My neighbor was telling me that his oil filled radiator type space
heater is more efficient than the kind with a fan and heating coils. I
told him that there is no difference, that all the electricity
consumed by the heater is converted to heat in the room. Even the
sound made by the fan vibrates the air which heats it up a little. So
if both were operated in a perfectly insulated room and consumed the
same amount of electricity the rooms would heat up the same amount.
Now I'm wondering about real world situations. Some frequencies of
light pass through walls, some through windows, some both, and some
neither. So I suppose the best heater is one that glows in a frequency
range that is completely absorbed by objects (including people) in the
room and reflected by the walls and windows. Are my asumptions
correct? I hope so. Otherwise I'll need to call my neighbor so he can
serve me a little crow.
Eric

On Nov 21, 7:55*am, wrote:
My neighbor was telling me that his oil filled radiator type space
heater is more efficient than the kind with a fan and heating coils. I
told him that there is no difference, that all the electricity
consumed by the heater is converted to heat in the room. Even the
sound made by the fan vibrates the air which heats it up a little. So
if both were operated in a perfectly insulated room and consumed the
same amount of electricity the rooms would heat up the same amount.
Now I'm wondering about real world situations. Some frequencies of
light pass through walls, some through windows, some both, and some
neither. So I suppose the best heater is one that glows in a frequency
range that is completely absorbed by objects (including people) in the
room and reflected by the walls and windows. Are my asumptions
correct? I hope so. Otherwise I'll need to call my neighbor so he can
serve me a little crow.
Eric

There are two kinds of electric space heaters, convection and radiant.
Convection heaters (attempt to) heat the entire room, radiant heaters
heat objects, including you. The oil filled radiator is a convection
heater, as are the heating coil plus fan heaters.

Comparing convection heaters to convection heaters, there is no
difference in efficiency, 100% of the electrical energy does turn into
heat. The Department of Energy prefers the oil filled units because
their thermal mass makes them a more constant heat source. Their
heating elements cycle less, for what it's worth.

But, radiant heaters should have more apparent efficiency in that they
require less energy to heat just you instead of the entire room plus
you in it.

http://www.energysavers.gov/your_hom.../mytopic=12600

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:10:12 -0800 (PST), spamtrap1888
wrote:

On Nov 21, 7:55*am, wrote:
My neighbor was telling me that his oil filled radiator type space
heater is more efficient than the kind with a fan and heating coils. I
told him that there is no difference, that all the electricity
consumed by the heater is converted to heat in the room. Even the
sound made by the fan vibrates the air which heats it up a little. So
if both were operated in a perfectly insulated room and consumed the
same amount of electricity the rooms would heat up the same amount.
Now I'm wondering about real world situations. Some frequencies of
light pass through walls, some through windows, some both, and some
neither. So I suppose the best heater is one that glows in a frequency
range that is completely absorbed by objects (including people) in the
room and reflected by the walls and windows. Are my asumptions
correct? I hope so. Otherwise I'll need to call my neighbor so he can
serve me a little crow.
Eric

There are two kinds of electric space heaters, convection and radiant.
Convection heaters (attempt to) heat the entire room, radiant heaters
heat objects, including you. The oil filled radiator is a convection
heater, as are the heating coil plus fan heaters.

Comparing convection heaters to convection heaters, there is no
difference in efficiency, 100% of the electrical energy does turn into
heat. The Department of Energy prefers the oil filled units because
their thermal mass makes them a more constant heat source. Their
heating elements cycle less, for what it's worth.

But, radiant heaters should have more apparent efficiency in that they
require less energy to heat just you instead of the entire room plus
you in it.

http://www.energysavers.gov/your_hom.../mytopic=12600

Correct, if you ignore one minor detail. Since a radiant heater warms
you, rather than the air, you will always feel colder on the side away
from the heater.

