View Single Post
  #93   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y,alt.home.repair,alt.computer.workshop
Fredxx[_4_] Fredxx[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,591
Default OT: How to attract cows

On 29/05/2021 19:11, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2021 05:00:59 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

On 26/05/2021 21:25, T i m wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2021 05:56:58 +1000, "Rod Speed"
wrote:

snip

Whereas you claim, "eating meat makes viruses antibiotic resistant",
which is just as valid as your other claims.

It's common knowledge.* Here, will you believe the World Health
Organisation?
https://www.who.int/news/item/07-11-...tic-resistance


That says nothing about VIRUSES.

Rod, all this is simply the trolls trying to make something out of
nothing because *nothing* is all they have.


The only troll here is a fanatical vegan who is crazy with envy we're
allowed to eat meat, and they're not.


It's not "not allowed" it's "decided not to".


No, his family has decided to go vegan. Clearly he has an impulse to eat
meat when passing establishments like kebab shops.

I don't eat meat either.
I don't go as far as Tim, I use milk, eggs, and so forth, but killing an
animal is as wrong as killing a human.


You are welcome to your opinion. I have mine, and want my family to eat
a balanced natural diet.

I 'happened' to use the word viruses (because the word was in my mind
with the pandemic) incorrectly, but the likes of ****Headxx has then
latched onto that *mistake* and tried to turn it into an arguing
point.


That shows a poorly performing mind. You make many mistakes consistent
with fanaticism and have a blinkered approach to a natural balanced diet.


Your mind is poor, you fail to understand a point with one small
insignificant error in it.* Do you have an organic brain or a CPU?


The error is more profound. Of course I know the point he was attempting
to make. Most studies say the claim is fallacious, although I am on
record as saying animals should not be given antibiotics if there is the
slimmest chance of a building up resistance.


No one else (other than trolls and carnists trying to gain points)
would have *decided* to take a mistake like that and try to capitalise
on it.


Then stop the embarrassment and shut the **** up.


Why, when it's you lot that caused the childish argument.* Probably
because you didn't have an answer for his point.


I have never started any thread involving the eating or refraining of
eating meat. My only job here is correct lies peddled by a fanatic vegan.

The spirit of my point still stands as confirmed by CC etc.


Reliance on P Hucker shows desperation.


Phuck you.

Anyone who wasn't either pathetic or desperate would see it as the
mistake it was and not even raise it as an issue, let alone try to use
it to spread FUD.


Some of us aren't desperate to tell lies and then back-pedal when shown
wrong.


There were no lies, there was a mistake.


Yes, the mistake was made in so many ways, 1) re viruses, and 2) that
levels of antibiotics in meat are not believed to build up resistance.

If I say "my car can go
1400mph" instead of "my car can go 140mph", it doesn't mean it can't do
140 because I "lied" in my typo.


A very good example of the lies that D i m peddles, in fact it's a
double lie, 1) it won't go 1,400mph, and 2) it won't go 140mph.