Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Electronic Schematics (alt.binaries.schematics.electronic) A place to show and share your electronics schematic drawings. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Group,
Many thanks for all the innovative and informative posts on the LED lighting scheme. Many of you have been quite generous with your time and knowledge and I am most appreciative. Certainly there are many different ways to put this together and each has a particular strength. I would prefer to stay with PWM techniques for dimming versus voltage changes. With 20 (and perhaps more) LEDs in the circuit, some are certain to begin to shut off before others when Vf starts falling too low. I have taken as many of your suggestions as I could understand (Sorry JosephKK, but for me, yours was grad school. Beta sounds like a coefficient of some sort. Perhaps you could post a primer for me.) and put them into a modified design. I have de-rated the LEDs somewhat and switched to a low noise regulator that uses a trim pot to adjust Vout. This way, should I need to go to two or even three LEDs in series, I can accommodate this in the design. Here I have calculated the total power consumption of the circuit at 4.56W with the LEDs consuming 1.23W (27% efficient). At 14V, it should require 0.33A to run. The most critical part is the junction temp of the regulator. It seemed to me to run too hot as is so I put in a series resistor (12 ohms, 7W) to absorb some (3.075W) of the power. I now estimate Tj to be 31.5°C hotter than ambient with an allowable Tmax of 125°C on the chip. Safe even in the desert. I also fixed a couple errors on the original schematic. As always, I would appreciate some experienced eyes looking at this and letting me know if I have seriously screwed something up somewhere. I'm not at all familiar with linear low-noise regulators. Thanks, Charlie |
#2
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:02:27 -0500, Charlie Smith
wrote: Group, Many thanks for all the innovative and informative posts on the LED lighting scheme. Many of you have been quite generous with your time and knowledge and I am most appreciative. Certainly there are many different ways to put this together and each has a particular strength. I would prefer to stay with PWM techniques for dimming versus voltage changes. With 20 (and perhaps more) LEDs in the circuit, some are certain to begin to shut off before others when Vf starts falling too low. I have taken as many of your suggestions as I could understand (Sorry JosephKK, but for me, yours was grad school. Beta sounds like a coefficient of some sort. Perhaps you could post a primer for me.) and put them into a modified design. I have de-rated the LEDs somewhat and switched to a low noise regulator that uses a trim pot to adjust Vout. This way, should I need to go to two or even three LEDs in series, I can accommodate this in the design. Here I have calculated the total power consumption of the circuit at 4.56W with the LEDs consuming 1.23W (27% efficient). At 14V, it should require 0.33A to run. The most critical part is the junction temp of the regulator. It seemed to me to run too hot as is so I put in a series resistor (12 ohms, 7W) to absorb some (3.075W) of the power. I now estimate Tj to be 31.5°C hotter than ambient with an allowable Tmax of 125°C on the chip. Safe even in the desert. I also fixed a couple errors on the original schematic. As always, I would appreciate some experienced eyes looking at this and letting me know if I have seriously screwed something up somewhere. I'm not at all familiar with linear low-noise regulators. Thanks, Charlie I wonder if a series choke in line with the final drive bus to the LED resistor bank would make the 'brightness control' "smoother" than harsh square waves would. Also, would it not be a good idea to control pulse width as well as the 'duty cycle' or 'off time'? Or are you controlling the final drive current average going to them? |
#3
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:02:27 -0500, Charlie Smith
wrote: Group, Many thanks for all the innovative and informative posts on the LED lighting scheme. Many of you have been quite generous with your time and knowledge and I am most appreciative. Certainly there are many different ways to put this together and each has a particular strength. I would prefer to stay with PWM techniques for dimming versus voltage changes. With 20 (and perhaps more) LEDs in the circuit, some are certain to begin to shut off before others when Vf starts falling too low. I have taken as many of your suggestions as I could understand (Sorry JosephKK, but for me, yours was grad school. Beta sounds like a coefficient of some sort. Perhaps you could post a primer for me.) and put them into a modified design. I have de-rated the LEDs somewhat and switched to a low noise regulator that uses a trim pot to adjust Vout. This way, should I need to go to two or even three LEDs in series, I can accommodate this in the design. Here I have calculated the total power consumption of the circuit at 4.56W with the LEDs consuming 1.23W (27% efficient). At 14V, it should require 0.33A to run. The most critical part is the junction temp of the regulator. It seemed to me to run too hot as is so I put in a series resistor (12 ohms, 7W) to absorb some (3.075W) of the power. I now estimate Tj to be 31.5°C hotter than ambient with an allowable Tmax of 125°C on the chip. Safe even in the desert. I also fixed a couple errors on the original schematic. As always, I would appreciate some experienced eyes looking at this and letting me know if I have seriously screwed something up somewhere. I'm not at all familiar with linear low-noise regulators. Thanks, Charlie Get rid of the 555 PWM thing! It accomplishes nothing. John |
#4
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:01:25 -0800, John Larkin
wrote: On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:02:27 -0500, Charlie Smith wrote: Group, Many thanks for all the innovative and informative posts on the LED lighting scheme. Many of you have been quite generous with your time and knowledge and I am most appreciative. Certainly there are many different ways to put this together and each has a particular strength. I would prefer to stay with PWM techniques for dimming versus voltage changes. With 20 (and perhaps more) LEDs in the circuit, some are certain to begin to shut off before others when Vf starts falling too low. I have taken as many of your suggestions as I could understand (Sorry JosephKK, but for me, yours was grad school. Beta sounds like a coefficient of some sort. Perhaps you could post a primer for me.) and put them into a modified design. I have de-rated the LEDs somewhat and switched to a low noise regulator that uses a trim pot to adjust Vout. This way, should I need to go to two or even three LEDs in series, I can accommodate this in the design. Here I have calculated the total power consumption of the circuit at 4.56W with the LEDs consuming 1.23W (27% efficient). At 14V, it should require 0.33A to run. The most critical part is the junction temp of the regulator. It seemed to me to run too hot as is so I put in a series resistor (12 ohms, 7W) to absorb some (3.075W) of the power. I now estimate Tj to be 31.5°C hotter than ambient with an allowable Tmax of 125°C on the chip. Safe even in the desert. I also fixed a couple errors on the original schematic. As always, I would appreciate some experienced eyes looking at this and letting me know if I have seriously screwed something up somewhere. I'm not at all familiar with linear low-noise regulators. Thanks, Charlie Get rid of the 555 PWM thing! It accomplishes nothing. John Did you forget about the dimming function? |
#5
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:11:04 -0800, Jupiter Jaq
wrote: On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:01:25 -0800, John Larkin wrote: On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:02:27 -0500, Charlie Smith wrote: Group, Many thanks for all the innovative and informative posts on the LED lighting scheme. Many of you have been quite generous with your time and knowledge and I am most appreciative. Certainly there are many different ways to put this together and each has a particular strength. I would prefer to stay with PWM techniques for dimming versus voltage changes. With 20 (and perhaps more) LEDs in the circuit, some are certain to begin to shut off before others when Vf starts falling too low. I have taken as many of your suggestions as I could understand (Sorry JosephKK, but for me, yours was grad school. Beta sounds like a coefficient of some sort. Perhaps you could post a primer for me.) and put them into a modified design. I have de-rated the LEDs somewhat and switched to a low noise regulator that uses a trim pot to adjust Vout. This way, should I need to go to two or even three LEDs in series, I can accommodate this in the design. Here I have calculated the total power consumption of the circuit at 4.56W with the LEDs consuming 1.23W (27% efficient). At 14V, it should require 0.33A to run. The most critical part is the junction temp of the regulator. It seemed to me to run too hot as is so I put in a series resistor (12 ohms, 7W) to absorb some (3.075W) of the power. I now estimate Tj to be 31.5°C hotter than ambient with an allowable Tmax of 125°C on the chip. Safe even in the desert. I also fixed a couple errors on the original schematic. As always, I would appreciate some experienced eyes looking at this and letting me know if I have seriously screwed something up somewhere. I'm not at all familiar with linear low-noise regulators. Thanks, Charlie Get rid of the 555 PWM thing! It accomplishes nothing. John Did you forget about the dimming function? There's a pot on the linear regulator; it's in plain sight. And that's all this thing needs. The PWM accomplishes nothing. John |
#6
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:02:08 -0800, John Larkin wrote:
snip There's a pot on the linear regulator; it's in plain sight. And that's all this thing needs. The PWM accomplishes nothing. PWM dimming is more efficient than linear dimming - by a long way. It all depends on how much heat the OP is willing to let the dimmer dissipate. -- Mick (Working in a M$-free zone!) Web: http://www.nascom.info Filtering everything posted from googlegroups to kill spam. |
#7
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 Jan 2010 16:01:35 GMT, mick wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:02:08 -0800, John Larkin wrote: snip There's a pot on the linear regulator; it's in plain sight. And that's all this thing needs. The PWM accomplishes nothing. PWM dimming is more efficient than linear dimming - by a long way. It all depends on how much heat the OP is willing to let the dimmer dissipate. PWM is no more efficient than resistive dimming the way he did it. There are no inductors in his circuit. All this sort of PWM can do is move the heat around. John |
#8
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:01:25 -0800, John Larkin
wrote: Did you really need to quote 40+ lines for a one line response? Jim Get rid of the 555 PWM thing! It accomplishes nothing. John |
#9
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:28:49 -0800, RST Engineering
wrote: On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:01:25 -0800, John Larkin wrote: Did you really need to quote 40+ lines for a one line response? Jim Get rid of the 555 PWM thing! It accomplishes nothing. John Are you incapable of using the bottom-posting convention? John |
#10
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
![]() John Larkin wrote: On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:28:49 -0800, RST Engineering wrote: On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:01:25 -0800, John Larkin wrote: Did you really need to quote 40+ lines for a one line response? Jim Get rid of the 555 PWM thing! It accomplishes nothing. John Are you incapable of using the bottom-posting convention? That requires the ability to think. ![]() -- Greed is the root of all eBay. |
#11
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:02:27 -0500, Charlie Smith wrote:
Group, Many thanks for all the innovative and informative posts on the LED lighting scheme. Many of you have been quite generous with your time and knowledge and I am most appreciative. Certainly there are many different ways to put this together and each has a particular strength. I would prefer to stay with PWM techniques for dimming versus voltage changes. With 20 (and perhaps more) LEDs in the circuit, some are certain to begin to shut off before others when Vf starts falling too low. I have taken as many of your suggestions as I could understand (Sorry JosephKK, but for me, yours was grad school. Beta sounds like a coefficient of some sort. Perhaps you could post a primer for me.) No problem. Simply stated beta is the ratio between base current and collector current. So 10 mA base current yields about 500 mA through the collector (with something like 2 V collector to emitter. With R3 = 1K your base current will be about 10 to 12 mA. A bit stronger drive by reducing R3 to 500 ohms will give you better consistency for the LED drive because the 3055 will be fully switching. Do make sure that your 555 can source at least 50 mA for this to be reliable. and put them into a modified design. I have de-rated the LEDs somewhat and switched to a low noise regulator that uses a trim pot to adjust Vout. This way, should I need to go to two or even three LEDs in series, I can accommodate this in the design. Here I have calculated the total power consumption of the circuit at 4.56W with the LEDs consuming 1.23W (27% efficient). At 14V, it should require 0.33A to run. The most critical part is the junction temp of the regulator. It seemed to me to run too hot as is so I put in a series resistor (12 ohms, 7W) to absorb some (3.075W) of the power. I now estimate Tj to be 31.5°C hotter than ambient with an allowable Tmax of 125°C on the chip. Safe even in the desert. I also fixed a couple errors on the original schematic. As always, I would appreciate some experienced eyes looking at this and letting me know if I have seriously screwed something up somewhere. I'm not at all familiar with linear low-noise regulators. Thanks, Charlie |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
LED Instrument Panel lighting | Electronic Schematics | |||
Instrument boxes | UK diy | |||
Win XP Instrument Panel | Electronics | |||
Precision Instrument Repair | Electronics Repair |