John Doe wrote:

Troll


So, you finally admit it? Great! That's the first step towards
recovery.


--
Been there, Done that, I've got my DD214 to prove it.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

Gary H wrote:

David Maynard wrote:

Gary H wrote:

David Maynard wrote:

SNIP

This is obviously going nowhere. You have your opinion, I have
mine. Hmmm, strange huh? Just like two nations. :-)

As with them, discussions are sometimes useless.



It is true that discussions usually go no where when one, or both,
simply throw 'opinions' around. That's why I provide the logic and
reasoning, so it isn't 'just an opinion'.

That, of course, doesn't work either if one clings to 'opinions'
regardless of logic or reasoning.

If I didn't know better I'd have been tempted to imagine your post was some
sort of joke, but I suppose not.

Sir, you supply *nothing* to these discussions except the same old tired
rhetoric, time after time, post after post.

As opposed to your diverse and multivariate contributions of greed, greed,
and greed plus, of course the highly innovative and intellectually
simulating variation GREED, greed, and greed, or greed, GREED, and greed,
as the universal explanations of just about everything.

It would seem that your idea of supplying 'something' is only if it
conforms to your arguments of greed, greed, or GREED, one or the other.

You "seem" as though you
don't live in the real world at all. All you ever offer the other side
of a discussion are your points of view

All I can say is you have a strange notion of what constitutes a "point of
view" and, as but one example, I point to my explanation that price
generally goes down as a result of "profit taking" and of the mechanism
why, that supply increases as the profit takers attempt to sell. That is
not a "point of view." It's an observable phenomenon.

However, opposing 'points of view' is often what a 'discussion' is about
and the value of it is how well one supports their position.

while trying to the discredit
the other party with accusations of paranoia, flawed logic, being a
whiner, irrational, conspiracy buff and so on and so on.
You take a totally off-hand discussion of views, on a given subject, and
turn it into a personal thing where you try to discredit a point of
view with personal slurs. Then you have the audacity to say?

*When attempting to work with someone else it's never 'all' one or the
other and that you seem to think so is likely one of the problems.*

I didn't say that and I don't even believe that.
I would think *that* would likely be *your* major problem though
because, as I see it, some of the things I said were "spot-on" and some
of the things you said were "spot-on". However, you have indicated
clearly, on more than one occasion, that you believe you were
*absolutely correct* and I was *absolutely incorrect*.

A beautiful example of taking a perfectly good quote out of context and
misrepresenting it. You might want to consider politics where some treasure
that sort of thing, although, IMO there's too much of it already.

The discussion there was Canada/U.S. oil company negotiations and your
comment "Of course we decide everything in this case, It's still our
country." I presumed you believed it.

Now, I don't know of anything that could be even remotely called
'negotiation' when one side, or the other, takes the position they're going
to "decide everything" and that is what my reply you quote addressed.

The reason I mentioned you is, first, it was your opinion and, second, I
presume Canada is still some form of representative government where the
opinions of the people have at least a modicum of influence so 'it matters'.

Thank you for the sometimes "spot on" bone. I'd have never guessed from
your text.

Man, you have no idea what debate or discussion is.

It would be unwise to place a bet on that.

I *could* play your
game.
I could be saying I think you're nothing but a goddam troll who doesn't
have a life who spends his time in the NGs looking for arguments and
trying to impress people with the thickness of his black book of useless
information. But I won't.
I could also say, I believe you're a condescending lecturer type filled
with a sense of wonder at what you perceive to be *your* wealth of
accumulated knowledge and wisdom. But I won't.

Anyone, including me, can play that stupidly useless "personal card" as
well. Useless because, as I said somewhere far back in these bull****
meanderings, I don't know you, I don't know anything about you, not
what your life is and sure as hell not what your knowledge base or
acquired level of wisdom is. So, how can I, in good conscience, make
personal remarks and/or observations about you without, "logically" (a
word you like to use a lot) having those facts. I can't.

A wonderful speech that, unfortunately, does not comport with experience as
exemplified by your opening salvo in the 'John Doe' exchange saying nothing
of fact or substance on the topic but simply that my remarks were "naive"
and I'd learn better after being "bitten on the ass a few times." And in
various other tirades you've accused me of 'wanting to kiss ass', being
'another amateur psychologist', "Stupid a**hole", unable to read or
understand, and other less than laudatory "personal remarks," none of which
addressed any part of the topic then at hand either.

Your halo needs adjusting.

I must say, though, that your new "I could... but won't" method of personal
attack is much more clever than the old direct outburst style.

One thing I am sure of though and that is the fact that you're one of
the nastiest assholes I've ever been unfortunate enough to come across.
Further communication between us is definitely *not* in the cards.

If I'm the "nastiest" you've run across then you've had a very sheltered
internet experience, indeed.

