On Mar 15, 7:06*pm, "Dave Bugg" wrote:
wrote:
but we arent talking about any sudden events....we are talking about 2
events, both studied by the federal govt and its agencies...

in the first case, upon further review, it was determiend the first
report was incorrect....
thats the issue here, not random sudden events...

No one knows to what you are replying to. Next time try to include just a
bit of the text.

warren--hsca
9/11 report--whatever the call the followup.....

I dont subscribe to any of the whos and whys of 9/11 theories, I agree
with you for the most part you gotta be pretty far out there to
believe hald the stuff there is...

all I am saying, is this wouldnt be the first time a national tragedy
was investigated, and in a follow up investigation, the original
report was found to have serious issues...

I dont see how point out that the govt agencies have botched
investigations before, and citing an example, makes me a kook....

If you can honestly say the rockefeller, warren and hcsa reports are
indentical, then you need better glasses....