View Single Post
  #26   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
J. Clarke[_2_] J. Clarke[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,366
Default Solar update for 1st quarter

In article om,
says...

On 03/28/2012 07:13 AM, J. Clarke wrote:
In aweb.com,
says...

On 03/27/2012 09:17 PM, Larry Jaques wrote:

Cool, Doug. What's your setup? Got battery backup so you stay online
when the rest of the block is out?

No, it's a grid tied system - SolarCity. The grid is our storage
device, in fact when the grid goes down, so does our system. Wouldn't
want to be pumping juice into the grid while the repair guys were trying
to get things fixed! Might make their hair look like Guy Fieri. The
inverter shuts off when the sun or the grid goes down.


So have a transfer switch that disconnects from the grid when the grid
goes down. I wouldn't pay a dime for a solar system that still had me
completely dependent on the electric company.


Then you would require a battery system to buffer variable instaneous
generation from a constant load. There is night and clouds etc that
keep a non battery system from producing constant power. I don't think
my gar^H^H^Hshop is big enough to hold the batteries, let alone my
wallet big enough to buy them.


Why do you need to produce this constant high power? Power here was out
for more than a week last year. Not just in my house, in most of the
state and the neighboring state. Would have been nice to be able to run
the heat and the refrigerator for a few hours a day so the pipes didn't
freeze and the food didn't spoil. Why would you need all these
batteries you talk about to do that?

And your wallet was big enough to buy this solar system you're bragging
about so why would batteries be an issue?

You would also have to get approval from the power utility, city and
Solar equipment provider.


You needed all those "approvals" to install the thing in the first place
so why is this an issue all of a sudden?