View Single Post
  #61   Report Post  
Posted to misc.legal,alt.home.repair
[email protected] clare@snyder.on.ca is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,538
Default Time and a half for over 40 hours

On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 17:49:35 -0700, "Bill Graham"
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 15:58:08 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 07:42:13 -0400, Meanie
wrote:

On 4/6/2013 12:51 AM, Bill Graham wrote:


My point is simple. Unless you can prove that you were layed off
for reasons unrelated to your job performance and or money
restrictions, you can probably do nothing about it.

Laid off or fired is irrelevant. If enough time elapse with the
job, the ex-employee can collect unemployment compensation.
Not if you are fired "with cause" in Canada - at least in Ontario.


Doesn't it depend on the cause? If the job changes and you're now not
qualified, it is a firing with cause (incompetency) but it's not
something you can do anything about.


True. And this happens to many people in this computer age. I was a high
energy physics machind operator. They obsoleted my machind and transferred
me to a new, much larger and more complicated machind when I was older and
less able to memorize large quantities of information. They didnlt lay me
off, but they instituted a, "geezer elimination program" (my descriotion)
where they paid you two weeks salery for every year you had been with them
(up to a maximum of a years pay.) Since I had been with them for 28 years, I
g9ot a years pay to leave, so I retired at the age of 61, but didn't start
collecting any social security until the following year, at 62.

It is "constructive dismissal" in Canada - and is NOT "with cause".
The employer pays