Have a good "Holiday season"

In all sincerity, you too.

David Maynard nospam private.net wrote:

Pig Bladder wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:52:27 -0600, David Maynard wrote:


Gary H wrote:


Mxsmanic wrote:


Many people refuse to believe that anyone could become more
successful than themselves through purely legitimate means
because it implies that these such a person might be smarter
than they are, and they cannot accept this possibility.


Awwww, please don't practice your dime store psychology on me? I
know Bill Gates is much much smarter than I am, no question
about it. I didn't say he wasn't. I merely said he was a thief
with accomplices before and after the fact. Why do you have to
make it complicated? :-)

Because David Maynard doesn't have a real argument.


Because you demonstrate the trait even in the denial of it.


You certainly are showing a lot of the symptoms of this "denial"
you so glibly bandy about, however.

Name one.

One example is your opinion that Microsoft doesn't hold monopoly
power. That's some serious denial.













Path: newsdbm04.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm01.news.prodigy. com!newsdst02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.pro digy.com!prodigy.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!pr odigy.net!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.c om!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news.mailg ate.org!surfnet.nl!surfnet.nl!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1. tudelft.nl!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!1 38.199.65.86.MISMATCH!sn-ams-06!sn-ams-03!sn-post-ams-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: David Maynard nospam private.net
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics,sci.electronics.repair,alt. comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
Subject: The truth about OS/2!!! [ Why aren't computer clocks as accurate as cheap quartz watches?]
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:36:55 -0600
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: 11q4dinhcik0g84 corp.supernews.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: Xns970147786A91Bfollydom 207.115.17.102 8EL9f.4374$8W.18 newssvr30.news.prodigy.com Xns9701B9F44C436follydom 207.115.17.102 8a1hm11b7cdbko4f1ds8ee8d5s1daispbl 4ax.com 0V4af.577$bU3.177499 twister.southeast.rr.com u88im195941fm8f4tbl8cjq9tnib11prvi 4ax.com ZZednQ-gsM6eoPTeRVn-pg midco.net 4398E636.DF76BAC7 earthlink.net YIKmf.5730$PX2.473113 news20.bellglobal.com 11pn5mpiojisd91 corp.supernews.com c7Nmf.10704$kt5.1054266 news20.bellglobal.com edvnp1hsoen1vit2ct08fgiatb6lq22nt8 4ax.com fkVmf.343$PQ3.8126 news20.bellglobal.com 11poboptnt4tr14 corp.supernews.com pan.2005.12.16.00.35.38.144444 neodruid.net
In-Reply-To: pan.2005.12.16.00.35.38.144444 neodruid.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse supernews.com
Lines: 37
Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com sci.electronics.basics:230192 sci.electronics.repair:433289 alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:452828

Gary H g.h sympatico.ca wrote:

David Maynard wrote:


It is true that discussions usually go no where when one, or
both, simply throw 'opinions' around. That's why I provide the
logic and reasoning,

That is very funny.


That, of course, doesn't work either if one clings to 'opinions'
regardless of logic or reasoning.

Sir, you supply *nothing* to these discussions except the same old
tired rhetoric, time after time, post after post.

Without ever snipping anything.


You "seem" as though you don't live in the real world at all. All
you ever offer the other side of a discussion are your points of
view while trying to the discredit the other party with
accusations of paranoia, flawed logic, being a whiner, irrational,
conspiracy buff and so on and so on. You take a totally off-hand
discussion of views, on a given subject, and turn it into a
personal thing where you try to discredit a point of view with
personal slurs.

Definitely, at least when it comes to his defense of Microsoft.

John Doe wrote:

David Maynard nospam private.net wrote:


Pig Bladder wrote:


On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:52:27 -0600, David Maynard wrote:



Gary H wrote:



Mxsmanic wrote:



Many people refuse to believe that anyone could become more
successful than themselves through purely legitimate means
because it implies that these such a person might be smarter
than they are, and they cannot accept this possibility.


Awwww, please don't practice your dime store psychology on me? I
know Bill Gates is much much smarter than I am, no question
about it. I didn't say he wasn't. I merely said he was a thief
with accomplices before and after the fact. Why do you have to
make it complicated? :-)


Because David Maynard doesn't have a real argument.

That was Pig Bladder speaking to Mxsmanic, not that accuracy was ever a
consideration for you.

Because you demonstrate the trait even in the denial of it.


You certainly are showing a lot of the symptoms of this "denial"
you so glibly bandy about, however.

Name one.


One example is your opinion that Microsoft doesn't hold monopoly
power. That's some serious denial.


Considering that I have refused to even discuss the topic with you, have
never said such a thing, and have reminded you of these facts uncounted
times you're not only incorrect but a bald face liar, or demented.

Which, as I have also told you numerous times, is one reason why I won't
discuss it with you.

Let's see, the other message you reached back into February for and this
one you went back to Dec 15 of last year.

John Doe wrote:

Gary H g.h sympatico.ca wrote:


David Maynard wrote:


It is true that discussions usually go no where when one, or
both, simply throw 'opinions' around. That's why I provide the
logic and reasoning,


That is very funny.

I'm not surprised you find logic and reasoning "funny."


That, of course, doesn't work either if one clings to 'opinions'
regardless of logic or reasoning.

Sir, you supply *nothing* to these discussions except the same old
tired rhetoric, time after time, post after post.


Without ever snipping anything.

Unlike you who snip everything out of context in order to misrepresent what
was said and this message is an excellent example as you, just below, try
to turn this into you favorite hair on fire bugaboo, Microsoft, when the
topic under discussion was Canada/U.S. oil company negotiations.

And, of course, in the best yellow journalism character assassination
attempt style you snipped everything I said in reply.

You "seem" as though you don't live in the real world at all. All
you ever offer the other side of a discussion are your points of
view while trying to the discredit the other party with
accusations of paranoia, flawed logic, being a whiner, irrational,
conspiracy buff and so on and so on. You take a totally off-hand
discussion of views, on a given subject, and turn it into a
personal thing where you try to discredit a point of view with
personal slurs.


Definitely, at least when it comes to his defense of Microsoft.

If the truth is a 'defense' then so be it.

David Maynard nospam private.net wrote:
John Doe wrote:
David Maynard nospam private.net wrote:
Pig Bladder wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:52:27 -0600, David Maynard wrote:
Gary H wrote:


Awwww, please don't practice your dime store psychology on me?
I know Bill Gates is much much smarter than I am, no question
about it. I didn't say he wasn't. I merely said he was a
thief with accomplices before and after the fact. Why do you
have to make it complicated? :-)

Because David Maynard doesn't have a real argument.

That was Pig Bladder speaking to Mxsmanic, not that accuracy was
ever a consideration for you.

In fact, Bozo, that was Gary H replying to Mxsmanic.

But even if the attributes were important to you, Bozo, why did you
reply as if you were Mxsmanic?

Because you demonstrate the trait even in the denial of it.

Message-ID: 11poboptnt4tr14 corp.supernews.com


You certainly are showing a lot of the symptoms of this "denial"
you so glibly bandy about, however.

Name one.

One example is your opinion that Microsoft doesn't hold monopoly
power. That's some serious denial.

Considering that I have refused to even discuss the topic with
you, have never said such a thing, and have reminded you of these
facts uncounted times you're not only incorrect but a bald face
liar, or demented.

Speaking of bold face liars. I've never seen anybody write so many
distortions and lies in front of everybody else and act like there's
nothing wrong with it. You act like you have no conscience, you will
say anything in an argument no matter how obviously false. I would
hesitate to accept any advice you give that I do not know or cannot
verify.

You are a libertarian who believes the government does good only by
chance.

"The law of averages and random chance dictate there's almost
certainly something [the government has done good], yes."

Message-ID: 114ms0birte795d corp.supernews.com

That's your basis for defending Microsoft against antitrust
litigation. You began backtracking on Microsoft after I started
laying down the facts in response to your nonsense.

"The fallacy there is that you only consider a 'Microsoft O.S.' to
be competition for Microsoft and that's as if I complained there are
no sources for "Barba Streisand songs" other than Barbra Streisand
so she enjoys a monopoly over them."

Message-ID: 114fptc8unq0h45 corp.supernews.com


Which, as I have also told you numerous times, is one reason why I
won't discuss it with you.

The reason you won't discuss it now is because you know I will show
that your opinion isn't acceptable to anybody except another freak
libertarian.











Path: newssvr14.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm05.news.prodigy. com!newsdbm04.news.prodigy.com!newsdst02.news.prod igy.com!prodigy.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!pro digy.net!news.glorb.com!sn-xt-sjc-15!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: David Maynard nospam private.net
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics,sci.electronics.repair,alt. comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
Subject: The truth about OS/2!!! [ Why aren't computer clocks as accurate as cheap quartz watches?]
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:48:41 -0500
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: 1236mhpisqqbva9 corp.supernews.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: Xns970147786A91Bfollydom 207.115.17.102 8EL9f.4374$8W.18 newssvr30.news.prodigy.com Xns9701B9F44C436follydom 207.115.17.102 8a1hm11b7cdbko4f1ds8ee8d5s1daispbl 4ax.com 0V4af.577$bU3.177499 twister.southeast.rr.com u88im195941fm8f4tbl8cjq9tnib11prvi 4ax.com ZZednQ-gsM6eoPTeRVn-pg midco.net 4398E636.DF76BAC7 earthlink.net YIKmf.5730$PX2.473113 news20.bellglobal.com 11pn5mpiojisd91 corp.supernews.com c7Nmf.10704$kt5.1054266 news20.bellglobal.com edvnp1hsoen1vit2ct08fgiatb6lq22nt8 4ax.com fkVmf.343$PQ3.8126 news20.bellglobal.com 11poboptnt4tr14 corp.supernews.com pan.2005.12.16.00.35.38.144444 neodruid.net 11q4dinhcik0g84 corp.supernews.com eTuYf.44596$_S7.43973 newssvr14.news.prodigy.com
In-Reply-To: eTuYf.44596$_S7.43973 newssvr14.news.prodigy.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse supernews.com
Lines: 61
Xref: prodigy.net sci.electronics.basics:240083 sci.electronics.repair:447052 alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:463061

