I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg
1 Attachment(s)
I need to make -12 from +12, at maybe 500 mA, and all the obvious
inverting switching regulators suck for one reason or another. The LM5112 is a 50-cent fet gate driver. John |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg
John Larkin wrote:
I need to make -12 from +12, at maybe 500 mA, and all the obvious inverting switching regulators suck for one reason or another. The LM5112 is a 50-cent fet gate driver. What does it do if the -12 volt output is overloaded? |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg
On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 21:09:01 -0400, John Popelish
wrote: John Larkin wrote: I need to make -12 from +12, at maybe 500 mA, and all the obvious inverting switching regulators suck for one reason or another. The LM5112 is a 50-cent fet gate driver. What does it do if the -12 volt output is overloaded? Just makes the +12 supply current-limit, optimistically. A hard-shorted -12 could fry the fet or the inductor, I suppose. John |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg
Why does a UC3842, etc. suck, exactly? Wrong sign? (I don't remember if
the 14-pin version has + and - inputs at the pins.) Not cheap enough? 6W is a little much for a, say, cap switcher?... Tim -- Deep Fryer: A very philosophical monk. Website @ http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms "John Larkin" wrote in message ... I need to make -12 from +12, at maybe 500 mA, and all the obvious inverting switching regulators suck for one reason or another. The LM5112 is a 50-cent fet gate driver. John |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 22:13:26 -0500, "Tim Williams"
wrote: Why does a UC3842, etc. suck, exactly? Wrong sign? (I don't remember if the 14-pin version has + and - inputs at the pins.) Not cheap enough? Yup, wrong feedback and gate drive signs, and the current-limit thing would be damned awkward with a p-fet switch. 6W is a little much for a, say, cap switcher?... Probably, and it would lose some voltage, too. It would have to be done with a *lot* of discretes, since the IC charge pump things couldn't handle the net 24 volts across the chip. A Cuk converter would be nice, even with the dual inductors, but I haven't found one that will flip +12 to -12 at this current. I think the math gets messy. An unregulated p-p forward converter would be OK, but the transformer would have to be 1ct to 1.1ct or something like that, custom magnetics, always a huge hassle. There are a bazillion buck regulators on the market, and very few inverters. John |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg
John Larkin a écrit :
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 22:13:26 -0500, "Tim Williams" wrote: Why does a UC3842, etc. suck, exactly? Wrong sign? (I don't remember if the 14-pin version has + and - inputs at the pins.) Not cheap enough? Yup, wrong feedback and gate drive signs, and the current-limit thing would be damned awkward with a p-fet switch. 6W is a little much for a, say, cap switcher?... Probably, and it would lose some voltage, too. It would have to be done with a *lot* of discretes, since the IC charge pump things couldn't handle the net 24 volts across the chip. A Cuk converter would be nice, even with the dual inductors, but I haven't found one that will flip +12 to -12 at this current. I think the math gets messy. An unregulated p-p forward converter would be OK, but the transformer would have to be 1ct to 1.1ct or something like that, custom magnetics, always a huge hassle. There are a bazillion buck regulators on the market, and very few inverters. Use a buck IC in an inverter configuration with a common gate pfet to extend the switch voltage compliance to negative voltages. Then twist feedback adequately. I did almost that once, with an LT1374, generating both +20V and -20V at 1A from 15V. In my case the feedback loop naturally came from the +20V output. Nice, simple and fully protected. -- Thanks, Fred. |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 09:29:13 +0200, Fred Bartoli
r_AndThisToo wrote: John Larkin a écrit : On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 22:13:26 -0500, "Tim Williams" wrote: Why does a UC3842, etc. suck, exactly? Wrong sign? (I don't remember if the 14-pin version has + and - inputs at the pins.) Not cheap enough? Yup, wrong feedback and gate drive signs, and the current-limit thing would be damned awkward with a p-fet switch. 6W is a little much for a, say, cap switcher?... Probably, and it would lose some voltage, too. It would have to be done with a *lot* of discretes, since the IC charge pump things couldn't handle the net 24 volts across the chip. A Cuk converter would be nice, even with the dual inductors, but I haven't found one that will flip +12 to -12 at this current. I think the math gets messy. An unregulated p-p forward converter would be OK, but the transformer would have to be 1ct to 1.1ct or something like that, custom magnetics, always a huge hassle. There are a bazillion buck regulators on the market, and very few inverters. Use a buck IC in an inverter configuration with a common gate pfet to extend the switch voltage compliance to negative voltages. Then twist feedback adequately. I did almost that once, with an LT1374, generating both +20V and -20V at 1A from 15V. In my case the feedback loop naturally came from the +20V output. Nice, simple and fully protected. I did this in one of the GenRad portable testers... http://analog-innovations.com/SED/Ol...tiveOutput.pdf ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | | http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg - CukFun.gif (0/1)
On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 21:15:31 -0700, John Larkin
wrote: On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 22:13:26 -0500, "Tim Williams" wrote: Why does a UC3842, etc. suck, exactly? Wrong sign? (I don't remember if the 14-pin version has + and - inputs at the pins.) Not cheap enough? Yup, wrong feedback and gate drive signs, and the current-limit thing would be damned awkward with a p-fet switch. 6W is a little much for a, say, cap switcher?... Probably, and it would lose some voltage, too. It would have to be done with a *lot* of discretes, since the IC charge pump things couldn't handle the net 24 volts across the chip. A Cuk converter would be nice, even with the dual inductors, but I haven't found one that will flip +12 to -12 at this current. I think the math gets messy. An unregulated p-p forward converter would be OK, but the transformer would have to be 1ct to 1.1ct or something like that, custom magnetics, always a huge hassle. There are a bazillion buck regulators on the market, and very few inverters. John LT1372 will do the job in a Cuk configuration. LT1372 is a bit pricy at $4.30 in unit quantities, but you do get a built in switch. You can get dual inductors from Coilcraft and Coiltronics (Digikey). You do get some sort of overload protection with the LT1372. --- Mark |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg - CukFun.gif (1/1)
1 Attachment(s)
|
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg
"John Larkin" wrote in message ... I need to make -12 from +12, at maybe 500 mA, and all the obvious inverting switching regulators suck for one reason or another. The LM5112 is a 50-cent fet gate driver. John have you considered a MC34063A ? might just do it wothout an external switch. input range 40v, for voltage inverter just connect ic ground to neg op. Colin =^.^= |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:26:32 GMT, "colin"
wrote: "John Larkin" wrote in message .. . I need to make -12 from +12, at maybe 500 mA, and all the obvious inverting switching regulators suck for one reason or another. The LM5112 is a 50-cent fet gate driver. John have you considered a MC34063A ? might just do it wothout an external switch. input range 40v, for voltage inverter just connect ic ground to neg op. Colin =^.^= Yeah, I looked at that. It would probably work, but it's an old, slow bipolar part with a darlington switch, so it would be pretty inefficient and would run at maybe 100 khz, so it would need a big inductor. But it is cheap, 35 cents or something. Thanks. John |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg - CukFun.gif (0/1)
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:18:30 GMT, qrk wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 21:15:31 -0700, John Larkin wrote: On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 22:13:26 -0500, "Tim Williams" wrote: Why does a UC3842, etc. suck, exactly? Wrong sign? (I don't remember if the 14-pin version has + and - inputs at the pins.) Not cheap enough? Yup, wrong feedback and gate drive signs, and the current-limit thing would be damned awkward with a p-fet switch. 6W is a little much for a, say, cap switcher?... Probably, and it would lose some voltage, too. It would have to be done with a *lot* of discretes, since the IC charge pump things couldn't handle the net 24 volts across the chip. A Cuk converter would be nice, even with the dual inductors, but I haven't found one that will flip +12 to -12 at this current. I think the math gets messy. An unregulated p-p forward converter would be OK, but the transformer would have to be 1ct to 1.1ct or something like that, custom magnetics, always a huge hassle. There are a bazillion buck regulators on the market, and very few inverters. John LT1372 will do the job in a Cuk configuration. LT1372 is a bit pricy at $4.30 in unit quantities, but you do get a built in switch. You can get dual inductors from Coilcraft and Coiltronics (Digikey). You do get some sort of overload protection with the LT1372. --- Mark What's the output current in your cukfun sim? National has a similar part, LM2611, with a 1.2 amp current limit switch. In the +12 to -12 config, it's only good for 170 mA out. All the LTC stuff is "a bit pricey." John |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg
"John Larkin" wrote in message ... On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:26:32 GMT, "colin" wrote: "John Larkin" wrote in message . .. I need to make -12 from +12, at maybe 500 mA, and all the obvious inverting switching regulators suck for one reason or another. The LM5112 is a 50-cent fet gate driver. John have you considered a MC34063A ? might just do it wothout an external switch. input range 40v, for voltage inverter just connect ic ground to neg op. Colin =^.^= Yeah, I looked at that. It would probably work, but it's an old, slow bipolar part with a darlington switch, so it would be pretty inefficient and would run at maybe 100 khz, so it would need a big inductor. But it is cheap, 35 cents or something. Yep it is realy cheap, and as you say old too. but ive used it many times now. it works realy well for lowish power if you have a fairly constant load, other wise it teneds to cycle skip wich can make some audible noise. ive used it from all sorts of combinations, from +30v to 3.3v to 3.3v to 250v lol The size of the inductor would probably not be any bigger than say the extra space for an external switch. I realy wish there was a more up to date replacement that had the wide input voltage. many nice new ones with integral FET seem to be for low voltage. there is also the lm259x series wich are much the same, they run quieter but are quite expensive. Colin =^.^= |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg - CukFun.gif (0/1)
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 15:29:59 -0700, John Larkin
wrote: On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:18:30 GMT, qrk wrote: On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 21:15:31 -0700, John Larkin wrote: On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 22:13:26 -0500, "Tim Williams" wrote: Why does a UC3842, etc. suck, exactly? Wrong sign? (I don't remember if the 14-pin version has + and - inputs at the pins.) Not cheap enough? Yup, wrong feedback and gate drive signs, and the current-limit thing would be damned awkward with a p-fet switch. 6W is a little much for a, say, cap switcher?... Probably, and it would lose some voltage, too. It would have to be done with a *lot* of discretes, since the IC charge pump things couldn't handle the net 24 volts across the chip. A Cuk converter would be nice, even with the dual inductors, but I haven't found one that will flip +12 to -12 at this current. I think the math gets messy. An unregulated p-p forward converter would be OK, but the transformer would have to be 1ct to 1.1ct or something like that, custom magnetics, always a huge hassle. There are a bazillion buck regulators on the market, and very few inverters. John LT1372 will do the job in a Cuk configuration. LT1372 is a bit pricy at $4.30 in unit quantities, but you do get a built in switch. You can get dual inductors from Coilcraft and Coiltronics (Digikey). You do get some sort of overload protection with the LT1372. --- Mark What's the output current in your cukfun sim? National has a similar part, LM2611, with a 1.2 amp current limit switch. In the +12 to -12 config, it's only good for 170 mA out. All the LTC stuff is "a bit pricey." John I have a 24 Ohm resistor on the output = 0.5A. The LT1372 current limit is somewhere around 1.5A. The LM6211 in a SOT23 package has a 256 deg/W thermal resistance which is probably why the output current is limited to such a low level. The LT part is around 125 deg/W for their SO8 package. Guess these little controllers with internal switches are pretty limited. --- Mark |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg
"John Larkin" wrote in message ... I need to make -12 from +12, at maybe 500 mA, and all the obvious inverting switching regulators suck for one reason or another. The LM5112 is a 50-cent fet gate driver. another thought, how about a self oscillating one with a nch mosfet, if its a steady 12vin and 12v out it should be doable with ~50% duty cycle so just an extra winding on the inductor. ofc with a bjt you need less turns for the base drive. and some bias to start it up. not sure if you could add current limit easily, maybe when the inductor saturates it would lose base drive (havnt given this much thought) a 3pin device (tl434?) could shunt gate drive to regulate voltage further. Ive also used one of those uc3843 to drive a transformer directly with no mosfet. Colin =^.^= |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:30:47 GMT, "colin"
wrote: "John Larkin" wrote in message .. . I need to make -12 from +12, at maybe 500 mA, and all the obvious inverting switching regulators suck for one reason or another. The LM5112 is a 50-cent fet gate driver. another thought, how about a self oscillating one with a nch mosfet, if its a steady 12vin and 12v out it should be doable with ~50% duty cycle so just an extra winding on the inductor. ofc with a bjt you need less turns for the base drive. and some bias to start it up. not sure if you could add current limit easily, maybe when the inductor saturates it would lose base drive (havnt given this much thought) Interesting idea. That would be a classic blocking oscillator, with the output taken on the flyback. The cool thing about a blocking oscillator is that it's simple and drives the transformer to saturation every shot, which automatically makes optimum use of the core. It would regulate in variable-frequency mode. I'll see if that leads to anything useful. I don't think I've seen that topology done anywhere. John |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg
John Larkin wrote:
I need to make -12 from +12, at maybe 500 mA, and all the obvious inverting switching regulators suck for one reason or another. The LM5112 is a 50-cent fet gate driver. 50 cents is a lot of money in electronics ;-) How about the old CD40106? The BCX70K seems overkill as well but only by a cent or so. I think you need to throw in another transistor or two because you may need a current limit, unless a short isn't going to have nasty consequences. BTW, I'd probably be a bit squeamish about letting Vbe climb above -3V on the BCX. But it's under abs max. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:59:17 GMT, Joerg
wrote: John Larkin wrote: I need to make -12 from +12, at maybe 500 mA, and all the obvious inverting switching regulators suck for one reason or another. The LM5112 is a 50-cent fet gate driver. 50 cents is a lot of money in electronics ;-) Not in my electronics! How about the old CD40106? The BCX70K seems overkill as well but only by a cent or so. I think you need to throw in another transistor or two because you may need a current limit, unless a short isn't going to have nasty consequences. After due consideration, not to mention being yelled at by junior staff members, it looks like we'll be going to a flyback with custom magnetics. It was an interesting diversion, anyhow. BTW, I'd probably be a bit squeamish about letting Vbe climb above -3V on the BCX. But it's under abs max. I tested some recently, and got around 5.1 typ Vbe breakdown. Beta degradation wouldn't matter much in a common-base circuit like this! I'm going to have to play with the blocking-oscillator converter one of these days, just for fun. John |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg
John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:59:17 GMT, Joerg wrote: John Larkin wrote: I need to make -12 from +12, at maybe 500 mA, and all the obvious inverting switching regulators suck for one reason or another. The LM5112 is a 50-cent fet gate driver. 50 cents is a lot of money in electronics ;-) Not in my electronics! Yeah, I know. Wish it was so in mine. But at least I got to design one "deluxe class" board earlier this year. How about the old CD40106? The BCX70K seems overkill as well but only by a cent or so. I think you need to throw in another transistor or two because you may need a current limit, unless a short isn't going to have nasty consequences. After due consideration, not to mention being yelled at by junior staff members, it looks like we'll be going to a flyback with custom magnetics. It was an interesting diversion, anyhow. Aw, that almost sounds like taking the chicken exit ;-) But I guess a few bucks for custom magnetics won't matter in your case. It is hard to find off-the-shelf transformers with air gaps that are under 50c. That is why I usually don't do flybacks. BTW, I'd probably be a bit squeamish about letting Vbe climb above -3V on the BCX. But it's under abs max. I tested some recently, and got around 5.1 typ Vbe breakdown. Beta degradation wouldn't matter much in a common-base circuit like this! Still I wouldn't like to hit it. Somehow that feels like driving with a check engine light that flickers from time to time. I'm going to have to play with the blocking-oscillator converter one of these days, just for fun. Absolutely. Once you have a well-tested design you can add it to your building block collection. Blocking oscillators are a pretty good path to make sure you won't be hit with part obsolescence issues. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com |
I wonder if this will work - Inverter.jpg
"Joerg" wrote in message
et... Still I wouldn't like to hit it. Somehow that feels like driving with a check engine light that flickers from time to time. The tape fell off, apply a new strip ;-) Tim -- Deep Fryer: A very philosophical monk. Website @ http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter