View Single Post
  #47   Report Post  
Posted to misc.kids,alt.music.monkees,rec.models.rockets,alt.home.repair,misc.survivalism
Dave Bugg Dave Bugg is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 505
Default WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition

wrote:
9. Using previous conspiracies as evidence to support their claims.
This argument invokes scandals like the Birmingham Six, the Bologna
station bombings, the Zinoviev letter and so on in order to try and
demonstrate that their conspiracy theory should be accorded some
weight (because it's "happened before".) They do not pause to reflect
that the conspiracies they are touting are almost always far more
unlikely and complicated than the real-life conspiracies with which
they make comparison, or that the fact that something might
potentially happen does not, in and of itself, make it anything other
than extremely unlikely.


so you are going to tell me that the warren commision and the findings
of the hsca are consistant with each other?


He isn't saying anything other than "Once a k00k, always a k00k?