|
Novice needs help with crazy project
|
Novice needs help with crazy project
|
Novice needs help with crazy project
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 01:55:57 GMT, "Jack"
wrote: Other than just pig-headed stubbornness, is there any reason why you top-post? I work in an environment where a very large amount of communication is done via email between a very large number of people in a Fortune 500 company and everyone top posts. --- This is not a very large Fortune 500 company and this is not email. This is USENET and hardly anyone top posts. --- It just seems right to us. I was not trying to be difficult. I was only ignorant of your adamancy. --- I assumed, since you've been here for about a month and have posted 17 articles, (and no doubt read many more threads) that you would have noticed that bottom posting was the norm. Since that didn't seem to be the case, I asked you to bottom post and when you refused to I was curious about your motivation. For your edification: http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html -- JF |
Novice needs help with crazy project
Jack wrote:
Other than just pig-headed stubbornness, is there any reason why you top-post? I work in an environment where a very large amount of communication is done via email between a very large number of people in a Fortune 500 company and everyone top posts. It just seems right to us. I was not trying to be difficult. I was only ignorant of your adamancy. This isn't email, its Usenet. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
Novice needs help with crazy project
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:33:31 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 01:55:57 GMT, "Jack" someone wrote Other than just pig-headed stubbornness, is there any reason why you top-post? I work in an environment where a very large amount of communication is done via email between a very large number of people in a Fortune 500 company and everyone top posts. This is not a very large Fortune 500 company and this is not email. This is USENET and hardly anyone top posts. .... For your edification: http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html Excellent page! Thanks! Rich |
Novice needs help with crazy project
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:05:58 +0000, MassiveProng wrote:
testing "MassiveProng" wrote in Why have you adopted the pseudonym of the most hated, reviled, stupid, profane, useless piece of crap that USENET has ever produced? Thanks, Rich |
Novice needs help with crazy project
just a thought how about using wireless. I guess the quality might not
be good and will have some delay. |
Novice needs help with crazy project
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:00:51 -0400, krw wrote:
In article , says... In article , MassiveProng wrote: On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 01:25:01 GMT, Jonathan Kirwan Gave us: On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:20:57 -0700, MassiveProng wrote: **** off, then die in any order you want. You are still infantile as ever. Said the retarded **** that said I needed a brain? Hypocrite! Oh, well. Meanwhile, please check with someone other than your dad about M80's I lived in Cincinnati, right across the river from the Kentucky plant that made them for the Army, you retarded ****. and where their oxygen comes from. You may learn something. I am fully aware of how they are constructed, and why there IS airspace in them. Consider how much oxygen is consumed when they explode, compared to how much oxygen is in that airspace: M80s have something like 99% or more of their oxidation done by oxygen in non-gaseous material that they have. I doubt that any of the oxidizer comes from "air". It's not where it needs to be when the flame front gets there. In fact, air just gets in the way - some portion of the blast energy gets dissipated by the shock wave. Cheers! Rich |
Novice needs help with crazy project
YD wrote:
Late at night, by candle light, MassiveProng penned this immortal opus: On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 10:46:24 -0300, YD Gave us: Late at night, by candle light, John Fields penned this immortal opus: On 17 Mar 2007 11:57:20 -0700, "jerry" wrote: On Mar 17, 2:16 pm, "jim menning" wrote: "jerry" wrote in message oglegroups.com... Gurus, I need your help... I am an amateur triathlete and I'm getting ready for the start of the triathlon season and I had this problem last year that I'm trying to solve. The problem is that during an open-water triathlon swim I need to skip a stroke every so often to lift my head out of the water and site the next turn buoy. I usually find myself off course by a few yards and need to make corrections. This costs me time from being off course and from skipping a stroke. So, I had this idea to take apart an old digital camera or picture phone and mount the camera part to the back of my head and attach the LCD part in front of my goggles. Sound Will such a device be illegal in competition?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not yet! --- But, if it's patented, it'll be illegal for you to build one. A one-off for personal use is allowed. One used to be able to make a "cable box" for "experimental purposes". They still may, but using it on the cable line is where the felony theft of service comes in. Doesn't do much just sitting there without a cable hooked to it. If I EVER made a "one off" of someone else's patented product or process, I would certainly be in correspondence with that person. It is just plain good civil practice, and if you claim to be a member of civil society, you should have enough presence of mind to know the difference between an experiment and a rip off or avoidance of paying one's dues. Oh **** off. I'll do whatever I damn well please and there's nothing you can do about it except **** and moan. - YD. DOn't worry YD, he's a ****, that is why he can **** and moan at the same time!.. -- "I'm never wrong, once i thought i was, but was mistaken" Real Programmers Do things like this. http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5 |
Novice needs help with crazy project
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:05:47 GMT, Rich Grise Gave
us: On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:05:58 +0000, MassiveProng wrote: testing "MassiveProng" wrote in Why have you adopted the pseudonym of the most hated, reviled, stupid, profane, useless piece of crap that USENET has ever produced? Can't handle my jabs... that's all you're about, BOY! |
Novice needs help with crazy project
Late at night, by candle light, MassiveProng
