Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
I may be able to obtain a very small 2-pole 240 vac contactor I need rated
for 50 Hz only. If I install it in N. America, what's the implication? Is the hold-in magnetism less than if it were 60 Hz? Just noisy? Please don't ask or suggest other sources. This is a very specific device and I've not been able to locate other than this. Thanks, Dave |
#2
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
DaveC wrote:
I may be able to obtain a very small 2-pole 240 vac contactor I need rated for 50 Hz only. If I install it in N. America, what's the implication? Is the hold-in magnetism less than if it were 60 Hz? Just noisy? Please don't ask or suggest other sources. This is a very specific device and I've not been able to locate other than this. Plug one into 60 Hz and find out what happens. It will probably work just fine. The Mfr only rated it for 50 because they weren't expecting international sales. Are you allowed to tell us why it has to be such a narrow menu of choices? Thanks, Rich |
#3
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
In article ,
DaveC writes: I may be able to obtain a very small 2-pole 240 vac contactor I need rated for 50 Hz only. If I install it in N. America, what's the implication? Is the hold-in magnetism less than if it were 60 Hz? Just noisy? Yes, the hold-in force will be proportionally less. If the coil impedance was due entirely to the inductance, it would be 50/60ths of the force. However, part of the current limiting is done by the coil resistance, and that won't change so the reduction in hold-in force will actually be less than this. The pull-in force before the magnetic core is closed also depend on the impedance and resistance, but the impedance will be lower, and thus the pull-in force will be reduced by even less. The pull-in force usually has to overcome a faily weak return spring. The hold-in force has to overcome a stronger contact pressure spring. Providing both these conditions are still met, you should be OK. Ideally, you should check that you have a reasonable working margin by testing the coil at lower voltage. If you don't, then the contactor might fail to close properly on minimum supply conditions which could cause it to burn out. I would not expect it to be more noisy if it closes properly. Noise would be an indication that is isn't closing properly. Of course, you void all waranties and certifications by operating it outside of it's specified ratings. The manufacturers advice should be sought, but unless you are buying lots of them, they probably won't commit other than to say it's at your own risk. -- Andrew Gabriel [email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup] |
#4
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
"DaveC" schreef in bericht ... I may be able to obtain a very small 2-pole 240 vac contactor I need rated for 50 Hz only. If I install it in N. America, what's the implication? Is the hold-in magnetism less than if it were 60 Hz? Just noisy? Please don't ask or suggest other sources. This is a very specific device and I've not been able to locate other than this. Thanks, Dave As we have very limited information about this device and its usage, I can only suggest two possible solutions: - The easy one: Just try it out. - Build a piece of electronics that converts your 60Hz to 50Hz. Dimensions of that electronics depend on the required current. petrsu bitbyter |
#6
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:21:56 -0700, DaveC wrote:
I may be able to obtain a very small 2-pole 240 vac contactor I need rated for 50 Hz only. If I install it in N. America, what's the implication? Is the hold-in magnetism less than if it were 60 Hz? Just noisy? Please don't ask or suggest other sources. This is a very specific device and I've not been able to locate other than this. --- Not knowing the specifics about the coil makes predicting what will happen at 60Hz difficult. However, assuming that the inductive reactance and resistance of the coil will remain constant at 50 and 60Hz means that the impedance of the coil at 60Hz will be 1.2 times (60Hz/50Hz) what it is at 50Hz. Consequently, the current in the coil at 60Hz will be about 83% of what it is at 50Hz. If that turns out to be a problem, a higher drive voltage could be used in order to increase the current, namely 1.2 times 240V; 288V. That could easily be accomplished using a transformer to boost the 240V mains to 288V, like this: (View with a fixed pitch font.) 240AC-----+--+ | | oP||S R||E I||Co | | | +----- \ | 288AC TO COIL 240AC-----+-------- / The transformer would need a 240V primary, a 48V secondary, and a VA rating greater than or equal to the contactor coil's rating. If you go he http://www.signaltransformer.com/con...with-isolation and select the input as 115/230 and the output as 48, you'll wind up with 5 transformers rated at from 6 to 400 VA, one of which would surely work. Also, many manufacturers make similar transformers, and Digi-Key and Mouser stock quite a few. -- JF |
#7
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Aug 29, 7:21*am, DaveC wrote:
I may be able to obtain a very small 2-pole 240 vac contactor I need rated for 50 Hz only. If I install it in N. America, what's the implication? Is the hold-in magnetism less than if it were 60 Hz? Just noisy? Please don't ask or suggest other sources. This is a very specific device and I've not been able to locate other than this. Thanks, Dave IME relays pull in at in the region of half rated voltage, and dc ratings are typically about half the voltage of the ac rating, which gives an idea of how much current is determined by L and how much by R. Running your relay on 220v 60Hz it will work fine. Contact closing speed will be slightly slower. Margin will be reduced, but its only being reduced from enormous to slightly less enormous, so its a non- issue except in very unusual situations. The vibration tolerance of the contacts will be little affected in practice; if your environment is harsh enough to shake the relay contact open, then you've got bigger worries than contacts crackling. If instead you meant you would use it on 110v 60Hz, then dont. But you could use diodes to get a higher dc voltage and use that. NT |
#8
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Aug 29, 3:03*pm, John Fields wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:21:56 -0700, DaveC wrote: I may be able to obtain a very small 2-pole 240 vac contactor I need rated for 50 Hz only. If I install it in N. America, what's the implication? Is the hold-in magnetism less than if it were 60 Hz? Just noisy? Please don't ask or suggest other sources. This is a very specific device and I've not been able to locate other than this. Not knowing the specifics about the coil makes predicting what will happen at 60Hz difficult. However, assuming that the inductive reactance and resistance of the coil will remain constant at 50 and 60Hz means that the impedance of the coil at 60Hz will be 1.2 times (60Hz/50Hz) what it is at 50Hz. no, only the L component of the impedance will be 1.2 times as high. Consequently, the current in the coil at 60Hz will be about 83% of what it is at 50Hz. If that turns out to be a problem, a higher drive voltage could be used in order to increase the current, namely 1.2 times 240V; 288V. That could easily be accomplished using a transformer to boost the 240V mains to 288V, like this: (View with a fixed pitch font.) 240AC-----+--+ * * * * * *| *| * * * * * oP||S * * * * * *R||E * * * * * *I||Co * * * * * * *| *| * * * * * *| *+----- \ * * * * * *| * * * * * 288AC TO COIL 240AC-----+-------- / The transformer would need a 240V primary, a 48V secondary, and a VA rating greater than or equal to the contactor coil's rating. these are the kind of 'solutions' that happen when people dont put the relevant numbers to things. |
#9
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Aug 29, 3:25*pm, NT wrote:
On Aug 29, 7:21*am, DaveC wrote: I may be able to obtain a very small 2-pole 240 vac contactor I need rated for 50 Hz only. If I install it in N. America, what's the implication? Is the hold-in magnetism less than if it were 60 Hz? Just noisy? Please don't ask or suggest other sources. This is a very specific device and I've not been able to locate other than this. Thanks, Dave IME relays pull in at in the region of half rated voltage, and dc ratings are typically about half the voltage of the ac rating, which gives an idea of how much current is determined by L and how much by R. Running your relay on 220v 60Hz it will work fine. Contact closing speed will be slightly slower. Margin will be reduced, but its only being reduced from enormous to slightly less enormous, so its a non- issue except in very unusual situations. The vibration tolerance of the contacts will be little affected in practice; if your environment is harsh enough to shake the relay contact open, then you've got bigger worries than contacts crackling. If instead you meant you would use it on 110v 60Hz, then dont. But you could use diodes to get a higher dc voltage and use that. NT Finally someone comes up with the correct answer. |
#10
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:28:53 -0700 (PDT), NT
wrote: On Aug 29, 3:03*pm, John Fields wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:21:56 -0700, DaveC wrote: I may be able to obtain a very small 2-pole 240 vac contactor I need rated for 50 Hz only. If I install it in N. America, what's the implication? Is the hold-in magnetism less than if it were 60 Hz? Just noisy? Please don't ask or suggest other sources. This is a very specific device and I've not been able to locate other than this. Not knowing the specifics about the coil makes predicting what will happen at 60Hz difficult. However, assuming that the inductive reactance and resistance of the coil will remain constant at 50 and 60Hz means that the impedance of the coil at 60Hz will be 1.2 times (60Hz/50Hz) what it is at 50Hz. no, only the L component of the impedance will be 1.2 times as high. --- Well, that's true, so let's just see how far off I was, by using a real-world example. I have an old P&B MR5A here with a 240V 50/60Hz coil. The coil has a resistance of 4800 ohms, and an open inductance of 14.5 henrys, so it has an impedance of 6616 ohms at 50 Hz, and 7270 ohms at 60 Hz. 7270 - 6616 = 1.1, so my error was 1 part in 11, or a little less than 10% I can live with that. --- Consequently, the current in the coil at 60Hz will be about 83% of what it is at 50Hz. If that turns out to be a problem, a higher drive voltage could be used in order to increase the current, namely 1.2 times 240V; 288V. That could easily be accomplished using a transformer to boost the 240V mains to 288V, like this: (View with a fixed pitch font.) 240AC-----+--+ * * * * * *| *| * * * * * oP||S * * * * * *R||E * * * * * *I||Co * * * * * * *| *| * * * * * *| *+----- \ * * * * * *| * * * * * 288AC TO COIL 240AC-----+-------- / The transformer would need a 240V primary, a 48V secondary, and a VA rating greater than or equal to the contactor coil's rating. these are the kind of 'solutions' that happen when people dont put the relevant numbers to things. --- Well, your tone is certainly insulting, while the solution remains valid, but since the voltage into the coil will only be 11% low, the transformer secondary will only have to supply 26V instead of 48. In reality, 24V will be fine. -- JF |
#11
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
"NT" wrote in message ... On Aug 29, 3:03 pm, John Fields wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:21:56 -0700, DaveC wrote: I may be able to obtain a very small 2-pole 240 vac contactor I need rated for 50 Hz only. If I install it in N. America, what's the implication? Is the hold-in magnetism less than if it were 60 Hz? Just noisy? Please don't ask or suggest other sources. This is a very specific device and I've not been able to locate other than this. Not knowing the specifics about the coil makes predicting what will happen at 60Hz difficult. However, assuming that the inductive reactance and resistance of the coil will remain constant at 50 and 60Hz means that the impedance of the coil at 60Hz will be 1.2 times (60Hz/50Hz) what it is at 50Hz. no, only the L component of the impedance will be 1.2 times as high. Consequently, the current in the coil at 60Hz will be about 83% of what it is at 50Hz. If that turns out to be a problem, a higher drive voltage could be used in order to increase the current, namely 1.2 times 240V; 288V. That could easily be accomplished using a transformer to boost the 240V mains to 288V, like this: (View with a fixed pitch font.) 240AC-----+--+ | | oP||S R||E I||Co | | | +----- \ | 288AC TO COIL 240AC-----+-------- / The transformer would need a 240V primary, a 48V secondary, and a VA rating greater than or equal to the contactor coil's rating. these are the kind of 'solutions' that happen when people dont put the relevant numbers to things. ----------------------------------------- I'd have accepted the figures as near enough and the transformer with stacked 48V secondary (wired as an autotransformer) as a convenient way to do the job. Even if the figures aren't correct to the nth decimal place, they're probably within tolerance. |
#12
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
|
#13
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Aug 29, 7:03*pm, John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:28:53 -0700 (PDT), NT wrote: On Aug 29, 3:03*pm, John Fields wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:21:56 -0700, DaveC wrote: I may be able to obtain a very small 2-pole 240 vac contactor I need rated for 50 Hz only. If I install it in N. America, what's the implication? Is the hold-in magnetism less than if it were 60 Hz? Just noisy? Please don't ask or suggest other sources. This is a very specific device and I've not been able to locate other than this. Not knowing the specifics about the coil makes predicting what will happen at 60Hz difficult. However, assuming that the inductive reactance and resistance of the coil will remain constant at 50 and 60Hz means that the impedance of the coil at 60Hz will be 1.2 times (60Hz/50Hz) what it is at 50Hz. no, only the L component of the impedance will be 1.2 times as high. --- Well, that's true, so let's just see how far off I was, by using a real-world example. I have an old P&B MR5A here with a 240V 50/60Hz coil. The coil has a resistance of 4800 ohms, and an open inductance of 14.5 henrys, so it has an impedance of 6616 ohms at 50 Hz, and 7270 ohms at 60 Hz. 7270 - 6616 = 1.1, so my error was 1 part in 11, or a little less than 10% I can live with that. --- Consequently, the current in the coil at 60Hz will be about 83% of what it is at 50Hz. If that turns out to be a problem, a higher drive voltage could be used in order to increase the current, namely 1.2 times 240V; 288V. That could easily be accomplished using a transformer to boost the 240V mains to 288V, like this: (View with a fixed pitch font.) 240AC-----+--+ * * * * * *| *| * * * * * oP||S * * * * * *R||E * * * * * *I||Co * * * * * * *| *| * * * * * *| *+----- \ * * * * * *| * * * * * 288AC TO COIL 240AC-----+-------- / The transformer would need a 240V primary, a 48V secondary, and a VA rating greater than or equal to the contactor coil's rating. these are the kind of 'solutions' that happen when people dont put the relevant numbers to things. Well, your tone is certainly insulting, while the solution remains valid, but since the voltage into the coil will only be 11% low, the transformer secondary will only have to supply 26V instead of 48. In reality, 24V will be fine. The relay has a voltage margin of around 50%, the mains supply wont vary more than 10%, so the transformer is of no use. NT |
#14
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Aug 29, 7:03*pm, John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:28:53 -0700 (PDT), NT wrote: On Aug 29, 3:03*pm, John Fields wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:21:56 -0700, DaveC wrote: I may be able to obtain a very small 2-pole 240 vac contactor I need rated for 50 Hz only. If I install it in N. America, what's the implication? Is the hold-in magnetism less than if it were 60 Hz? Just noisy? Please don't ask or suggest other sources. This is a very specific device and I've not been able to locate other than this. Not knowing the specifics about the coil makes predicting what will happen at 60Hz difficult. However, assuming that the inductive reactance and resistance of the coil will remain constant at 50 and 60Hz means that the impedance of the coil at 60Hz will be 1.2 times (60Hz/50Hz) what it is at 50Hz. no, only the L component of the impedance will be 1.2 times as high. --- Well, that's true, so let's just see how far off I was, by using a real-world example. I have an old P&B MR5A here with a 240V 50/60Hz coil. The coil has a resistance of 4800 ohms, and an open inductance of 14.5 henrys, so it has an impedance of 6616 ohms at 50 Hz, and 7270 ohms at 60 Hz. 7270 - 6616 = 1.1, so my error was 1 part in 11, or a little less than 10% I can live with that. --- Consequently, the current in the coil at 60Hz will be about 83% of what it is at 50Hz. If that turns out to be a problem, a higher drive voltage could be used in order to increase the current, namely 1.2 times 240V; 288V. That could easily be accomplished using a transformer to boost the 240V mains to 288V, like this: (View with a fixed pitch font.) 240AC-----+--+ * * * * * *| *| * * * * * oP||S * * * * * *R||E * * * * * *I||Co * * * * * * *| *| * * * * * *| *+----- \ * * * * * *| * * * * * 288AC TO COIL 240AC-----+-------- / The transformer would need a 240V primary, a 48V secondary, and a VA rating greater than or equal to the contactor coil's rating. these are the kind of 'solutions' that happen when people dont put the relevant numbers to things. Well, your tone is certainly insulting, yes, my apologies. NT |
#15
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Aug 30, 12:44*am, John G wrote:
wrote on 30/08/2011 : Finally someone comes up with the correct answer. And actually practical! Not the wild theoretical solutions that are often way way over the head of the original inquirer or so impractical as to be useless. -- John G.- Hide quoted text - Oh they don't do practical here! It's rare for them to get it right either, this thread is no exception. Some of them even advertise their place of work! I wonder how much business that has cost them. |
#16
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:25:23 -0700 (PDT), the renowned NT
wrote: On Aug 29, 7:21*am, DaveC wrote: I may be able to obtain a very small 2-pole 240 vac contactor I need rated for 50 Hz only. If I install it in N. America, what's the implication? Is the hold-in magnetism less than if it were 60 Hz? Just noisy? Please don't ask or suggest other sources. This is a very specific device and I've not been able to locate other than this. Thanks, Dave IME relays pull in at in the region of half rated voltage, and dc ratings are typically about half the voltage of the ac rating, which gives an idea of how much current is determined by L and how much by R. Running your relay on 220v 60Hz it will work fine. Contact closing speed will be slightly slower. Margin will be reduced, but its only being reduced from enormous to slightly less enormous, so its a non- issue except in very unusual situations. Well, high ambient temperature and low input voltage. May not be that unusual. I've seen it happen more than once, particularly in industrial situations where ambient temperatures can be relatively high. I even had to wire an autotransformer into a domestic elevator control panel because the designer ignored the necessity of allowing for voltage drop when the drive motor started, which caused chattering of the AC contactor even in a climate-controlled 22°C environment. The vibration tolerance of the contacts will be little affected in practice; if your environment is harsh enough to shake the relay contact open, then you've got bigger worries than contacts crackling. Since the OP didn't describe the environment.. it may or may not be. For aircraft work (yes, some is 60Hz) it would be a really good idea to check. If it's sitting on a subpanel with the control cabinet bolted to the floor rather than to an OBI punch press, not a big deal. If instead you meant you would use it on 110v 60Hz, then dont. But you could use diodes to get a higher dc voltage and use that. NT Best regards, Spehro Pefhany -- "it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com |
#17
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
DaveC writes:
I may be able to obtain a very small 2-pole 240 vac contactor I need rated for 50 Hz only. If I install it in N. America, what's the implication? Is the hold-in magnetism less than if it were 60 Hz? Just noisy? It will be happy. If it were a 60Hz on 50, it would not be as happy. -- A host is a host from coast to & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433 |
#18
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
John Fields writes:
I have an old P&B MR5A here with a 240V 50/60Hz coil. The coil has a resistance of 4800 ohms, and an open inductance of 14.5 henrys, so it has an impedance of 6616 ohms at 50 Hz, and 7270 ohms at 60 Hz. What's the inductance while closed? -- A host is a host from coast to & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433 |
#19
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
If instead you meant you would use it on 110v 60Hz, then dont. But you
could use diodes to get a higher dc voltage and use that. NT No, there are models for both 115 and 230 in both 50 and 60 Hz flavors. Here in N. America these are difficult to get so I may have to settle for the 50 Hz models, ordered from Europe. Hence my query. Thanks, Dave |
#20
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
..
Since the OP didn't describe the environment.. it may or may not be. For aircraft work (yes, some is 60Hz) it would be a really good idea to check. If it's sitting on a subpanel with the control cabinet bolted to the floor rather than to an OBI punch press, not a big deal. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany It's usually in old (60's & 70's) V-belt driven letterpress type printing presses (think "clamshell" press). No vibration at the controls. Thanks, Dave |
#21
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
It will be happy. If it were a 60Hz on 50, it would not be as happy.
[David Lesher] Interesting. Good to know. It's stuff like this I learn here that I wouldn't otherwise know. Cheers, Dave |
#22
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 02:58:19 +0000 (UTC), David Lesher
wrote: John Fields writes: I have an old P&B MR5A here with a 240V 50/60Hz coil. The coil has a resistance of 4800 ohms, and an open inductance of 14.5 henrys, so it has an impedance of 6616 ohms at 50 Hz, and 7270 ohms at 60 Hz. What's the inductance while closed? --- 16 henries, but that measurement was made by closing the armature manually. If there's any real interest I can measure it energized. -- JF |
#23
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:25:23 -0700 (PDT), NT
wrote: IME relays pull in at in the region of half rated voltage, and dc ratings are typically about half the voltage of the ac rating, which gives an idea of how much current is determined by L and how much by R. --- IME, most relays (with either AC or DC coils) are guaranteed to pull in at about 80% of their rated coil voltage, so I'm at a loss trying to understand what you meant by: "dc ratings are typically about half of the ac rating." Can you elaborate, please? --- Running your relay on 220v 60Hz it will work fine. --- Knowing nothing about the contactor, other than that it's specified to energize when 240V 50Hz is placed across the coil, your imprimatur is premature. --- Contact closing speed will be slightly slower. Margin will be reduced, but its only being reduced from enormous to slightly less enormous, so its a non-issue except in very unusual situations. --- It seems you've forgotten that when the armature makes, and the magnetic circuit is closed, the inductance of the coil will rise. Such being the case, the current in it will diminish, reducing the hold on the armature and making the contacts more likely to chatter. --- The vibration tolerance of the contacts will be little affected in practice; if your environment is harsh enough to shake the relay contact open, then you've got bigger worries than contacts crackling. If instead you meant you would use it on 110v 60Hz, then dont. But you could use diodes to get a higher dc voltage and use that. --- Interesting conjecture. Something like this? +-----+ 120AC--|~ +|----+ | | | | | [COIL] | | | 120AC--|~ -|----+ +-----+ Since the coil has an impedance of about 6600 ohms at 50Hz, then the current through it will be: E 240V I = --- = ------- = 0.036A = 36mA Z 6600R Then, since the coil has a resistance of 4800 ohms, the DC voltage across it required to force 36mA through it would be: E = IR = 0.036A * 4800R ~ 174V. The peak voltage out of the bridge would be: E = RMS * sqrt(2) = 120 * 1.414 ~ 170V. Pretty close, but at 120Hz, the reactance of the coil would increase, limiting the current to something less than the 36mA needed to close the armature. However, the reactance of the coil will smooth the current and the addition of a capacitor in parallel with the coil will remove some of the ripple and allow the coil to see more nearly pure DC. Here's a simulation showing both ways: Version 4 SHEET 1 880 680 WIRE -144 16 -304 16 WIRE 112 16 -144 16 WIRE 448 16 288 16 WIRE 704 16 448 16 WIRE -304 80 -304 16 WIRE 288 80 288 16 WIRE 448 80 448 64 WIRE 480 80 448 80 WIRE 592 80 560 80 WIRE 704 80 704 64 WIRE 704 80 672 80 WIRE -144 112 -144 80 WIRE -112 112 -144 112 WIRE 0 112 -32 112 WIRE 112 112 112 80 WIRE 112 112 80 112 WIRE -144 160 -144 112 WIRE 112 160 112 112 WIRE 448 160 448 80 WIRE 544 160 448 160 WIRE 704 160 704 80 WIRE 704 160 608 160 WIRE -304 224 -304 160 WIRE -144 224 -304 224 WIRE 112 224 -144 224 WIRE 288 224 288 160 WIRE 448 224 288 224 WIRE 704 224 448 224 WIRE -304 272 -304 224 WIRE 288 272 288 224 FLAG -304 272 0 FLAG 288 272 0 SYMBOL ind -128 128 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 5 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName L1 SYMATTR Value 15 SYMBOL voltage -304 64 R0 WINDOW 3 24 104 Invisible 0 WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName V1 SYMATTR Value SINE(0 170 60) SYMBOL diode -160 16 R0 WINDOW 0 4 -52 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -28 -24 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D1 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 128 80 R180 WINDOW 0 1 119 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -33 84 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D2 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 96 160 R0 WINDOW 0 3 89 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -27 118 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D3 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode -128 224 R180 WINDOW 0 2 -28 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -31 -57 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D4 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL res -16 128 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 0 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName R1 SYMATTR Value 4800 SYMBOL ind 464 96 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 5 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName L2 SYMATTR Value 15 SYMBOL voltage 288 64 R0 WINDOW 3 24 104 Invisible 0 WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName V2 SYMATTR Value SINE(0 170 60) SYMBOL diode 432 16 R0 WINDOW 0 4 -52 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -28 -24 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D5 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 720 80 R180 WINDOW 0 1 119 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -33 84 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D6 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 688 160 R0 WINDOW 0 3 89 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -27 118 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D7 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 464 224 R180 WINDOW 0 2 -28 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -31 -57 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D8 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL res 576 96 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 0 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName R2 SYMATTR Value 4800 SYMBOL cap 608 144 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 0 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 0 SYMATTR InstName C1 SYMATTR Value 10µ TEXT -298 246 Left 0 !.tran .05 If the relay is spec'ed as "must make" at 80% of rated current through the coil (~29mA), then note that with a 10µF cap in parallel with the coil the relay will _always_ make using full-wave rectified 120V 60Hz mains. -- JF |
#24
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Aug 30, 12:39*pm, John Fields
wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:25:23 -0700 (PDT), NT wrote: IME relays pull in at in the region of half rated voltage, and dc ratings are typically about half the voltage of the ac rating, which gives an idea of how much current is determined by L and how much by R. --- IME, most relays (with either AC or DC coils) are guaranteed to pull in at about 80% of their rated coil voltage, so I'm at a loss trying to understand what you meant by: "dc ratings are typically about half of the ac rating." Can you elaborate, please? When relays have dual ratings for ac and dc, its normal for the dc voltage rating to be half the ac voltage rating. Running your relay on 220v 60Hz it will work fine. Knowing nothing about the contactor, other than that it's specified to energize when 240V 50Hz is placed across the coil, your imprimatur is premature. I really dont agree. I do know the basics about relays, and one normally finds that pull-in occurs at around 50% rated voltage. The OP is welcome to test theirs to see if it behaves the usual way. Contact closing speed will be slightly slower. Margin will be reduced, but its only being reduced from enormous to slightly less enormous, so its a non-issue except in very unusual situations. It seems you've forgotten that when the armature makes, and the magnetic circuit is closed, the inductance of the coil will rise. I dont know why you think I've forgotten it. What's relevant here is inductance in the closed position. Such being the case, the current in it will diminish, true with all relays under all ac conditions. Theyre designed to work that way. reducing the hold on the armature and making the contacts more likely to chatter. No, its exactly how theyre designed to operate. The vibration tolerance of the contacts will be little affected in practice; if your environment is harsh enough to shake the relay contact open, then you've got bigger worries than contacts crackling. If instead you meant you would use it on 110v 60Hz, then dont. But you could use diodes to get a higher dc voltage and use that. Interesting conjecture. Where's the conjecture? I get the feeling you could do with bringing your skills up to speed on relays. Something like this? * * * * +-----+ 120AC--|~ * +|----+ * * * * | * * | * *| * * * * * | * * | *[COIL] * * * * | * * | * *| 120AC--|~ * -|----+ * * * * +-----+ That would work. Since the coil has an impedance of about 6600 ohms at 50Hz, then the current through it will be: * * * * * E * * *240V * * *I = --- = ------- = 0.036A = 36mA * * * * * Z * * 6600R Then, since the coil has a resistance of 4800 ohms, the DC voltage across it required to force 36mA through it would be: * * *E = IR = 0.036A * 4800R ~ 174V. You're not saying where you got those figures from. Typically dc rating is half ac rating. The peak voltage out of the bridge would be: * * *E = RMS * sqrt(2) = 120 * 1.414 ~ 170V. Pretty close, but at 120Hz, the reactance of the coil would increase, limiting the current to something less than the 36mA needed to close the armature. The effect of the relay's inductance, when run off a BR, is simply to smooth the current flow somewhat. Mean current remains much the same. So we're looking for 120v rms, which is what the BR would deliver. However, the reactance of the coil will smooth the current and the addition of a capacitor in parallel with the coil will remove some of the ripple and allow the coil to see more nearly pure DC. and overheat the relay by increasing its rms dc voltage to above 120v. Here's a simulation showing both ways: Version 4 SHEET 1 880 680 WIRE -144 16 -304 16 WIRE 112 16 -144 16 WIRE 448 16 288 16 WIRE 704 16 448 16 WIRE -304 80 -304 16 WIRE 288 80 288 16 WIRE 448 80 448 64 WIRE 480 80 448 80 WIRE 592 80 560 80 WIRE 704 80 704 64 WIRE 704 80 672 80 WIRE -144 112 -144 80 WIRE -112 112 -144 112 WIRE 0 112 -32 112 WIRE 112 112 112 80 WIRE 112 112 80 112 WIRE -144 160 -144 112 WIRE 112 160 112 112 WIRE 448 160 448 80 WIRE 544 160 448 160 WIRE 704 160 704 80 WIRE 704 160 608 160 WIRE -304 224 -304 160 WIRE -144 224 -304 224 WIRE 112 224 -144 224 WIRE 288 224 288 160 WIRE 448 224 288 224 WIRE 704 224 448 224 WIRE -304 272 -304 224 WIRE 288 272 288 224 FLAG -304 272 0 FLAG 288 272 0 SYMBOL ind -128 128 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 5 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName L1 SYMATTR Value 15 SYMBOL voltage -304 64 R0 WINDOW 3 24 104 Invisible 0 WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName V1 SYMATTR Value SINE(0 170 60) SYMBOL diode -160 16 R0 WINDOW 0 4 -52 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -28 -24 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D1 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 128 80 R180 WINDOW 0 1 119 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -33 84 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D2 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 96 160 R0 WINDOW 0 3 89 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -27 118 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D3 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode -128 224 R180 WINDOW 0 2 -28 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -31 -57 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D4 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL res -16 128 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 0 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName R1 SYMATTR Value 4800 SYMBOL ind 464 96 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 5 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName L2 SYMATTR Value 15 SYMBOL voltage 288 64 R0 WINDOW 3 24 104 Invisible 0 WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName V2 SYMATTR Value SINE(0 170 60) SYMBOL diode 432 16 R0 WINDOW 0 4 -52 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -28 -24 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D5 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 720 80 R180 WINDOW 0 1 119 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -33 84 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D6 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 688 160 R0 WINDOW 0 3 89 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -27 118 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D7 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 464 224 R180 WINDOW 0 2 -28 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -31 -57 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D8 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL res 576 96 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 0 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName R2 SYMATTR Value 4800 SYMBOL cap 608 144 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 0 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 0 SYMATTR InstName C1 SYMATTR Value 10µ TEXT -298 246 Left 0 !.tran .05 If the relay is spec'ed as "must make" at 80% of rated current through the coil (~29mA), then note that with a 10µF cap in parallel with the coil the relay will _always_ make using full-wave rectified 120V 60Hz mains. * NT |
#25
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
"NT" schreef in bericht ... On Aug 29, 7:03 pm, John Fields wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:28:53 -0700 (PDT), NT wrote: On Aug 29, 3:03 pm, John Fields wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:21:56 -0700, DaveC wrote: I may be able to obtain a very small 2-pole 240 vac contactor I need rated for 50 Hz only. If I install it in N. America, what's the implication? Is the hold-in magnetism less than if it were 60 Hz? Just noisy? Please don't ask or suggest other sources. This is a very specific device and I've not been able to locate other than this. Not knowing the specifics about the coil makes predicting what will happen at 60Hz difficult. However, assuming that the inductive reactance and resistance of the coil will remain constant at 50 and 60Hz means that the impedance of the coil at 60Hz will be 1.2 times (60Hz/50Hz) what it is at 50Hz. no, only the L component of the impedance will be 1.2 times as high. --- Well, that's true, so let's just see how far off I was, by using a real-world example. I have an old P&B MR5A here with a 240V 50/60Hz coil. The coil has a resistance of 4800 ohms, and an open inductance of 14.5 henrys, so it has an impedance of 6616 ohms at 50 Hz, and 7270 ohms at 60 Hz. 7270 - 6616 = 1.1, so my error was 1 part in 11, or a little less than 10% I can live with that. --- Consequently, the current in the coil at 60Hz will be about 83% of what it is at 50Hz. If that turns out to be a problem, a higher drive voltage could be used in order to increase the current, namely 1.2 times 240V; 288V. That could easily be accomplished using a transformer to boost the 240V mains to 288V, like this: (View with a fixed pitch font.) 240AC-----+--+ | | oP||S R||E I||Co | | | +----- \ | 288AC TO COIL 240AC-----+-------- / The transformer would need a 240V primary, a 48V secondary, and a VA rating greater than or equal to the contactor coil's rating. these are the kind of 'solutions' that happen when people dont put the relevant numbers to things. Well, your tone is certainly insulting, while the solution remains valid, but since the voltage into the coil will only be 11% low, the transformer secondary will only have to supply 26V instead of 48. In reality, 24V will be fine. | | The relay has a voltage margin of around 50%, the mains supply wont | vary more than 10%, so the transformer is of no use. | | |NT | "The relay has a voltage margin of around 50%" How do you know? FAIK the op did not supply this numbers. petrus bitbyter |
#26
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
DaveC writes:
It will be happy. If it were a 60Hz on 50, it would not be as happy. [David Lesher] Interesting. Good to know. It's stuff like this I learn here that I wouldn't otherwise know. Well anytime you run transformers {Be they two fixed windings, or one fixed and one rotating aka motor, or one fixed & one sliding aka solenoid or relay....} on LESS than design frequency, worry. Lower frequencies need more iron. I'm not sure the slightly less pull-in power will be relevent but it's possible. If you do pursue the "make DC and use that..." approach; don't forget you need to limit the holdin current. One technique is a cap in parallel with a resistor. -- A host is a host from coast to & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433 |
#27
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On 8/30/2011 10:38 AM, David Lesher wrote:
Well anytime you run transformers {Be they two fixed windings, or one fixed and one rotating aka motor, or one fixed& one sliding aka solenoid or relay....} on LESS than design frequency, worry. Lower frequencies need more iron. Hasn't anybody read the original question? He wants to know if a 50 Hz relay coil will work at 60 Hz. Jeff -- "Everything from Crackers to Coffins" |
#28
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
Jeffrey Angus wrote:
On 8/30/2011 10:38 AM, David Lesher wrote: Well anytime you run transformers {Be they two fixed windings, or one fixed and one rotating aka motor, or one fixed& one sliding aka solenoid or relay....} on LESS than design frequency, worry. Lower frequencies need more iron. Hasn't anybody read the original question? Yeah. It was answered some days ago. Guess you gotta be quick. ;-) Cheers! Rich |
