Looking for a powered RF splitter
Radio Shack used to sell a powered 4 way RF splitter.
One RF signal in, 4 RF signals out. Supposedly something like a broad band emitter follower. The Radio Shack things were junk: noisy, poor high frequency performance, not as good as a passive splitter. Is there anything on the market that does work? TIA |
Looking for a powered RF splitter
"root" wrote in message ... Radio Shack used to sell a powered 4 way RF splitter. One RF signal in, 4 RF signals out. Supposedly something like a broad band emitter follower. The Radio Shack things were junk: noisy, poor high frequency performance, not as good as a passive splitter. Is there anything on the market that does work? TIA There's plenty over here in the UK that work perfectly adequately, generally available from any reasonable electronic / electrical outlet, so I'm sure there must be over your side of the pond as well. Bear in mind that with terrestrial broadcasts going digital all over the world, if the transmission system that your broadcasting authorities are (going to be) using, is anything like ours, then any kind of distribution amplifier that you use needs to be specced for the digital signals, which over here means very wideband, and very linear. In my experience, the digital signals are actually nothing like as robust as they would have you believe ... Arfa |
Looking for a powered RF splitter
In article , root wrote:
Radio Shack used to sell a powered 4 way RF splitter. One RF signal in, 4 RF signals out. Supposedly something like a broad band emitter follower. The Radio Shack things were junk: noisy, poor high frequency performance, not as good as a passive splitter. Is there anything on the market that does work? I had the RS amplifier in at the old house. Seemed to work fine, had adj. gain. It was the one that also allowed internet to pass through without amplification. The cable guy explained why it was not good, but I forgot the reason. I have tried a few, and made my own. All tend to be problematic. greg |
Looking for a powered RF splitter
In article ,
Arfa Daily wrote: Bear in mind that with terrestrial broadcasts going digital all over the world, if the transmission system that your broadcasting authorities are (going to be) using, is anything like ours, then any kind of distribution amplifier that you use needs to be specced for the digital signals, which over here means very wideband, and very linear. In my experience, the digital signals are actually nothing like as robust as they would have you believe ... In the London area, FreeView digital is within the grouping of the analogue channels so no alteration is necessary. The ERP of the digital transmissions will be increased when analogue ones cease. -- *When the going gets tough, the tough take a coffee break * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Looking for a powered RF splitter
root wrote:
Radio Shack used to sell a powered 4 way RF splitter. One RF signal in, 4 RF signals out. Supposedly something like a broad band emitter follower. The Radio Shack things were junk: noisy, poor high frequency performance, not as good as a passive splitter. Is there anything on the market that does work? http://www.channelplus.com/products_rf.html http://www.channelplus.com/product_d...p?productId=55 |
Looking for a powered RF splitter
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Arfa Daily wrote: Bear in mind that with terrestrial broadcasts going digital all over the world, if the transmission system that your broadcasting authorities are (going to be) using, is anything like ours, then any kind of distribution amplifier that you use needs to be specced for the digital signals, which over here means very wideband, and very linear. In my experience, the digital signals are actually nothing like as robust as they would have you believe ... In the London area, FreeView digital is within the grouping of the analogue channels so no alteration is necessary. The ERP of the digital transmissions will be increased when analogue ones cease. I'm sure I read somewhere that they now say that the power won't be increased, as that would 'cause interference' to equipment using channels they propose to sell off! Ron(UK) |
Looking for a powered RF splitter
Arfa Daily wrote:
"root" wrote in message ... Radio Shack used to sell a powered 4 way RF splitter. One RF signal in, 4 RF signals out. Supposedly something like a broad band emitter follower. The Radio Shack things were junk: noisy, poor high frequency performance, not as good as a passive splitter. Is there anything on the market that does work? TIA There's plenty over here in the UK that work perfectly adequately, generally available from any reasonable electronic / electrical outlet, so I'm sure there must be over your side of the pond as well. Bear in mind that with terrestrial broadcasts going digital all over the world, if the transmission system that your broadcasting authorities are (going to be) using, is anything like ours, then any kind of distribution amplifier that you use needs to be specced for the digital signals, which over here means very wideband, and very linear. In my experience, the digital signals are actually nothing like as robust as they would have you believe ... Arfa I agree with you. Woolworths do one, but its only two outputs and does indicate its suitability for digital. Bit expensive though at £12.00. -- Best Regards: Baron. |
Looking for a powered RF splitter
In article ,
Ron(UK) wrote: In the London area, FreeView digital is within the grouping of the analogue channels so no alteration is necessary. The ERP of the digital transmissions will be increased when analogue ones cease. I'm sure I read somewhere that they now say that the power won't be increased, as that would 'cause interference' to equipment using channels they propose to sell off! Could be - but it would require a major re-vamp of the proposed final network - more fill in TX required. -- *Why isn't 11 pronounced onety one? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Looking for a powered RF splitter
In article , Dave Plowman (News)
wrote: In article , Ron(UK) wrote: In the London area, FreeView digital is within the grouping of the analogue channels so no alteration is necessary. The ERP of the digital transmissions will be increased when analogue ones cease. I'm sure I read somewhere that they now say that the power won't be increased, as that would 'cause interference' to equipment using channels they propose to sell off! Could be - but it would require a major re-vamp of the proposed final network - more fill in TX required. Just had a look in the horses mouth and nothing about any changes there. It's the 'Existing 81-Site Plan' pdf. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/ifi/tech/dsodetails/ -- *Do they ever shut up on your planet? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Looking for a powered RF splitter
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Ron(UK) wrote: In the London area, FreeView digital is within the grouping of the analogue channels so no alteration is necessary. The ERP of the digital transmissions will be increased when analogue ones cease. I'm sure I read somewhere that they now say that the power won't be increased, as that would 'cause interference' to equipment using channels they propose to sell off! Could be - but it would require a major re-vamp of the proposed final network - more fill in TX required. -- *Why isn't 11 pronounced onety one? * Dave Have you ever been to bingo ? Sadly, I have to admit that I do attend my local club (just to keep the wife company, you understand, although I do win quite a bit of money ... ) and the caller there does occasionally call 11 as "both (or all) the ones, onety one !" just for a laugh. So sometimes, it is ! Arfa |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter