high frequency oscillation at pin 6 of the replacement device which I presume were confusing the meter. Before anyone asks, the unit works perfectly when pin 6 is connected to ground to turn the relay on and the output is only mV away from ground with no signal. The schematic of the unit I'm trying to repair can be found by googling ElectroVoice-61_81PMX pwrmix.pdf And the TA7317P data sheet can be similarly found. Before I replaced the chip I checked the voltage at all pins as follows. 1. -0.7 2. 0.7 3. 0.1 4. 0 5. -0.8 6. 76.5 7. 0 8. 0.6 9. 3.2 I concluded that The 0.7V at pin 2 must be coming from within the chip because there is near 0V at the other end of the series resistor on that pin. After replacing the TA7317P, meter readings show only 1.8 V at pin 9. There is high (higher than my old 20MHz oscilloscope can show) frequency oscillation at pin 6. So I think that either the replacement TA7317P is duff or fake. I'm going to fit some socket strip when I take the replacement out again. I have three more TA7317P from the same source (I bought four). I think I'll test the remaining devices with a power supply, a series resistor to pin 9 and pin 4 grounded, and see what is on pin 9. Unless anyone can suggests other tests to confirm whether or not the replacement parts I bought really are TA7317P. Thanks for any suggestions. old guy I was wrestling with a similar function C1237HA / uPC1237HA recently, as falsely holding off the relays, replaced associated caps, replaced the device , still the same |
#3
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
On 2/24/2012 11:43 PM, John Smith wrote:
Has anyone encountered fake TA7317P devices? I've just replaced one in an Electro Voice 81PMX powered mixer but the output relay still doesn't turn on. Meter readings after replacement made no sense but an oscilloscope showed high frequency oscillation at pin 6 of the replacement device which I presume were confusing the meter. Before anyone asks, the unit works perfectly when pin 6 is connected to ground to turn the relay on and the output is only mV away from ground with no signal. The schematic of the unit I'm trying to repair can be found by googling ElectroVoice-61_81PMX pwrmix.pdf And the TA7317P data sheet can be similarly found. Before I replaced the chip I checked the voltage at all pins as follows. 1. -0.7 2. 0.7 3. 0.1 4. 0 5. -0.8 6. 76.5 7. 0 8. 0.6 9. 3.2 I concluded that The 0.7V at pin 2 must be coming from within the chip because there is near 0V at the other end of the series resistor on that pin. After replacing the TA7317P, meter readings show only 1.8 V at pin 9. There is high (higher than my old 20MHz oscilloscope can show) frequency oscillation at pin 6. So I think that either the replacement TA7317P is duff or fake. I'm going to fit some socket strip when I take the replacement out again. I have three more TA7317P from the same source (I bought four). I think I'll test the remaining devices with a power supply, a series resistor to pin 9 and pin 4 grounded, and see what is on pin 9. Unless anyone can suggests other tests to confirm whether or not the replacement parts I bought really are TA7317P. Thanks for any suggestions. old guy Good Morning, I've usually seen these IC's in NAD receivers. I've certainly had issues with both the capacitors and resistors going bad, even though they seem to measure OK in circuit. I'm going from my memory (bad idea) but 150K, 180K, 220K 15K, 18K and 22K stick in my mind. Best of luck, Tim Schwartz Bristol Electronics |
#4
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
John Smith wrote in message
... Has anyone encountered fake TA7317P devices? I've just replaced one in an Electro Voice 81PMX powered mixer but the output relay still doesn't turn on. Meter readings after replacement made no sense but an oscilloscope showed high frequency oscillation at pin 6 of the replacement device which I presume were confusing the meter. Before anyone asks, the unit works perfectly when pin 6 is connected to ground to turn the relay on and the output is only mV away from ground with no signal. The schematic of the unit I'm trying to repair can be found by googling ElectroVoice-61_81PMX pwrmix.pdf And the TA7317P data sheet can be similarly found. Before I replaced the chip I checked the voltage at all pins as follows. 1. -0.7 2. 0.7 3. 0.1 4. 0 5. -0.8 6. 76.5 7. 0 8. 0.6 9. 