View Single Post
  #13   Report Post  
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
N_Cook N_Cook is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,247
Default Resistance variation with thickness

DaveM wrote in message
...
"N_Cook" wrote in message
...
Again 1m length , ps set for constant voltage and unlimited current.
Set V for 0.5 amps , 2 flats and no change, set for 1A and 4 flats

added, no
change ie less than 0.01 amp change, if any.
Set to give 1.7 amp and varnish burnt off. So no further forward.


--
Diverse Devices, Southampton, England
electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on
http://home.graffiti.net/diverse:graffiti.net/




All your testing seems to have verified that the formula for resistance

vs.
cross-sectional area does work. No matter how many 'flats' you make on

the
wire, you haven't changed its resistance. The small amount that it

changed can
easily be contributed to variations in meter connections and/or minute

changes
in length due to the squeezing of the wire to make the 'flats'. Barring

any
crystalline structure changes in the metal itself, so long as the
cross-sectional area and length doesn't change, the resistance doesn't

change.

I suggest that the speaker winding that you're trying to diagnose failed

because
of metal fatigue, possibly due to loose mounting, broken adhesive or just

an
imperfection in the coil at manufacture.

Time to move on?

--
Dave M
MasonDG44 at comcast dot net (Just substitute the appropriate characters

in the
address)

Life is like a roll of toilet paper; the closer it gets to the end, the

faster
it goes.




If it was just a one off , then fair enough. But 2 separate Mackie amps with
the same problem in the same 2 squashed percent of the wire of the speaker
voice-coils ?

--
Diverse Devices, Southampton, England
electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on
http://home.graffiti.net/diverse:graffiti.net/