On 05/19/2017 06:28 PM, T wrote:
On 05/19/2017 04:36 PM, Dean Hoffman wrote:
On 5/19/17 1:51 PM, trader_4 wrote:
On Friday, May 19, 2017 at 11:21:52 AM UTC-4, Gordon Shumway wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2017 19:26:45 -0700, Oren wrote:
http://video.foxnews.com/v/5440432505001/?playlist_id=5198073478001#sp=show-clips

Better than I could explain it :-)
I saw that interview last night and it was what I believed was the
case all along. My reasoning was simple. With everything that was
"leaked" in an attempt to destroy Trump there has been absolutely
nothing leaked that is evidence of collusion. That should be proof
enough for all the loony leftists, but of course it won't.
ROFL. So, the fact that definitive proof hasn't been leaked, means
there is nothing there? How did that work in Watergate? At this
stage in Watergate, there was no definitive proof that Nixon was a
crook either.

Alan Dershowitz was on whatever talk show. His position is that there
wasn't any crime
committed even if Trump asked the Russians to help him win with all of
their resources.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNX6eqTMCEE
Dershowitz is pretty heavy on the Democrat side if memory serves.



It is beyond me why these deep state regressive want to restart
the cold war. The only thing I can think of it Finstein's husband
wants more no-bid weapons contracts.

Funny, when I was a kid it was the Birchers and the Spotlight crowd that
saw Russians behind every potted plant. Now it's the Dems.

I'm not a fan of the guy but it's also amusing how the Dems don't like
their VP candidate for the 2000 election anymore and Comey is the most
standup guy in the world.

You don't need a weatherman to know which was the wind is blowing.
Somebody said that once. Just watch a Democrat. They've been swinging in
the breeze since slick willie invented triangulation.

Not that the Republicans are any better. I used to look at redstate.com
every now and then but i think they got bought by WaPo.