John Doe wrote:

David Maynard nospam private.net wrote:

John Doe wrote:

David Maynard nospam private.net wrote:

Pig Bladder wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:52:27 -0600, David Maynard wrote:

Gary H wrote:


Awwww, please don't practice your dime store psychology on me?
I know Bill Gates is much much smarter than I am, no question
about it. I didn't say he wasn't. I merely said he was a
thief with accomplices before and after the fact. Why do you
have to make it complicated? :-)

Because David Maynard doesn't have a real argument.

That was Pig Bladder speaking to Mxsmanic, not that accuracy was
ever a consideration for you.


In fact, Bozo, that was Gary H replying to Mxsmanic.

But even if the attributes were important to you, Bozo, why did you
reply as if you were Mxsmanic?

I didn't, your inability to follow quote indents notwithstanding, 'Bozo'.

Because you demonstrate the trait even in the denial of it.


Message-ID: 11poboptnt4tr14 corp.supernews.com

You certainly are showing a lot of the symptoms of this "denial"
you so glibly bandy about, however.

Name one.

One example is your opinion that Microsoft doesn't hold monopoly
power. That's some serious denial.

Considering that I have refused to even discuss the topic with
you, have never said such a thing, and have reminded you of these
facts uncounted times you're not only incorrect but a bald face
liar, or demented.


Speaking of bold face liars. I've never seen anybody write so many
distortions and lies in front of everybody else and act like there's
nothing wrong with it. You act like you have no conscience, you will
say anything in an argument no matter how obviously false. I would
hesitate to accept any advice you give that I do not know or cannot
verify.

You've given a fairly decent description of yourself.


You are a libertarian who believes the government does good only by
chance.

You haven't got the slightest idea what I 'believe' and, as I've told you
nigh onto a thousand times by now, I'm not going to discuss them with you
either.


"The law of averages and random chance dictate there's almost
certainly something [the government has done good], yes."

Taken out of context and misrepresented, as usual, not to mention you can't
even quote one sentence without inserting your own 'rewording' of it.

snip of more distortions

Message-ID: 114fptc8unq0h45 corp.supernews.com

Which, as I have also told you numerous times, is one reason why I
won't discuss it with you.


The reason you won't discuss it now is because you know I will show
that your opinion isn't acceptable to anybody except another freak
libertarian.

I won't discuss it with you because you're demented, and a liar.

John Doe wrote:

Gary H g.h sympatico.ca wrote:


You "seem" as though you don't live in the real world at all.
All you ever offer the other side of a discussion are your points
of view while trying to the discredit the other party with
accusations of paranoia, flawed logic, being a whiner,
irrational, conspiracy buff and so on and so on. You take a
totally off-hand discussion of views, on a given subject, and
turn it into a personal thing where you try to discredit a point
of view with personal slurs.


That is true in just about any debate with David Maynard. It's as if
he can't cope with dissension. When someone disagrees with him, he
immediately resorts to attacking their character.

What's the matter? Your first three troll attempts on this one too
'frustrating'?

David Maynard nospam private.net wrote:

John Doe wrote:

David Maynard nospam private.net wrote:

John Doe wrote:

David Maynard nospam private.net wrote:

Pig Bladder wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:52:27 -0600, David Maynard wrote:

Gary H wrote:


That was Pig Bladder speaking to Mxsmanic, not that accuracy was
ever a consideration for you.

In fact, Bozo, that was Gary H replying to Mxsmanic.

But even if the attributes were important to you, Bozo, why did
you reply as if you were Mxsmanic?

I didn't, your inability to follow quote indents notwithstanding,
'Bozo'.

I provided the message ID, Bozo. Mxsmanic asked the question. Gary H
replied. And you replied to Gary H as if you were Mxsmanic. It's
right here, Bozo.

Message-ID:

Do you think the people reading your messages are so stupid that
they can't see your blatant lies?

When you lie in plain sight like that, I think it brings into
question any advice you give on USENET.


You certainly are showing a lot of the symptoms of this
"denial" you so glibly bandy about, however.


[David Maynard is] a libertarian who believes the government does
good only by chance.

You haven't got the slightest idea what I 'believe'

I know what you have written, which is more than you know.


"The law of averages and random chance dictate there's almost
certainly something [the government has done good], yes."

Taken out of context and misrepresented,

Do you think the people reading your messages are so stupid that
they can't see your blatant lies? I provided the message ID, Bozo,
it's right here.

Message-ID:

When you lie in plain sight like that, I think it brings into
question any advice you give on USENET.


The reason you won't discuss [whether Microsoft holds monopoly
power] now is because you know I will show that your opinion
isn't acceptable to anybody except another freak libertarian.












Path: newssvr11.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm04.news.prodigy. com!newsdst02.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon 02.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!news.moat.net!news 2.volia.net!newsfeed.gamma.ru!Gamma.RU!sn-xt-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: David Maynard nospam private.net
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics,sci.electronics.repair,alt. comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
Subject: The truth about OS/2!!! [ Why aren't computer clocks as accurate as cheap quartz watches?]
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 08:04:17 -0500
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: 1237g2j7uufn796 corp.supernews.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: Xns970147786A91Bfollydom 207.115.17.102 8EL9f.4374$8W.18 newssvr30.news.prodigy.com Xns9701B9F44C436follydom 207.115.17.102 8a1hm11b7cdbko4f1ds8ee8d5s1daispbl 4ax.com 0V4af.577$bU3.177499 twister.southeast.rr.com u88im195941fm8f4tbl8cjq9tnib11prvi 4ax.com ZZednQ-gsM6eoPTeRVn-pg midco.net 4398E636.DF76BAC7 earthlink.net YIKmf.5730$PX2.473113 news20.bellglobal.com 11pn5mpiojisd91 corp.supernews.com c7Nmf.10704$kt5.1054266 news20.bellglobal.com edvnp1hsoen1vit2ct08fgiatb6lq22nt8 4ax.com fkVmf.343$PQ3.8126 news20.bellglobal.com 11poboptnt4tr14 corp.supernews.com pan.2005.12.16.00.35.38.144444 neodruid.net 11q4dinhcik0g84 corp.supernews.com eTuYf.44596$_S7.43973 newssvr14.news.prodigy.com 1236mhpisqqbva9 corp.supernews.com YcMYf.8520$4L1.3361 newssvr11.news.prodigy.com
In-Reply-To: YcMYf.8520$4L1.3361 newssvr11.news.prodigy.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse supernews.com
Lines: 91
Xref: prodigy.net sci.electronics.basics:240094 sci.electronics.repair:447067 alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:463081

John Doe wrote:

David Maynard nospam private.net wrote:


John Doe wrote:


David Maynard nospam private.net wrote:


John Doe wrote:


David Maynard nospam private.net wrote:


Pig Bladder wrote:


On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:52:27 -0600, David Maynard wrote:


Gary H wrote:


That was Pig Bladder speaking to Mxsmanic, not that accuracy was
ever a consideration for you.

In fact, Bozo, that was Gary H replying to Mxsmanic.

But even if the attributes were important to you, Bozo, why did
you reply as if you were Mxsmanic?

I didn't, your inability to follow quote indents notwithstanding,
'Bozo'.


I provided the message ID, Bozo. Mxsmanic asked the question. Gary H
replied. And you replied to Gary H as if you were Mxsmanic. It's
right here, Bozo.

I replied under my name, you idiot, and your stupidity is not my problem.


Do you think the people reading your messages are so stupid that
they can't see your blatant lies?

When you lie in plain sight like that, I think it brings into
question any advice you give on USENET.

What they'll see is you're an idiot who can't read and then tries to blame
others for your own incompetence.


You certainly are showing a lot of the symptoms of this
"denial" you so glibly bandy about, however.


[David Maynard is] a libertarian who believes the government does
good only by chance.

You haven't got the slightest idea what I 'believe'


I know what you have written, which is more than you know.

From the idiot who can't read the names quoted in a message.
Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahaha


"The law of averages and random chance dictate there's almost
certainly something [the government has done good], yes."

Taken out of context and misrepresented,


Do you think the people reading your messages are so stupid that
they can't see your blatant lies? I provided the message ID, Bozo,
it's right here.

Message-ID:

When you lie in plain sight like that, I think it brings into
question any advice you give on USENET.

What they'll see is you snip, hack, and take quotes out of context to
misrepresent and lie, not to mention just plain ass inventing things never
said.

When you lie in plain sight like that, I think it brings into
question any advice you give on USENET.


Says John Doe the Merry Old troll, while loosening his belt cause he's over
fed ;^)

A top posting troll who's been corrected for giving bad advice more
than once, and just can't handle it.


