On 15/03/2019 09:22, Rod Speed wrote:

In this case it is intended to be a long term rental (many yaers) with
intelligent users.

Intended isnt the same thing as what actually happens.

What ever the length of the rental the floodlight will not be taken down
and the remotes left as problem for the next tenant.

However, what is the problem with wireless remotes that make them
unsuitable for rented property that isn't also a problem for any other
domestic property owned in a different way?

--
mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk