On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:38:35 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:18:45 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:25:53 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:10:24 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
m...
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:45:24 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:41:20 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:32:54 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:csrkv61a2dktml5u31dc190rkbdat9ip6v@4a x.com...

I guess I'll have to buy a new flower pot saucer for the flower pot

--
JF


You need to keep your cat properly amused - play tunnel, scratching
post,
ramps and walkways nailed up at picture rail height.

---
You need to come to the realization that you're an idiot, although
that's not likely to happen because your idiocy will get in the way of
your illumination.

You can't, apparently, just enjoy the image of one of my kitties being
happily at rest in an unconventional bed, without perverting the image
by issuing edicts about how you think what my cats should be subjected
to during their waking hours.

Figures, since I've criticized you once or twice on technical issues
and you just can't stand being found lacking, so you retaliate in any
way you can.

Sounds to me like you should court Larkin's daughter.

You keep getting more and more hostile. More and more stupid, too.

---
Me? More hostile???

Geez, John, all I'm saying is that it sounds to me like it'd be a
match made in heaven since Ian seems to be just like you.

I made a suggestion how to keep your cat amused and you went ballistic!

---
No, you didn't.

You tried to start a fight, it worked, and now that you're being shown
up for the scurrilous, lily-livered lightweight you are, you're
back-pedaling as fast as you can in order to keep from being fully
outed.

More and more stupid!

---
That reminds me of the story about the conceited moron who called the
genius stupid because he couldn't figure out what the genius was
talking about.

If you are indeed a (self-proclaimed!) genius, how come you have so
little to say about electronics? You skip all the good SED threads,
except to whine and cluck off-topic.

I suppose, from an avian standpoint, all clucking is off-topic.

John

"John Larkin" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:32:06 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:14:54 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:20:25 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"Jim Thompson" wrote
in
message ...
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:00:10 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:10:42 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:2mfnv6tmoj55mv1kuidapa7sups2joo4ma@4ax .com...
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:32:54 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:csrkv61a2dktml5u31dc190rkbdat9ip6v@4 ax.com...

I guess I'll have to buy a new flower pot saucer for the flower
pot


--
JF


You need to keep your cat properly amused - play tunnel, scratching
post,
ramps and walkways nailed up at picture rail height.

---
You need to come to the realization that you're an idiot, although
that's not likely to happen because your idiocy will get in the way
of
your illumination.

You can't, apparently, just enjoy the image of one of my kitties
being
happily at rest in an unconventional bed, without perverting the
image
by issuing edicts about how you think what my cats should be
subjected
to during their waking hours.

Figures, since I've criticized you once or twice on technical
issues


You criticize me so often its beginning to take the character of
psychotic
compulsion!

---
Perhaps it seems that way to you because you can't believe that you're
not above criticism.

Ian is of that "class" who are so ignorant they don't know the
definition of ignorant ;-)


Sticking up for your bumchum eh?


Birds of a feather. Hens, in this particular instance.

---
And when we find worms we dispatch them quickly, so it's our peckers
you're afraid of, yes?

Stupid, paranoid geezer.

John


Straight-jacket & padded cell for sure.

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:54:28 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:32:06 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:14:54 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:20:25 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"Jim Thompson" wrote in
message ...
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:00:10 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:10:42 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:2mfnv6tmoj55mv1kuidapa7sups2joo4ma@4ax .com...
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:32:54 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:csrkv61a2dktml5u31dc190rkbdat9ip6v@4 ax.com...

I guess I'll have to buy a new flower pot saucer for the flower pot


--
JF


You need to keep your cat properly amused - play tunnel, scratching
post,
ramps and walkways nailed up at picture rail height.

---
You need to come to the realization that you're an idiot, although
that's not likely to happen because your idiocy will get in the way of
your illumination.

You can't, apparently, just enjoy the image of one of my kitties being
happily at rest in an unconventional bed, without perverting the image
by issuing edicts about how you think what my cats should be subjected
to during their waking hours.

Figures, since I've criticized you once or twice on technical issues


You criticize me so often its beginning to take the character of
psychotic
compulsion!

---
Perhaps it seems that way to you because you can't believe that you're
not above criticism.

Ian is of that "class" who are so ignorant they don't know the
definition of ignorant ;-)


Sticking up for your bumchum eh?


Birds of a feather. Hens, in this particular instance.

---
And when we find worms we dispatch them quickly, so it's our peckers
you're afraid of, yes?

Stupid, paranoid geezer.

---
Wow, hostility from someone who's trying to hang on to an indefensible
position and can't quite get it right?

Seems like that to me.

Your response doesn't really address the subject, which is that you've
been emasculated by the females you've chosen to subjugate yourself
to, probably starting with your mother, since your father (and I'm
guessing) left you all, somehow, in dire straits.

Am I wrong?

--
JF

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:59:03 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:38:35 -0500, John Fields
wrote:


---
That reminds me of the story about the conceited moron who called the
genius stupid because he couldn't figure out what the genius was
talking about.

If you are indeed a (self-proclaimed!) genius, how come you have so
little to say about electronics? You skip all the good SED threads,
except to whine and cluck off-topic.

---
I guess the part about where the post was allegorical and not entirely
an allusion to fact eluded you.

No big surprise there.

As far as what I have to say about electronics goes, I think my
posting history will largely bear me out as having been genuine.
---

I suppose, from an avian standpoint, all clucking is off-topic.

---
That doesn't seem to make much sense.

What are you talking about?

--
JF

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:02:27 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:59:03 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:38:35 -0500, John Fields
wrote:


---
That reminds me of the story about the conceited moron who called the
genius stupid because he couldn't figure out what the genius was
talking about.

If you are indeed a (self-proclaimed!) genius, how come you have so
little to say about electronics? You skip all the good SED threads,
except to whine and cluck off-topic.

---
I guess the part about where the post was allegorical and not entirely
an allusion to fact eluded you.

No big surprise there.

As far as what I have to say about electronics goes, I think my
posting history will largely bear me out as having been genuine.
---

I suppose, from an avian standpoint, all clucking is off-topic.

---
That doesn't seem to make much sense.

What are you talking about?

Larkin either skips "all the good threads" or takes an idiotic
position and throws so much sand in the air, that the original topic
is totally lost.

It's quite laughable for him to claim we (Fields and me) don't post
electronics and he does.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:57:29 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:02:27 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:59:03 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:38:35 -0500, John Fields
wrote:


---
That reminds me of the story about the conceited moron who called the
genius stupid because he couldn't figure out what the genius was
talking about.

If you are indeed a (self-proclaimed!) genius, how come you have so
little to say about electronics? You skip all the good SED threads,
except to whine and cluck off-topic.

---
I guess the part about where the post was allegorical and not entirely
an allusion to fact eluded you.

No big surprise there.

As far as what I have to say about electronics goes, I think my
posting history will largely bear me out as having been genuine.
---

I suppose, from an avian standpoint, all clucking is off-topic.

---
That doesn't seem to make much sense.

What are you talking about?

Larkin either skips "all the good threads" or takes an idiotic
position and throws so much sand in the air, that the original topic
is totally lost.

It's quite laughable for him to claim we (Fields and me) don't post
electronics and he does.

...Jim Thompson

---
Indeed.

In particular, lately, the thread in which I posted a tricky PNP LDO
clamp which you improved upon and which Larkin totally ignored.

--
JF

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:14:04 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:57:29 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:02:27 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:59:03 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:38:35 -0500, John Fields
wrote:


---
That reminds me of the story about the conceited moron who called the
genius stupid because he couldn't figure out what the genius was
talking about.

If you are indeed a (self-proclaimed!) genius, how come you have so
little to say about electronics? You skip all the good SED threads,
except to whine and cluck off-topic.

---
I guess the part about where the post was allegorical and not entirely
an allusion to fact eluded you.

No big surprise there.

As far as what I have to say about electronics goes, I think my
posting history will largely bear me out as having been genuine.
---

I suppose, from an avian standpoint, all clucking is off-topic.

---
That doesn't seem to make much sense.

What are you talking about?

Larkin either skips "all the good threads" or takes an idiotic
position and throws so much sand in the air, that the original topic
is totally lost.

It's quite laughable for him to claim we (Fields and me) don't post
electronics and he does.

...Jim Thompson

---
Indeed.

In particular, lately, the thread in which I posted a tricky PNP LDO
clamp which you improved upon and which Larkin totally ignored.

Have you noticed how Larkin ALWAYS avoids posting a firm schematic?
Always generalities so loose that he can claim function somehow...
even when it's been pointed out how faulty his "thought processes"
(and I use that term loosely :-)

And his latest post for an LM376 replacement? He can't even roll his
own regulator with easily available off-the-shelf parts. What a dork!

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:30:10 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:54:28 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:32:06 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:14:54 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:20:25 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"Jim Thompson" wrote in
message ...
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:00:10 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:10:42 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:2mfnv6tmoj55mv1kuidapa7sups2joo4ma@4a x.com...
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:32:54 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:csrkv61a2dktml5u31dc190rkbdat9ip6v@ 4ax.com...

I guess I'll have to buy a new flower pot saucer for the flower pot


--
JF


You need to keep your cat properly amused - play tunnel, scratching
post,
ramps and walkways nailed up at picture rail height.

---
You need to come to the realization that you're an idiot, although
that's not likely to happen because your idiocy will get in the way of
your illumination.

You can't, apparently, just enjoy the image of one of my kitties being
happily at rest in an unconventional bed, without perverting the image
by issuing edicts about how you think what my cats should be subjected
to during their waking hours.

Figures, since I've criticized you once or twice on technical issues


You criticize me so often its beginning to take the character of
psychotic
compulsion!

---
Perhaps it seems that way to you because you can't believe that you're
not above criticism.

Ian is of that "class" who are so ignorant they don't know the
definition of ignorant ;-)


Sticking up for your bumchum eh?


Birds of a feather. Hens, in this particular instance.

---
And when we find worms we dispatch them quickly, so it's our peckers
you're afraid of, yes?

Stupid, paranoid geezer.

---
Wow, hostility from someone who's trying to hang on to an indefensible
position and can't quite get it right?

Seems like that to me.

Your response doesn't really address the subject, which is that you've
been emasculated by the females you've chosen to subjugate yourself
to, probably starting with your mother, since your father (and I'm
guessing) left you all, somehow, in dire straits.

Am I wrong?

You're always wrong.

John

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:14:04 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:57:29 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:02:27 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:59:03 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:38:35 -0500, John Fields
wrote:


---
That reminds me of the story about the conceited moron who called the
genius stupid because he couldn't figure out what the genius was
talking about.

If you are indeed a (self-proclaimed!) genius, how come you have so
little to say about electronics? You skip all the good SED threads,
except to whine and cluck off-topic.

---
I guess the part about where the post was allegorical and not entirely
an allusion to fact eluded you.

No big surprise there.

As far as what I have to say about electronics goes, I think my
posting history will largely bear me out as having been genuine.
---

I suppose, from an avian standpoint, all clucking is off-topic.

---
That doesn't seem to make much sense.

What are you talking about?

Larkin either skips "all the good threads" or takes an idiotic
position and throws so much sand in the air, that the original topic
is totally lost.

It's quite laughable for him to claim we (Fields and me) don't post
electronics and he does.

...Jim Thompson

---
Indeed.

In particular, lately, the thread in which I posted a tricky PNP LDO
clamp which you improved upon and which Larkin totally ignored.

You posted about electronics? Where?

John

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:04:44 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:14:04 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:57:29 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:02:27 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:59:03 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:38:35 -0500, John Fields
wrote:


---
That reminds me of the story about the conceited moron who called the
genius stupid because he couldn't figure out what the genius was
talking about.

If you are indeed a (self-proclaimed!) genius, how come you have so
little to say about electronics? You skip all the good SED threads,
except to whine and cluck off-topic.

---
I guess the part about where the post was allegorical and not entirely
an allusion to fact eluded you.

No big surprise there.

As far as what I have to say about electronics goes, I think my
posting history will largely bear me out as having been genuine.
---

I suppose, from an avian standpoint, all clucking is off-topic.

---
That doesn't seem to make much sense.

What are you talking about?

Larkin either skips "all the good threads" or takes an idiotic
position and throws so much sand in the air, that the original topic
is totally lost.

It's quite laughable for him to claim we (Fields and me) don't post
electronics and he does.

...Jim Thompson

---
Indeed.

In particular, lately, the thread in which I posted a tricky PNP LDO
clamp which you improved upon and which Larkin totally ignored.

You posted about electronics? Where?

---
Selective blindness???

He

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6UAYGxiRwU

--
JF

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:00:20 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:30:10 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:54:28 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:32:06 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:14:54 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:20:25 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"Jim Thompson" wrote in
message ...
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:00:10 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:10:42 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:2mfnv6tmoj55mv1kuidapa7sups2joo4ma@4 ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:32:54 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:csrkv61a2dktml5u31dc190rkbdat9ip6v @4ax.com...

I guess I'll have to buy a new flower pot saucer for the flower pot


--
JF


You need to keep your cat properly amused - play tunnel, scratching
post,
ramps and walkways nailed up at picture rail height.

---
You need to come to the realization that you're an idiot, although
that's not likely to happen because your idiocy will get in the way of
your illumination.

You can't, apparently, just enjoy the image of one of my kitties being
happily at rest in an unconventional bed, without perverting the image
by issuing edicts about how you think what my cats should be subjected
to during their waking hours.

Figures, since I've criticized you once or twice on technical issues


You criticize me so often its beginning to take the character of
psychotic
compulsion!

---
Perhaps it seems that way to you because you can't believe that you're
not above criticism.

Ian is of that "class" who are so ignorant they don't know the
definition of ignorant ;-)


Sticking up for your bumchum eh?


Birds of a feather. Hens, in this particular instance.

---
And when we find worms we dispatch them quickly, so it's our peckers
you're afraid of, yes?

Stupid, paranoid geezer.