PlainBill

wrote:
My neighbor was telling me that his oil filled radiator type space
heater is more efficient than the kind with a fan and heating coils. I
told him that there is no difference, that all the electricity
consumed by the heater is converted to heat in the room. Even the
sound made by the fan vibrates the air which heats it up a little. So
if both were operated in a perfectly insulated room and consumed the
same amount of electricity the rooms would heat up the same amount.
Now I'm wondering about real world situations. Some frequencies of
light pass through walls, some through windows, some both, and some
neither. So I suppose the best heater is one that glows in a frequency
range that is completely absorbed by objects (including people) in the
room and reflected by the walls and windows. Are my asumptions
correct? I hope so. Otherwise I'll need to call my neighbor so he can
serve me a little crow.
Eric

True.

The only thing, radiant might be considered more efficient because inducing
drafts might make the air feel colder.

Greg

wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:10:12 -0800 (PST), spamtrap1888
wrote:

On Nov 21, 7:55 am, wrote:
My neighbor was telling me that his oil filled radiator type space
heater is more efficient than the kind with a fan and heating coils. I
told him that there is no difference, that all the electricity
consumed by the heater is converted to heat in the room. Even the
sound made by the fan vibrates the air which heats it up a little. So
if both were operated in a perfectly insulated room and consumed the
same amount of electricity the rooms would heat up the same amount.
Now I'm wondering about real world situations. Some frequencies of
light pass through walls, some through windows, some both, and some
neither. So I suppose the best heater is one that glows in a frequency
range that is completely absorbed by objects (including people) in the
room and reflected by the walls and windows. Are my asumptions
correct? I hope so. Otherwise I'll need to call my neighbor so he can
serve me a little crow.
Eric

There are two kinds of electric space heaters, convection and radiant.
Convection heaters (attempt to) heat the entire room, radiant heaters
heat objects, including you. The oil filled radiator is a convection
heater, as are the heating coil plus fan heaters.

Comparing convection heaters to convection heaters, there is no
difference in efficiency, 100% of the electrical energy does turn into
heat. The Department of Energy prefers the oil filled units because
their thermal mass makes them a more constant heat source. Their
heating elements cycle less, for what it's worth.

But, radiant heaters should have more apparent efficiency in that they
require less energy to heat just you instead of the entire room plus
you in it.

http://www.energysavers.gov/your_hom.../mytopic=12600

Correct, if you ignore one minor detail. Since a radiant heater warms
you, rather than the air, you will always feel colder on the side away
from the heater.

PlainBill

I don't know what the efficiency of radiant conversion is, but radiant
heaters give out plenty of heated air also. Some also have fans.

Greg

On Nov 21, 10:10*am, spamtrap1888 wrote:
On Nov 21, 7:55*am, wrote:

My neighbor was telling me that his oil filled radiator type space
heater is more efficient than the kind with a fan and heating coils. I
told him that there is no difference, that all the electricity
consumed by the heater is converted to heat in the room. Even the
sound made by the fan vibrates the air which heats it up a little. So
if both were operated in a perfectly insulated room and consumed the
same amount of electricity the rooms would heat up the same amount.
Now I'm wondering about real world situations. Some frequencies of
light pass through walls, some through windows, some both, and some
neither. So I suppose the best heater is one that glows in a frequency
range that is completely absorbed by objects (including people) in the
room and reflected by the walls and windows. Are my asumptions
correct? I hope so. Otherwise I'll need to call my neighbor so he can
serve me a little crow.
Eric

There are two kinds of electric space heaters, convection and radiant.
Convection heaters (attempt to) heat the entire room, radiant heaters
heat objects, including you. The oil filled radiator is a convection
heater, as are the heating coil plus fan heaters.

Comparing convection heaters to convection heaters, there is no
difference in efficiency, 100% of the electrical energy does turn into
heat. The Department of Energy prefers the oil filled units because
their thermal mass makes them a more constant heat source. Their
heating elements cycle less, for what it's worth.

But, radiant heaters should have more apparent efficiency in that they
require less energy to heat just you instead of the entire room plus
you in it.

http://www.energysavers.gov/your_hom...ling/index.cfm...