"JAD" kapasitor earthcharter.net wrote:

Path: newssvr13.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm04.news.prodigy. com!newsdst02.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon 02.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!nx01.iad01.newshos ting.com!newshosting.com!69.28.186.75.MISMATCH!hwm npeer01.lga!hwmedia!news.highwinds-media.com!hw-filter.lga!fe02.lga.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "JAD" kapasitor earthcharter.net
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics,sci.electronics.repair,alt. comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
References: Xns970147786A91Bfollydom 207.115.17.102 8EL9f.4374$8W.18 newssvr30.news.prodigy.com Xns9701B9F44C436follydom 207.115.17.102 8a1hm11b7cdbko4f1ds8ee8d5s1daispbl 4ax.com 0V4af.577$bU3.177499 twister.southeast.rr.com u88im195941fm8f4tbl8cjq9tnib11prvi 4ax.com ZZednQ-gsM6eoPTeRVn-pg midco.net 4398E636.DF76BAC7 earthlink.net YIKmf.5730$PX2.473113 news20.bellglobal.com 11pn5mpiojisd91 corp.supernews.com c7Nmf.10704$kt5.1054266 news20.bellglobal.com edvnp1hsoen1vit2ct08fgiatb6lq22nt8 4ax.com fkVmf.343$PQ3.8126 news20.bellglobal.com 11poboptnt4tr14 corp.supernews.com pan.2005.12.16.00.35.38.144444 neodruid.net 11q4dinhcik0g84 corp.supernews.com eTuYf.44596$_S7.43973 newssvr14.news.prodigy.com 1236mhpisqqbva9 corp.supernews.com YcMYf.8520$4L1.3361 newssvr11.news.prodigy.com 1237g2j7uufn796 corp.supernews.com JRVYf.8643$4L1.1836 newssvr11.news.prodigy.com 1238tvfc6isusd0 corp.supernews.com
Subject: The truth about OS/2!!! [ Why aren't computer clocks as accurate as cheap quartz watches?]
Lines: 8
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Message-ID: Qw%Yf.879$3U7.807 fe02.lga
X-Trace: ejlmlnpfppkfdeplbcdolonpgpbieepkbidbmgocohnollpaao nhidceclnhngfnmaheihlkafjlaohemaflllcofhhemameolel djjegeeioagaceabbnlgoenfdjfnbcfagklmibllijll
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:02:08 MST
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 20:01:50 -0700
Xref: prodigy.net sci.electronics.basics:240133 sci.electronics.repair:447096 alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:463157

When you lie in plain sight like that, I think it brings into
question any advice you give on USENET.


Says John Doe the Merry Old troll, while loosening his belt cause he's over
fed ;^)

David Maynard nospam private.net wrote:

John Doe wrote:


When you lie in plain sight like that, I think it brings into
question any advice you give on USENET.

What they'll see is you snip, hack, and take quotes out of context
to misrepresent and lie, not to mention just plain ass inventing
things never said.

They were said, you are just afraid to defend them (for some strange
reason) you always run away when confronted. You just deny you
expressed them. Weird IMO but true.

Here again is your libertarian freak opinion about government doing
good only by chance.

Message-ID:

"The law of averages and random chance dictate there's almost
certainly something [government has done good], yes."

Here are two examples of your libertarian freak opinion about
Microsoft Windows not being a monopoly.

Message-ID:

"The fallacy there is that you only consider a 'Microsoft O.S.' to
be competition for Microsoft and that's as if I complained there are
no sources for "Barba Streisand songs" other than Barbra Streisand
so she enjoys a monopoly over them."

Message-ID:

"[Saying that there's no competition to windows] is like
saying there's no competition to ABC, and please don't say NBC
because they don't show the same programs."










Path: newssvr13.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm04.news.prodigy. com!newsdst02.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon 02.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!nx02.iad01.newshos ting.com!newshosting.com!novia!newsfeed.icl.net!pr oxad.net!proxad.net!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!216.196. 110.149.MISMATCH!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nnt p.giganews.com!feeder1.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews. nl!138.199.65.86.MISMATCH!sn-ams-06!sn-xt-ams-04!sn-ams!sn-feed-ams-03!sn-ams!sn-feed-ams-01!sn-xt-ams-05!sn-post-ams-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: David Maynard nospam private.net
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics,sci.electronics.repair,alt. comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
Subject: The truth about OS/2!!! [ Why aren't computer clocks as accurate as cheap quartz watches?]
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:07:42 -0500
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: 1238tvfc6isusd0 corp.supernews.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: Xns970147786A91Bfollydom 207.115.17.102 8EL9f.4374$8W.18 newssvr30.news.prodigy.com Xns9701B9F44C436follydom 207.115.17.102 8a1hm11b7cdbko4f1ds8ee8d5s1daispbl 4ax.com 0V4af.577$bU3.177499 twister.southeast.rr.com u88im195941fm8f4tbl8cjq9tnib11prvi 4ax.com ZZednQ-gsM6eoPTeRVn-pg midco.net 4398E636.DF76BAC7 earthlink.net YIKmf.5730$PX2.473113 news20.bellglobal.com 11pn5mpiojisd91 corp.supernews.com c7Nmf.10704$kt5.1054266 news20.bellglobal.com edvnp1hsoen1vit2ct08fgiatb6lq22nt8 4ax.com fkVmf.343$PQ3.8126 news20.bellglobal.com 11poboptnt4tr14 corp.supernews.com pan.2005.12.16.00.35.38.144444 neodruid.net 11q4dinhcik0g84 corp.supernews.com eTuYf.44596$_S7.43973 newssvr14.news.prodigy.com 1236mhpisqqbva9 corp.supernews.com YcMYf.8520$4L1.3361 newssvr11.news.prodigy.com 1237g2j7uufn796 corp.supernews.com JRVYf.8643$4L1.1836 newssvr11.news.prodigy.com
In-Reply-To: JRVYf.8643$4L1.1836 newssvr11.news.prodigy.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse supernews.com
Lines: 92
Xref: prodigy.net sci.electronics.basics:240132 sci.electronics.repair:447094 alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:463152

David Maynard wrote:

John Doe wrote:

Gary H g.h sympatico.ca wrote:


You "seem" as though you don't live in the real world at all.
All you ever offer the other side of a discussion are your
points of view while trying to the discredit the other party
with accusations of paranoia, flawed logic, being a whiner,
irrational, conspiracy buff and so on and so on. You take a
totally off-hand discussion of views, on a given subject, and
turn it into a personal thing where you try to discredit a
point of view with personal slurs.

That is true in just about any debate with David Maynard. It's as
if he can't cope with dissension. When someone disagrees with
him, he immediately resorts to attacking their character.

What's the matter?

Nothing. I was just being agreeable.

John Doe wrote:

David Maynard wrote:


John Doe wrote:


Gary H g.h sympatico.ca wrote:


You "seem" as though you don't live in the real world at all.
All you ever offer the other side of a discussion are your
points of view while trying to the discredit the other party
with accusations of paranoia, flawed logic, being a whiner,
irrational, conspiracy buff and so on and so on. You take a
totally off-hand discussion of views, on a given subject, and
turn it into a personal thing where you try to discredit a
point of view with personal slurs.

That is true in just about any debate with David Maynard. It's as
if he can't cope with dissension. When someone disagrees with
him, he immediately resorts to attacking their character.

What's the matter?


Nothing. I was just being agreeable.

A snip to misrepresent my message added on top of the original attempt at
character assassination and this you describe as "being agreeable."

Speaks volumes.

John Doe wrote:

David Maynard nospam private.net wrote:


John Doe wrote:


When you lie in plain sight like that, I think it brings into
question any advice you give on USENET.

What they'll see is you snip, hack, and take quotes out of context
to misrepresent and lie, not to mention just plain ass inventing
things never said.


They were said, you are just afraid to defend them (for some strange
reason) you always run away when confronted. You just deny you
expressed them. Weird IMO but true.

I've told you a thousand times I'm not going to discuss the topics with you
at all and I'm certainly not going to discuss your partial, reworded, and
hacked out of context supposed 'quotes' you use to misrepresent, distort,
and lie.

snip

On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 06:46:24 GMT, John Doe
wrote:

"JAD" kapasitor earthcharter.net wrote:
nothing worth repeating

A top posting troll who's been corrected for giving bad advice more
than once, and just can't handle it.

Same thing happened when I was having a discussion with D.Maynard.
JAD jumped to defend him, someone who "can't cope with dissension.
When someone disagrees with him, he immediately resorts to attacking
their character". Other things he does: denies what he just said, or
changes the topic.

Geo

"GEO" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 06:46:24 GMT, John Doe
wrote:

"JAD" kapasitor earthcharter.net wrote:
nothing worth repeating

Says John Doe the Merry Old troll, while loosening his belt cause he's over
fed ;^)

WAY WORTH repeating


A top posting troll who's been corrected for giving bad advice more
than once, and just can't handle it.

Same thing happened when I was having a discussion with D.Maynard.
JAD jumped to defend him, someone who "can't cope with dissension.


I always hated detention


When someone disagrees with him, he immediately resorts to attacking
their character".

John Doe, by the very nature of his name, is devoid of character. Unlike
you, who has the 'character of a toady. I am not defending anyone, merely
pointing out that unless your really really really bored, John Doe and his
'defenders' are not worth the effort. Sometimes we get caught up in
'debates' (for lack of a better word) with Trolls who repeatedly Chum the
waters with outlandish exaggerations, and we, for whatever the reason, start
typing, (Referred to as TWI), And a friendly reminder is due, that trolls
are fed more than enough in their -other-than-usenet- persona everyday.

Other things he does: denies what he just said, or
changes the topic.

I never said that.


So How about those White Sox?....................stop crying toady

David Maynard nospam private.net wrote:

John Doe wrote:


... you are just afraid to defend [your opinions] (for some
strange reason) you always run away when confronted. You just
deny you expressed them. Weird IMO but true.

I've told you a thousand times I'm not going to discuss the topics
with you at all

You are afraid and run away from defending your bizarre freakish
opinions about government and Microsoft's (lack of, in your opinion)
monopoly power.

I am familiar with your bizarre and freakish opinions because I've
argued with libertarians who were defending Microsoft before. Most
of them, just like you, have shied away from the subject since the
issues were firmly decided in court.

You say government can't do anything right except "by chance". You
say antitrust enforcement against Microsoft is wrong. You say that
Microsoft's former competitors were whining to the government for
help. The problem with your argument is that Microsoft is in court
every day whining to the government for help. If it weren't for our
government enforcing intellectual property law at Microsoft's
request and at the point of a gun, Microsoft would fall apart like a
playing card house.










Path: newssvr12.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm05.news.prodigy. com!
newsdbm04.news.prodigy.com!newsdst02.news.prodigy. com!prodigy.com!
newscon02.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!news.moat.n et!news.hub.org!sn-
xt-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-
for-mail
From: David Maynard nospam private.net
Newsgroups:
sci.electronics.basics,sci.electronics.repair,alt. comp.hardware.pc-
homebuilt
Subject: The truth about OS/2!!! [ Why aren't computer clocks
as accurate as cheap quartz watches?]
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 03:26:22 -0500
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: 1239k5ejq60sda8 corp.supernews.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4)
Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: Xns970147786A91Bfollydom 207.115.17.102 8EL9f.4374
$8W.18 newssvr30.news.prodigy.com Xns9701B9F44C436follydom
207.115.17.102 8a1hm11b7cdbko4f1ds8ee8d5s1daispbl 4ax.com 0V4af.577
$bU3.177499 twister.southeast.rr.com
u88im195941fm8f4tbl8cjq9tnib11prvi 4ax.com ZZednQ-gsM6eoPTeRVn-pg
midco.net 4398E636.DF76BAC7 earthlink.net YIKmf.5730$PX2.473113
news20.bellglobal.com 11pn5mpiojisd91 corp.supernews.com
c7Nmf.10704$kt5.1054266 news20.bellglobal.com
edvnp1hsoen1vit2ct08fgiatb6lq22nt8 4ax.com fkVmf.343$PQ3.8126
news20.bellglobal.com 11poboptnt4tr14 corp.supernews.com
pan.2005.12.16.00.35.38.144444 neodruid.net 11q4dinhcik0g84
corp.supernews.com eTuYf.44596$_S7.43973 newssvr14.news.prodigy.com
1236mhpisqqbva9 corp.supernews.com YcMYf.8520$4L1.3361
newssvr11.news.prodigy.com 1237g2j7uufn796 corp.supernews.com
JRVYf.8643$4L1.1836 newssvr11.news.prodigy.com 1238tvfc6isusd0
corp.supernews.com gl3Zf.62445$H71.2925 newssvr13.news.prodigy.com
In-Reply-To: gl3Zf.62445$H71.2925 newssvr13.news.prodigy.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse supernews.com
Lines: 27
Xref: prodigy.net sci.electronics.basics:240142
sci.electronics.repair:447107 alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:463170

John Doe wrote:
David Maynard nospam private.net wrote:


John Doe wrote:


... you are just afraid to defend [your opinions] (for some
strange reason) you always run away when confronted. You just
deny you expressed them. Weird IMO but true.

I've told you a thousand times I'm not going to discuss the topics
with you at all


You are afraid and run away from defending your bizarre freakish
opinions about government and Microsoft's (lack of, in your opinion)
monopoly power.

I'm simply not going to discuss it with a liar and you trolling more lies
won't alter that.

snip

On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 03:18:18 -0500, David Maynard wrote:

Followups repaired.
--
Flap!
The Pig Bladder from Uranus, still waiting for that
hot babe to ask what my favorite planet is. ;-j

On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 22:27:09 -0500, David Maynard wrote:

Followups repaired.
--
Flap!
The Pig Bladder from Uranus, still waiting for that
hot babe to ask what my favorite planet is. ;-j

On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 08:53:19 -0700, JAD wrote:

Followups repaired.

"Pig Bladder" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 22:27:09 -0500, David Maynard wrote:

Followups repaired.
--
Flap!
The Pig Bladder from Uranus, still waiting for that
hot babe to ask what my favorite planet is. ;-j



Thank you and goodnight, what would the usenet do without you??