---
Wow, hostility from someone who's trying to hang on to an indefensible
position and can't quite get it right?

Seems like that to me.

Your response doesn't really address the subject, which is that you've
been emasculated by the females you've chosen to subjugate yourself
to, probably starting with your mother, since your father (and I'm
guessing) left you all, somehow, in dire straits.

Am I wrong?

You're always wrong.

---
Hmm...

Better be careful, Johnny-boy, you're stepping into the arena of
absolutes, where you don't seem to do well.

--
JF

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:56:09 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:00:20 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:30:10 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:54:28 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:32:06 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:14:54 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:20:25 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"Jim Thompson" wrote in
message ...
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:00:10 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:10:42 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:2mfnv6tmoj55mv1kuidapa7sups2joo4ma@ 4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:32:54 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:csrkv61a2dktml5u31dc190rkbdat9ip6 ...

I guess I'll have to buy a new flower pot saucer for the flower pot


--
JF


You need to keep your cat properly amused - play tunnel, scratching
post,
ramps and walkways nailed up at picture rail height.

---
You need to come to the realization that you're an idiot, although
that's not likely to happen because your idiocy will get in the way of
your illumination.

You can't, apparently, just enjoy the image of one of my kitties being
happily at rest in an unconventional bed, without perverting the image
by issuing edicts about how you think what my cats should be subjected
to during their waking hours.

Figures, since I've criticized you once or twice on technical issues


You criticize me so often its beginning to take the character of
psychotic
compulsion!

---
Perhaps it seems that way to you because you can't believe that you're
not above criticism.

Ian is of that "class" who are so ignorant they don't know the
definition of ignorant ;-)


Sticking up for your bumchum eh?


Birds of a feather. Hens, in this particular instance.

---
And when we find worms we dispatch them quickly, so it's our peckers
you're afraid of, yes?

Stupid, paranoid geezer.

---
Wow, hostility from someone who's trying to hang on to an indefensible
position and can't quite get it right?

Seems like that to me.

Your response doesn't really address the subject, which is that you've
been emasculated by the females you've chosen to subjugate yourself
to, probably starting with your mother, since your father (and I'm
guessing) left you all, somehow, in dire straits.

Am I wrong?

You're always wrong.

---
Hmm...

Better be careful, Johnny-boy, you're stepping into the arena of
absolutes, where you don't seem to do well.

Toothless philosophical nonsense. I design electronics, and I do it
well.

Try it some time. It might improve your mood.

John

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:30:55 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:04:44 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:14:04 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:57:29 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:02:27 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:59:03 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:38:35 -0500, John Fields
wrote:


---
That reminds me of the story about the conceited moron who called the
genius stupid because he couldn't figure out what the genius was
talking about.

If you are indeed a (self-proclaimed!) genius, how come you have so
little to say about electronics? You skip all the good SED threads,
except to whine and cluck off-topic.

---
I guess the part about where the post was allegorical and not entirely
an allusion to fact eluded you.

No big surprise there.

As far as what I have to say about electronics goes, I think my
posting history will largely bear me out as having been genuine.
---

I suppose, from an avian standpoint, all clucking is off-topic.

---
That doesn't seem to make much sense.

What are you talking about?

Larkin either skips "all the good threads" or takes an idiotic
position and throws so much sand in the air, that the original topic
is totally lost.

It's quite laughable for him to claim we (Fields and me) don't post
electronics and he does.

...Jim Thompson

---
Indeed.

In particular, lately, the thread in which I posted a tricky PNP LDO
clamp which you improved upon and which Larkin totally ignored.

You posted about electronics? Where?

---
Selective blindness???

He

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6UAYGxiRwU

What's with the music links? That's just secondhand emotion:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCBttS_y7lE


Why are you hiding the electronics? If JT "improved" it, I assume you
got it wrong initially. As usual.

John

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:58:04 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:56:09 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:00:20 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:30:10 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:54:28 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:32:06 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:14:54 -0700, John Larkin
m wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:20:25 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"Jim Thompson" wrote in
message ...
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:00:10 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:10:42 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:2mfnv6tmoj55mv1kuidapa7sups2joo4ma @4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:32:54 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:csrkv61a2dktml5u31dc190rkbdat9ip ...

I guess I'll have to buy a new flower pot saucer for the flower pot


--
JF


You need to keep your cat properly amused - play tunnel, scratching
post,
ramps and walkways nailed up at picture rail height.

---
You need to come to the realization that you're an idiot, although
that's not likely to happen because your idiocy will get in the way of
your illumination.

You can't, apparently, just enjoy the image of one of my kitties being
happily at rest in an unconventional bed, without perverting the image
by issuing edicts about how you think what my cats should be subjected
to during their waking hours.

Figures, since I've criticized you once or twice on technical issues


You criticize me so often its beginning to take the character of
psychotic
compulsion!

---
Perhaps it seems that way to you because you can't believe that you're
not above criticism.

Ian is of that "class" who are so ignorant they don't know the
definition of ignorant ;-)


Sticking up for your bumchum eh?


Birds of a feather. Hens, in this particular instance.

---
And when we find worms we dispatch them quickly, so it's our peckers
you're afraid of, yes?

Stupid, paranoid geezer.

---
Wow, hostility from someone who's trying to hang on to an indefensible
position and can't quite get it right?

Seems like that to me.

Your response doesn't really address the subject, which is that you've
been emasculated by the females you've chosen to subjugate yourself
to, probably starting with your mother, since your father (and I'm
guessing) left you all, somehow, in dire straits.

Am I wrong?

You're always wrong.

---
Hmm...

Better be careful, Johnny-boy, you're stepping into the arena of
absolutes, where you don't seem to do well.

Toothless philosophical nonsense.

---
How would _you_ know?
---

I design electronics, and I do it well.

---
Well, then, you ought to stick to that and give up USENET, which you
don't do well at all.
---

Try it some time.

---
I do it all the time and, as a matter of fact, I post more circuits
than you do and I blow my own horn much less than you do yours,
braggart.
---

It might improve your mood.

---
My mood's fine, thank you very much, but yours seems to be running a
little ragged lately; _on_ the rag, are we?

--
JF

"John Larkin" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:56:09 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:00:20 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:30:10 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:54:28 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:32:06 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:14:54 -0700, John Larkin
m wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:20:25 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"Jim Thompson"
wrote in
message ...
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:00:10 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:10:42 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:2mfnv6tmoj55mv1kuidapa7sups2joo4ma @4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:32:54 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:csrkv61a2dktml5u31dc190rkbdat9ip ...

I guess I'll have to buy a new flower pot saucer for the
flower pot


--
JF


You need to keep your cat properly amused - play tunnel,
scratching
post,
ramps and walkways nailed up at picture rail height.

---
You need to come to the realization that you're an idiot,
although
that's not likely to happen because your idiocy will get in the
way of
your illumination.

You can't, apparently, just enjoy the image of one of my
kitties being
happily at rest in an unconventional bed, without perverting
the image
by issuing edicts about how you think what my cats should be
subjected
to during their waking hours.

Figures, since I've criticized you once or twice on technical
issues


You criticize me so often its beginning to take the character of
psychotic
compulsion!

---
Perhaps it seems that way to you because you can't believe that
you're
not above criticism.

Ian is of that "class" who are so ignorant they don't know the
definition of ignorant ;-)


Sticking up for your bumchum eh?


Birds of a feather. Hens, in this particular instance.

---
And when we find worms we dispatch them quickly, so it's our peckers
you're afraid of, yes?

Stupid, paranoid geezer.

---
Wow, hostility from someone who's trying to hang on to an indefensible
position and can't quite get it right?

Seems like that to me.

Your response doesn't really address the subject, which is that you've
been emasculated by the females you've chosen to subjugate yourself
to, probably starting with your mother, since your father (and I'm
guessing) left you all, somehow, in dire straits.

Am I wrong?

You're always wrong.

---
Hmm...

Better be careful, Johnny-boy, you're stepping into the arena of
absolutes, where you don't seem to do well.

Toothless philosophical nonsense. I design electronics, and I do it
well.

Try it some time. It might improve your mood.


Nah - antipsychotics!

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:04:04 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:30:55 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:04:44 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:14:04 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:57:29 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:02:27 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:59:03 -0700, John Larkin
m wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:38:35 -0500, John Fields
wrote:


---
That reminds me of the story about the conceited moron who called the
genius stupid because he couldn't figure out what the genius was
talking about.

If you are indeed a (self-proclaimed!) genius, how come you have so
little to say about electronics? You skip all the good SED threads,
except to whine and cluck off-topic.

---
I guess the part about where the post was allegorical and not entirely
an allusion to fact eluded you.

No big surprise there.

As far as what I have to say about electronics goes, I think my
posting history will largely bear me out as having been genuine.
---

I suppose, from an avian standpoint, all clucking is off-topic.

---
That doesn't seem to make much sense.

What are you talking about?

Larkin either skips "all the good threads" or takes an idiotic
position and throws so much sand in the air, that the original topic
is totally lost.

It's quite laughable for him to claim we (Fields and me) don't post
electronics and he does.

...Jim Thompson

---
Indeed.

In particular, lately, the thread in which I posted a tricky PNP LDO
clamp which you improved upon and which Larkin totally ignored.

You posted about electronics? Where?

---
Selective blindness???

He

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6UAYGxiRwU

What's with the music links?

---
Put yourself in the position of the person she's addressing.

Can you do that?

Why are you hiding the electronics?

---
"Golly, gee, Mister, it's because if I don't that big ol' mean John
Larkin will jump out and say mean things to me!"

Sheesh... I'm not hiding anything, you raving loon; is it that you
don't pay attention or you just can't find the post?
---

If JT "improved" it, I assume you got it wrong initially. As usual.

---
Nope, he just lowered the complexity of it and, unlike you, isn't
always trying to start a fight.

--
JF

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:24:12 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:58:04 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:56:09 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

[snip]


Better be careful, Johnny-boy, you're stepping into the arena of
absolutes, where you don't seem to do well.

Toothless philosophical nonsense.

---
How would _you_ know?
---

I design electronics, and I do it well.

Funny how we never see examples of "... do it well". All we see is
crap.


---
Well, then, you ought to stick to that and give up USENET, which you
don't do well at all.
---

Try it some time.

---
I do it all the time and, as a matter of fact, I post more circuits
than you do and I blow my own horn much less than you do yours,
braggart.
---

It might improve your mood.

---
My mood's fine, thank you very much, but yours seems to be running a
little ragged lately; _on_ the rag, are we?

Bwahahahahahaha !-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

"John Fields" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:04:04 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:30:55 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:04:44 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:14:04 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:57:29 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:02:27 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:59:03 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:38:35 -0500, John Fields
wrote:


---
That reminds me of the story about the conceited moron who called
the
genius stupid because he couldn't figure out what the genius was
talking about.

If you are indeed a (self-proclaimed!) genius, how come you have so
little to say about electronics? You skip all the good SED threads,
except to whine and cluck off-topic.

---
I guess the part about where the post was allegorical and not
entirely
an allusion to fact eluded you.

No big surprise there.

As far as what I have to say about electronics goes, I think my
posting history will largely bear me out as having been genuine.
---

I suppose, from an avian standpoint, all clucking is off-topic.

---
That doesn't seem to make much sense.

What are you talking about?

Larkin either skips "all the good threads" or takes an idiotic
position and throws so much sand in the air, that the original topic
is totally lost.

It's quite laughable for him to claim we (Fields and me) don't post
electronics and he does.

...Jim Thompson

---
Indeed.

In particular, lately, the thread in which I posted a tricky PNP LDO
clamp which you improved upon and which Larkin totally ignored.

You posted about electronics? Where?

---
Selective blindness???

He

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6UAYGxiRwU

What's with the music links?

---
Put yourself in the position of the person she's addressing.

Can you do that?

Why are you hiding the electronics?

---
"Golly, gee, Mister, it's because if I don't that big ol' mean John
Larkin will jump out and say mean things to me!"

Sheesh... I'm not hiding anything, you raving loon; is it that you
don't pay attention or you just can't find the post?
---

If JT "improved" it, I assume you got it wrong initially. As usual.

---
Nope, he just lowered the complexity of it and, unlike you, isn't
always trying to start a fight.


Pot - kettle..........................

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:56:09 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:00:20 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:30:10 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:54:28 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:32:06 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:14:54 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:20:25 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"Jim Thompson" wrote in
message ...
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:00:10 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:10:42 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:2mfnv6tmoj55mv1kuidapa7sups2joo4ma@ 4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:32:54 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:csrkv61a2dktml5u31dc190rkbdat9ip6 ...

I guess I'll have to buy a new flower pot saucer for the flower pot


--
JF


You need to keep your cat properly amused - play tunnel, scratching
post,
ramps and walkways nailed up at picture rail height.

---
You need to come to the realization that you're an idiot, although
that's not likely to happen because your idiocy will get in the way of
your illumination.

You can't, apparently, just enjoy the image of one of my kitties being
happily at rest in an unconventional bed, without perverting the image
by issuing edicts about how you think what my cats should be subjected
to during their waking hours.

Figures, since I've criticized you once or twice on technical issues


You criticize me so often its beginning to take the character of
psychotic
compulsion!

---
Perhaps it seems that way to you because you can't believe that you're
not above criticism.

Ian is of that "class" who are so ignorant they don't know the
definition of ignorant ;-)


Sticking up for your bumchum eh?


Birds of a feather. Hens, in this particular instance.

---
And when we find worms we dispatch them quickly, so it's our peckers
you're afraid of, yes?

Stupid, paranoid geezer.

---
Wow, hostility from someone who's trying to hang on to an indefensible
position and can't quite get it right?

Seems like that to me.

Your response doesn't really address the subject, which is that you've
been emasculated by the females you've chosen to subjugate yourself
to, probably starting with your mother, since your father (and I'm
guessing) left you all, somehow, in dire straits.

Am I wrong?

You're always wrong.

---
Hmm...

Better be careful, Johnny-boy, you're stepping into the arena of
absolutes, where you don't seem to do well.

So where's the electronics post you referred to?

John

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:42:14 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:04:04 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:30:55 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:04:44 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:14:04 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:57:29 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:02:27 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:59:03 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:38:35 -0500, John Fields
wrote:


---
That reminds me of the story about the conceited moron who called the
genius stupid because he couldn't figure out what the genius was
talking about.

If you are indeed a (self-proclaimed!) genius, how come you have so
little to say about electronics? You skip all the good SED threads,
except to whine and cluck off-topic.

---
I guess the part about where the post was allegorical and not entirely
an allusion to fact eluded you.

No big surprise there.

As far as what I have to say about electronics goes, I think my
posting history will largely bear me out as having been genuine.
---

I suppose, from an avian standpoint, all clucking is off-topic.

---
That doesn't seem to make much sense.

What are you talking about?

Larkin either skips "all the good threads" or takes an idiotic
position and throws so much sand in the air, that the original topic
is totally lost.

It's quite laughable for him to claim we (Fields and me) don't post
electronics and he does.

...Jim Thompson

---
Indeed.

In particular, lately, the thread in which I posted a tricky PNP LDO
clamp which you improved upon and which Larkin totally ignored.

You posted about electronics? Where?

---
Selective blindness???

He

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6UAYGxiRwU

What's with the music links?

---
Put yourself in the position of the person she's addressing.

Can you do that?

Why are you hiding the electronics?

---
"Golly, gee, Mister, it's because if I don't that big ol' mean John
Larkin will jump out and say mean things to me!"

Sheesh... I'm not hiding anything, you raving loon; is it that you
don't pay attention or you just can't find the post?
---

If JT "improved" it, I assume you got it wrong initially. As usual.

---
Nope, he just lowered the complexity of it and, unlike you, isn't
always trying to start a fight.

Where is it?

John

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:32:33 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:42:14 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:04:04 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:30:55 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:04:44 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:14:04 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:57:29 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:02:27 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:59:03 -0700, John Larkin
m wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:38:35 -0500, John Fields
wrote:


---
That reminds me of the story about the conceited moron who called the
genius stupid because he couldn't figure out what the genius was
talking about.

If you are indeed a (self-proclaimed!) genius, how come you have so
little to say about electronics? You skip all the good SED threads,
except to whine and cluck off-topic.

---
I guess the part about where the post was allegorical and not entirely
an allusion to fact eluded you.

No big surprise there.

As far as what I have to say about electronics goes, I think my
posting history will largely bear me out as having been genuine.
---

I suppose, from an avian standpoint, all clucking is off-topic.

---
That doesn't seem to make much sense.

What are you talking about?

Larkin either skips "all the good threads" or takes an idiotic
position and throws so much sand in the air, that the original topic
is totally lost.

It's quite laughable for him to claim we (Fields and me) don't post
electronics and he does.

...Jim Thompson

---
Indeed.

In particular, lately, the thread in which I posted a tricky PNP LDO
clamp which you improved upon and which Larkin totally ignored.

You posted about electronics? Where?

---
Selective blindness???

He

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6UAYGxiRwU

What's with the music links?

---
Put yourself in the position of the person she's addressing.

Can you do that?

Why are you hiding the electronics?

---
"Golly, gee, Mister, it's because if I don't that big ol' mean John
Larkin will jump out and say mean things to me!"

Sheesh... I'm not hiding anything, you raving loon; is it that you
don't pay attention or you just can't find the post?
---

If JT "improved" it, I assume you got it wrong initially. As usual.

---
Nope, he just lowered the complexity of it and, unlike you, isn't
always trying to start a fight.

Where is it?

---
Go do your on leg work.

--
JF

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:31:29 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:56:09 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:00:20 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:30:10 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:54:28 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:32:06 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:14:54 -0700, John Larkin
m wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:20:25 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"Jim Thompson" wrote in
message ...
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:00:10 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:10:42 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:2mfnv6tmoj55mv1kuidapa7sups2joo4ma @4ax.com...
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:32:54 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news:csrkv61a2dktml5u31dc190rkbdat9ip ...

I guess I'll have to buy a new flower pot saucer for the flower pot


--
JF


You need to keep your cat properly amused - play tunnel, scratching
post,
ramps and walkways nailed up at picture rail height.

---
You need to come to the realization that you're an idiot, although
that's not likely to happen because your idiocy will get in the way of
your illumination.

You can't, apparently, just enjoy the image of one of my kitties being
happily at rest in an unconventional bed, without perverting the image
by issuing edicts about how you think what my cats should be subjected
to during their waking hours.

Figures, since I've criticized you once or twice on technical issues


You criticize me so often its beginning to take the character of
psychotic
compulsion!

---
Perhaps it seems that way to you because you can't believe that you're
not above criticism.

Ian is of that "class" who are so ignorant they don't know the
definition of ignorant ;-)


Sticking up for your bumchum eh?


Birds of a feather. Hens, in this particular instance.

---
And when we find worms we dispatch them quickly, so it's our peckers
you're afraid of, yes?

Stupid, paranoid geezer.

---
Wow, hostility from someone who's trying to hang on to an indefensible
position and can't quite get it right?

Seems like that to me.

Your response doesn't really address the subject, which is that you've
been emasculated by the females you've chosen to subjugate yourself
to, probably starting with your mother, since your father (and I'm
guessing) left you all, somehow, in dire straits.

Am I wrong?

You're always wrong.

---
Hmm...

Better be careful, Johnny-boy, you're stepping into the arena of
absolutes, where you don't seem to do well.

So where's the electronics post you referred to?

---
Want it?

Go do your own leg work.

--
JF

Ian Field wrote:

Nah - antipsychotics!


They don't seem to be helping you any. Maybe a half pound of ExLax
will work better?


--
It's easy to think outside the box, when you have a cutting torch.

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:49:21 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:24:12 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:58:04 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:56:09 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

[snip]


Better be careful, Johnny-boy, you're stepping into the arena of
absolutes, where you don't seem to do well.

Toothless philosophical nonsense.

---
How would _you_ know?
---

I design electronics, and I do it well.

Funny how we never see examples of "... do it well". All we see is
crap.

---
And, to top it off, vague verbal descriptions of his crap.

But, dontcha know that's all we can expect without a query accompanied
by an NDA signed in blood with a gun to our head and, even then, only
on a "need to know" basis, since Larkin (by his own careless admission
of his displeasure with the administration's handling of his
daughter's unfortunate airline misadventures) is (or is pretending to
be) a spook tied down with security clearances which he's not supposed
to talk about.

But, which he talked about anyway?

Who could trust a creep like that?

Certainly not me...

---
Well, then, you ought to stick to that and give up USENET, which you
don't do well at all.
---

Try it some time.

---
I do it all the time and, as a matter of fact, I post more circuits
than you do and I blow my own horn much less than you do yours,
braggart.
---

It might improve your mood.

---
My mood's fine, thank you very much, but yours seems to be running a
little ragged lately; _on_ the rag, are we?

Bwahahahahahaha !-)

...Jim Thompson
:-)
--
JF

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
m...

Ian Field wrote:

Nah - antipsychotics!


They don't seem to be helping you any. Maybe a half pound of ExLax
will work better?

Don't take your own advice - it would be the end of you!

Ian Field wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
m...

Ian Field wrote:

Nah - antipsychotics!


They don't seem to be helping you any. Maybe a half pound of ExLax
will work better?

Don't take your own advice - it would be the end of you!


I see the probes have reached what was left of your mind.


--
It's easy to think outside the box, when you have a cutting torch.

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
m...

Ian Field wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
m...

Ian Field wrote:

Nah - antipsychotics!


They don't seem to be helping you any. Maybe a half pound of ExLax
will work better?

Don't take your own advice - it would be the end of you!


I see the probes have reached what was left of your mind.


Your fantasies are an open book.

Ian Field wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
m...

Ian Field wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
m...

Ian Field wrote:

Nah - antipsychotics!


They don't seem to be helping you any. Maybe a half pound of ExLax
will work better?

Don't take your own advice - it would be the end of you!


I see the probes have reached what was left of your mind.

Your fantasies are an open book.


Just as we suspected all along, you're just another gay 'dimboobie'.
Phil wil be mad that you have one of his woolies, too.

--
It's easy to think outside the box, when you have a cutting torch.

John Fields wrote:

He

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6UAYGxiRwU

No, no, no. He

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09zKoHUlhDY


--

Reply in group, but if emailing add one more
zero, and remove the last word.

John Fields wrote:

He

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6UAYGxiRwU

No, no, no. He

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09zKoHUlhDY


--

Reply in group, but if emailing add one more
zero, and remove the last word.

On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:41:58 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:


John Fields wrote:

He

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6UAYGxiRwU

No, no, no. He

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09zKoHUlhDY

---
Funny! :-)

--
JF

John Fields wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:41:58 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:


John Fields wrote:

He

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6UAYGxiRwU

No, no, no. He

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09zKoHUlhDY

---
Funny! :-)

If you liked the show, check out The Odd Couple Opera, from the same album.

"La fleur! Su mort!"

All the tracks used to be on the web. Only way to get it now.


--

Reply in group, but if emailing add one more
zero, and remove the last word.