That said, I have not yet seen an oil filled heater more than a few
years old that did not leak to some degree. Not sure what might happen
if the oil level drops to the point that the heater element starts
boiling it.

Neil S.

nesesu wrote:

That said, I have not yet seen an oil filled heater more than a few
years old that did not leak to some degree. Not sure what might happen
if the oil level drops to the point that the heater element starts
boiling it.


I've had mine for 15 years, and I bought it used. Soon, it'll be
time to drag it out for another winter.


--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.

wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:10:12 -0800 (PST), spamtrap1888
wrote:

On Nov 21, 7:55 am, wrote:
My neighbor was telling me that his oil filled radiator type space
heater is more efficient than the kind with a fan and heating
coils. I told him that there is no difference, that all the
electricity consumed by the heater is converted to heat in the
room. Even the sound made by the fan vibrates the air which heats
it up a little. So if both were operated in a perfectly insulated
room and consumed the same amount of electricity the rooms would
heat up the same amount. Now I'm wondering about real world
situations. Some frequencies of light pass through walls, some
through windows, some both, and some neither. So I suppose the best
heater is one that glows in a frequency range that is completely
absorbed by objects (including people) in the room and reflected by
the walls and windows. Are my asumptions correct? I hope so.
Otherwise I'll need to call my neighbor so he can serve me a little
crow.
Eric

There are two kinds of electric space heaters, convection and
radiant. Convection heaters (attempt to) heat the entire room,
radiant heaters heat objects, including you. The oil filled radiator
is a convection heater, as are the heating coil plus fan heaters.

Comparing convection heaters to convection heaters, there is no
difference in efficiency, 100% of the electrical energy does turn
into heat. The Department of Energy prefers the oil filled units
because their thermal mass makes them a more constant heat source.
Their heating elements cycle less, for what it's worth.

But, radiant heaters should have more apparent efficiency in that
they require less energy to heat just you instead of the entire room
plus you in it.

http://www.energysavers.gov/your_hom.../mytopic=12600

Correct, if you ignore one minor detail. Since a radiant heater warms
you, rather than the air, you will always feel colder on the side away
from the heater.

And, the radiant heat will go right through any uncovered windows in its
radiation path.

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:31:36 -0800, "Bob F"
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:10:12 -0800 (PST), spamtrap1888
wrote:

On Nov 21, 7:55 am, wrote:
My neighbor was telling me that his oil filled radiator type space
heater is more efficient than the kind with a fan and heating
coils. I told him that there is no difference, that all the
electricity consumed by the heater is converted to heat in the
room. Even the sound made by the fan vibrates the air which heats
it up a little. So if both were operated in a perfectly insulated
room and consumed the same amount of electricity the rooms would
heat up the same amount. Now I'm wondering about real world
situations. Some frequencies of light pass through walls, some
through windows, some both, and some neither. So I suppose the best
heater is one that glows in a frequency range that is completely
absorbed by objects (including people) in the room and reflected by
the walls and windows. Are my asumptions correct? I hope so.
Otherwise I'll need to call my neighbor so he can serve me a little
crow.
Eric

There are two kinds of electric space heaters, convection and
radiant. Convection heaters (attempt to) heat the entire room,
radiant heaters heat objects, including you. The oil filled radiator
is a convection heater, as are the heating coil plus fan heaters.

Comparing convection heaters to convection heaters, there is no
difference in efficiency, 100% of the electrical energy does turn
into heat. The Department of Energy prefers the oil filled units
because their thermal mass makes them a more constant heat source.
Their heating elements cycle less, for what it's worth.

But, radiant heaters should have more apparent efficiency in that
they require less energy to heat just you instead of the entire room
plus you in it.

http://www.energysavers.gov/your_hom.../mytopic=12600

Correct, if you ignore one minor detail. Since a radiant heater warms
you, rather than the air, you will always feel colder on the side away
from the heater.

And, the radiant heat will go right through any uncovered windows in its
radiation path.

