On 2/12/2020 2:38 PM, micky wrote:
In alt.home.repair, on Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:02:30 -0800 (PST), trader_4
wrote:

On Wednesday, February 12, 2020 at 1:20:47 PM UTC-5, micky wrote:
What the next president should do is offer to hire back everyone who has
resigned under Stumpie, complete with seniority and whatever else they
had because of prior longevity.

As much as I despise Trump, that's an incredibly stupid idea.

Why, because you say so? We lost enormous amounts of talent in the 3
years, and they're not going to come back if they've lost their
seniority. And most won't even think to re-apply for their jobs unless
they get an invitation.

This includes the prosecutor on the Roger Stone case who resigned**,

You've fallen for the lib media spin. They didn't resign from their jobs,
the withdrew from being the prosecutors on the case. Which is what the
media should have reported, if they were honest.

I guess you don't read well what I wrote, and you don't listen well,
because nothing I heard said they all resigned.



all
those from the Dept. of Agriculture, and maybe every US department and
agency, and all who couldn't stomach stumpie.

99% were talented people and all got new jobs, but they might still want
their old jobs back, because they believe in public service, because the
commute is easier, or any other reason.

**Only one resigned. The other 3 resigned from the case.

None actually resigned, they just quit the case. Only the dishonest
would refer to that as "resigning".

I don't think 'quit' is the proper term. Maybe it's not resign either
but I was clear nonetheless, I said just one line up, "Only one
resigned. The other 3 resigned from the case."

Only a jackass would refer to that as dishonest, like you did.


You are incredibly dense. Who were the prosecutors who resigned? What
was their former job?