Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronic Schematics (alt.binaries.schematics.electronic) A place to show and share your electronics schematic drawings. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Resonance Frequency of a parallel RC/RL circuit - Expression.png (1/1)
|
#2
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Resonance Frequency of a parallel RC/RL circuit - Expression.png (1/1)
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 14:53:39 -0700, wrote:
Excessive obtuseness.... Ga-a-a-a-a-ack! ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I can see November from my house :-) |
#3
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Resonance Frequency of a parallel RC/RL circuit - Expression.png (1/1)
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 14:53:39 -0700, wrote: Excessive obtuseness.... Ga-a-a-a-a-ack! Sorry, I thought "resonant frequency: was 1/(2*pi*SQRT(L*C)) Thanks, Rich |
#4
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Resonance Frequency of a parallel RC/RL circuit - Expression.png (1/1)
"Rich Grise" wrote in message
... Sorry, I thought "resonant frequency: was 1/(2*pi*SQRT(L*C)) For an LC circuit, yes. For a damped RLC (series or parallel), there's an L/R or RC time constant which reduces it. This is called the pseudofrequency. Tim -- Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk. Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms |
#5
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Resonance Frequency of a parallel RC/RL circuit - Expression.png (1/1)
"Fred Abse" wrote in message news On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:54:53 -0500, Tim Williams wrote: For an LC circuit, yes. For a damped RLC (series or parallel), there's an L/R or RC time constant which reduces it. This is called the pseudofrequency. Only in the parallel case. I went 100 deep with Google looking for a "Resonant frequency Calculator" that allows individual -capacitor loss resistance- and -inductor loss resistance-, or Q of the individual cap and inductor. Didn't have any luck. Anyone know of an online calculator that puts all of phantom at aol's formula behind a few for inputs and buttons. MikeK. -- "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." (Richard Feynman) |
#6
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Resonance Frequency of a parallel RC/RL circuit - Expression.png (1/1)
amdx wrote:
"Fred Abse" wrote in message news On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:54:53 -0500, Tim Williams wrote: For an LC circuit, yes. For a damped RLC (series or parallel), there's an L/R or RC time constant which reduces it. This is called the pseudofrequency. Only in the parallel case. I went 100 deep with Google looking for a "Resonant frequency Calculator" that allows individual -capacitor loss resistance- and -inductor loss resistance-, or Q of the individual cap and inductor. Didn't have any luck. Anyone know of an online calculator that puts all of phantom at aol's formula behind a few for inputs and buttons. MikeK. You might look at the QL_QC program from G4FGQ archive site at http://www.zerobeat.net/G4FGQ/page3.html. It starts with entry of the Inductance , Inductor Q, Capacitance, Capacitor Q, test freq, and calculates a bunch of stuff from those data. The calculated data returned a resonant freq magnitude of impedance --- angle of impedance | equiv shunt resistance | equiv shunt j(x) | at test freq equiv series resistance | equiv series j(x) --- reactance of L and C at resonant freq coil series loss resistance capacitor series loss resistance overall Q at resonance 3db BW at resonance All of the programs on that site were written in Pascal, and run in a DOS window. The author (Reg G4FGQ) is now a silent key. One of his friends now maintains the archive of his developments. Cheers, -- David dgminala at mediacombb dot net |
#7
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Resonance Frequency of a parallel RC/RL circuit - Expression.png (1/1)
amdx wrote:
"Fred Abse" wrote in message On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:54:53 -0500, Tim Williams wrote: For an LC circuit, yes. For a damped RLC (series or parallel), there's an L/R or RC time constant which reduces it. This is called the pseudofrequency. Only in the parallel case. I went 100 deep with Google looking for a "Resonant frequency Calculator" that allows individual -capacitor loss resistance- and -inductor loss resistance-, or Q of the individual cap and inductor. Didn't have any luck. Anyone know of an online calculator that puts all of phantom at aol's formula behind a few for inputs and buttons. No, but I found a reactance calculator: http://www.daycounter.com/Calculator...lculator.phtml which you could use in tandem with the RFC and then the Q is related to that and the resistive R by some formula that I've left as an exercise for the reader. ;-) (I'm pretty sure it's something really simple, like X/R or something.) Hope This Helps! Rich |
#8
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Resonance Frequency of a parallel RC/RL circuit - Expression.png (1/1)
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:12:51 -0600, "amdx" wrote:
SNIP I went 100 deep with Google looking for a "Resonant frequency Calculator" that allows individual -capacitor loss resistance- and -inductor loss resistance-, or Q of the individual cap and inductor. Didn't have any luck. Anyone know of an online calculator that puts all of phantom at aol's formula behind a few for inputs and buttons. MikeK. I did some simplification of the expressions and here they a http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/1...rallelrlrc.png The expressions for the zero phase angle frequency and impedance magnitude became quite simple, and are probably the most interesting case also. |
#9
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Resonance Frequency of a parallel RC/RL circuit - Expression.png (1/1)
Hmm, you seem to have lost the subscripts past equation 2?
Also, the opening magnitude symbol on the last line ("|Z|") is purple, which is weird. Come to look at it, blue letters are used occasionally in equations 1 and 2, and the "impedance /is/" of the 5th line is italic and green. Oh well. It's not LaTeX Do you have an accompanying circuit? Are they both ESR, or is RL in parallel (i.e., loss instead of DCR)? Funny thing is, depending on how you wind it, both DCR and loss may be significant, whereas most capacitors don't suffer from noticable dielectric loss. I like how "resonance" (in either case) ends up as Fo times a correction factor. Tim -- Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk. Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms "Phantom" wrote in message ... On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:12:51 -0600, "amdx" wrote: SNIP I went 100 deep with Google looking for a "Resonant frequency Calculator" that allows individual -capacitor loss resistance- and -inductor loss resistance-, or Q of the individual cap and inductor. Didn't have any luck. Anyone know of an online calculator that puts all of phantom at aol's formula behind a few for inputs and buttons. MikeK. I did some simplification of the expressions and here they a http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/1...rallelrlrc.png The expressions for the zero phase angle frequency and impedance magnitude became quite simple, and are probably the most interesting case also. |
#10
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Resonance Frequency of a parallel RC/RL circuit - Expression.png (1/1)
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 13:54:32 -0600, "Tim Williams"
wrote: Hmm, you seem to have lost the subscripts past equation 2? Also, the opening magnitude symbol on the last line ("|Z|") is purple, which is weird. Come to look at it, blue letters are used occasionally in equations 1 and 2, and the "impedance /is/" of the 5th line is italic and green. Oh well. It's not LaTeX Do you have an accompanying circuit? The circuit was described elsewhere; it's a series combination of a resistor RL and an inductance L, in parallel with another series combination of a resistor RC and a capacitor C. Are they both ESR, or is RL in parallel (i.e., loss instead of DCR)? Funny thing is, depending on how you wind it, both DCR and loss may be significant, whereas most capacitors don't suffer from noticable dielectric loss. I like how "resonance" (in either case) ends up as Fo times a correction factor. I did that on purpose. Notice how for the zero phase angle case you can easily see that if RC=RL, then the multiplying factor becomes 1. Tim |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Harmonic resonance shower | Home Repair | |||
Gardening-An Expression | Home Ownership | |||
Vibration resonance? | Home Repair | |||
Boiler resonance noise | UK diy |