Not necessarily. Glass is opaque in the infrared range. However,
they WILL absorb the energy and if single pane will release half the
heat generated outdoors.

PlainBill

nesesu wrote:
On Nov 21, 10:10?am, spamtrap1888 wrote:
On Nov 21, 7:55?am, wrote:

My neighbor was telling me that his oil filled radiator type space
heater is more efficient than the kind with a fan and heating coils. I
told him that there is no difference, that all the electricity
consumed by the heater is converted to heat in the room. Even the
sound made by the fan vibrates the air which heats it up a little. So
if both were operated in a perfectly insulated room and consumed the
same amount of electricity the rooms would heat up the same amount.
Now I'm wondering about real world situations. Some frequencies of
light pass through walls, some through windows, some both, and some
neither. So I suppose the best heater is one that glows in a frequency
range that is completely absorbed by objects (including people) in the
room and reflected by the walls and windows. Are my asumptions
correct? I hope so. Otherwise I'll need to call my neighbor so he can
serve me a little crow.
Eric

There are two kinds of electric space heaters, convection and radiant.
Convection heaters (attempt to) heat the entire room, radiant heaters
heat objects, including you. The oil filled radiator is a convection
heater, as are the heating coil plus fan heaters.

Comparing convection heaters to convection heaters, there is no
difference in efficiency, 100% of the electrical energy does turn into
heat. The Department of Energy prefers the oil filled units because
their thermal mass makes them a more constant heat source. Their
heating elements cycle less, for what it's worth.

But, radiant heaters should have more apparent efficiency in that they
require less energy to heat just you instead of the entire room plus
you in it.

http://www.energysavers.gov/your_hom...ling/index.cfm...

That said, I have not yet seen an oil filled heater more than a few
years old that did not leak to some degree. Not sure what might happen
if the oil level drops to the point that the heater element starts
boiling it.

Neil S.

Are those things full of used chinese motor oil or something else you
don't want to touch or have catch on fire?

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:44:28 +0000 (UTC), Cydrome Leader
wrote:

nesesu wrote:
On Nov 21, 10:10?am, spamtrap1888 wrote:
On Nov 21, 7:55?am, wrote:

My neighbor was telling me that his oil filled radiator type space
heater is more efficient than the kind with a fan and heating coils. I
told him that there is no difference, that all the electricity
consumed by the heater is converted to heat in the room. Even the
sound made by the fan vibrates the air which heats it up a little. So
if both were operated in a perfectly insulated room and consumed the
same amount of electricity the rooms would heat up the same amount.
Now I'm wondering about real world situations. Some frequencies of
light pass through walls, some through windows, some both, and some
neither. So I suppose the best heater is one that glows in a frequency
range that is completely absorbed by objects (including people) in the
room and reflected by the walls and windows. Are my asumptions
correct? I hope so. Otherwise I'll need to call my neighbor so he can
serve me a little crow.
Eric

There are two kinds of electric space heaters, convection and radiant.
Convection heaters (attempt to) heat the entire room, radiant heaters
heat objects, including you. The oil filled radiator is a convection
heater, as are the heating coil plus fan heaters.

Comparing convection heaters to convection heaters, there is no
difference in efficiency, 100% of the electrical energy does turn into
heat. The Department of Energy prefers the oil filled units because
their thermal mass makes them a more constant heat source. Their
heating elements cycle less, for what it's worth.

But, radiant heaters should have more apparent efficiency in that they
require less energy to heat just you instead of the entire room plus
you in it.

http://www.energysavers.gov/your_hom...ling/index.cfm...

That said, I have not yet seen an oil filled heater more than a few
years old that did not leak to some degree. Not sure what might happen
if the oil level drops to the point that the heater element starts
boiling it.

Neil S.

Are those things full of used chinese motor oil or something else you
don't want to touch or have catch on fire?
Where do you think they're putting all that pcb tainted oil?

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:44:28 +0000 (UTC), Cydrome Leader
wrote:

nesesu wrote:
On Nov 21, 10:10?am, spamtrap1888 wrote:
On Nov 21, 7:55?am, wrote:

My neighbor was telling me that his oil filled radiator type space
heater is more efficient than the kind with a fan and heating coils. I
told him that there is no difference, that all the electricity
consumed by the heater is converted to heat in the room. Even the
sound made by the fan vibrates the air which heats it up a little. So
if both were operated in a perfectly insulated room and consumed the
same amount of electricity the rooms would heat up the same amount.
Now I'm wondering about real world situations. Some frequencies of
light pass through walls, some through windows, some both, and some
neither. So I suppose the best heater is one that glows in a frequency
range that is completely absorbed by objects (including people) in the
room and reflected by the walls and windows. Are my asumptions
correct? I hope so. Otherwise I'll need to call my neighbor so he can
serve me a little crow.
Eric

There are two kinds of electric space heaters, convection and radiant.
Convection heaters (attempt to) heat the entire room, radiant heaters
heat objects, including you. The oil filled radiator is a convection
heater, as are the heating coil plus fan heaters.

Comparing convection heaters to convection heaters, there is no
difference in efficiency, 100% of the electrical energy does turn into
heat. The Department of Energy prefers the oil filled units because
their thermal mass makes them a more constant heat source. Their
heating elements cycle less, for what it's worth.

But, radiant heaters should have more apparent efficiency in that they
require less energy to heat just you instead of the entire room plus
you in it.

http://www.energysavers.gov/your_hom...ling/index.cfm...

That said, I have not yet seen an oil filled heater more than a few
years old that did not leak to some degree. Not sure what might happen
if the oil level drops to the point that the heater element starts
boiling it.

Neil S.

Are those things full of used chinese motor oil or something else you
don't want to touch or have catch on fire?
Where do you think they're putting all that pcb tainted oil?

Ha, I figured they used all that stuff up in foods and to polish rice by
now.

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 05:18:44 +0000 (UTC), Cydrome Leader
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:44:28 +0000 (UTC), Cydrome Leader
wrote:

nesesu wrote:
On Nov 21, 10:10?am, spamtrap1888 wrote:
On Nov 21, 7:55?am, wrote:

My neighbor was telling me that his oil filled radiator type space
heater is more efficient than the kind with a fan and heating coils. I
told him that there is no difference, that all the electricity
consumed by the heater is converted to heat in the room. Even the
sound made by the fan vibrates the air which heats it up a little. So
if both were operated in a perfectly insulated room and consumed the
same amount of electricity the rooms would heat up the same amount.
Now I'm wondering about real world situations. Some frequencies of
light pass through walls, some through windows, some both, and some
neither. So I suppose the best heater is one that glows in a frequency
range that is completely absorbed by objects (including people) in the
room and reflected by the walls and windows. Are my asumptions
correct? I hope so. Otherwise I'll need to call my neighbor so he can
serve me a little crow.
Eric

There are two kinds of electric space heaters, convection and radiant.
Convection heaters (attempt to) heat the entire room, radiant heaters
heat objects, including you. The oil filled radiator is a convection
heater, as are the heating coil plus fan heaters.

Comparing convection heaters to convection heaters, there is no
difference in efficiency, 100% of the electrical energy does turn into
heat. The Department of Energy prefers the oil filled units because
their thermal mass makes them a more constant heat source. Their
heating elements cycle less, for what it's worth.

But, radiant heaters should have more apparent efficiency in that they
require less energy to heat just you instead of the entire room plus
you in it.

http://www.energysavers.gov/your_hom...ling/index.cfm...

That said, I have not yet seen an oil filled heater more than a few
years old that did not leak to some degree. Not sure what might happen
if the oil level drops to the point that the heater element starts
boiling it.

Neil S.

Are those things full of used chinese motor oil or something else you
don't want to touch or have catch on fire?
Where do you think they're putting all that pcb tainted oil?

Ha, I figured they used all that stuff up in foods and to polish rice by
now.
Duzzat mean I should avoid brown rice?