On Monday, September 23, 2019 at 9:56:56 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Wieber has claimed to have paid $250,000 to put his drug-addled pup,
Richard, through drug rehab to get him off meth (aka crank, chalk, wash,
dunk, pookie, cotton candy, rocket fuel, scooby snax).

It's a lie. Wieber couldn't beg/borrow/steal $25,000, let alone $250,000.
He has never had even a minute fraction that much money, nor assets he
could sell to get it. It just Did Not Happen - but Wieber tells the lie
anyway. Why?

Oh, wait - this is a ****wit who claims to have ridden a motorcycle on a
public highway at 264mph. That, of course, also Did Not Happen.

Wieber lies. The question is, why does he tell such absurd, easy-to-spot
lies? Why can't he try to tell plausible lies (given that he *is* going to
lie)?

The answer should be obvious. Gunner is not trying to have anyone believe him. He is telling a tall tale, intended to amuse not intended to be believed.

Dan