3.2 I concluded that The 0.7V at pin 2 must be coming from within the chip because there is near 0V at the other end of the series resistor on that pin. After replacing the TA7317P, meter readings show only 1.8 V at pin 9. There is high (higher than my old 20MHz oscilloscope can show) frequency oscillation at pin 6. So I think that either the replacement TA7317P is duff or fake. I'm going to fit some socket strip when I take the replacement out again. I have three more TA7317P from the same source (I bought four). I think I'll test the remaining devices with a power supply, a series resistor to pin 9 and pin 4 grounded, and see what is on pin 9. Unless anyone can suggests other tests to confirm whether or not the replacement parts I bought really are TA7317P. Thanks for any suggestions. old guy For a Panasonic SA313 use of TA7317P, p1 to p9 -.7,0,0,0,-.7,1.3,0,1.3,3.1 V dc |
#5
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:43:18 -0500, "John Smith"
put finger to keyboard and composed: The schematic of the unit I'm trying to repair can be found by googling ... It would have been nice for you to have made it easy for us ... ElectroVoice-61_81PMX pwrmix.pdf http://www.eserviceinfo.com/download.php?fileid=46360 http://elektrotanya.com/electro-voic.../download.html And the TA7317P data sheet can be similarly found. http://www.portes.cz/data/integrovan...dy/TA7317P.pdf Before I replaced the chip I checked the voltage at all pins as follows. 1. -0.7 2. 0.7 3. 0.1 4. 0 5. -0.8 6. 76.5 7. 0 8. 0.6 9. 3.2 I concluded that The 0.7V at pin 2 must be coming from within the chip because there is near 0V at the other end of the series resistor on that pin. After replacing the TA7317P, meter readings show only 1.8 V at pin 9. AISI, the maximum voltage at this point would be equivalent to the voltage drop across 4 forward biased diodes. Simlarly, the voltage drop at pin 5 should be equal to a single forward biased diode. If the voltage drop is taken to be 0.8V, then this is consistent with both measurements. What voltage do you see at pin 5 of the replacement? Do pins 1,2,3 and 7 of the replacement part now show the expected voltages? Does pin 9's series resistor (R372) measure correctly (22K)? - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#6
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:43:18 -0500, "John Smith"
put finger to keyboard and composed: Before I replaced the chip I checked the voltage at all pins as follows. 6. 76.5 9. 3.2 AISI, the voltage across R372 (22K) must be 73.3V. Therefore its power dissipation would be ... 73.3 ^ 2 / 22K = 244mW However, the parts list rates it for 1/5W. - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#7
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
"Franc Zabkar" wrote in message
... On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:43:18 -0500, "John Smith" put finger to keyboard and composed: Before I replaced the chip I checked the voltage at all pins as follows. 6. 76.5 9. 3.2 AISI, the voltage across R372 (22K) must be 73.3V. Therefore its power dissipation would be ... 73.3 ^ 2 / 22K = 244mW However, the parts list rates it for 1/5W. Thanks but this is one of the first things I checked before replacing the device. R372 does measure 22K. I actually cut one of its legs to test it out of circuit because it's a pain to get the board off the heatsink (all output FETs have to be unsoldered) I then soldered its leg together again. I spotted another potential design error. Compare the TA7317 Vcc max with what I measured. This only affects pin 6. I'll find out more when I get back to it on Monday. old guy - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#8
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
"Franc Zabkar" wrote in message
... On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:43:18 -0500, "John Smith" put finger to keyboard and composed: The schematic of the unit I'm trying to repair can be found by googling ... It would have been nice for you to have made it easy for us ... Sorry, I didn't think a quick cut & paste into Google was hard. I'll be able to answer your other questions on Monday. old guy .... |
#9
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
"N_Cook" wrote in message
... John Smith wrote in message ... Has anyone encountered fake TA7317P devices? .... For a Panasonic SA313 use of TA7317P, p1 to p9 -.7,0,0,0,-.7,1.3,0,1.3,3.1 V dc Useful information. Thanks. |
#10
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
"John Smith" wrote in message
... Has anyone encountered fake TA7317P devices? I've just replaced one in an Electro Voice 81PMX powered mixer but the output relay still doesn't turn on. Meter readings after replacement made no sense but an oscilloscope showed high frequency oscillation at pin 6 of the replacement device which I presume were confusing the meter. Before anyone asks, the unit works perfectly when pin 6 is connected to ground to turn the relay on and the output is only mV away from ground with no signal. The schematic of the unit I'm trying to repair can be found by googling ElectroVoice-61_81PMX pwrmix.pdf And the TA7317P data sheet can be similarly found. Before I replaced the chip I checked the voltage at all pins as follows. 1. -0.7 2. 0.7 3. 0.1 4. 0 5. -0.8 6. 76.5 7. 0 8. 0.6 9. 3.2 I concluded that The 0.7V at pin 2 must be coming from within the chip because there is near 0V at the other end of the series resistor on that pin. After replacing the TA7317P, meter readings show only 1.8 V at pin 9. There is high (higher than my old 20MHz oscilloscope can show) frequency oscillation at pin 6. So I think that either the replacement TA7317P is duff or fake. I'm going to fit some socket strip when I take the replacement out again. I have three more TA7317P from the same source (I bought four). I think I'll test the remaining devices with a power supply, a series resistor to pin 9 and pin 4 grounded, and see what is on pin 9. Unless anyone can suggests other tests to confirm whether or not the replacement parts I bought really are TA7317P. Thanks for any suggestions. old guy At a glance, 0.6 volts at pin 8 is wrong - capacitor C312 should charge up through R364. If it is held low, the thing will never turn on. The voltage at pin 9 looks like may be low - R372 could be way high in value. Mark Z. |
#11
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:00:43 -0500, "John Smith"
put finger to keyboard and composed: "Franc Zabkar" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:43:18 -0500, "John Smith" put finger to keyboard and composed: The schematic of the unit I'm trying to repair can be found by googling ... It would have been nice for you to have made it easy for us ... Sorry, I didn't think a quick cut & paste into Google was hard. No harder than a quick cut & paste into a newsreader ... BTW, I notice that the voltage rating of the filter capacitors (C401 / C402) on the amp's positive and negative supplies is 80V. Are you sure the AC mains voltage selector is in the correct position? - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#12
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
"Mark Zacharias" wrote in message
... "John Smith" wrote in message ... Has anyone encountered fake TA7317P devices? ..... Thanks for any suggestions. old guy At a glance, 0.6 volts at pin 8 is wrong - capacitor C312 should charge up through R364. I'll check R364/C312 tomorrow. R362 measured 22K out of circuit. I might replace it anyway. If it is held low, the thing will never turn on. The voltage at pin 9 looks like may be low - R372 could be way high in value. Mark Z. |
#13
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:11:41 -0600, "Mark Zacharias"
put finger to keyboard and composed: At a glance, 0.6 volts at pin 8 is wrong - capacitor C312 should charge up through R364. If it is held low, the thing will never turn on. AISI, pin #8 should go low if either pin #1 or pin #7 are high, or if either pin #2 or pin #3 are outside the range of -0.7V to +0.7V. If there is a fault condition, one or more of Q6, Q18, and Q19 will be on. This means that Q10 will be off and Q11 will be on. This in turn means that Q12 and Q13 will be off and the relay will be open. - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#14
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
It took me a little longer than expected to get back to this but here's the