penned this immortal opus: On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 01:05:53 -0300, YD Gave us: Late at night, by candle light, MassiveProng penned this immortal opus: On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 10:46:24 -0300, YD Gave us: Late at night, by candle light, John Fields penned this immortal opus: On 17 Mar 2007 11:57:20 -0700, "jerry" wrote: On Mar 17, 2:16 pm, "jim menning" wrote: "jerry" wrote in message oups.com... Gurus, I need your help... I am an amateur triathlete and I'm getting ready for the start of the triathlon season and I had this problem last year that I'm trying to solve. The problem is that during an open-water triathlon swim I need to skip a stroke every so often to lift my head out of the water and site the next turn buoy. I usually find myself off course by a few yards and need to make corrections. This costs me time from being off course and from skipping a stroke. So, I had this idea to take apart an old digital camera or picture phone and mount the camera part to the back of my head and attach the LCD part in front of my goggles. Sound Will such a device be illegal in competition?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not yet! --- But, if it's patented, it'll be illegal for you to build one. A one-off for personal use is allowed. One used to be able to make a "cable box" for "experimental purposes". They still may, but using it on the cable line is where the felony theft of service comes in. Doesn't do much just sitting there without a cable hooked to it. If I EVER made a "one off" of someone else's patented product or process, I would certainly be in correspondence with that person. It is just plain good civil practice, and if you claim to be a member of civil society, you should have enough presence of mind to know the difference between an experiment and a rip off or avoidance of paying one's dues. Oh **** off. I'll do whatever I damn well please and there's nothing you can do about it except **** and moan. That is only due to the fact that I follow laws. If that were not the case, dumb ****tards like you would be plowing fields at a prison farm, because that is where I would ship your ass, trial or not. Oh **** off a bit more. If I find the design for something that interests me I'll build it no matter what. Now stick that in your prong and light it up. - YD. -- Remove HAT if replying by mail. |
Novice needs help with crazy project
Late at night, by candle light, Jamie
t penned this immortal opus: YD wrote: Late at night, by candle light, MassiveProng penned this immortal opus: On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 10:46:24 -0300, YD Gave us: Late at night, by candle light, John Fields penned this immortal opus: On 17 Mar 2007 11:57:20 -0700, "jerry" wrote: On Mar 17, 2:16 pm, "jim menning" wrote: "jerry" wrote in message ooglegroups.com... Gurus, I need your help... I am an amateur triathlete and I'm getting ready for the start of the triathlon season and I had this problem last year that I'm trying to solve. The problem is that during an open-water triathlon swim I need to skip a stroke every so often to lift my head out of the water and site the next turn buoy. I usually find myself off course by a few yards and need to make corrections. This costs me time from being off course and from skipping a stroke. So, I had this idea to take apart an old digital camera or picture phone and mount the camera part to the back of my head and attach the LCD part in front of my goggles. Sound Will such a device be illegal in competition?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not yet! --- But, if it's patented, it'll be illegal for you to build one. A one-off for personal use is allowed. One used to be able to make a "cable box" for "experimental purposes". They still may, but using it on the cable line is where the felony theft of service comes in. Doesn't do much just sitting there without a cable hooked to it. If I EVER made a "one off" of someone else's patented product or process, I would certainly be in correspondence with that person. It is just plain good civil practice, and if you claim to be a member of civil society, you should have enough presence of mind to know the difference between an experiment and a rip off or avoidance of paying one's dues. Oh **** off. I'll do whatever I damn well please and there's nothing you can do about it except **** and moan. - YD. DOn't worry YD, he's a ****, that is why he can **** and moan at the same time!.. LOL! - YD. -- Remove HAT if replying by mail. |
Novice needs help with crazy project
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:05:47 GMT, Rich Grise Gave
us: On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:05:58 +0000, MassiveProng wrote: testing "MassiveProng" wrote in Why have you adopted the pseudonym of the most hated, reviled, stupid, profane, useless piece of crap that USENET has ever produced? Because the ****ing retarded twit doesn't realize that spoofing someone else's posting info is a severe TOS violation, and that verizon will soon be letting him know that very thing. |
Novice needs help with crazy project
On Mar 17, 5:21 pm, John Fields wrote:
But, if it's patented, it'll be illegal for you to build one. It's illegal to build one to the patent specs, however patents are very specific. Using something besides fiber optics, and mounting the screen in a different manner pretty much gets him around this patent. |
Novice needs help with crazy project
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:14:21 +0000, feebo Gave us:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 07:36:00 -0700, MassiveProng wrote: I do. It was the same silver powder used for photography. Very fast burn, very bright flash. The fireworks folks still use it in almost everything. It is called flash powder. he he... "Flash powder" lol! That's what it is called, you ****ing retard! |
Novice needs help with crazy project
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:13:33 +0000, feebo Gave us:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:08:48 -0700, MassiveProng wrote: On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:03:52 GMT, Jonathan Kirwan Gave us: On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:54:55 -0700, MassiveProng wrote: snip I am fully aware of how they are constructed, and why there IS airspace in them. snip You still abundantly proved you know nothing about their chemistry to everyone. You still are in serious need of almost any education. Best of luck with your infantile insults, which are at least at a level consistent with your science knowledge. I would bet right now, ****tard, that you do not even know what is in one. (the old, out of production REAL versions, not the **** out there today). "bangy stuff"? No. That is what you let your boyfriend cream you up with. BTW sinced you like to lecture people on usenet etiquette... **** you , retard. STOP ****ING CROSS-POSTING TO ALT.WORLD.PLUS.DOG!!!! You're a goddamned idiot. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter