Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronic Schematics (alt.binaries.schematics.electronic) A place to show and share your electronics schematic drawings. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Probably a stupid question, but...
Above is the schematic for an audio amp I am hoping to build for one side of an intercom for my front door. I am using a 7812 to provide +12V, and precision resistors (1% for the 2.7K and .01% for the 4K as well as 1% for the 4.02K, which actually measures 4.02K) to bias the JFET. I would have used .01% for the 2.7K also, but my candy store was out of them. May have to order some... Anyway, am hoping to get some feedback on the design, as I am NOT an EE, and really have no idea as to what I am attempting here (if that isn't already obvious.) If anyone sees anything particularly stupid, I am hoping they will say something so I can troubleshoot it at this point, rather than on the perfboard. Comments are sought, good, bad or indifferent. Blast away. I have a lot to learn, and would like to get started. Many thanks. Dave PS: just for the record, input is open end of C5 and output is open end of C4. The JFET's IDSS is 3mA, and if anyone wants to see the calcs for this biasing network, I will happily upload them. Otherwise, I'll try to shut up. Again, my thanks. Hoping I haven't already committed some mortal sin... |
#2
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Probably a stupid question, but...
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:53:29 -0600, "Dave" wrote:
Above is the schematic for an audio amp I am hoping to build for one side of an intercom for my front door. I am using a 7812 to provide +12V, and precision resistors (1% for the 2.7K and .01% for the 4K as well as 1% for the 4.02K, which actually measures 4.02K) to bias the JFET. I would have used .01% for the 2.7K also, but my candy store was out of them. May have to order some... Jfets characteristics are all over the place; 4:1 or even 10:1 on Idsss between parts is common. 5% resistors are plenty good enough. Anyway, am hoping to get some feedback on the design, as I am NOT an EE, and really have no idea as to what I am attempting here (if that isn't already obvious.) If anyone sees anything particularly stupid, I am hoping they will say something so I can troubleshoot it at this point, rather than on the perfboard. Comments are sought, good, bad or indifferent. Blast away. I have a lot to learn, and would like to get started. Many thanks. Dave PS: just for the record, input is open end of C5 and output is open end of C4. The JFET's IDSS is 3mA, and if anyone wants to see the calcs for this biasing network, I will happily upload them. Otherwise, I'll try to shut up. Again, my thanks. Hoping I haven't already committed some mortal sin... May I suggest that you spread out the schematic and generally clean it up a bit? It's hard to read, and there are a number of intersections that might or might not be connections. The caps all look small in value. John |
#3
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Probably a stupid question, but...
"John Larkin" wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:53:29 -0600, "Dave" wrote: Above is the schematic for an audio amp I am hoping to build for one side of an intercom for my front door. I am using a 7812 to provide +12V, and precision resistors (1% for the 2.7K and .01% for the 4K as well as 1% for the 4.02K, which actually measures 4.02K) to bias the JFET. I would have used .01% for the 2.7K also, but my candy store was out of them. May have to order some... Jfets characteristics are all over the place; 4:1 or even 10:1 on Idsss between parts is common. 5% resistors are plenty good enough. \ Hmm. I understand this to be the case, but my NTE JFETS seem to contradict the idea. Still, I am planning on taking measurements in the actual circuit to make sure I am on target. Thanks. Anyway, am hoping to get some feedback on the design, as I am NOT an EE, and really have no idea as to what I am attempting here (if that isn't already obvious.) If anyone sees anything particularly stupid, I am hoping they will say something so I can troubleshoot it at this point, rather than on the perfboard. Comments are sought, good, bad or indifferent. Blast away. I have a lot to learn, and would like to get started. Many thanks. Dave PS: just for the record, input is open end of C5 and output is open end of C4. The JFET's IDSS is 3mA, and if anyone wants to see the calcs for this biasing network, I will happily upload them. Otherwise, I'll try to shut up. Again, my thanks. Hoping I haven't already committed some mortal sin... May I suggest that you spread out the schematic and generally clean it up a bit? It's hard to read, and there are a number of intersections that might or might not be connections. The caps all look small in value. John Yeah, it is rather cramped. Apologies. Will work on that, for the sake of clarity. Thanks again. Dave Oh, and all the caps (I *think*) are .1uF ceramic disks. This is small in value? I'm not sure I understand... |
#4
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Probably a stupid question, but...
"Dave" wrote in message ica... "John Larkin" wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:53:29 -0600, "Dave" wrote: Above is the schematic for an audio amp I am hoping to build for one side of an intercom for my front door. I am using a 7812 to provide +12V, and precision resistors (1% for the 2.7K and .01% for the 4K as well as 1% for the 4.02K, which actually measures 4.02K) to bias the JFET. I would have used .01% for the 2.7K also, but my candy store was out of them. May have to order some... Jfets characteristics are all over the place; 4:1 or even 10:1 on Idsss between parts is common. 5% resistors are plenty good enough. \ Hmm. I understand this to be the case, but my NTE JFETS seem to contradict the idea. Still, I am planning on taking measurements in the actual circuit to make sure I am on target. Thanks. Anyway, am hoping to get some feedback on the design, as I am NOT an EE, and really have no idea as to what I am attempting here (if that isn't already obvious.) If anyone sees anything particularly stupid, I am hoping they will say something so I can troubleshoot it at this point, rather than on the perfboard. Comments are sought, good, bad or indifferent. Blast away. I have a lot to learn, and would like to get started. Many thanks. Dave PS: just for the record, input is open end of C5 and output is open end of C4. The JFET's IDSS is 3mA, and if anyone wants to see the calcs for this biasing network, I will happily upload them. Otherwise, I'll try to shut up. Again, my thanks. Hoping I haven't already committed some mortal sin... May I suggest that you spread out the schematic and generally clean it up a bit? It's hard to read, and there are a number of intersections that might or might not be connections. The caps all look small in value. John Yeah, it is rather cramped. Apologies. Will work on that, for the sake of clarity. Thanks again. Dave Oh, and all the caps (I *think*) are .1uF ceramic disks. This is small in value? I'm not sure I understand... Or, do you mean that the *resistor* values seem small? That I could see, as they might appear such. If I'm wrong than I'm wrong, but these are the numbers I come up with as optimum for different reasons. Thanks. Dave |
#5
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Probably a stupid question, but...
Assuming everything about the circuit is as usually intended (a series of
common-emitter stages, or common-source for the JFET), you are missing two interstage coupling capacitors. You indicate several bias resistor dividers (R2/R1, R3/R4), but these are affected by the voltages that the preceeding stage produces (from R12/J1 or R10/Q1). The common-side bypass capacitors C1, C2 and C3 are working against the output impedance of the transistors, which are approximately 1/Gm ohms for the JFET, and around (0.025V / Ic) ohms for the BJTs. This is significantly lower than the associated bias resistors, because transistors are active devices. Typically the impedance is under 100 ohms; under real conditions, the 2N5486 might be closer to 300 ohms, while the BJTs might be 10 ohms or less. A 0.1uF capacitor will then have a cutoff frequency of F = 1 / (2*pi*R*C) = 15.9kHz, which is very high -- in fact, so high that, for much of the audio range, the circuit will behave as if they are not there. In that case, the large value emitter resistors reduce gain significantly from the high frequency case. You'll notice this as a peak in high-frequency gain above a few kHz, causing it to sound very tinny or screeching. Because the impedances are typically on the order of kohms or less, transistor circuits like this often use coupling capacitors of several uF, and bypass capacitors up to 100uF (more for power stages of this type). Capacitors in this range are usually electrolytic, so be careful to assign the '+' side to the higher voltage side (usually the collector/drain side, but check to be sure). Strictly speaking, coupling capacitors are not required for this type of circuit, but only if you have global feedback setting an equilibrium condition. Trying to adjust the setpoint of the whole chain with a couple resistors at the front is doomed to failure. Tim -- Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk. Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms "Dave" wrote in message ica... "John Larkin" wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:53:29 -0600, "Dave" wrote: Above is the schematic for an audio amp I am hoping to build for one side of an intercom for my front door. I am using a 7812 to provide +12V, and precision resistors (1% for the 2.7K and .01% for the 4K as well as 1% for the 4.02K, which actually measures 4.02K) to bias the JFET. I would have used .01% for the 2.7K also, but my candy store was out of them. May have to order some... Jfets characteristics are all over the place; 4:1 or even 10:1 on Idsss between parts is common. 5% resistors are plenty good enough. \ Hmm. I understand this to be the case, but my NTE JFETS seem to contradict the idea. Still, I am planning on taking measurements in the actual circuit to make sure I am on target. Thanks. Anyway, am hoping to get some feedback on the design, as I am NOT an EE, and really have no idea as to what I am attempting here (if that isn't already obvious.) If anyone sees anything particularly stupid, I am hoping they will say something so I can troubleshoot it at this point, rather than on the perfboard. Comments are sought, good, bad or indifferent. Blast away. I have a lot to learn, and would like to get started. Many thanks. Dave PS: just for the record, input is open end of C5 and output is open end of C4. The JFET's IDSS is 3mA, and if anyone wants to see the calcs for this biasing network, I will happily upload them. Otherwise, I'll try to shut up. Again, my thanks. Hoping I haven't already committed some mortal sin... May I suggest that you spread out the schematic and generally clean it up a bit? It's hard to read, and there are a number of intersections that might or might not be connections. The caps all look small in value. John Yeah, it is rather cramped. Apologies. Will work on that, for the sake of clarity. Thanks again. Dave Oh, and all the caps (I *think*) are .1uF ceramic disks. This is small in value? I'm not sure I understand... |
#6
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Probably a stupid question, but...
My God, thank you, Tim. I now have something to work with and for. Can
hardly believe I left out the interstage coupling capacitors, but that's what I did. Like I said, I am no EE, but I am trying to learn. I will weigh the information in your post so carefully... Much appreciated. Dave "Tim Williams" wrote in message ... Assuming everything about the circuit is as usually intended (a series of common-emitter stages, or common-source for the JFET), you are missing two interstage coupling capacitors. You indicate several bias resistor dividers (R2/R1, R3/R4), but these are affected by the voltages that the preceeding stage produces (from R12/J1 or R10/Q1). The common-side bypass capacitors C1, C2 and C3 are working against the output impedance of the transistors, which are approximately 1/Gm ohms for the JFET, and around (0.025V / Ic) ohms for the BJTs. This is significantly lower than the associated bias resistors, because transistors are active devices. Typically the impedance is under 100 ohms; under real conditions, the 2N5486 might be closer to 300 ohms, while the BJTs might be 10 ohms or less. A 0.1uF capacitor will then have a cutoff frequency of F = 1 / (2*pi*R*C) = 15.9kHz, which is very high -- in fact, so high that, for much of the audio range, the circuit will behave as if they are not there. In that case, the large value emitter resistors reduce gain significantly from the high frequency case. You'll notice this as a peak in high-frequency gain above a few kHz, causing it to sound very tinny or screeching. Because the impedances are typically on the order of kohms or less, transistor circuits like this often use coupling capacitors of several uF, and bypass capacitors up to 100uF (more for power stages of this type). Capacitors in this range are usually electrolytic, so be careful to assign the '+' side to the higher voltage side (usually the collector/drain side, but check to be sure). Strictly speaking, coupling capacitors are not required for this type of circuit, but only if you have global feedback setting an equilibrium condition. Trying to adjust the setpoint of the whole chain with a couple resistors at the front is doomed to failure. Tim -- Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk. Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms "Dave" wrote in message ica... "John Larkin" wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:53:29 -0600, "Dave" wrote: Above is the schematic for an audio amp I am hoping to build for one side of an intercom for my front door. I am using a 7812 to provide +12V, and precision resistors (1% for the 2.7K and .01% for the 4K as well as 1% for the 4.02K, which actually measures 4.02K) to bias the JFET. I would have used .01% for the 2.7K also, but my candy store was out of them. May have to order some... Jfets characteristics are all over the place; 4:1 or even 10:1 on Idsss between parts is common. 5% resistors are plenty good enough. \ Hmm. I understand this to be the case, but my NTE JFETS seem to contradict the idea. Still, I am planning on taking measurements in the actual circuit to make sure I am on target. Thanks. Anyway, am hoping to get some feedback on the design, as I am NOT an EE, and really have no idea as to what I am attempting here (if that isn't already obvious.) If anyone sees anything particularly stupid, I am hoping they will say something so I can troubleshoot it at this point, rather than on the perfboard. Comments are sought, good, bad or indifferent. Blast away. I have a lot to learn, and would like to get started. Many thanks. Dave PS: just for the record, input is open end of C5 and output is open end of C4. The JFET's IDSS is 3mA, and if anyone wants to see the calcs for this biasing network, I will happily upload them. Otherwise, I'll try to shut up. Again, my thanks. Hoping I haven't already committed some mortal sin... May I suggest that you spread out the schematic and generally clean it up a bit? It's hard to read, and there are a number of intersections that might or might not be connections. The caps all look small in value. John Yeah, it is rather cramped. Apologies. Will work on that, for the sake of clarity. Thanks again. Dave Oh, and all the caps (I *think*) are .1uF ceramic disks. This is small in value? I'm not sure I understand... |
#7
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Okay, maybe a little better...
Thoughts and suggestions are again welcome and sought. Thanks, Dave |
#8
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Okay, maybe a little better...
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:00:18 -0600, "Dave" wrote:
