On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:05:39 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:10:32 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 11:43:31 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 17:00:14 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Fri, 03 Oct 2014 08:43:02 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 19:54:04 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UB0_47XUDvY

I resent the poor. If we had more good jobs, we could eliminate most
of those nasty poor people.

---
They're only nasty because their survival threatens you and you
don't have the guts to do anything but name-call.

What makes you think that "good jobs" are where the poor would be
trapped into kow-towing to your system, and shutting the **** up is
what they'd want, and that what they _should_ want is to work to
lessen your self-serving interests?

John Fields

As time goes on, you make less and less sense.

---
A different take on it, reductio ad absurdum, may clear it up for
you. Perhaps:

If you resent the poor, then you'd rather not have them around, and
eliminating most of them would be possible with the good jobs held
by your own SS.

Get it now?

John Fields

I was wrong. You now make absolutely no sense.

---
Y'know, John, being of diminutive stature and realizing that a
physical fight would reduce you to meat leads you to think that an
intellectual confrontation would be more to your liking.

So far, you haven't showed a lot of aptitude in that arena either.