#29
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
John Fields wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 02:58:19 +0000 (UTC), David Lesher John Fields writes: I have an old P&B MR5A here with a 240V 50/60Hz coil. The coil has a resistance of 4800 ohms, and an open inductance of 14.5 henrys, so it has an impedance of 6616 ohms at 50 Hz, and 7270 ohms at 60 Hz. What's the inductance while closed? 16 henries, but that measurement was made by closing the armature manually. If there's any real interest I can measure it energized. Well, I guess that depends on what you mean by "real interest" - I'd be interested in seeing your experimental results, but that's just because I like seeing experimental results. ;-) Cheers! Rich |
#30
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 10:55:10 -0500, Jeffrey Angus
wrote: Hasn't anybody read the original question? Nope. With 5 groups in the distribution, I just assumed the original question to not be worth reading. Besides, some of the groups appear to be write-only, where nobody (including me) reads the original question. He wants to know if a 50 Hz relay coil will work at 60 Hz. Well, if it's too much of a risk trying it and checking if it will explode, there are plenty of 50 to/from 60 Hz converters available for a small fortune: http://www.50hz.com/Rotary/rotary.htm If sufficiently low power, one could probably just build a converter from two motors and a suitable gearbox. Jeff (part of the problem) L. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#31
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
Jeffrey Angus writes:
On 8/30/2011 10:38 AM, David Lesher wrote: Well anytime you run transformers {Be they two fixed windings, or one fixed and one rotating aka motor, or one fixed& one sliding aka solenoid or relay....} on LESS than design frequency, worry. Lower frequencies need more iron. Hasn't anybody read the original question? I have. He wants to know if a 50 Hz relay coil will work at 60 Hz. And that's my point; if it were the other way, he SHOULD worry. -- A host is a host from coast to & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433 |
#32
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 05:11:20 -0700 (PDT), NT
wrote: On Aug 30, 12:39*pm, John Fields wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:25:23 -0700 (PDT), NT wrote: IME relays pull in at in the region of half rated voltage, and dc ratings are typically about half the voltage of the ac rating, which gives an idea of how much current is determined by L and how much by R. --- IME, most relays (with either AC or DC coils) are guaranteed to pull in at about 80% of their rated coil voltage, so I'm at a loss trying to understand what you meant by: "dc ratings are typically about half of the ac rating." Can you elaborate, please? When relays have dual ratings for ac and dc, its normal for the dc voltage rating to be half the ac voltage rating. Running your relay on 220v 60Hz it will work fine. Knowing nothing about the contactor, other than that it's specified to energize when 240V 50Hz is placed across the coil, your imprimatur is premature. I really dont agree. I do know the basics about relays, and one normally finds that pull-in occurs at around 50% rated voltage. The OP is welcome to test theirs to see if it behaves the usual way. Contact closing speed will be slightly slower. Margin will be reduced, but its only being reduced from enormous to slightly less enormous, so its a non-issue except in very unusual situations. It seems you've forgotten that when the armature makes, and the magnetic circuit is closed, the inductance of the coil will rise. I dont know why you think I've forgotten it. What's relevant here is inductance in the closed position. --- I disagree. Since the relay is open when power is applied to the coil, it's the open inductance (and the resistance, of course) which will determine how much current will flow through the coil, that current being what generates the magnetic field to start the armature on its way. Then when the relay closes, the closed inductance comes into play and holds the armature in place until the current through the coil is reduced to a point where the armature's return spring overcomes the weakened magnetic field, allowing the armature to open. --- Such being the case, the current in it will diminish, true with all relays under all ac conditions. Theyre designed to work that way. reducing the hold on the armature and making the contacts more likely to chatter. No, its exactly how theyre designed to operate. The vibration tolerance of the contacts will be little affected in practice; if your environment is harsh enough to shake the relay contact open, then you've got bigger worries than contacts crackling. If instead you meant you would use it on 110v 60Hz, then dont. But you could use diodes to get a higher dc voltage and use that. Interesting conjecture. Where's the conjecture? I get the feeling you could do with bringing your skills up to speed on relays. --- Perhaps. --- Something like this? * * * * +-----+ 120AC--|~ * +|----+ * * * * | * * | * *| * * * * * | * * | *[COIL] * * * * | * * | * *| 120AC--|~ * -|----+ * * * * +-----+ That would work. --- Not in all cases, certainly. --- Since the coil has an impedance of about 6600 ohms at 50Hz, then the current through it will be: * * * * * E * * *240V * * *I = --- = ------- = 0.036A = 36mA * * * * * Z * * 6600R Then, since the coil has a resistance of 4800 ohms, the DC voltage across it required to force 36mA through it would be: * * *E = IR = 0.036A * 4800R ~ 174V. You're not saying where you got those figures from. --- The P&B MR5A I talked about in an earlier post, which has a 240V 50/60Hz coil, a coil resistance of 4800 ohms, an impedance of ~ 6600 ohms at 50 Hz, an open inductance of 14.5 henrys, and a closed inductance of 16 henrys --- Typically dc rating is half ac rating. --- But I don't think "typical" is what we're after since we want something that will _always_ work. Since current is what's doing the work, my real-world example shows that 240V 50 Hz RMS impressed across a load with an impedance of 6600 ohms will force 36mA RMS of current through the load. Then, since it's current that's doing the work, 36mA of DC through the coil should accomplish the same thing. --- The peak voltage out of the bridge would be: * * *E = RMS * sqrt(2) = 120 * 1.414 ~ 170V. Pretty close, but at 120Hz, the reactance of the coil would increase, limiting the current to something less than the 36mA needed to close the armature. The effect of the relay's inductance, when run off a BR, is simply to smooth the current flow somewhat. --- Yeah, I know, said so earlier, and posted a simulation showing the ripple. --- Mean current remains much the same. So we're looking for 120v rms, which is what the BR would deliver. --- But, what it won't deliver is the worst-case voltage required over the interval required to guarantee the armature will close. --- However, the reactance of the coil will smooth the current and the addition of a capacitor in parallel with the coil will remove some of the ripple and allow the coil to see more nearly pure DC. and overheat the relay by increasing its rms dc voltage to above 120v. --- There's no such thing as "rms dc voltage", and if the relay is designed to operate on AC with a certain RMS current in its coil, how can it possibly overheat if that current is DC? --- Here's a simulation showing both ways: Version 4 SHEET 1 880 680 WIRE -144 16 -304 16 WIRE 112 16 -144 16 WIRE 448 16 288 16 WIRE 704 16 448 16 WIRE -304 80 -304 16 WIRE 288 80 288 16 WIRE 448 80 448 64 WIRE 480 80 448 80 WIRE 592 80 560 80 WIRE 704 80 704 64 WIRE 704 80 672 80 WIRE -144 112 -144 80 WIRE -112 112 -144 112 WIRE 0 112 -32 112 WIRE 112 112 112 80 WIRE 112 112 80 112 WIRE -144 160 -144 112 WIRE 112 160 112 112 WIRE 448 160 448 80 WIRE 544 160 448 160 WIRE 704 160 704 80 WIRE 704 160 608 160 WIRE -304 224 -304 160 WIRE -144 224 -304 224 WIRE 112 224 -144 224 WIRE 288 224 288 160 WIRE 448 224 288 224 WIRE 704 224 448 224 WIRE -304 272 -304 224 WIRE 288 272 288 224 FLAG -304 272 0 FLAG 288 272 0 SYMBOL ind -128 128 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 5 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName L1 SYMATTR Value 15 SYMBOL voltage -304 64 R0 WINDOW 3 24 104 Invisible 0 WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName V1 SYMATTR Value SINE(0 170 60) SYMBOL diode -160 16 R0 WINDOW 0 4 -52 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -28 -24 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D1 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 128 80 R180 WINDOW 0 1 119 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -33 84 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D2 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 96 160 R0 WINDOW 0 3 89 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -27 118 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D3 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode -128 224 R180 WINDOW 0 2 -28 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -31 -57 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D4 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL res -16 128 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 0 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName R1 SYMATTR Value 4800 SYMBOL ind 464 96 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 5 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName L2 SYMATTR Value 15 SYMBOL voltage 288 64 R0 WINDOW 3 24 104 Invisible 0 WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName V2 SYMATTR Value SINE(0 170 60) SYMBOL diode 432 16 R0 WINDOW 0 4 -52 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -28 -24 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D5 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 720 80 R180 WINDOW 0 1 119 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -33 84 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D6 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 688 160 R0 WINDOW 0 3 89 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -27 118 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D7 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 464 224 R180 WINDOW 0 2 -28 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -31 -57 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D8 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL res 576 96 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 0 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName R2 SYMATTR Value 4800 SYMBOL cap 608 144 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 0 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 0 SYMATTR InstName C1 SYMATTR Value 10µ TEXT -298 246 Left 0 !.tran .05 If the relay is spec'ed as "must make" at 80% of rated current through the coil (~29mA), then note that with a 10µF cap in parallel with the coil the relay will _always_ make using full-wave rectified 120V 60Hz mains. * -- JF |
#33
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Aug 30, 4:35*pm, "petrus bitbyter"
wrote: "NT" schreef in ... On Aug 29, 7:03 pm, John Fields wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:28:53 -0700 (PDT), NT wrote: On Aug 29, 3:03 pm, John Fields wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:21:56 -0700, DaveC wrote: I may be able to obtain a very small 2-pole 240 vac contactor I need rated for 50 Hz only. If I install it in N. America, what's the implication? Is the hold-in magnetism less than if it were 60 Hz? Just noisy? Please don't ask or suggest other sources. This is a very specific device and I've not been able to locate other than this. Not knowing the specifics about the coil makes predicting what will happen at 60Hz difficult. However, assuming that the inductive reactance and resistance of the coil will remain constant at 50 and 60Hz means that the impedance of the coil at 60Hz will be 1.2 times (60Hz/50Hz) what it is at 50Hz. no, only the L component of the impedance will be 1.2 times as high. --- Well, that's true, so let's just see how far off I was, by using a real-world example. I have an old P&B MR5A here with a 240V 50/60Hz coil. The coil has a resistance of 4800 ohms, and an open inductance of 14.5 henrys, so it has an impedance of 6616 ohms at 50 Hz, and 7270 ohms at 60 Hz. 7270 - 6616 = 1.1, so my error was 1 part in 11, or a little less than 10% I can live with that. --- Consequently, the current in the coil at 60Hz will be about 83% of what it is at 50Hz. If that turns out to be a problem, a higher drive voltage could be used in order to increase the current, namely 1.2 times 240V; 288V. That could easily be accomplished using a transformer to boost the 240V mains to 288V, like this: (View with a fixed pitch font.) 240AC-----+--+ | | oP||S R||E I||Co | | | +----- \ | 288AC TO COIL 240AC-----+-------- / The transformer would need a 240V primary, a 48V secondary, and a VA rating greater than or equal to the contactor coil's rating. these are the kind of 'solutions' that happen when people dont put the relevant numbers to things. Well, your tone is certainly insulting, while the solution remains valid, but since the voltage into the coil will only be 11% low, the transformer secondary will only have to supply 26V instead of 48. In reality, 24V will be fine. | | The relay has a voltage margin of around 50%, the mains supply wont | vary more than 10%, so the transformer is of no use. | | |NT | "The relay has a voltage margin of around 50%" How do you know? FAIK the op did not supply this numbers. petrus bitbyter experience with various relays NT |
#34
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Aug 31, 1:36*am, John Fields wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 05:11:20 -0700 (PDT), NT wrote: On Aug 30, 12:39*pm, John Fields wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:25:23 -0700 (PDT), NT wrote: IME relays pull in at in the region of half rated voltage, and dc ratings are typically about half the voltage of the ac rating, which gives an idea of how much current is determined by L and how much by R. --- IME, most relays (with either AC or DC coils) are guaranteed to pull in at about 80% of their rated coil voltage, so I'm at a loss trying to understand what you meant by: "dc ratings are typically about half of the ac rating." Can you elaborate, please? When relays have dual ratings for ac and dc, its normal for the dc voltage rating to be half the ac voltage rating. Running your relay on 220v 60Hz it will work fine. Knowing nothing about the contactor, other than that it's specified to energize when 240V 50Hz is placed across the coil, your imprimatur is premature. I really dont agree. I do know the basics about relays, and one normally finds that pull-in occurs at around 50% rated voltage. The OP is welcome to test theirs to see if it behaves the usual way. Contact closing speed will be slightly slower. Margin will be reduced, but its only being reduced from enormous to slightly less enormous, so its a non-issue except in very unusual situations. It seems you've forgotten that when the armature makes, and the magnetic circuit is closed, the inductance of the coil will rise. I dont know why you think I've forgotten it. What's relevant here is inductance in the closed position. I disagree. Since the relay is open when power is applied to the coil, it's the open inductance (and the resistance, of course) which will determine how much current will flow through the coil, that current being what generates the magnetic field to start the armature on its way. yup Then when the relay closes, the closed inductance comes into play and holds the armature in place until the current through the coil is reduced to a point where the armature's return spring overcomes the weakened magnetic field, allowing the armature to open. yes. I guess in theory both matter, one determines closing behaviour, the other ensures the relay doesnt overheat. In practice though the margins are very large, and its normal to simply fix holding current to suit the relay, and not worry about closing current, which will be so close as to make no real world difference in all but exceptional circumstances. But yes, we can consider both if need be. Such being the case, the current in it will diminish, true with all relays under all ac conditions. Theyre designed to work that way. reducing the hold on the armature and making the contacts more likely to chatter. No, its exactly how theyre designed to operate. The vibration tolerance of the contacts will be little affected in practice; if your environment is harsh enough to shake the relay contact open, then you've got bigger worries than contacts crackling. If instead you meant you would use it on 110v 60Hz, then dont. But you could use diodes to get a higher dc voltage and use that. Interesting conjecture. Where's the conjecture? I get the feeling you could do with bringing your skills up to speed on relays. --- Perhaps. --- Something like this? * * * * +-----+ 120AC--|~ * +|----+ * * * * | * * | * *| * * * * * | * * | *[COIL] * * * * | * * | * *| 120AC--|~ * -|----+ * * * * +-----+ That would work. Not in all cases, certainly. I'd like to see you find one single electromechanical relay that wont work for. Since the coil has an impedance of about 6600 ohms at 50Hz, then the current through it will be: * * * * * E * * *240V * * *I = --- = ------- = 0.036A = 36mA * * * * * Z * * 6600R Then, since the coil has a resistance of 4800 ohms, the DC voltage across it required to force 36mA through it would be: * * *E = IR = 0.036A * 4800R ~ 174V. You're not saying where you got those figures from. --- The P&B MR5A I talked about in an earlier post, which has a 240V 50/60Hz coil, a coil resistance of 4800 ohms, an impedance of ~ 6600 ohms at 50 Hz, an open inductance of 14.5 henrys, and a closed inductance of 16 henrys Typically dc rating is half ac rating. But I don't think "typical" is what we're after since we want something that will _always_ work. This 2:1 ratio normally is good for relays, and the OP can check his to see if it conforms to that. If it does, the thing will always work when subject to this formula. FWIW, when ac is applied you get puling force plus vibration. With dc there is no vibration component when its closed, so less holding current is needed. How much less I've really no idea. Some relays are fast movers capable of 100s of Hz, some are slow. Ac relays can always work on dc, but dc ones often dont work ok on ac. Since current is what's doing the work, my real-world example shows that 240V 50 Hz RMS impressed across a load with an impedance of 6600 ohms will force 36mA RMS of current through the load. Then, since it's current that's doing the work, 36mA of DC through the coil should accomplish the same thing. --- The peak voltage out of the bridge would be: * * *E = RMS * sqrt(2) = 120 * 1.414 ~ 170V. Pretty close, but at 120Hz, the reactance of the coil would increase, limiting the current to something less than the 36mA needed to close the armature. The effect of the relay's inductance, when run off a BR, is simply to smooth the current flow somewhat. --- Yeah, I know, said so earlier, and posted a simulation showing the ripple. --- Mean current remains much the same. So we're looking for 120v rms, which is what the BR would deliver. --- But, what it won't deliver is the worst-case voltage required over the interval required to guarantee the armature will close. Re ripple: If the relay is designed to run on ac 50 or 60Hz, its designed and rated to live with the current and force variations that go along with that, 100-120 times a second. Running it on rectified mains will only serve to reduce the current variations through the cycle, it wont cause the relay any issues. Re rms voltage: With my 2:1 figures, rectified 120v is spot on. With your 174v figure, 120v is well within the 50% margin. Of course for some uses that margin would need to be confirmed by testing before production, and reconfirmed if a new relay type is used. Or as you say, a cap could be added. Or for off brand consumer goods, in it goes, relays are good for it. However, the reactance of the coil will smooth the current and the addition of a capacitor in parallel with the coil will remove some of the ripple and allow the coil to see more nearly pure DC. and overheat the relay by increasing its rms dc voltage to above 120v. There's no such thing as "rms dc voltage", RMS can be applied to any and every waveform, dc included. Its very relevant when working with rectified ac, semismoothed or unsmoothed. and if the relay is designed to operate on AC with a certain RMS current in its coil, how can it possibly overheat if that current is DC? With the same current it wont, with higher curren ti will. IIRC you proposed using 174v rms, that would be ok on your specific relay, but not a universal solution. NT Here's a simulation showing both ways: Version 4 SHEET 1 880 680 WIRE -144 16 -304 16 WIRE 112 16 -144 16 WIRE 448 16 288 16 WIRE 704 16 448 16 WIRE -304 80 -304 16 WIRE 288 80 288 16 WIRE 448 80 448 64 WIRE 480 80 448 80 WIRE 592 80 560 80 WIRE 704 80 704 64 WIRE 704 80 672 80 WIRE -144 112 -144 80 WIRE -112 112 -144 112 WIRE 0 112 -32 112 WIRE 112 112 112 80 WIRE 112 112 80 112 WIRE -144 160 -144 112 WIRE 112 160 112 112 WIRE 448 160 448 80 WIRE 544 160 448 160 WIRE 704 160 704 80 WIRE 704 160 608 160 WIRE -304 224 -304 160 WIRE -144 224 -304 224 WIRE 112 224 -144 224 WIRE 288 224 288 160 WIRE 448 224 288 224 WIRE 704 224 448 224 WIRE -304 272 -304 224 WIRE 288 272 288 224 FLAG -304 272 0 FLAG 288 272 0 SYMBOL ind -128 128 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 5 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName L1 SYMATTR Value 15 SYMBOL voltage -304 64 R0 WINDOW 3 24 104 Invisible 0 WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName V1 SYMATTR Value SINE(0 170 60) SYMBOL diode -160 16 R0 WINDOW 0 4 -52 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -28 -24 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D1 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 128 80 R180 WINDOW 0 1 119 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -33 84 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D2 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 96 160 R0 WINDOW 0 3 89 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -27 118 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D3 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode -128 224 R180 WINDOW 0 2 -28 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -31 -57 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D4 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL res -16 128 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 0 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName R1 SYMATTR Value 4800 SYMBOL ind 464 96 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 5 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName L2 SYMATTR Value 15 SYMBOL voltage 288 64 R0 WINDOW 3 24 104 Invisible 0 WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName V2 SYMATTR Value SINE(0 170 60) SYMBOL diode 432 16 R0 WINDOW 0 4 -52 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -28 -24 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D5 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 720 80 R180 WINDOW 0 1 119 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -33 84 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D6 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 688 160 R0 WINDOW 0 3 89 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -27 118 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D7 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 464 224 R180 WINDOW 0 2 -28 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -31 -57 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D8 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL res 576 96 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 0 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName R2 SYMATTR Value 4800 SYMBOL cap 608 144 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 0 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 0 SYMATTR InstName C1 SYMATTR Value 10µ TEXT -298 246 Left 0 !.tran .05 If the relay is spec'ed as "must make" at 80% of rated current through the coil (~29mA), then note that with a 10µF cap in parallel with the coil the relay will _always_ make using full-wave rectified 120V 60Hz mains. * -- JF |
#35
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Aug 31, 12:38*pm, NT wrote:
On Aug 31, 1:36*am, John Fields wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 05:11:20 -0700 (PDT), NT wrote: On Aug 30, 12:39*pm, John Fields wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:25:23 -0700 (PDT), NT wrote: IME relays pull in at in the region of half rated voltage, and dc ratings are typically about half the voltage of the ac rating, which gives an idea of how much current is determined by L and how much by R. --- IME, most relays (with either AC or DC coils) are guaranteed to pull in at about 80% of their rated coil voltage, so I'm at a loss trying to understand what you meant by: "dc ratings are typically about half of the ac rating." Can you elaborate, please? When relays have dual ratings for ac and dc, its normal for the dc voltage rating to be half the ac voltage rating. Running your relay on 220v 60Hz it will work fine. Knowing nothing about the contactor, other than that it's specified to energize when 240V 50Hz is placed across the coil, your imprimatur is premature. I really dont agree. I do know the basics about relays, and one normally finds that pull-in occurs at around 50% rated voltage. The OP is welcome to test theirs to see if it behaves the usual way. Contact closing speed will be slightly slower. Margin will be reduced, but its only being reduced from enormous to slightly less enormous, so its a non-issue except in very unusual situations. It seems you've forgotten that when the armature makes, and the magnetic circuit is closed, the inductance of the coil will rise. I dont know why you think I've forgotten it. What's relevant here is inductance in the closed position. I disagree. Since the relay is open when power is applied to the coil, it's the open inductance (and the resistance, of course) which will determine how much current will flow through the coil, that current being what generates the magnetic field to start the armature on its way. yup Then when the relay closes, the closed inductance comes into play and holds the armature in place until the current through the coil is reduced to a point where the armature's return spring overcomes the weakened magnetic field, allowing the armature to open. yes. I guess in theory both matter, one determines closing behaviour, the other ensures the relay doesnt overheat. In practice though the margins are very large, and its normal to simply fix holding current to suit the relay, and not worry about closing current, which will be so close as to make no real world difference in all but exceptional circumstances. But yes, we can consider both if need be. Such being the case, the current in it will diminish, true with all relays under all ac conditions. Theyre designed to work that way. reducing the hold on the armature and making the contacts more likely to chatter. No, its exactly how theyre designed to operate. The vibration tolerance of the contacts will be little affected in practice; if your environment is harsh enough to shake the relay contact open, then you've got bigger worries than contacts crackling. If instead you meant you would use it on 110v 60Hz, then dont. But you could use diodes to get a higher dc voltage and use that. Interesting conjecture. Where's the conjecture? I get the feeling you could do with bringing your skills up to speed on relays. --- Perhaps. --- Something like this? * * * * +-----+ 120AC--|~ * +|----+ * * * * | * * | * *| * * * * * | * * | *[COIL] * * * * | * * | * *| 120AC--|~ * -|----+ * * * * +-----+ That would work. Not in all cases, certainly. I'd like to see you find one single electromechanical relay that wont work for. Since the coil has an impedance of about 6600 ohms at 50Hz, then the current through it will be: * * * * * E * * *240V * * *I = --- = ------- = 0.036A = 36mA * * * * * Z * * 6600R Then, since the coil has a resistance of 4800 ohms, the DC voltage across it required to force 36mA through it would be: * * *E = IR = 0.036A * 4800R ~ 174V. You're not saying where you got those figures from. --- The P&B MR5A I talked about in an earlier post, which has a 240V 50/60Hz coil, a coil resistance of 4800 ohms, an impedance of ~ 6600 ohms at 50 Hz, an open inductance of 14.5 henrys, and a closed inductance of 16 henrys Typically dc rating is half ac rating. But I don't think "typical" is what we're after since we want something that will _always_ work. This 2:1 ratio normally is good for relays, and the OP can check his to see if it conforms to that. If it does, the thing will always work when subject to this formula. FWIW, when ac is applied you get puling force plus vibration. With dc there is no vibration component when its closed, so less holding current is needed. How much less I've really no idea. Some relays are fast movers capable of 100s of Hz, some are slow. Ac relays can always work on dc, but dc ones often dont work ok on ac. Since current is what's doing the work, my real-world example shows that 240V 50 Hz RMS impressed across a load with an impedance of 6600 ohms will force 36mA RMS of current through the load. Then, since it's current that's doing the work, 36mA of DC through the coil should accomplish the same thing. --- The peak voltage out of the bridge would be: * * *E = RMS * sqrt(2) = 120 * 1.414 ~ 170V. Pretty close, but at 120Hz, the reactance of the coil would increase, limiting the current to something less than the 36mA needed to close the armature. The effect of the relay's inductance, when run off a BR, is simply to smooth the current flow somewhat. --- Yeah, I know, said so earlier, and posted a simulation showing the ripple. --- Mean current remains much the same. So we're looking for 120v rms, which is what the BR would deliver. --- But, what it won't deliver is the worst-case voltage required over the interval required to guarantee the armature will close. Re ripple: If the relay is designed to run on ac 50 or 60Hz, its designed and rated to live with the current and force variations that go along with that, 100-120 times a second. Running it on rectified mains will only serve to reduce the current variations through the cycle, it wont cause the relay any issues. Re rms voltage: With my 2:1 figures, rectified 120v is spot on. With your 174v figure, 120v is well within the 50% margin. Of course for some uses that margin would need to be confirmed by testing before production, and reconfirmed if a new relay type is used. Or as you say, a cap could be added. Or for off brand consumer goods, in it goes, relays are good for it. However, the reactance of the coil will smooth the current and the addition of a capacitor in parallel with the coil will remove some of the ripple and allow the coil to see more nearly pure DC. and overheat the relay by increasing its rms dc voltage to above 120v. There's no such thing as "rms dc voltage", RMS can be applied to any and every waveform, dc included. Its very relevant when working with rectified ac, semismoothed or unsmoothed. and if the relay is designed to operate on AC with a certain RMS current in its coil, how can it possibly overheat if that current is DC? With the same current it wont, with higher curren ti will. IIRC you proposed using 174v rms, that would be ok on your specific relay, but not a universal solution. NT Here's a simulation showing both ways: Version 4 SHEET1 880 680 WIRE -144 16 -304 16 WIRE112 16 -144 16 WIRE448 16 288 16 WIRE704 16 448 16 WIRE -304 80 -304 16 WIRE288 80 288 16 WIRE448 80 448 64 WIRE480 80 448 80 WIRE592 80 560 80 WIRE704 80 704 64 WIRE704 80 672 80 WIRE -144 112 -144 80 WIRE -112 112 -144 112 WIRE0 112 -32 112 WIRE112 112 112 80 WIRE112 112 80 112 WIRE -144 160 -144 112 WIRE112 160 112 112 WIRE448 160 448 80 WIRE544 160 448 160 WIRE704 160 704 80 WIRE704 160 608 160 WIRE -304 224 -304 160 WIRE -144 224 -304 224 WIRE112 224 -144 224 WIRE288 224 288 160 WIRE448 224 288 224 WIRE704 224 448 224 WIRE -304 272 -304 224 WIRE288 272 288 224 FLAG -304 272 0 FLAG288 272 0 SYMBOL ind -128 128 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 5 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName L1 SYMATTR Value 15 SYMBOL voltage -304 64 R0 WINDOW 3 24 104 Invisible 0 WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName V1 SYMATTR Value SINE(0 170 60) SYMBOL diode -160 16 R0 WINDOW 0 4 -52 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -28 -24 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D1 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 128 80 R180 WINDOW 0 1 119 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -33 84 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D2 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode 96 160 R0 WINDOW 0 3 89 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -27 118 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D3 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL diode -128 224 R180 WINDOW 0 2 -28 Left 0 WINDOW 3 -31 -57 Left 0 SYMATTR InstName D4 SYMATTR Value MUR460 SYMBOL res -16 128 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 0 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName R1 SYMATTR Value 4800 SYMBOL ind 464 96 R270 WINDOW 0 32 56 VTop 0 WINDOW 3 5 56 VBottom 0 SYMATTR InstName L2 SYMATTR Value 15 SYMBOL voltage 288 64 R0 WINDOW 3 24 104 Invisible 0... read more » YES A-NT-MAN BUT THE RMS REFERS TO THE AC WAVEFORM NOT THE DC OUTPUT. HENCE THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS RMS DC VOLTAGE. PATECUM TGITM |
#36
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On 8/31/2011 1:06 PM, The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
YES A-NT-MAN BUT THE RMS REFERS TO THE AC WAVEFORM NOT THE DC OUTPUT. HENCE THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS RMS DC VOLTAGE. PATECUM TGITM Actually, RMS DC voltage is a redundant expression since DC is RMS. |
#37
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Aug 31, 7:11*pm, John S wrote:
On 8/31/2011 1:06 PM, The Ghost In The Machine wrote: YES A-NT-MAN BUT THE RMS REFERS TO THE AC WAVEFORM NOT THE DC OUTPUT. HENCE THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS RMS DC VOLTAGE. PATECUM TGITM Root Mean Square does not imply an ac waveform, its jsut most commonly used for ac waveforms. Every stable waveform has an rms value, even perfect dc. Actually, RMS DC voltage is a redundant expression since DC is RMS. I realised it was perhaps not the best phrasing. But... would the dc component be the average V or the rms? NT |
#38
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On 8/31/2011 2:33 PM, NT wrote:
I realised it was perhaps not the best phrasing. But... would the dc component be the average V or the rms? DC would be the RMS value. Because, RMS means "This is what the DC value would be." Jeff -- "Everything from Crackers to Coffins" |
#39
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
"Jeffrey Angus" wrote in message ... On 8/31/2011 2:33 PM, NT wrote: I realised it was perhaps not the best phrasing. But... would the dc component be the average V or the rms? DC would be the RMS value. Because, RMS means "This is what the DC value would be." Years ago when I needed more power from a soldering iron I used to feed the 240VRMS through a rectifier/reservoir to get aproximately 320VDC. |
#40
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.equipment,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Contactor coil: 50 Hz vs. 60 Hz
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:33:06 -0700 (PDT), NT
wrote: On Aug 31, 7:11*pm, John S wrote: On 8/31/2011 1:06 PM, The Ghost In The Machine wrote: YES A-NT-MAN BUT THE RMS REFERS TO THE AC WAVEFORM NOT THE DC OUTPUT. HENCE THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS RMS DC VOLTAGE. PATECUM TGITM Root Mean Square does not imply an ac waveform, its jsut most commonly used for ac waveforms. Every stable waveform has an rms value, even perfect dc. Actually, RMS DC voltage is a redundant expression since DC is RMS. I realised it was perhaps not the best phrasing. But... would the dc component be the average V or the rms? NT Generally, in electronics, "DC component" is defined as the average value (say, over a period of a periodic waveform). So a 1V peak sine wave sitting on top of 1VDC would have DC component of 1.0V. A 1V peak sine wave has a DC component of 0. The RMS value is the heating value- a 1 ohm resistor with 1VDC across it will dissipate 1W. A 1 ohm resistor with 1.414V peak sine wave across it (1 V RMS) will dissipate 1W. A 1 ohm resistor powered with a 1V peak sine wave sitting on top of 1VDC will dissipate a bit more than 1 watt (RMS value is sqrt(3/2) if you want to get analytical about it, so about 1.22W). |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GE magnetic contactor? | Metalworking | |||
Trane coil vs Aspen coil | Home Repair | |||
AC Switch or contactor | Electronics Repair | |||
Changeover contactor | UK diy |