Thoughts and suggestions are again welcome and sought. Thanks, Dave --- Version 4 SHEET 1 932 680 WIRE -16 16 -256 16 WIRE 96 16 -16 16 WIRE 272 16 96 16 WIRE 368 16 272 16 WIRE 544 16 368 16 WIRE 640 16 544 16 WIRE -16 64 -16 16 WIRE 96 64 96 16 WIRE 272 64 272 16 WIRE 368 64 368 16 WIRE 544 64 544 16 WIRE 640 64 640 16 WIRE 96 192 96 144 WIRE 144 192 96 192 WIRE 272 192 272 144 WIRE 272 192 208 192 WIRE 368 192 368 144 WIRE 416 192 368 192 WIRE 544 192 544 144 WIRE 544 192 480 192 WIRE 640 192 640 144 WIRE 720 192 640 192 WIRE 848 192 784 192 WIRE 368 208 368 192 WIRE 640 208 640 192 WIRE 96 240 96 192 WIRE 272 256 272 192 WIRE 304 256 272 256 WIRE 544 256 544 192 WIRE 576 256 544 256 WIRE -112 288 -144 288 WIRE -16 288 -16 144 WIRE -16 288 -48 288 WIRE 848 288 848 192 WIRE -16 304 -16 288 WIRE 48 304 -16 304 WIRE 176 336 96 336 WIRE 368 336 368 304 WIRE 448 336 368 336 WIRE 640 336 640 304 WIRE 736 336 640 336 WIRE -16 352 -16 304 WIRE 96 352 96 336 WIRE 272 352 272 256 WIRE 368 352 368 336 WIRE 544 352 544 256 WIRE 640 352 640 336 WIRE -256 368 -256 16 WIRE -144 368 -144 288 WIRE 176 368 176 336 WIRE 448 368 448 336 WIRE 736 368 736 336 WIRE -256 480 -256 448 WIRE -144 480 -144 448 WIRE -144 480 -256 480 WIRE -16 480 -16 432 WIRE -16 480 -144 480 WIRE 96 480 96 432 WIRE 96 480 -16 480 WIRE 176 480 176 432 WIRE 176 480 96 480 WIRE 272 480 272 432 WIRE 272 480 176 480 WIRE 368 480 368 432 WIRE 368 480 272 480 WIRE 448 480 448 432 WIRE 448 480 368 480 WIRE 544 480 544 432 WIRE 544 480 448 480 WIRE 640 480 640 432 WIRE 640 480 544 480 WIRE 736 480 736 432 WIRE 736 480 640 480 WIRE 848 480 848 368 WIRE 848 480 736 480 WIRE -256 544 -256 480 FLAG -256 544 0 SYMBOL res 80 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R2 SYMATTR Value 820 SYMBOL res 256 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R3 SYMATTR Value 80K SYMBOL res 352 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R4 SYMATTR Value 10K SYMBOL res 528 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R5 SYMATTR Value 5.1K SYMBOL res 624 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R6 SYMATTR Value 510 SYMBOL res -32 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R1 SYMATTR Value 2.7K SYMBOL njf 48 240 R0 WINDOW 3 54 60 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName J1 SYMATTR Value 2N5486 SYMBOL res 80 336 R0 WINDOW 0 35 59 Left 2 WINDOW 3 22 90 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName R8 SYMATTR Value 4.02K SYMBOL res -32 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R7 SYMATTR Value 4K SYMBOL cap -48 272 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2 SYMATTR InstName C1 SYMATTR Value 100µ SYMBOL cap 160 368 R0 SYMATTR InstName C3 SYMATTR Value 4.7µ SYMBOL cap 208 176 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2 SYMATTR InstName C2 SYMATTR Value 100µ SYMBOL npn 304 208 R0 SYMATTR InstName Q1 SYMATTR Value 2N5210 SYMBOL res 352 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R10 SYMATTR Value 2K SYMBOL cap 432 368 R0 SYMATTR InstName C5 SYMATTR Value 4.7µ SYMBOL res 256 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R9 SYMATTR Value 39K SYMBOL npn 576 208 R0 SYMATTR InstName Q2 SYMATTR Value 2N3904 SYMBOL res 624 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R12 SYMATTR Value 470 SYMBOL cap 720 368 R0 SYMATTR InstName C6 SYMATTR Value 4.7µ SYMBOL cap 480 176 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2 SYMATTR InstName C4 SYMATTR Value 100µ SYMBOL res 528 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R11 SYMATTR Value 4.7K SYMBOL cap 784 176 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2 SYMATTR InstName C7 SYMATTR Value 100µ SYMBOL voltage -144 352 R0 WINDOW 3 24 96 Invisible 2 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName V1 SYMATTR Value SINE(0 .01 1000) SYMATTR Value2 AC 1 SYMBOL res 832 272 R0 SYMATTR InstName R13 SYMATTR Value 1000 SYMBOL voltage -256 352 R0 WINDOW 3 24 96 Invisible 2 WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 2 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName V2 SYMATTR Value 12 TEXT 38 520 Left 2 !;tran .01 TEXT -232 520 Left 2 !.ac oct 1024 10 100000 -- JF |
#9
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Okay, maybe a little better...
"John Fields" wrote in message ... On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:00:18 -0600, "Dave" wrote: Thoughts and suggestions are again welcome and sought. Thanks, Dave --- Version 4 SHEET 1 932 680 WIRE -16 16 -256 16 WIRE 96 16 -16 16 WIRE 272 16 96 16 WIRE 368 16 272 16 WIRE 544 16 368 16 WIRE 640 16 544 16 WIRE -16 64 -16 16 WIRE 96 64 96 16 WIRE 272 64 272 16 WIRE 368 64 368 16 WIRE 544 64 544 16 WIRE 640 64 640 16 WIRE 96 192 96 144 WIRE 144 192 96 192 WIRE 272 192 272 144 WIRE 272 192 208 192 WIRE 368 192 368 144 WIRE 416 192 368 192 WIRE 544 192 544 144 WIRE 544 192 480 192 WIRE 640 192 640 144 WIRE 720 192 640 192 WIRE 848 192 784 192 WIRE 368 208 368 192 WIRE 640 208 640 192 WIRE 96 240 96 192 WIRE 272 256 272 192 WIRE 304 256 272 256 WIRE 544 256 544 192 WIRE 576 256 544 256 WIRE -112 288 -144 288 WIRE -16 288 -16 144 WIRE -16 288 -48 288 WIRE 848 288 848 192 WIRE -16 304 -16 288 WIRE 48 304 -16 304 WIRE 176 336 96 336 WIRE 368 336 368 304 WIRE 448 336 368 336 WIRE 640 336 640 304 WIRE 736 336 640 336 WIRE -16 352 -16 304 WIRE 96 352 96 336 WIRE 272 352 272 256 WIRE 368 352 368 336 WIRE 544 352 544 256 WIRE 640 352 640 336 WIRE -256 368 -256 16 WIRE -144 368 -144 288 WIRE 176 368 176 336 WIRE 448 368 448 336 WIRE 736 368 736 336 WIRE -256 480 -256 448 WIRE -144 480 -144 448 WIRE -144 480 -256 480 WIRE -16 480 -16 432 WIRE -16 480 -144 480 WIRE 96 480 96 432 WIRE 96 480 -16 480 WIRE 176 480 176 432 WIRE 176 480 96 480 WIRE 272 480 272 432 WIRE 272 480 176 480 WIRE 368 480 368 432 WIRE 368 480 272 480 WIRE 448 480 448 432 WIRE 448 480 368 480 WIRE 544 480 544 432 WIRE 544 480 448 480 WIRE 640 480 640 432 WIRE 640 480 544 480 WIRE 736 480 736 432 WIRE 736 480 640 480 WIRE 848 480 848 368 WIRE 848 480 736 480 WIRE -256 544 -256 480 FLAG -256 544 0 SYMBOL res 80 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R2 SYMATTR Value 820 SYMBOL res 256 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R3 SYMATTR Value 80K SYMBOL res 352 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R4 SYMATTR Value 10K SYMBOL res 528 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R5 SYMATTR Value 5.1K SYMBOL res 624 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R6 SYMATTR Value 510 SYMBOL res -32 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R1 SYMATTR Value 2.7K SYMBOL njf 48 240 R0 WINDOW 3 54 60 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName J1 SYMATTR Value 2N5486 SYMBOL res 80 336 R0 WINDOW 0 35 59 Left 2 WINDOW 3 22 90 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName R8 SYMATTR Value 4.02K SYMBOL res -32 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R7 SYMATTR Value 4K SYMBOL cap -48 272 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2 SYMATTR InstName C1 SYMATTR Value 100µ SYMBOL cap 160 368 R0 SYMATTR InstName C3 SYMATTR Value 4.7µ SYMBOL cap 208 176 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2 SYMATTR InstName C2 SYMATTR Value 100µ SYMBOL npn 304 208 R0 SYMATTR InstName Q1 SYMATTR Value 2N5210 SYMBOL res 352 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R10 SYMATTR Value 2K SYMBOL cap 432 368 R0 SYMATTR InstName C5 SYMATTR Value 4.7µ SYMBOL res 256 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R9 SYMATTR Value 39K SYMBOL npn 576 208 R0 SYMATTR InstName Q2 SYMATTR Value 2N3904 SYMBOL res 624 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R12 SYMATTR Value 470 SYMBOL cap 720 368 R0 SYMATTR InstName C6 SYMATTR Value 4.7µ SYMBOL cap 480 176 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2 SYMATTR InstName C4 SYMATTR Value 100µ SYMBOL res 528 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R11 SYMATTR Value 4.7K SYMBOL cap 784 176 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2 SYMATTR InstName C7 SYMATTR Value 100µ SYMBOL voltage -144 352 R0 WINDOW 3 24 96 Invisible 2 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName V1 SYMATTR Value SINE(0 .01 1000) SYMATTR Value2 AC 1 SYMBOL res 832 272 R0 SYMATTR InstName R13 SYMATTR Value 1000 SYMBOL voltage -256 352 R0 WINDOW 3 24 96 Invisible 2 WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 2 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName V2 SYMATTR Value 12 TEXT 38 520 Left 2 !;tran .01 TEXT -232 520 Left 2 !.ac oct 1024 10 100000 -- JF Hello John, and thank you for this info. Unfortunately I can'tremember waht to do with a netlist for LTSpice. Could you possibly spare a word or two, and clue me in? I've only done this once before, I think, and the memory o what I did eludes me. Thanks, Dave |
#10
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Okay, maybe a little better...
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 19:32:42 -0600, "Dave" wrote:
"John Fields" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:00:18 -0600, "Dave" wrote: Thoughts and suggestions are again welcome and sought. Thanks, Dave --- Version 4 SHEET 1 932 680 WIRE -16 16 -256 16 WIRE 96 16 -16 16 WIRE 272 16 96 16 WIRE 368 16 272 16 WIRE 544 16 368 16 WIRE 640 16 544 16 WIRE -16 64 -16 16 WIRE 96 64 96 16 WIRE 272 64 272 16 WIRE 368 64 368 16 WIRE 544 64 544 16 WIRE 640 64 640 16 WIRE 96 192 96 144 WIRE 144 192 96 192 WIRE 272 192 272 144 WIRE 272 192 208 192 WIRE 368 192 368 144 WIRE 416 192 368 192 WIRE 544 192 544 144 WIRE 544 192 480 192 WIRE 640 192 640 144 WIRE 720 192 640 192 WIRE 848 192 784 192 WIRE 368 208 368 192 WIRE 640 208 640 192 WIRE 96 240 96 192 WIRE 272 256 272 192 WIRE 304 256 272 256 WIRE 544 256 544 192 WIRE 576 256 544 256 WIRE -112 288 -144 288 WIRE -16 288 -16 144 WIRE -16 288 -48 288 WIRE 848 288 848 192 WIRE -16 304 -16 288 WIRE 48 304 -16 304 WIRE 176 336 96 336 WIRE 368 336 368 304 WIRE 448 336 368 336 WIRE 640 336 640 304 WIRE 736 336 640 336 WIRE -16 352 -16 304 WIRE 96 352 96 336 WIRE 272 352 272 256 WIRE 368 352 368 336 WIRE 544 352 544 256 WIRE 640 352 640 336 WIRE -256 368 -256 16 WIRE -144 368 -144 288 WIRE 176 368 176 336 WIRE 448 368 448 336 WIRE 736 368 736 336 WIRE -256 480 -256 448 WIRE -144 480 -144 448 WIRE -144 480 -256 480 WIRE -16 480 -16 432 WIRE -16 480 -144 480 WIRE 96 480 96 432 WIRE 96 480 -16 480 WIRE 176 480 176 432 WIRE 176 480 96 480 WIRE 272 480 272 432 WIRE 272 480 176 480 WIRE 368 480 368 432 WIRE 368 480 272 480 WIRE 448 480 448 432 WIRE 448 480 368 480 WIRE 544 480 544 432 WIRE 544 480 448 480 WIRE 640 480 640 432 WIRE 640 480 544 480 WIRE 736 480 736 432 WIRE 736 480 640 480 WIRE 848 480 848 368 WIRE 848 480 736 480 WIRE -256 544 -256 480 FLAG -256 544 0 SYMBOL res 80 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R2 SYMATTR Value 820 SYMBOL res 256 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R3 SYMATTR Value 80K SYMBOL res 352 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R4 SYMATTR Value 10K SYMBOL res 528 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R5 SYMATTR Value 5.1K SYMBOL res 624 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R6 SYMATTR Value 510 SYMBOL res -32 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R1 SYMATTR Value 2.7K SYMBOL njf 48 240 R0 WINDOW 3 54 60 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName J1 SYMATTR Value 2N5486 SYMBOL res 80 336 R0 WINDOW 0 35 59 Left 2 WINDOW 3 22 90 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName R8 SYMATTR Value 4.02K SYMBOL res -32 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R7 SYMATTR Value 4K SYMBOL cap -48 272 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2 SYMATTR InstName C1 SYMATTR Value 100µ SYMBOL cap 160 368 R0 SYMATTR InstName C3 SYMATTR Value 4.7µ SYMBOL cap 208 176 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2 SYMATTR InstName C2 SYMATTR Value 100µ SYMBOL npn 304 208 R0 SYMATTR InstName Q1 SYMATTR Value 2N5210 SYMBOL res 352 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R10 SYMATTR Value 2K SYMBOL cap 432 368 R0 SYMATTR InstName C5 SYMATTR Value 4.7µ SYMBOL res 256 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R9 SYMATTR Value 39K SYMBOL npn 576 208 R0 SYMATTR InstName Q2 SYMATTR Value 2N3904 SYMBOL res 624 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R12 SYMATTR Value 470 SYMBOL cap 720 368 R0 SYMATTR InstName C6 SYMATTR Value 4.7µ SYMBOL cap 480 176 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2 SYMATTR InstName C4 SYMATTR Value 100µ SYMBOL res 528 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R11 SYMATTR Value 4.7K SYMBOL cap 784 176 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2 SYMATTR InstName C7 SYMATTR Value 100µ SYMBOL voltage -144 352 R0 WINDOW 3 24 96 Invisible 2 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName V1 SYMATTR Value SINE(0 .01 1000) SYMATTR Value2 AC 1 SYMBOL res 832 272 R0 SYMATTR InstName R13 SYMATTR Value 1000 SYMBOL voltage -256 352 R0 WINDOW 3 24 96 Invisible 2 WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 2 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName V2 SYMATTR Value 12 TEXT 38 520 Left 2 !;tran .01 TEXT -232 520 Left 2 !.ac oct 1024 10 100000 -- JF Hello John, and thank you for this info. Unfortunately I can'tremember waht to do with a netlist for LTSpice. Could you possibly spare a word or two, and clue me in? I've only done this once before, I think, and the memory o what I did eludes me. Thanks, Dave Just in case JF might take a while, copy and paste the text into wordpad or similar program and save as ..txt into a file with an extention of .asc and you should be able to open it with LTspice. boB |
#11
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Okay, maybe a little better...
boB wrote in message ... On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 19:32:42 -0600, "Dave" wrote: "John Fields" wrote in message . .. On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:00:18 -0600, "Dave" wrote: Thoughts and suggestions are again welcome and sought. Thanks, Dave --- Version 4 SHEET 1 932 680 WIRE -16 16 -256 16 WIRE 96 16 -16 16 WIRE 272 16 96 16 WIRE 368 16 272 16 WIRE 544 16 368 16 WIRE 640 16 544 16 WIRE -16 64 -16 16 WIRE 96 64 96 16 WIRE 272 64 272 16 WIRE 368 64 368 16 WIRE 544 64 544 16 WIRE 640 64 640 16 WIRE 96 192 96 144 WIRE 144 192 96 192 WIRE 272 192 272 144 WIRE 272 192 208 192 WIRE 368 192 368 144 WIRE 416 192 368 192 WIRE 544 192 544 144 WIRE 544 192 480 192 WIRE 640 192 640 144 WIRE 720 192 640 192 WIRE 848 192 784 192 WIRE 368 208 368 192 WIRE 640 208 640 192 WIRE 96 240 96 192 WIRE 272 256 272 192 WIRE 304 256 272 256 WIRE 544 256 544 192 WIRE 576 256 544 256 WIRE -112 288 -144 288 WIRE -16 288 -16 144 WIRE -16 288 -48 288 WIRE 848 288 848 192 WIRE -16 304 -16 288 WIRE 48 304 -16 304 WIRE 176 336 96 336 WIRE 368 336 368 304 WIRE 448 336 368 336 WIRE 640 336 640 304 WIRE 736 336 640 336 WIRE -16 352 -16 304 WIRE 96 352 96 336 WIRE 272 352 272 256 WIRE 368 352 368 336 WIRE 544 352 544 256 WIRE 640 352 640 336 WIRE -256 368 -256 16 WIRE -144 368 -144 288 WIRE 176 368 176 336 WIRE 448 368 448 336 WIRE 736 368 736 336 WIRE -256 480 -256 448 WIRE -144 480 -144 448 WIRE -144 480 -256 480 WIRE -16 480 -16 432 WIRE -16 480 -144 480 WIRE 96 480 96 432 WIRE 96 480 -16 480 WIRE 176 480 176 432 WIRE 176 480 96 480 WIRE 272 480 272 432 WIRE 272 480 176 480 WIRE 368 480 368 432 WIRE 368 480 272 480 WIRE 448 480 448 432 WIRE 448 480 368 480 WIRE 544 480 544 432 WIRE 544 480 448 480 WIRE 640 480 640 432 WIRE 640 480 544 480 WIRE 736 480 736 432 WIRE 736 480 640 480 WIRE 848 480 848 368 WIRE 848 480 736 480 WIRE -256 544 -256 480 FLAG -256 544 0 SYMBOL res 80 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R2 SYMATTR Value 820 SYMBOL res 256 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R3 SYMATTR Value 80K SYMBOL res 352 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R4 SYMATTR Value 10K SYMBOL res 528 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R5 SYMATTR Value 5.1K SYMBOL res 624 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R6 SYMATTR Value 510 SYMBOL res -32 48 R0 SYMATTR InstName R1 SYMATTR Value 2.7K SYMBOL njf 48 240 R0 WINDOW 3 54 60 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName J1 SYMATTR Value 2N5486 SYMBOL res 80 336 R0 WINDOW 0 35 59 Left 2 WINDOW 3 22 90 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName R8 SYMATTR Value 4.02K SYMBOL res -32 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R7 SYMATTR Value 4K SYMBOL cap -48 272 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2 SYMATTR InstName C1 SYMATTR Value 100µ SYMBOL cap 160 368 R0 SYMATTR InstName C3 SYMATTR Value 4.7µ SYMBOL cap 208 176 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2 SYMATTR InstName C2 SYMATTR Value 100µ SYMBOL npn 304 208 R0 SYMATTR InstName Q1 SYMATTR Value 2N5210 SYMBOL res 352 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R10 SYMATTR Value 2K SYMBOL cap 432 368 R0 SYMATTR InstName C5 SYMATTR Value 4.7µ SYMBOL res 256 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R9 SYMATTR Value 39K SYMBOL npn 576 208 R0 SYMATTR InstName Q2 SYMATTR Value 2N3904 SYMBOL res 624 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R12 SYMATTR Value 470 SYMBOL cap 720 368 R0 SYMATTR InstName C6 SYMATTR Value 4.7µ SYMBOL cap 480 176 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2 SYMATTR InstName C4 SYMATTR Value 100µ SYMBOL res 528 336 R0 SYMATTR InstName R11 SYMATTR Value 4.7K SYMBOL cap 784 176 R90 WINDOW 0 0 32 VBottom 2 WINDOW 3 32 32 VTop 2 SYMATTR InstName C7 SYMATTR Value 100µ SYMBOL voltage -144 352 R0 WINDOW 3 24 96 Invisible 2 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName V1 SYMATTR Value SINE(0 .01 1000) SYMATTR Value2 AC 1 SYMBOL res 832 272 R0 SYMATTR InstName R13 SYMATTR Value 1000 SYMBOL voltage -256 352 R0 WINDOW 3 24 96 Invisible 2 WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 2 WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 2 SYMATTR InstName V2 SYMATTR Value 12 TEXT 38 520 Left 2 !;tran .01 TEXT -232 520 Left 2 !.ac oct 1024 10 100000 -- JF Hello John, and thank you for this info. Unfortunately I can'tremember waht to do with a netlist for LTSpice. Could you possibly spare a word or two, and clue me in? I've only done this once before, I think, and the memory o what I did eludes me. Thanks, Dave Just in case JF might take a while, copy and paste the text into wordpad or similar program and save as .txt into a file with an extention of .asc and you should be able to open it with LTspice. boB Well *thank you* Bob. I do appreciate the help... Dave |
#12
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Okay, maybe a little better...
"Dave" wrote:
Well *thank you* Bob. I do appreciate the help... Dave Dave, the first stage has an attenuation of 21dB. I'd run it in Transient Analysis first and get the bias and load conditions set properly before messing with Frequency Analysis. Mike |
#13
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Okay, maybe a little better...
"Mike" wrote in message ... "Dave" wrote: Well *thank you* Bob. I do appreciate the help... Dave Dave, the first stage has an attenuation of 21dB. I'd run it in Transient Analysis first and get the bias and load conditions set properly before messing with Frequency Analysis. Mike Hey Mike, Yes, I was working with it on the workbench today, and could hardly believe it's lack of performance. Definetely needs more work. Wish I had a copy of Electronics Workbench. Thanks for the encouragement. Dave |
#14
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Okay, maybe a little better...
"Dave" wrote in message .. . "Mike" wrote in message ... "Dave" wrote: Well *thank you* Bob. I do appreciate the help... Dave Dave, the first stage has an attenuation of 21dB. I'd run it in Transient Analysis first and get the bias and load conditions set properly before messing with Frequency Analysis. Mike Hey Mike, Yes, I was working with it on the workbench today, and could hardly believe it's lack of performance. Definetely needs more work. Wish I had a copy of Electronics Workbench. Thanks for the encouragement. Dave Neglected to mention I got stage one running okay *I think* by replacing R7 with a 1.5K resistor. Doesn't do a damn thing for the rest of the circuit, but I'm working on that... Thanks. |
#15
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Okay, maybe a little better...
"Dave" wrote:
Neglected to mention I got stage one running okay *I think* by replacing R7 with a 1.5K resistor. Doesn't do a damn thing for the rest of the circuit, but I'm working on that... Thanks. I don't have a copy of the circuit any more, but I wonder if there's a reason you want a FET as the first stage? It seemed there were fairly low value resistors in the input bias network. These would swamp the high input impedance of the FET gate. So a good bipolar at the input might be a better match and have lower noise at that impedance level. Mike |
#16
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Okay, maybe a little better...