story so far. The mains voltage selector is set correctly for the area I'm working in. So +75V and -75V rails seem to be correct. I removed the replacement TA7317P and fitted socket strip. With no chip fitted R372 = 21.6K and R364 = 220K. All other resistance checks made sense and no adjacent socket pins are shoreted together. I then connected pin 6 to pin 4 of the socket to turn the relay on and also connected four 1N4148 dioded in series from pin 9 to pin 4 of the socket. With the power on, here are the voltage readings I now get. Note that no chip is fitted, just the diodes mentioned above. 1. -15V 2. 8.8mV 3. 0.17V 4. 0V 5. -75V 6. 0V 7. 0V 8. 2.67V 9. 2.7V The voltage on C314 is varying between -42 and -49V, presumably due to ripple. I'll scope it tomorrow. The voltage at pin 1 of the socket is also varying a bit too. Thanks for any further suggestions. My next move will be to test the remaining TA7317P I bought, with a 22K resistor to pin 9 and pin 4 grounded with no other pins connected and see what I get on pin 9. Old guy |
#15
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:30:32 -0500, "John Smith"
put finger to keyboard and composed: The mains voltage selector is set correctly for the area I'm working in. So +75V and -75V rails seem to be correct. That means that quite a few components are operating close to spec or slightly in excess of spec. I removed the replacement TA7317P and fitted socket strip. With the power on, here are the voltage readings I now get. Note that no chip is fitted, just the diodes mentioned above. 1. -15V 2. 8.8mV 3. 0.17V 4. 0V 5. -75V 6. 0V 7. 0V 8. 2.67V 9. 2.7V The voltage on C314 is varying between -42 and -49V, presumably due to ripple. I'll scope it tomorrow. The voltage at pin 1 of the socket is also varying a bit too. I'd change the capacitor, but I don't believe that level of ripple would be enough to influence the circuit. AISI, pin #1 senses the current in the 0.33 ohm load sharing/sensing resistors R33, R34, R35, and R36. It would require about 2A to turn on Q324. Q325 would then turn on after a delay determined by C311 and R357, sending pin #1 of the TA7317P high and causing the relay to open. My next move will be to test the remaining TA7317P I bought, with a 22K resistor to pin 9 and pin 4 grounded with no other pins connected and see what I get on pin 9. I suspect that your replacement parts may have a string of 3 diodes on pin #9. If the voltage at pin #5 is -0.6V, then this would tend to confirm it. I notice that the datasheet identifies each diode as a Q rather than a D, so I suspect that the original part uses diode-connected transistors rather than actual diodes. Perhaps your replacement part uses the latter? - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#16
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:43:18 -0500, "John Smith"
put finger to keyboard and composed: Has anyone encountered fake TA7317P devices? Before I replaced the chip I checked the voltage at all pins as follows. 1. -0.7 2. 0.7 3. 0.1 4. 0 5. -0.8 6. 76.5 7. 0 8. 0.6 9. 3.2 I concluded that The 0.7V at pin 2 must be coming from within the chip because there is near 0V at the other end of the series resistor on that pin. After replacing the TA7317P, meter readings show only 1.8 V at pin 9. I believe pin #3 is being used to provide thermal overload protection. That said, I can't see how it could possibly work, even with the "correct" supply voltage at pin #9. Here is the relevant section of the circuit: pin #3 o | pin #9 o-|-- R366, 15K -- TH301 --|-- R367, 3K --o pin #4, Ground | | |-- R365, 180K ----------| TH301 is an NTC thermistor, Panasonic p/n ERT-D2FHL503S: http://www.panasonic.com/industrial/...arg0000ce2.pdf It's resistance at 25C is 50K. AISI, in order for the thermal overload to activate, pin #3 would have to exceed 0.6V (the B-E voltage of Q15 in the datasheet). However, even if we allow the resistance of TH301 to fall to 0, then the voltage at pin #3 is still only 0.57V, assuming a voltage of 3.2V at pin #9. At 1.8V, the voltage at pin #3 would be only 0.32V. C316, R371 and R374 appear to provide a dethump delay at switch-on. - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#17
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
"Franc Zabkar" wrote in message
... On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:43:18 -0500, "John Smith" put finger to keyboard and composed: ..... I believe pin #3 is being used to provide thermal overload protection. That said, I can't see how it could possibly work, even with the "correct" supply voltage at pin #9. Here is the relevant section of the circuit: pin #3 o | pin #9 o-|-- R366, 15K -- TH301 --|-- R367, 3K --o pin #4, Ground | | |-- R365, 180K ----------| TH301 is an NTC thermistor, Panasonic p/n ERT-D2FHL503S: http://www.panasonic.com/industrial/...arg0000ce2.pdf It's resistance at 25C is 50K. AISI, in order for the thermal overload to activate, pin #3 would have to exceed 0.6V (the B-E voltage of Q15 in the datasheet). However, even if we allow the resistance of TH301 to fall to 0, then the voltage at pin #3 is still only 0.57V, assuming a voltage of 3.2V at pin #9. At 1.8V, the voltage at pin #3 would be only 0.32V. C316, R371 and R374 appear to provide a dethump delay at switch-on. Thanks Franc I haven't checked your analysis but in my time as a circuit designer (not saying how many years or what I worked on) I encountered many situations where pleasing management was the most important thing. So a thermal overload test may have been done on one unit and it may well have passed. And then it may have been assumed that... The unit has a very big heat sink, actually I don't recall many that were bigger. So I'm not too concerned if thermal overload doesn't work. No one is going to be injured by a FET going pop, well except the speaker if the relay doesn't turn off, so my risk assessment is that it doesn't matter as long as I can get the relay to turn on when the output isn't stuck at a rail. If I can't do that then I won't get paid for the repair Old guy - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#18
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 00:52:36 -0500, "John Smith"
put finger to keyboard and composed: The unit has a very big heat sink, actually I don't recall many that were bigger. So I'm not too concerned if thermal overload doesn't work. No one is going to be injured by a FET going pop, well except the speaker if the relay doesn't turn off, so my risk assessment is that it doesn't matter as long as I can get the relay to turn on when the output isn't stuck at a rail. I pointed it out because it looked wrong. In fact the design seems to have too many oddities. That said, the 4 protection inputs look OK to me, so there does appear to be a problem with the IC. There is one thing you might like to try. The TA7317P datasheet specifies a maximum current of 5mA into pin #9. The circuit as it stands draws about 3mA through R372. Perhaps you could add a 47K resistor in parallel with R372. If the voltage on pin #9 rises, then this would point to an internal regulation problem. - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#19
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
Thanks Franc,
Here are the results of todays experiments. I took another of the TA7317P I bought and carefully bent most pins so that when I put it in the socket only pins 4,5 and 9 are in the socket. Here's what I get: Socket pin V, Chip pin V. 1 -16.5, -1.04 2 0.01, -1.98 3 0.01, -0.66 4 0, 0 5 -2.39 -2.39 6 76.6 -2.38 7 0, -1.29 8 0.3 0.122 9 0.3 0.3 Something tells me that this can't be a TA7317P despite its markings. Maybe the manufacturer got it reversed in the package. I think it should be safe to try one backwards. Old guy |
#20
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
Well wadda you know.
I straightened the pins and put it in backwards. At power on there was a click and the readings now are. 1. 0.23 2. 0.32 3. 0.64 4. 0 5. 0.82 6. 3.7 7. 2.57 8. 1.44 9. 3.35 For socket pins 1 - 9. The device is definitely in backwards. I rechecked pin 5. It's +0.82 not -0.82, strange. Pins 7 and 8 seem strange too. Perhaps it's still not really a TA7317P Old guy |
#21
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:30:36 -0500, "John Smith"
put finger to keyboard and composed: Socket pin V, Chip pin V. 1 -16.5, -1.04 2 0.01, -1.98 3 0.01, -0.66 4 0, 0 5 -2.39 -2.39 6 76.6 -2.38 7 0, -1.29 8 0.3 0.122 9 0.3 0.3 Something tells me that this can't be a TA7317P despite its markings. It sure looks that way. That said, I can't see any economic incentive to counterfeit a part that I can buy for AU$2.75 in single quantities. Maybe you should bite the bullet and buy it as a spare part from Panasonic or Yamaha? BTW, the more I examine the circuit, the more errors and anomalies I find. For example, AFAICS there is a 50V capacitor (C409) in the 40V phantom power supply that would be operating at 49V. I have a feeling that the correct HV supplies should be +/-55V, not 75V. There is also a PNP transistor (Q405) in the -15V supply that is drawn as an NPN, and a 2SD transistor (Q401) in the 40V supply is listed as a 2SC in the parts list. My overall impression is that it's a shoddy product. - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#22
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 16:42:59 -0500, "John Smith"
put finger to keyboard and composed: Well wadda you know. I straightened the pins and put it in backwards. At power on there was a click and the readings now are. 1. 0.23 2. 0.32 3. 0.64 4. 0 5. 0.82 6. 3.7 7. 2.57 8. 1.44 9. 3.35 For socket pins 1 - 9. The device is definitely in backwards. I rechecked pin 5. It's +0.82 not -0.82, strange. Pins 7 and 8 seem strange too. Perhaps it's still not really a TA7317P Old guy Maybe the chip was damaged by your first attempt? I think pin #8 is probably OK. AFAICS, Q7 (diode) and Q10 should both contribute around 0.6V when the relay is closed. I would think that pin#6 should be a lot closer to 0V. I also don't understand why the voltage on pin #3 is so high. - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#23
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 16:42:59 -0500, "John Smith"
put finger to keyboard and composed: I straightened the pins and put it in backwards. At power on there was a click and the readings now are. 1. 0.23 2. 0.32 3. 0.64 4. 0 5. 0.82 6. 3.7 7. 2.57 8. 1.44 9. 3.35 When the IC was installed backwards, pins 4 and 6, and pins 3 and 7, would have been swapped. This means that the +75V supply would have been applied to the IC's ground pin via the relay coil. The IC's pin #7 would have been grounded via a 3K resistor (R367). This means that Q19's base-emitter junction would have been reverse biased by the +75V supply, thereby destroying it. Your measurements would suggest that Q19's B-E junction is now open, which would be consistent with the expected damage. Furthermore, the reading at pin #5 (Q20) would suggest that its connection to the IC's ground (pin #4) has been opened. AFAICS, this is also to be expected. - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#24
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:00:29 +1100, Franc Zabkar
put finger to keyboard and composed: When the IC was installed backwards, pins 4 and 6, and pins 3 and 7, would have been swapped. If you are wary about the polarity of your ICs, I would use a 9V battery and a 1.8K series resistor to test the IC. I would connect the battery's negative terminal to pin #5. This pin is consistent, irrespective of polarity. I would then connect the battery's positive terminal, via the resistor, to pins 1 and 9 in turn. I expect that you should see approximately 1.4V at pin #1 and 3.2V at pin #9. - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#25
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
"Franc Zabkar" wrote in message
... On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 16:42:59 -0500, "John Smith" put finger to keyboard and composed: Well wadda you know. I straightened the pins and put it in backwards. At power on there was a click and the readings now are. 1. 0.23 2. 0.32 3. 0.64 4. 0 5. 0.82 6. 3.7 7. 2.57 8. 1.44 9. 3.35 For socket pins 1 - 9. The device is definitely in backwards. I rechecked pin 5. It's +0.82 not -0.82, strange. Pins 7 and 8 seem strange too. Perhaps it's still not really a TA7317P Old guy Maybe the chip was damaged by your first attempt? I have two more unused parts. I'll try another unused one in backwards on Monday. I think pin #8 is probably OK. AFAICS, Q7 (diode) and Q10 should both contribute around 0.6V when the relay is closed. I would think that pin#6 should be a lot closer to 0V. Yes I noticed that. I also don't understand why the voltage on pin #3 is so high. I don't either. I do agree it's a shoddy product but I won't get my pocket money if I can't fix it. Old guy - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#26
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
"Franc Zabkar" wrote in message
... On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:00:29 +1100, Franc Zabkar put finger to keyboard and composed: When the IC was installed backwards, pins 4 and 6, and pins 3 and 7, would have been swapped. If you are wary about the polarity of your ICs, I would use a 9V battery and a 1.8K series resistor to test the IC. I would connect the battery's negative terminal to pin #5. This pin is consistent, irrespective of polarity. I would then connect the battery's positive terminal, via the resistor, to pins 1 and 9 in turn. I expect that you should see approximately 1.4V at pin #1 and 3.2V at pin #9. Thanks Franc, I'll take your advice and do that on Monday with the two unused parts I have. Old guy - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#27
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 18:52:18 -0500, "John Smith"
put finger to keyboard and composed: "Franc Zabkar" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:00:29 +1100, Franc Zabkar put finger to keyboard and composed: When the IC was installed backwards, pins 4 and 6, and pins 3 and 7, would have been swapped. If you are wary about the polarity of your ICs, I would use a 9V battery and a 1.8K series resistor to test the IC. I would connect the battery's negative terminal to pin #5. This pin is consistent, irrespective of polarity. I would then connect the battery's positive terminal, via the resistor, to pins 1 and 9 in turn. I expect that you should see approximately 1.4V at pin #1 and 3.2V at pin #9. Thanks Franc, I'll take your advice and do that on Monday with the two unused parts I have. I should have said that the above voltages would be with respect to pin #4. Add about 0.8V when measuring with respect to pin #5. BTW, I suspect that the 3K resistor on pin #3 would now be open. That would explain the higher than expected voltage on pin #3. - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#28
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
John Smith wrote in message
... Well wadda you know. I straightened the pins and put it in backwards. At power on there was a click and the readings now are. 1. 0.23 2. 0.32 3. 0.64 4. 0 5. 0.82 6. 3.7 7. 2.57 8. 1.44 9. 3.35 For socket pins 1 - 9. The device is definitely in backwards. I rechecked pin 5. It's +0.82 not -0.82, strange. Pins 7 and 8 seem strange too. Perhaps it's still not really a TA7317P Old guy Are you using the left hand side of the printing as your index for pin "1" or the chamfer or notch in the body ? |
#29
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
"N_Cook" wrote in message
... John Smith wrote in message ... Well wadda you know. .... Are you using the left hand side of the printing as your index for pin "1" or the chamfer or notch in the body ? Both are at the same end. I even googled up a drawing of SIP9 to make certain that the chamfer end should be pin 1. It's not a Toshiba one but it looks just like the one on this page I found with google images. Watch out for link wrap. http://www.donberg.ie/catalogue/semi...c/ta_7317.html |
#30
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
John Smith wrote in message
... "N_Cook" wrote in message ... John Smith wrote in message ... Well wadda you know. ... Are you using the left hand side of the printing as your index for pin "1" or the chamfer or notch in the body ? Both are at the same end. I even googled up a drawing of SIP9 to make certain that the chamfer end should be pin 1. It's not a Toshiba one but it looks just like the one on this page I found with google images. Watch out for link wrap. http://www.donberg.ie/catalogue/semi...t-tc/ta_7317.h tml I looked in my tub of salvaged and sorted on 731.... and did not find one , surprisingly ( a Matshusta AN7317 9 pinner but dual amp , not protector . I could have done some "diode" tests. Its just no the sort of thing to pirate , there are other TA73** devices of 9 pin SIL so perhaps a cock-up in the labelling section. Now removing 3055 marking off TO3s and marking them 2N3773 or whatever , would be the actions of a pirater |
#31
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 08:45:51 +1100, Franc Zabkar
wrote: On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:30:36 -0500, "John Smith" put finger to keyboard and composed: Socket pin V, Chip pin V. 1 -16.5, -1.04 2 0.01, -1.98 3 0.01, -0.66 4 0, 0 5 -2.39 -2.39 6 76.6 -2.38 7 0, -1.29 8 0.3 0.122 9 0.3 0.3 Something tells me that this can't be a TA7317P despite its markings. It sure looks that way. That said, I can't see any economic incentive to counterfeit a part that I can buy for AU$2.75 in single quantities. Maybe you should bite the bullet and buy it as a spare part from Panasonic or Yamaha? BTW, the more I examine the circuit, the more errors and anomalies I find. For example, AFAICS there is a 50V capacitor (C409) in the 40V phantom power supply that would be operating at 49V. I have a feeling that the correct HV supplies should be +/-55V, not 75V. It begins to sound like somebody "hot rodded" the amplifier. And did a shoddy job of it. There is also a PNP transistor (Q405) in the -15V supply that is drawn as an NPN, and a 2SD transistor (Q401) in the 40V supply is listed as a 2SC in the parts list. My overall impression is that it's a shoddy product. - Franc Zabkar |
#32
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
"Franc Zabkar" wrote in message
... On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 18:52:18 -0500, "John Smith" put finger to keyboard and composed: "Franc Zabkar" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:00:29 +1100, Franc Zabkar put finger to keyboard and composed: When the IC was installed backwards, pins 4 and 6, and pins 3 and 7, would have been swapped. If you are wary about the polarity of your ICs, I would use a 9V battery and a 1.8K series resistor to test the IC. I would connect the battery's negative terminal to pin #5. This pin is consistent, irrespective of polarity. I would then connect the battery's positive terminal, via the resistor, to pins 1 and 9 in turn. I expect that you should see approximately 1.4V at pin #1 and 3.2V at pin #9. Thanks Franc, I'll take your advice and do that on Monday with the two unused parts I have. I should have said that the above voltages would be with respect to pin #4. Add about 0.8V when measuring with respect to pin #5. BTW, I suspect that the 3K resistor on pin #3 would now be open. That would explain the higher than expected voltage on pin #3. None of the resistors look distressed and R367 measures 2.85K with no chip fitted. I was going to try the battery test but first I used a resistance meter between pin 4 and pins 2 and 3. I was expecting these two pins to look the same but they didn't no matter which pin I assumed to be pin 1. With nothing to lose I fitted an unused chip backwards. At power on there was a click and: 1. 0.22V 2. 0.32V 3. 0.6V 4. 0V 5. 0.82V 6. 3.49V 7. 2.38V 8. 1.35V 9. 3.16V R366 (15K) has 2.53V at the thermistor end. R369 is 28mV at the end not connected to the chip. My next move was to connect a 100K resistor between the rail end of R372 and pin2. This took pin 2 up to 3.11V but the relay didn't turn off. My conclusion is that whatever I bought in SIP9 packages marked TA7317P can't be TA7317P This could have happened accidentally, the manufacturer may have packaged the wrong device. There is no doubt that the devices are marked TA7317P but I happened to accidentaly type TA7137P into Google today and found that this is also SIP9. I think the only thing I can do to make progress is to get more TA7317P from a different source and perhaps tell the vendor that I don't think they supplied TA7317P despite the markings. Old guy. |
#33
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
TA7317P output protection
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 18:44:57 -0500, "John Smith"
put finger to keyboard and composed: I was going to try the battery test but first I used a resistance meter between pin 4 and pins 2 and 3. I was expecting these two pins to look the same but they didn't no matter which pin I assumed to be pin 1. Nice idea. With nothing to lose I fitted an unused chip backwards. At power on there was a click and: 1. 0.22V 2. 0.32V 3. 0.6V 4. 0V 5. 0.82V 6. 3.49V 7. 2.38V 8. 1.35V 9. 3.16V R366 (15K) has 2.53V at the thermistor end. That means that the current through R366 is ... (3.16V - 2.53V) / 15K = 42uA The current through R367 is ... 0.6V / 2.85K = 210uA The current through R365 is ... (3.16V - 0.6V) / 180K = 14uA Therefore pin 3 of the IC must be sourcing 154uA (= 210 - 42 - 14). This is inconsistent with the equivalent circuit in the IC datasheet. Also, the fact that pin #5 is at a higher potential than ground would suggest that the IC has an internal open circuit between pin #4 and Q20. Assuming capacitor C316 is not leaking, then pin #7 of the IC must be sourcing 72uA (= 2.38V / 33K). This is also inconsistent with the equivalent circuit. R369 is 28mV at the end not connected to the chip. My next move was to connect a 100K resistor between the rail end of R372 and pin2. This took pin 2 up to 3.11V but the relay didn't turn off. My conclusion is that whatever I bought in SIP9 packages marked TA7317P can't be TA7317P It sure seems that way. :-( - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|