Again. *Citing one conspiracy (that doesn't exist) to prove an
unassociated one is Kookism. *Use a bit of logic for god's sake.

Harry K- Hide quoted text -


I would love to know what you base this on. I dare say the hsca had
access to everything. They had at their disposal the best methods of
study avaiable at the time. They concluded that there was likely 2
gunmen, and also that it was probable jfk was killed as a result of
some sort of conspiracy. That is fact. There is no longer a question
of if there was a conspiracy, but instead of how many and what other
people were involved. We will never know. But we know through this
report that it did occur.

As far as comparing the 2 things, I am not comparing them at all.
just stating the fact that sometimes people rush thrugh an
investigation to get it to the public ASAP and when reviewed later, it
is foudn the intial report was wrong. it happens all the time, and
not just in cases where there are conspiracy theories.

I would love t hear you rationale for disagreeing with the findings of
the hsca. I dont know anyone who still clings to the lone nut theory,
that isnt themselves a litttle nutty.