"Mike" wrote in message ... "Dave" wrote: Neglected to mention I got stage one running okay *I think* by replacing R7 with a 1.5K resistor. Doesn't do a damn thing for the rest of the circuit, but I'm working on that... Thanks. I don't have a copy of the circuit any more, but I wonder if there's a reason you want a FET as the first stage? It seemed there were fairly low value resistors in the input bias network. These would swamp the high input impedance of the FET gate. So a good bipolar at the input might be a better match and have lower noise at that impedance level. Mike Hey Mike, sorry it took me so long to get back to you. I was wanting to use a JFET at the input due to the high impedance value of such a device, since I'm hooking it directly to the microphone of the intercom. And I was originally using the 1.5K and 4K resistors so I could use the 4.02K resistor to drive the source. I am no longer attempting to bias the device so close to pinch-off however, (which is what the 4.02K resistor was about) so I supppose I could change these at his point. I must admit I am not certain what you mean by the potential for these low-value resistors swamping the high impedance of the JFET. As I mentioned earlier, I am NOT an EE, and am learning this as I go along. Any info you could give me on this subject, or as to what to look up in my textbooks, would be most appreciated. Attached is a copy of the current version of the schematic I am working with. I am wanting to use a 25K pot to control the output, but am not certain as to where to put it. (Was originally thinking of putting it between the drain of J1 and capacitor C6, but am not sure if that is actually the best place for it. Also, the 5 Ohm resistors (R4 and R1) are something I simply plugged in, and are obviously not written in stone. LTSpice says this circuit ought to work like gangbusters though. Maybe too well... Thanks for the feedback. |
#17
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Okay, maybe a little better...
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 05:41:20 -0600, "Dave" wrote:
Hey Mike, sorry it took me so long to get back to you. I was wanting to use a JFET at the input due to the high impedance value of such a device, since I'm hooking it directly to the microphone of the intercom. And I was originally using the 1.5K and 4K resistors so I could use the 4.02K resistor to drive the source. I am no longer attempting to bias the device so close to pinch-off however, (which is what the 4.02K resistor was about) so I supppose I could change these at his point. I must admit I am not certain what you mean by the potential for these low-value resistors swamping the high impedance of the JFET. As I mentioned earlier, I am NOT an EE, and am learning this as I go along. Any info you could give me on this subject, or as to what to look up in my textbooks, would be most appreciated. Attached is a copy of the current version of the schematic I am working with. I am wanting to use a 25K pot to control the output, but am not certain as to where to put it. (Was originally thinking of putting it between the drain of J1 and capacitor C6, but am not sure if that is actually the best place for it. Also, the 5 Ohm resistors (R4 and R1) are something I simply plugged in, and are obviously not written in stone. LTSpice says this circuit ought to work like gangbusters though. Maybe too well... Thanks for the feedback. The input impedance of the amplifier includes the effect of _all_ components connected to the input, not just the input impedance of the Jfet. Since both ground and +12V are effectively at AC ground, the two input resistors are in parallel to ground, as far as the input signal is concerned, so your input impedance is 1.5K in parallel with 4K, or about 900 ohms. Incidently, we usually use "Q" as the reference prefix for all transistor-like devices. "J" is usually used for a connector (jack). -- Peter Bennett, VE7CEI peterbb (at) telus.net GPS and NMEA info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter Vancouver Power Squadron: http://vancouver.powersquadron.ca |
#18
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Okay, maybe a little better...
"Peter Bennett" wrote in message news.com... On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 05:41:20 -0600, "Dave" wrote: Hey Mike, sorry it took me so long to get back to you. I was wanting to use a JFET at the input due to the high impedance value of such a device, since I'm hooking it directly to the microphone of the intercom. And I was originally using the 1.5K and 4K resistors so I could use the 4.02K resistor to drive the source. I am no longer attempting to bias the device so close to pinch-off however, (which is what the 4.02K resistor was about) so I supppose I could change these at his point. I must admit I am not certain what you mean by the potential for these low-value resistors swamping the high impedance of the JFET. As I mentioned earlier, I am NOT an EE, and am learning this as I go along. Any info you could give me on this subject, or as to what to look up in my textbooks, would be most appreciated. Attached is a copy of the current version of the schematic I am working with. I am wanting to use a 25K pot to control the output, but am not certain as to where to put it. (Was originally thinking of putting it between the drain of J1 and capacitor C6, but am not sure if that is actually the best place for it. Also, the 5 Ohm resistors (R4 and R1) are something I simply plugged in, and are obviously not written in stone. LTSpice says this circuit ought to work like gangbusters though. Maybe too well... Thanks for the feedback. The input impedance of the amplifier includes the effect of _all_ components connected to the input, not just the input impedance of the Jfet. Since both ground and +12V are effectively at AC ground, the two input resistors are in parallel to ground, as far as the input signal is concerned, so your input impedance is 1.5K in parallel with 4K, or about 900 ohms. Incidently, we usually use "Q" as the reference prefix for all transistor-like devices. "J" is usually used for a connector (jack). -- Peter Bennett, VE7CEI peterbb (at) telus.net GPS and NMEA info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter Vancouver Power Squadron: http://vancouver.powersquadron.ca Thank you, Peter, for this feedback and info. I must admit I am still struggling to understand input and output impedances (obviously) but your post makes it pretty clear. Thanks. And yes, I know that transistors and transistor-like devices are usually referred to as Qx and not Jx, but that was put there by the version os Spice I am using for circuit simulation, and I didn't argue about it. Figured maybe this was something else I just didnt know... 'preciate it. Dave |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stupid question | Electronics Repair | |||
Possible Stupid Question | Woodworking | |||
Stupid question of the day.... | Electronics | |||
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________==___ ykemzyb | Woodworking | |||
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_ ejowp | Woodturning |