270 degree zero crossing shifter
 

270 degree zero crossing shifter
 

On Sun, 22 May 2011 10:31:37 -0500, John Fields wrote:

Uncommented jumble

Wouldn't a 4046 be a better fit?

270 degree zero crossing shifter
 

"John Fields" wrote in message
...

Pardon my ignorance but what does that open with?
How about a GIF or PDF?

270 degree zero crossing shifter
 

On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:30:26 -0400, "Oppie" wrote:

"John Fields" wrote in message
.. .

Pardon my ignorance but what does that open with?
How about a GIF or PDF?

---
Place all the files into a single folder and click on the .asc file.

If you have LTspice on your machine you should see the schematic come
up and then you can run the simulation.

--
JF

270 degree zero crossing shifter
 

On Mon, 23 May 2011 05:01:22 +1000, Grant wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2011 10:31:37 -0500, John Fields wrote:

Uncommented jumble

---
Need a circuit description and a timing diagram?
---

Wouldn't a 4046 be a better fit?

---
Dunno.

What did you have in mind?

--
JF

270 degree zero crossing shifter
 

"John Fields" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:30:26 -0400, "Oppie" wrote:
Place all the files into a single folder and click on the .asc file.

If you have LTspice on your machine you should see the schematic come
up and then you can run the simulation.


Much better after getting the current version of LTspice - thank you

270 degree zero crossing shifter
 

On Mon, 23 May 2011 05:01:22 +1000, Grant wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2011 10:31:37 -0500, John Fields wrote:

Uncommented jumble

Wouldn't a 4046 be a better fit?

Or a simple bandwidth-limited differentiator if the system is not too
noisy. (Or pull the reverse trick... integrator as feedback.)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

270 degree zero crossing shifter
 

On Mon, 23 May 2011 16:53:52 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Mon, 23 May 2011 05:01:22 +1000, Grant wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2011 10:31:37 -0500, John Fields wrote:

Uncommented jumble

Wouldn't a 4046 be a better fit?

Or a simple bandwidth-limited differentiator if the system is not too
noisy. (Or pull the reverse trick... integrator as feedback.)

...Jim Thompson

---
My way is to measure the time between zero crossings, right shift it
by one bit with the LSB on the right edge, and then count it down to
get the sampling edge.

--
JF

270 degree zero crossing shifter
 

On Mon, 23 May 2011 19:11:35 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Mon, 23 May 2011 16:53:52 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Mon, 23 May 2011 05:01:22 +1000, Grant wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2011 10:31:37 -0500, John Fields wrote:

Uncommented jumble

Wouldn't a 4046 be a better fit?

Or a simple bandwidth-limited differentiator if the system is not too
noisy. (Or pull the reverse trick... integrator as feedback.)

...Jim Thompson

---
My way is to measure the time between zero crossings, right shift it
by one bit with the LSB on the right edge, and then count it down to
get the sampling edge.

I know ;-)

Did the OP need that kind of accuracy, particularly given his problem
originated due to extreme band0limiting?

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

270 degree zero crossing shifter
 

On Mon, 23 May 2011 17:14:17 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Mon, 23 May 2011 19:11:35 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Mon, 23 May 2011 16:53:52 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Mon, 23 May 2011 05:01:22 +1000, Grant wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2011 10:31:37 -0500, John Fields wrote:

Uncommented jumble

Wouldn't a 4046 be a better fit?

Or a simple bandwidth-limited differentiator if the system is not too
noisy. (Or pull the reverse trick... integrator as feedback.)

...Jim Thompson

---
My way is to measure the time between zero crossings, right shift it
by one bit with the LSB on the right edge, and then count it down to
get the sampling edge.

I know ;-)

Did the OP need that kind of accuracy, particularly given his problem
originated due to extreme band0limiting?

...Jim Thompson
---
Dunno.


--
JF