Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronic Schematics (alt.binaries.schematics.electronic) A place to show and share your electronics schematic drawings. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Why even bother with SMPS chips?
I see circuits like these in VCRs a lot... not really anywhere else, for
some reason. Not the greatest efficiency, but the parts are a lot cheaper than a whole UC3842 or TL494 deal. Maybe not worthwhile against TOPswitches and such these days. Efficiency as shown is around 67%. Runs at ~200kHz full power, much slower at lighter loadings (it fires a full cycle, then stays off for a while) Tim -- Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk. Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms |
#2
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Why even bother with SMPS chips?
Self oscillating and fairly simple, yes.
when you start adding power factor correction or special control functions like soft start, a smps chip makes more sense. The trend in some new power supplies is to actually use a microprocessor for control. Microchip for one has been pushing their 32bit DSC chip for this: http://www.microchip.com/stellent/id...ote= cn531747 Happy New Year all Oppie (aka bob Oppenheimer) "Tim Williams" wrote in message ... I see circuits like these in VCRs a lot... not really anywhere else, for some reason. Not the greatest efficiency, but the parts are a lot cheaper than a whole UC3842 or TL494 deal. Maybe not worthwhile against TOPswitches and such these days. Efficiency as shown is around 67%. Runs at ~200kHz full power, much slower at lighter loadings (it fires a full cycle, then stays off for a while) Tim -- Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk. Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms |
#3
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Why even bother with SMPS chips?
Oppie wrote:
Self oscillating and fairly simple, yes. when you start adding power factor correction or special control functions like soft start, a smps chip makes more sense. The trend in some new power supplies is to actually use a microprocessor for control. Microchip for one has been pushing their 32bit DSC chip for this: http://www.microchip.com/stellent/id...ote= cn531747 Happy New Year all Oppie (aka bob Oppenheimer) "Tim Williams" wrote in message ... I see circuits like these in VCRs a lot... not really anywhere else, for some reason. Not the greatest efficiency, but the parts are a lot cheaper than a whole UC3842 or TL494 deal. Maybe not worthwhile against TOPswitches and such these days. Efficiency as shown is around 67%. Runs at ~200kHz full power, much slower at lighter loadings (it fires a full cycle, then stays off for a while) Tim -- Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk. Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms 32 bits for such _simple_ work?? Like using a sledge hammer to kill an ant. |
#4
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Why even bother with SMPS chips?
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:34:04 -0800, the renowned Robert Baer
wrote: Oppie wrote: Self oscillating and fairly simple, yes. when you start adding power factor correction or special control functions like soft start, a smps chip makes more sense. The trend in some new power supplies is to actually use a microprocessor for control. Microchip for one has been pushing their 32bit DSC chip for this: http://www.microchip.com/stellent/id...ote= cn531747 Happy New Year all Oppie (aka bob Oppenheimer) "Tim Williams" wrote in message ... I see circuits like these in VCRs a lot... not really anywhere else, for some reason. Not the greatest efficiency, but the parts are a lot cheaper than a whole UC3842 or TL494 deal. Maybe not worthwhile against TOPswitches and such these days. Efficiency as shown is around 67%. Runs at ~200kHz full power, much slower at lighter loadings (it fires a full cycle, then stays off for a while) Tim -- Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk. Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms 32 bits for such _simple_ work?? Like using a sledge hammer to kill an ant. It's actually a 16-bit microcontroller with some rudimentary fixed-point DSP functionality barnacled onto it. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany -- "it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com |
#5
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Why even bother with SMPS chips?
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 11:56:28 -0600, "Tim Williams"
wrote: I see circuits like these in VCRs a lot... not really anywhere else, for some reason. Not the greatest efficiency, but the parts are a lot cheaper than a whole UC3842 or TL494 deal. Maybe not worthwhile against TOPswitches and such these days. Efficiency as shown is around 67%. Runs at ~200kHz full power, much slower at lighter loadings (it fires a full cycle, then stays off for a while) Tim Here's my +12 to -12 converter. The IC is just a schmitt-trigger gate driver. ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/Inverter.jpg At powerup it self-oscillates at a calculated duty cycle, 75% maybe, until the -12 comes up, turns on the common-base transistor, and backs down the duty cycle. John |
#6
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Why even bother with SMPS chips?
"Tim Williams" wrote in message ... I see circuits like these in VCRs a lot... not really anywhere else, for some reason. Not the greatest efficiency, but the parts are a lot cheaper than a whole UC3842 or TL494 deal. Maybe not worthwhile against TOPswitches and such these days. Most of the discrete PSUs I've encountered in field service have been much more complex, and a right PITA to fault find compared to IC designs (apart from TDA4600 types which should be classified as a notifiable disease!), probably they have to comply with requirements for safety shutdown circuits which are usually included on-chip. |
#7
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Why even bother with SMPS chips?
"Spehro Pefhany" wrote in message ... 32 bits for such _simple_ work?? Like using a sledge hammer to kill an ant. It's actually a 16-bit microcontroller with some rudimentary fixed-point DSP functionality barnacled onto it. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany My bad. thanks for the correction. I've seen several reference designs now for power supplies, inverters and motor drives that are using low pin count 16 bit DSPics for the control elements. My biggest problem with this is running a debugger. Not only does the system have to be isolated (affecting the impedance of the power source) but what happens when you hit a breakpoint and emulation stops. I keep asking the emulator manufacturers to make available a hardware flag for emulation stopped so power can be safely controlled. No takers yet. Oppie |
#8
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Why even bother with SMPS chips?
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 14:02:28 -0500, "Oppie" wrote:
"Spehro Pefhany" wrote in message .. . 32 bits for such _simple_ work?? Like using a sledge hammer to kill an ant. It's actually a 16-bit microcontroller with some rudimentary fixed-point DSP functionality barnacled onto it. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany My bad. thanks for the correction. I've seen several reference designs now for power supplies, inverters and motor drives that are using low pin count 16 bit DSPics for the control elements. My biggest problem with this is running a debugger. Not only does the system have to be isolated (affecting the impedance of the power source) but what happens when you hit a breakpoint and emulation stops. I keep asking the emulator manufacturers to make available a hardware flag for emulation stopped so power can be safely controlled. No takers yet. Oppie Optically coupled JTAG? John |
#9
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Why even bother with SMPS chips?
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 14:02:28 -0500, the renowned "Oppie"
wrote: My biggest problem with this is running a debugger. Not only does the system have to be isolated (affecting the impedance of the power source) but what happens when you hit a breakpoint and emulation stops. I keep asking the emulator manufacturers to make available a hardware flag for emulation stopped so power can be safely controlled. No takers yet. Oppie That would be very convenient-- just hook it to the fault input on the drivers. It's not that hard to debug in chunks, implement monitors, use burn & crash, etc., but it would be nice to be able to avoid that. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany -- "it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SPOT of Bother (dont look) | Woodworking | |||
bother | Woodworking | |||
dont bother fixing... | Electronics Repair | |||
Do you ever not bother with permits? | Home Repair | |||
Do you bother repairing these anymore ? | Electronics Repair |