View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
[email protected] hallerb@aol.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,199
Default Direct Drive vs Belt Drive for New Washer

On Dec 2, 3:23�pm, wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 20:51:26 -0600, "HeyBub"
wrote:





Ulysses wrote:
Any opinions on which is better for a new washing machine, belt-drive
or direct-drive? �In a recent thread we were discussing my old Kenmore
direct-drive washer and how to fix it. �I determined it needs a new
motor. �I can get a used motor for $45 but who knows how long that
will last. �A new motor is about $135 plus shipping. �Plus another
$20- $30 for new "dogs" and a new coupler. �A new Kenmore large
capacity washer from Sears is $299. �The thing is it is a "steel belt
drive" and has a plastic case for the gearbox. �I was under the
impresson that direct-drive had pretty much replaced belt drive
washers due to lower maintenance and easier repairs. �There must be
some reason why new washers are belt drive. �Any reason why a plastic
case on the gearbox is not as good as steel? �On a direct-drive it
seems like there would be little stress on the seals and bearings but
I'm not so sure about a plastic box on a belt drive.


$150.00 for parts to repair the direct drive failure vs $6.00 for a new
belt.


Hmm. Let me think...


you forgot you still need the motor.

The coupler is about $27 and usually outlasts the belt about 2 or 3 to
1. And the labour involved is not substantially different.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


sears service is the most costly way to get any appliance repaired.

most likely other parts will fail so belt doesnt matter much