Thread
:
WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
View Single Post
#
47
Posted to misc.kids,alt.music.monkees,rec.models.rockets,alt.home.repair,misc.survivalism
Dave Bugg
external usenet poster
Posts: 505
WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
wrote:
9. Using previous conspiracies as evidence to support their claims.
This argument invokes scandals like the Birmingham Six, the Bologna
station bombings, the Zinoviev letter and so on in order to try and
demonstrate that their conspiracy theory should be accorded some
weight (because it's "happened before".) They do not pause to reflect
that the conspiracies they are touting are almost always far more
unlikely and complicated than the real-life conspiracies with which
they make comparison, or that the fact that something might
potentially happen does not, in and of itself, make it anything other
than extremely unlikely.
so you are going to tell me that the warren commision and the findings
of the hsca are consistant with each other?
He isn't saying anything other than "Once a k00k, always a k00k?
Reply With Quote
Dave Bugg
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Dave Bugg