On Saturday, September 28, 2019 at 2:00:10 PM UTC-4, N.R.A. ghoul Wayne LaPierre wrote:
On 9/24/2019 6:54 AM, wrote:
On Monday, September 23, 2019 at 9:56:56 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Wieber has claimed to have paid $250,000 to put his drug-addled pup,
Richard, through drug rehab to get him off meth (aka crank, chalk, wash,
dunk, pookie, cotton candy, rocket fuel, scooby snax).

It's a lie. Wieber couldn't beg/borrow/steal $25,000, let alone $250,000.
He has never had even a minute fraction that much money, nor assets he
could sell to get it. It just Did Not Happen - but Wieber tells the lie
anyway. Why?

Oh, wait - this is a ****wit who claims to have ridden a motorcycle on a
public highway at 264mph. That, of course, also Did Not Happen.

Wieber lies. The question is, why does he tell such absurd, easy-to-spot
lies? Why can't he try to tell plausible lies (given that he *is* going to
lie)?

The answer should be obvious. Gunner is not trying to have anyone believe him. He is telling a tall tale, intended to amuse not intended to be believed.


Cut the ****. Wieber insists every one of his lies is the sterling truth.
He isn't telling these absurd stories to be amusing.

The real problem here is that you fall for the lies. Then, when you look
like a complete dope (because you are), you feel the need to cook up some
bull**** about "tall tales."

Of course he insists the stories are true. No one tells a tall tale and then says it was not true. You must have had an unusual upbringing to think that every thing said is always the truth.

Dan