Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
Anyone else coming across this ? Twice in about 2 months, an owner of new
music kit wanting me to repair intermittant faults after being used only a few times from new. So loosing his warranty rights. 2 different companies , reason for first owner foregoing his rights, unknown. This second time owner was quoted 2 months minimum turn around, sending back to the factory (import/asembly plant) in another part of the country, but otherwise no charge. Is there an excessive number of returns these days or what is the reason? |
#2
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:30:03 +0100, "N_Cook"
wrote: Anyone else coming across this ? Yes. It's a major source of my business. Usually it's someone who has purchased an extended warranty with onsite repair, that is on try #3 to get it fixed right. Some things just can't be done at the customers home or office. Similarly, with purchases of Apple Care, who really don't want to wait up to 4 months to get their whatever fixed. If they really need their computer to working now, they'll forego the warranty and deal with a disreputable but fast repair person like me. Twice in about 2 months, an owner of new music kit wanting me to repair intermittant faults after being used only a few times from new. So loosing his warranty rights. 2 different companies , reason for first owner foregoing his rights, unknown. This second time owner was quoted 2 months minimum turn around, sending back to the factory (import/asembly plant) in another part of the country, but otherwise no charge. Is there an excessive number of returns these days or what is the reason? It's the 2 month delay that is probably the primary incentive. A friend, looking over my shoulder, casually mentioned that it took a large telescope manufacturer about 7 months to return his telescope for out of warranty repair. Delays are also not very consistent. I've seen amazingly fast turn around by HP and Dell on warranty repairs (usually exchange for another repaired unit), followed by atrocious delays the next month, sometimes losing the item. My guess is that all these vendors are using outsourced repair facilities, which are having their own problems ranging from too much business (overload), to variations on ineptitude. Locally, the various authorized service centers, are constantly complaining about delivery delays on replacement components. Their contract with the manufacturer requires that they use only brand new parts, obtained directly from the manufacturer. No eBay or cannibalized parts. So, the customers waits, even though the missing part is sitting only a few feet away. Drivel: You have no idea how many laptop hinges I repair. Actually, I have no idea either as I don't keep count, but it's plenty. Broken hinges seem to be a problem. Some vendors cover them under warranty, while others claim that since their hinges are perfect, it must be customer abuse that caused them to break apart. -- # Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060 # 831-336-2558 # http://802.11junk.com # http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS |
#3
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:51:36 -0700, Jeff Liebermann
wrote: (...) I forgot to include my warranty certificate: http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/pics/drivel/slides/diploma.html -- # Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060 # 831-336-2558 # http://802.11junk.com # http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS |
#4
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
"Jeff Liebermann" I forgot to include my warranty certificate: http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/pics/drivel/slides/diploma.html ** ROTFL !! You have inspired me to maybe create something similar. The audio gear I see and repair is all used in live entertainment, both portable and installed systems. At least 90% of the failures are CAUSED by careless an continuous abuse of the gear - I consider turning all the knobs on a Marshall up to 10 and thrashing it to death to be in that category. So, my repair guarantee goes like this: " I guarantee that if you continue to abuse any item I have repaired for you OR do again the same stupid thing that caused it to fail before - it is GUARANTEED to fail again. The usual service charges apply to all items covered under this guarantee. " ..... Phil |
#5
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
"Jeff Urban" "Jeff Liebermann" "they'll forego the warranty and deal with a disreputable but fast repair person like me. " I don't think that should be called disreputable. If you mean disreputable with the manufacturer, just how reputable are they ? ** Think Jeff L had his tongue firmly in his cheek when he referred to himself as "disreputable". Because Jeff L has apparently not sought or been granted "Authorised Repairer " status for any brands - he might be seen as disreputable by some people. As with many things, the direct opposite is actually the case. So called "Authorised Repairers" are under the most odious kinds of contract which force them to become aligned with the maker's or importer's demands and whims rather than their own or their customer's natural interests. Few if any customers understand this difference and falsely imagine they are still dealing with a normal repairer. A normal repairer charges for every job, will tell customers what they found wrong and how to avoid a repeat. They also do their best to avoid returns under repair warranties - so shonky " patch up " repairs are just not on. If the item is clearly a lemon, they will gently point that out too. OTOH contract warranty repairers do not charge, tell the customer nothing ( or else a pack of bull ) and do work that need only last until the maker's warranty period expires. They will not openly criticise anything sold under the brand names they are contracted to work on - no matter how awful it is. IOW, a contracted repairer is at permanently at war with his own customers. I can hardly imagine any situation more *disreputable*. ..... Phil |
#6
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
"Jeff Liebermann" " Jeff Urban" If they need it and you fix it, and they pay you - WHAT is disreputable about that ? The lack of a certificate from the manufacturer attesting to my competence. ** ROTFL - I doubt there is even one importer or manufacturer in Australia capable of making that determination with any accuracy. After all, how would any of them know ?? They are NOT operating repair businesses, have no understanding of them and generally take no interest in the topic. Anecdote: One time, back in the 80s, I worked for a repair business that had "authorised" service arrangements for several brands of guitar amp - including Marshall, Acoustic and ELFA. The Greek lunatic who imported Acoustic into Australia decided that he could " micro-manage " the servicing of his brand by making up " kits " of spare parts that all service techs would have to buy to repair various classes of fault. All one needed to do was tell HIM the fault scenario and he would nominate the kit that you needed to purchase. Ordering individual parts as required was simply no longer an option. He claimed to me on the phone that all the auto importers and makers were doing the same thing and it was more " efficient ". Soooo, I told him about the fault in the unit I had on the bench - that it suffered from loud, very intermittent crackling noises. After a long pause, he said to ship the unit down to him, in Melbourne, 500 miles away. The boss and I did no such stupid thing, of course. Anecdote 2. A Melbourne based maker of guitar amps ( ELFA) had issues with their latest models: 1. The quad op-amps ( all RC4136s) in the pre-amp section were from a faulty batch ( rejects?) with about a 50% failure rate in the first 3 months. The maker had earmarked all their remaining stock for manufacture and REFUSED to supply any spares to us for warranty repairs. 2. Some nut case, probably as an after thought, had fitted stereo headphone sockets to the amps with no series limiting resistors. The left and right earphone connections were simply linked to the internal amplifier module and the speaker connected itself when there was no plug in place. Soooo, soon as anyone plugged a mono jack into the headphone socket - bang went the Sanken 60 watt amp module inside. Then, soon as the mono plug was removed, a 40 volt DC rail was linked to the 12 inch speaker and burnt it out. The 12 inch speaker was made right here in Sydney and despite the scenario being non warrantee, the people in Melbourne wanted US to send the 6 kg wrecks down to them for appraisal before they would agree to supply a new one. The boss told them to shove it. From then on, we sourced all needed parts ourselves ( including speakers) got Marshall and Fender mains and output transformers re-wound as needed and saved ourselves and our customers a lot of grief. We did no more warranty work. ...... Phil |
#7
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
Jeff Liebermann wrote in message
... On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:30:03 +0100, "N_Cook" wrote: Anyone else coming across this ? Yes. It's a major source of my business. Usually it's someone who has purchased an extended warranty with onsite repair, that is on try #3 to get it fixed right. Some things just can't be done at the customers home or office. Similarly, with purchases of Apple Care, who really don't want to wait up to 4 months to get their whatever fixed. If they really need their computer to working now, they'll forego the warranty and deal with a disreputable but fast repair person like me. Twice in about 2 months, an owner of new music kit wanting me to repair intermittant faults after being used only a few times from new. So loosing his warranty rights. 2 different companies , reason for first owner foregoing his rights, unknown. This second time owner was quoted 2 months minimum turn around, sending back to the factory (import/asembly plant) in another part of the country, but otherwise no charge. Is there an excessive number of returns these days or what is the reason? It's the 2 month delay that is probably the primary incentive. A friend, looking over my shoulder, casually mentioned that it took a large telescope manufacturer about 7 months to return his telescope for out of warranty repair. Delays are also not very consistent. I've seen amazingly fast turn around by HP and Dell on warranty repairs (usually exchange for another repaired unit), followed by atrocious delays the next month, sometimes losing the item. My guess is that all these vendors are using outsourced repair facilities, which are having their own problems ranging from too much business (overload), to variations on ineptitude. Locally, the various authorized service centers, are constantly complaining about delivery delays on replacement components. Their contract with the manufacturer requires that they use only brand new parts, obtained directly from the manufacturer. No eBay or cannibalized parts. So, the customers waits, even though the missing part is sitting only a few feet away. Drivel: You have no idea how many laptop hinges I repair. Actually, I have no idea either as I don't keep count, but it's plenty. Broken hinges seem to be a problem. Some vendors cover them under warranty, while others claim that since their hinges are perfect, it must be customer abuse that caused them to break apart. -- # Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060 # 831-336-2558 # http://802.11junk.com # http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS Is this the scenario. These companies import populated boards from China etc and asssemble in this country ( England). Apart from a designer there may be no one technical enough in the assembly plant to do repair. Which is fine when there are plenty of new units around to send out as in-warranty replacements. But that only works if the rate of returns is say 2 percent , the returns sold on in that specialist auction house in Nottingham . But if the returns is more like 10 percent then it will impact on the viability of the company |
#8
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
My favorite example is the cell phone. I have a small side business
repairing these and supplying spares and replacements. None of them are built to be repaired, so that's a challenge. Yet, the condition of most of the phones I see are so bad, that were it any other product, I would claim that the owner was intentionally abusing the device. With an average lifetime of about 18 months for a consumer dumb phone, the level of quality need not be much above minimal. I'm curious. My current cell phone -- a Korean Lucky Goldstar -- is almost five years old. Never had problems with it, and it's in great shape. (I rarely abuse my purchases.) What, exactly, are the things you see that suggest products -- cell phones or otherwise -- are abused? On a related note... I was talking with a friend who's my age, and owns a company that makes consumer audio equipment. He agreed with me that pride of ownership has largely disappeared. Nothing seems to be of lasting value. Products become obsolete after only a few months. |
#9
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 04:08:59 -0700, "William Sommerwerck"
wrote: My favorite example is the cell phone. I have a small side business repairing these and supplying spares and replacements. None of them are built to be repaired, so that's a challenge. Yet, the condition of most of the phones I see are so bad, that were it any other product, I would claim that the owner was intentionally abusing the device. With an average lifetime of about 18 months for a consumer dumb phone, the level of quality need not be much above minimal. I'm curious. My current cell phone -- a Korean Lucky Goldstar -- is almost five years old. Never had problems with it, and it's in great shape. (I rarely abuse my purchases.) What, exactly, are the things you see that suggest products -- cell phones or otherwise -- are abused? Mechanical damage, broken hinges, scratched screens, fingernails through the key tops, mangled connector covers, broken antennas, cracked earphone connectors, cracked power/accessory connectors, water damage, dirt, filth, crud, good, pogs, labels, cracked case, bulging batteries, etc. http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/crud/cell-phones-02.jpg These are some of the recent arrivals, after some cleaning. The really beat up phones, I don't bother trying to fix (unless I need the parts). My guess is that I have about 150 phones in stock. Other vendors: http://www.recellular.com http://www.dotcells.com etc... Incidentally, LG phones are generally good quality, fairly easy to fix, and tend to survive. I've had problems with the ENV2 models falling apart. I'm currently using an LG VX-8300. On a related note... I was talking with a friend who's my age, and owns a company that makes consumer audio equipment. He agreed with me that pride of ownership has largely disappeared. Nothing seems to be of lasting value. Products become obsolete after only a few months. Products are obsolete on arrival. The next generation and possibly one or two generations after that are in the design, manufacture, and distribution chain when the current version hits the market. Because the obvious answer to any problems with the current model is to just wait for the "new and improved" model that follows, there's no incentive to fix any of the first generation problems. -- # Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060 # 831-336-2558 # http://802.11junk.com # http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS |
#10
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
In article ,
Jeff Liebermann wrote: Incidentally, LG phones are generally good quality, fairly easy to fix, and tend to survive. As I was leaning over a railing, talking on it, my LG slipped from my hand and fell 14 feet onto concrete. It landed flat. Back came off, battery popped out. Nary a scratch and works perfectly since. |
#11
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
"Jeff Liebermann" Some ****** asked: What, exactly, are the things you see that suggest products -- cell phones or otherwise -- are abused? Mechanical damage, broken hinges, scratched screens, fingernails through the key tops, mangled connector covers, broken antennas, cracked earphone connectors, cracked power/accessory connectors, water damage, dirt, filth, crud, good, pogs, labels, cracked case, bulging batteries, etc. ** I was given a " Palm Pilot " to fix once. About two weeks prior to my receiving it - a whole container of yoghurt ( flavour unknown) had leaked over it while in a woman's handbag. The woman concerned had then only wiped it over with a cloth and noted it did not work. She left the battery inside - so of course it was ruined. My own mobile has copped a spillage of bleach and also of liquid detergent in a similar way - but by immediately removing the battery and rinsing it with warm water, it lives to fight another day. Why is it that no maker ever gives advice on what to do if your pocket digital wonder gets accidentally immersed or suffers a spillage ?? Get the damn battery OUT immediately - then rinse and dry it pronto. ..... Phil |
#12
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:06:04 -0700, Smitty Two
wrote: In article , Jeff Liebermann wrote: Incidentally, LG phones are generally good quality, fairly easy to fix, and tend to survive. As I was leaning over a railing, talking on it, my LG slipped from my hand and fell 14 feet onto concrete. It landed flat. Back came off, battery popped out. Nary a scratch and works perfectly since. Have you noticed that most cell phones have rounded corners and bottoms? The rounded corner distributes the inpact load over a larger area of the case than it would if it were more box shaped. However, that doesn't seem to be a design feature in smartphones, which more closely resemble a box due to the requirement of having a large rectangular screen. Drop a smart phone, and they're history. The number of cracked screens on the iPhone and Droid should offer a clue. They do have somewhat rounded corners, but with a metal frame, any edge impact transfers directly to the glass screen. There are some better ideas, but these will need to wait for a change in public acceptance of what a cell phone should look like: http://gadgetsin.com/bugatty-cell-phone-shaped-as-bugatti-veyron.htm http://www.porhomme.com/2008/12/the-concept-handgun-with-built-in-cellphone/ http://www.thedesignblog.org/entry/dya-cell-phone-slides-diagonally-to-make-or-receive-a-call/ http://www.cellfoam.com etc... -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#13
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 14:09:39 +1100, "Phil Allison"
wrote: Why is it that no maker ever gives advice on what to do if your pocket digital wonder gets accidentally immersed or suffers a spillage ?? Because they want you to destroy their product so that you'll buy a new one. Every product that is repaired is one less product that is sold. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto If you're into ecology and conservation, repair is a good thing. If you're into designed obsolescence, then it's a bad thing. Get the damn battery OUT immediately - then rinse and dry it pronto. The common perception among cell phone vendors and manufacturers is that the condition and disposition of the phone, AFTER IT'S SOLD, is not their problem. If you trash the phone, unless you've purchased the overpriced extended equipment warranty, it's your problem, not theirs. In most cases, they don't even bother to repair the wet phone, and simply issue a replacement (or try to sell you an upgrade). I suppose safety might be a possible justification for removing the battery, but selling the customer a new phone is far more profitable. I suppose we could include some verbage in the voluminous book of legal disclaimers and limitations of responsibility that seems to be included with all consumer products these days. Removing the battery would fit nicely between "Do not eat the phone" and "Do not go swimming with your cell phone". -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#14
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 14:09:39 +1100, "Phil Allison" wrote: Why is it that no maker ever gives advice on what to do if your pocket digital wonder gets accidentally immersed or suffers a spillage ?? Because they want you to destroy their product so that you'll buy a new one. Every product that is repaired is one less product that is sold. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto If you're into ecology and conservation, repair is a good thing. If you're into designed obsolescence, then it's a bad thing. Get the damn battery OUT immediately - then rinse and dry it pronto. The common perception among cell phone vendors and manufacturers is that the condition and disposition of the phone, AFTER IT'S SOLD, is not their problem. If you trash the phone, unless you've purchased the overpriced extended equipment warranty, it's your problem, not theirs. In most cases, they don't even bother to repair the wet phone, and simply issue a replacement (or try to sell you an upgrade). I suppose safety might be a possible justification for removing the battery, but selling the customer a new phone is far more profitable. I suppose we could include some verbage in the voluminous book of legal disclaimers and limitations of responsibility that seems to be included with all consumer products these days. Removing the battery would fit nicely between "Do not eat the phone" and "Do not go swimming with your cell phone". Or, "Do not swim while eating your cell phone..." ;-) -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a Band-Aid™ on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
#15
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Or, "Do not swim while eating your cell phone..." ;-) Best one IMHO was the directions I got with a stainless steel coffee percolator: "Do Not Use In A Microwave Oven." Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson N3OWJ/4X1GM Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to misquote it. |
#16
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 14:09:39 +1100, "Phil Allison"
wrote: Why is it that no maker ever gives advice on what to do if your pocket digital wonder gets accidentally immersed or suffers a spillage ?? One vendor tries to be ummmm... helpful: http://www.printingchoice.com/8-examples-of-horrific-fine-print/ Near the bottom of the page: "Motorola Razr: Do not try to dry your phone in a microwave" Well, it's a start. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#17
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
"Geoffrey S. Mendelson" wrote: Michael A. Terrell wrote: Or, "Do not swim while eating your cell phone..." ;-) Best one IMHO was the directions I got with a stainless steel coffee percolator: "Do Not Use In A Microwave Oven." Sure, but that because you would have to lay it on it's side. ;-) -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a Band-Aid™ on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
#18
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
"The rounded corner distributes the inpact load over a larger
area of the case than it would if it were more box shaped." You are an engineer somewhere ? I am not being sarcastic, maybe you should be if you aren't. That's the way to think. Look at how some things, bigger things are built. You might scratch your head and say " What, did they think it was going to fall up ? ". Well that is exactly what they were thinking. I can design simple stuff, test fixtures and all that, apply a signal and watch the result through a current resistor, **** like that, but I am not an employable engineer, except by myself and a few others. But I can think of it from their viewpoint. All they care is get it on the shelves intact working and sellable. After that the minimum warranty possible, anything goes under US law. Got to watch it in Europe, their governments seem to work for the people there. We're working on that. But the US government works for us. Think I'm ****ing kidding ? J |
#19
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
Best one IMHO was the directions I got
with a stainless steel coffee percolator: "Do Not Use In A Microwave Oven." That isn't quite so stupid as it sounds. Even though I had a good grasp of electronics as a teenager, I didn't understand this. |
#20
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
William Sommerwerck wrote:
That isn't quite so stupid as it sounds. Even though I had a good grasp of electronics as a teenager, I didn't understand this. I can understand this, but anyone born after 1970 probably had their bottles heated in a microwave and have grown up with one. That makes it likely that they were taught as infants you never put metal into a microwave, and although there are some exceptions (they probably don't know them) In fact, anyone with a computer capable of playing youtube videos or a tv with the discovery channel has seen the effect of a microwave on a CD. On the other hand, a coffee percolator is not a young person's device, only people who drank their coffee before Mr. Coffee, Melita filters, and Starbucks would even think of using one. I'm sure there are a lot of older people out there who would buy one but have never quite grasped the concept of no metal in a micro. :-) Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson N3OWJ/4X1GM Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to misquote it. |
#21
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
Why is it that no maker ever gives advice on what to do
if your pocket digital wonder gets accidentally immersed or suffers a spillage? It's common knowledge in the electronics industry that if the "soiled" item is thoroughly flushed in/with distilled water, then allowed to dry (or forcibly dried), it will often recover. If the manufacturer advises the consumer to do this, and the device remains dead, the manufacturer could find itself liable for a free replacement. * In many cases, a customer could visit the nearest cell phone store and get a replacement in less time. Nikon once ran an ad about a photographer in India who'd accidentally dunked his F. He carried it some distance in a bucket of fresh water (which was then standard for photo equipment -- you kept the camera wet until you got it to a service tech), periodically removing it to snap a shot! (It's not clear how the film survived this treatment.) Almost 30 years ago, while on a canoe trip, my Olympus XA got completely immersed. I immediately bought another one, but I discovered -- several years later -- that it still worked! And it still is working! It didn't rust or corrode. Amazing. Structural plastics -- ya gotta love 'em. * About 15 years ago, I took my HP 4M into work, because we were doing so much printing there weren't enough printers to go around. (The company later bought me a replacement toner cartridge.) As I was carrying it out of my apartment, the paper tray came loose and crashed on the concrete steps, breaking. This was around the time of a major California earthquake, and HP had run an ad telling how another model of laser printer had fallen to the floor without damage. I pointed out that HP couldn't very well use this fact as an inducement to buy their products, then object when I asked for a replacement tray that had been subjected to similar abuse. After some haggling, I was sent a slightly used tray at no charge. |
#22
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
On the other hand, a coffee percolator is not a young person's device,
only people who drank their coffee before Mr. Coffee, Melita filters, and Starbucks would even think of using one. I'm sure there are a lot of older people out there who would buy one but have never quite grasped the concept of no metal in a micro. :-) Actually, modern microwaves are more tolerant. You can put a metal tray in a microwave, and nothing bad will happen. The issue isn't metal, per se -- a metal plate reflects microwaves as the cavity walls do -- but sharp spots at which the field intensity is so high that you get corona discharge or arcing. I once put a jar of Adam's peanut butter in the microwave to warm it -- and you should have seen the arcing at the tiny -- really tiny -- bits of aluminum that were left on the lip from the seal. |
#23
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 01:11:21 -0700 (PDT), Jeff Urban
wrote: "The rounded corner distributes the inpact load over a larger area of the case than it would if it were more box shaped." You are an engineer somewhere ? Yep. Wit out mah spellin chequer, I kin spel just like an engineer. http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jeff-liebermann/0/823/151 I am not being sarcastic, maybe you should be if you aren't. That's the way to think. Thanks. The down side of being an engineer is the bad habit of looking at any product and thinking that it could have been designed better. For example, the doctor recommended I get some exercise. So, I bought a bicycle, then another, etc, until I now have far too many bicycles: http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/pics/bicycles/index.html Instead of riding them, I've been looking at the way they work, and the way the components are designed. I've read some books on design, researched patents, performed my own repairs, rebuilt a few bikes, and pondered the logic behind the designs. Of course, I think I can do better and have designed and built a few experimental components that I might eventually sell. The problem is, I'm so busy analyzing the bicycles, I don't have much time left to actually ride them. According to the bicycle computah, I've only ridden about 100 miles in the last 3 months. Look at how some things, bigger things are built. You might scratch your head and say " What, did they think it was going to fall up ? ". Well that is exactly what they were thinking. Yep. However, that's not exactly the way I do it. I think "What problem were they trying to solve"? If you understand the motivation, you usually understand the rational. That's often difficult when dealing with industrial design and artistic concerns. The problem may have been nothing more than product differentiation, or trying to look sufficiently different than the rest of the pack. For example, the rounded corners have many potential benefits besides surviving a drop test. Rounded corners appeal more to women, while men prefer more angular products. It's easier to mold parts with rounded angles, than with angular corners. It may have been simply functional, so that the iPhone doesn't rip one's pocket or purse liner. It might have been human factors, where talking on a phone with a sharp edge digging into one's palm, is not exactly ergonomic. I can design simple stuff, test fixtures and all that, apply a signal and watch the result through a current resistor, **** like that, but I am not an employable engineer, except by myself and a few others. Welcome to the age of specialization. It's a dangerous place to be as when your specialty is suddenly exported overseas, you're potentially unemployable. I saw the problem early. Officially, I was an RF engineer. However, I made the effort to get experience in many adjacent fields, and bounced around the company doing almost everything. Hint: avoid specialization. But I can think of it from their viewpoint. You need to attend a few product brainstorming and subsequent design review meetings to really understand how things work. Reverse engineering is possible only if the motivations that inspired the designs are logical. I've seen designs that were based on faulty marketing, bad guesses as to user needs, managerial egos, and simple stupidity. The designs that worked and sold were deemed brilliant. Those that failed were deemed, ummm.... something else. For example, the first incantation of the iPod player, was the Diamond Rio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_PMP300 which pre-dated the iPod by about 3 years. It was very similar to the iPod, but instead was a flop. There were many problems, but the big one as that Apple solved the legal issues prior to release, while Diamond did not. Diamond spent the initial years fighting lawsuits, while Apple had already made a deal with the recording industry. You could not have determined any of this just looking at the product and trying to reverse engineer the logic behind the design. All they care is get it on the shelves intact working and sellable. Nope. I could easily design almost anything that will appear on the shelf and be sellable. The trick is to make it profitable for everyone involved. There's also litigation avoidance, bad press, timing, reviews, distribution, warehousing, shipping, promotion, ad infinitum that has to be dealt with. Those are often more difficult and time consuming than the product design. I recall several product launches that had to be delayed because of some obscure problem, such as wrong wording on the legal disclaimers page/book or failure to display some certification agency's logo with the proper font size. I've worked on several products where the initial product design took about 2 weeks. Prototypes and troubleshooting added another 3 weeks. However, getting it into production, out the door, and into the hands of paying customers, took an additional 30 weeks, little of which had much to do with the initial design. In effect, the design was "frozen" after 2 weeks. After that the minimum warranty possible, anything goes under US law. Got to watch it in Europe, their governments seem to work for the people there. We're working on that. But the US government works for us. Not really. If you were ever to do your own product, you'll soon find that the legal system heavily favors the plaintiff. In Europe, court costs are paid by the loser, so there's a tremendous counter incentive to solving problems by litigation. In the US, it's paid by both parties, meaning that even if you prevail in court, you can easily lose your potential profits or the company to the legal costs. Product liability, tort reform, and patent law all currently favor the "injured" party in the US. Think I'm ****ing kidding ? Yes, because engineers don't talk or write like that. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#24
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 07:34:19 -0700, "William Sommerwerck"
wrote: Actually, modern microwaves are more tolerant. You can put a metal tray in a microwave, and nothing bad will happen. Yep. Some come with metal racks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Microwave_metal_shelf.JPG As long as there is something inside the oven cavity that will ABSORB the RF power, it's safe. Take away the absorber, such as with an empty microwave oven, and the resultant standing waves will build up a sufficiently large field to initiate arcing. Of course, put anything, except food, in a microwave oven, and your warranty is torched. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#25
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
As long as there is in the oven that will ABSORB
the RF power, it's safe. Take away the absorber, such as with an empty microwave oven, and the resultant standing waves will build up a sufficiently large field to initiate arcing. Even with something to absorb the energy, you can still get arcing from sharp metal edges. |
#26
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
So--and this is completely out of left field, I know -- what
would happen if a guy put a vacuum tube -- say a biggish octal one, like a 5Y3 or a 6V6 -- into a microwave and nuked it? You'd certainly get arcing from the pins. It's not obvious (to me) how the tube's elements would react. |
#27
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
On 4/3/2011 5:29 AM Geoffrey S. Mendelson spake thus:
William Sommerwerck wrote: That isn't quite so stupid as it sounds. Even though I had a good grasp of electronics as a teenager, I didn't understand this. I can understand this, but anyone born after 1970 probably had their bottles heated in a microwave and have grown up with one. That makes it likely that they were taught as infants you never put metal into a microwave, and although there are some exceptions (they probably don't know them) So--and this is completely out of left field, I know--what would happen if a guy put a vacuum tube--say a biggish octal one, like a 5Y3 or a 6V6--into a microwave and nuked it? I've nuked CDs and derived many seconds of amusement from that ... -- The current state of literacy in our advanced civilization: yo wassup nuttin wan2 hang k where here k l8tr by - from Usenet (what's *that*?) |
#28
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
"William Sommer****** is a lying ASS" Why is it that no maker ever gives advice on what to do if your pocket digital wonder gets accidentally immersed or suffers a spillage? It's common knowledge in the electronics industry... ** How would a bull****ting puke like you know anything of the sort ? that if the "soiled" item is thoroughly flushed in/with distilled water, then allowed to dry (or forcibly dried), it will often recover. If the manufacturer advises the consumer to do this, and the device remains dead, the manufacturer could find itself liable for a free replacement. ** Total ********. ...... Phil |
#29
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
What I'm hoping for, of course, is some kewl effect, like
that purplish glow you sometimes see emanating from the plates of overdriven tubes... Unfortunately, there's no gas in a "vacuum" tube to glow. |
#30
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
"Phil Allison" wrote in message
... "William Sommer****** is a lying ASS" Why is it that no maker ever gives advice on what to do if your pocket digital wonder gets accidentally immersed or suffers a spillage? It's common knowledge in the electronics industry... ** How would a bull****ting puke like you know anything of the sort ? that if the "soiled" item is thoroughly flushed in/with distilled water, then allowed to dry (or forcibly dried), it will often recover. If the manufacturer advises the consumer to do this, and the device remains dead, the manufacturer could find itself liable for a free replacement. ** Total ********. Phil... SHUT UP. |
#31
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
On 4/3/2011 3:42 PM William Sommerwerck spake thus:
So--and this is completely out of left field, I know -- what would happen if a guy put a vacuum tube -- say a biggish octal one, like a 5Y3 or a 6V6 -- into a microwave and nuked it? You'd certainly get arcing from the pins. It's not obvious (to me) how the tube's elements would react. Ah, I forgot about the pins. OK, let's say we really have too much time on our hands and want to continue the experiment, so we get something to plug the tube into, say a pin straightener, with no exposed metal. What then? (What I'm hoping for, of course, is some kewl effect, like that purplish glow you sometimes see emanating from the plates of overdriven tubes ...) -- The current state of literacy in our advanced civilization: yo wassup nuttin wan2 hang k where here k l8tr by - from Usenet (what's *that*?) |
#32
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
"William Sommer****** is a lying ASS"
Why is it that no maker ever gives advice on what to do if your pocket digital wonder gets accidentally immersed or suffers a spillage? It's common knowledge in the electronics industry... ** How would a bull****ting puke like you know anything of the sort ? that if the "soiled" item is thoroughly flushed in/with distilled water, then allowed to dry (or forcibly dried), it will often recover. If the manufacturer advises the consumer to do this, and the device remains dead, the manufacturer could find itself liable for a free replacement. ** Total ********. Phil... SHUT UP. ** **** off and die you vile TROLLING pig. ..... Phil |
#33
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
"David Nebenzahl" What I'm hoping for, of course, is some kewl effect, like that purplish glow you sometimes see emanating from the plates of overdriven tubes... Unfortunately, there's no gas in a "vacuum" tube to glow. So where does that purplish glow come from? I've seen it. ** The blue/ purple glow is emanating from " impurities" in the glass - it is generated by electrons hitting the glass at high speed. Most audio power tubes (ie 6L6GCs, EL34s, EL84s and 6550s ) have cut outs in the plate structures that allow this to happen. The blue glow will be there when the tube is new ( if it's there at all ) and is not a sign of a problem. It may be fairly steady or respond to high drive levels - ie when the plate voltage nearly doubles in magnitude with signal peaks. ..... Phil |
#34
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 20:09:10 -0700, David Nebenzahl
wrote: So where does that purplish glow come from? I've seen it. Impurities in the glass envelope or gas in the tube. If gas, take an anti-acid tablet and you should be fine in a few minutes. http://www.vacuumtubes.net/How_Vacuum_Tubes_Work.htm Scroll down to: C. Blue Glow -- what causes it? for more details. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#35
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
On 4/3/2011 5:05 PM William Sommerwerck spake thus:
What I'm hoping for, of course, is some kewl effect, like that purplish glow you sometimes see emanating from the plates of overdriven tubes... Unfortunately, there's no gas in a "vacuum" tube to glow. So where does that purplish glow come from? I've seen it. -- The current state of literacy in our advanced civilization: yo wassup nuttin wan2 hang k where here k l8tr by - from Usenet (what's *that*?) |
#36
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
In article ,
David Nebenzahl wrote: So--and this is completely out of left field, I know--what would happen if a guy put a vacuum tube--say a biggish octal one, like a 5Y3 or a 6V6--into a microwave and nuked it? Everything on planet Earth has been put into a microwave. Search YouTube for "vacuum tube microwave" and you'll get several relevant hits. |
#37
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 19:34:29 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 20:09:10 -0700, David Nebenzahl wrote: So where does that purplish glow come from? I've seen it. Impurities in the glass envelope or gas in the tube. If gas, take an anti-acid tablet and you should be fine in a few minutes. http://www.vacuumtubes.net/How_Vacuum_Tubes_Work.htm Scroll down to: C. Blue Glow -- what causes it? for more details. So even after a getter flash there is still a certain amount of impurities? I've never seen a 6L6 that didn't have some blue inside when in operation. It looks as though the blue only occurs where the electron beams hit the inside of the glass. At least in new tubes. -- Live Fast Die Young, Leave A Pretty Corpse |
