"Cliff" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:58:52 -0500, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:

"Cliff" wrote in message
.. .

Huh? Are you saying that Bush and the neocons are behind the
destruction
of
the WTC? Or what are you saying?

It was a *criminal* act.
Then bush & the neocons promoted it to further their *existing*
agenda to start wars in the Middle East and gain vast powers in
the US.

So you think that flying airplanes into the WTC was a criminal act,
rather
than an act of policital terror?

How easily some wish to toss out the rule of law, the US
constitution, international treaties, the UN's charter, people's
rights. etc.

What does that have to do with flying airplanes into the WTC? Keep your eye
on the ball, Cliff.


Do you think that it was NOT criminal? Can you think
of even one nation on the face of the planet that would
not have said that it was criminal?

Yeah. Practically every one. First they'd say it was criminal, since they
would lack for words to say what it really is. Then they'd realize how silly
that sounds, and they'd start looking for words that are more appropriate.

'Have any?


Do you have some evidence of this, because virtually the entire world
disagrees with you, based on the evidence.

Virtually the entire world knows that the neocons
are lying fundie winger loons too. And fewer than
7% of it's population outside the UK & he US NOW
have any respect for the US. Down from about 78%
IIRC (before the lying neocon loons).

Had existing world laws been used ......

Which ones would have stopped the planes flying into the WTC?

--
Ed Huntress