Inappropriate technique still unsubstantiated
 

On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:29:16 -0000, JeffM wrote:

Farmer Giles wrote:
test

JeffM wrote:
You would think that immediately after running the test,
you would see these morons make an actual post
--making the test surperfluous.

So, why even bother testing if you don't have something to post?
...and why bother testing if you DO have something to post?

...and why don't the morons test in the PROPER place?
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:aetkKiLDUawJ:lipas.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/testpost.html+Please-don't-do-this+better.solution+alt.test+annoying+Zen+tens-of-thousands-*-*+misc.test

Charlie wrote:
Continuing that thought, What kind of moron puts the above post
in an electronics repair NG?

So far, there's the original moron,
an apologist for the moron (with no useful example),
and another clueless someone who hasn't answered my question.

Here it is again:
If you can _read_ a *discussion* group and can _post_ to a *test*
group,
what is to be gained by posting a **test** to a **discussion** group.

I maintain that last case is always selfishness and ignorance
and is ALWAYS inappropriate.
...and I haven't heard an example given yet where that isn't true.

Lazyness, quickness, and not caring about pedants like you.

--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

To confirm the discontinuation of stopping the startup, click cancel.