#38
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 16:27:32 +0000 (UTC), Meat Plow
wrote: On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 19:34:29 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 20:09:10 -0700, David Nebenzahl wrote: So where does that purplish glow come from? I've seen it. Impurities in the glass envelope or gas in the tube. If gas, take an anti-acid tablet and you should be fine in a few minutes. http://www.vacuumtubes.net/How_Vacuum_Tubes_Work.htm Scroll down to: C. Blue Glow -- what causes it? for more details. So even after a getter flash there is still a certain amount of impurities? I've never seen a 6L6 that didn't have some blue inside when in operation. It looks as though the blue only occurs where the electron beams hit the inside of the glass. At least in new tubes. Yep. As I vaguely recall (which means I didn't Google for a reference) glass has the irritating habit of collecting impurities and volatiles during manufacture. Irving Langmuir figured this out in the 1920's working on light bulbs. He would draw the best vacuum possible and in a few days, find the bulb full of water vapor and other gasses. The hot filament would break down the water into hydrogen and oxygen. The oxygen would then oxidize the electrodes, and blacken the inside of the bulb. So, he invented a method of baking the glass to remove the volatiles prior to evacuation and an acid bath to remove some of the impurities. It also works nicely for vacuum tubes, but like all such processes, is far from perfect. There's always some impurities left behind. When we talk about a "gassy" vacuum tube, it's not a leaky glass envelope or seal. The getter does best with reactive gases and does nothing for eliminating noble gases, which will not react with metals (or most anything else). It's those noble gases that remain (helium, neon, argon, krypton, xenon, and radon) that you're seeing glow. Most likely helium and argon mix. The small helium molecule will also diffuse through the glass from the outside air. See photos at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_gas#Discharge_color -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#39
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
"Jeff Liebermann" When we talk about a "gassy" vacuum tube, it's not a leaky glass envelope or seal. ** The term covers that eventuality too. Any tube that has even a tiny air leak will glow a pinkish purple inside like a *******. The getter does best with reactive gases and does nothing for eliminating noble gases, which will not react with metals (or most anything else). It's those noble gases that remain (helium, neon, argon, krypton, xenon, and radon) that you're seeing glow. ** Maybe - but how would any significant amount of Argon get inside the tube UNLESS there was air leaking in ? Remember, Argon makes up less than 1% of air and does not react with metal parts. The vacuum inside a tube is less than one millionth of atmospheric pressure. BTW: Nitrogen mixed with a little CO2 makes a nice, white glow under low pressure - its called a "Moore Tube" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_McFarlan_Moore His untimely death was a bit shocking. ..... Phil |
#40
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Foregoing warranty rights
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:53:16 +1000, "Phil Allison"
wrote: "Jeff Liebermann" When we talk about a "gassy" vacuum tube, it's not a leaky glass envelope or seal. ** The term covers that eventuality too. Ok. My bad grammar. I meant that if the tube is deemed "gassy", it's probably not an air leak in the envelope or seal. It's more likely gaseous diffusion of helium or neon through the envelope. Any tube that has even a tiny air leak will glow a pinkish purple inside like a *******. Yep. I've seen the pink glow. The only way I could tell the difference between the nitrogen glow of an air leak: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionized_air_glow and that of a helium diffusion through the glass leak: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_gas#Discharge_color was that the nitrogen glow would not last very long as the filament would burn out due to oxidation. The getter does best with reactive gases and does nothing for eliminating noble gases, which will not react with metals (or most anything else). It's those noble gases that remain (helium, neon, argon, krypton, xenon, and radon) that you're seeing glow. ** Maybe - but how would any significant amount of Argon get inside the tube UNLESS there was air leaking in ? Remember, Argon makes up less than 1% of air and does not react with metal parts. Oops. Y'er correct. Only helium and neon will diffuse through glass. Argon and larger gas molecules won't diffuse through glass. The vacuum inside a tube is less than one millionth of atmospheric pressure. Yeah, but the pressure differential is 14.7 lbs/sq-in. Over the surface of the 6L6, that's about (assuming a cylinder): Surface Area = 2 Pi r^2 + 2 pi r h = (2 * 3.14 * 0.7^2) + (2 * 3.14 * 0.7 * 3.0) = 16 sq-in Surface pressure = 16 * 14.7 lbs/sq-in = 235 lbs. (Yes, I'm guessing at the dimension for a 6L6 as I don't have one handy). That's quite a bit of pressure pushing the helium and neon atoms through the glass. Still, for helium, the diffusion rate is slow (helium through pyrex at STP): http://teaching.matdl.org/teachingarchives/browser/trunk/matml/transport/problems/hepyrex-solution.pdf?format=raw 8.0 x 10^-8 m^3/hr Nitrogen mixed with a little CO2 makes a nice, white glow under low pressure - its called a "Moore Tube" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_McFarlan_Moore His untimely death was a bit shocking. I guess his murderer didn't do a proper patent search before starting work on his invention. We're more civilized these daze. Instead of murder, we have litigation. It's much like murder in slow motion. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Your rights | UK diy | |||
Rights of Neighbors | Home Repair | |||
Hey, where did our "rights" go? | Home Ownership | |||
OT-More attacks on gun rights | Metalworking |