View Single Post
  #20   Report Post  
Posted to misc.kids,alt.music.monkees,rec.models.rockets,alt.home.repair,misc.survivalism
Harry K Harry K is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,044
Default WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition

On Mar 13, 7:26*pm, wrote:
On Mar 13, 6:50 pm, Harry K wrote:



On Mar 13, 11:37 am, wrote:


On Mar 13, 8:26 am, Harry K wrote:


On Mar 13, 1:17 am, wrote:


WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
By Herman Schoenfeld


In this article we show that "top-down" controlled demolition
accurately accounts for the collapse times of the World Trade Center
towers. A top-down controlled demolition can be simply characterized
as a "pancake collapse" of a building missing its support columns.
This demolition profile requires that the support columns holding a
floor be destroyed just before that floor is collided with by the
upper falling masses. The net effect is a pancake-style collapse at
near free fall speed.


snip


You are in the wrong newsgroup. *Take it to alt.conspiracy. *Prepare
to be laughed at.


For a CD you have to explain how months of work, entire crews,


So you know how many it took to do this?


walls
and coverings stripped out,


Not needed.
All access to critical components was available through the elevator
shafts.


charges placed, miles of fuse cord, etc.


Don't need cable if you have radio controlled charges.


were not noticed by the people working there.


All they had to do wa wear janitor outfits.
Power was shut down at the towers days before the "attack" and all
security cameras were off.


You might also find at
least one expert on CD that will agree that it is a sane proposition
to do a CD by starting at the top.


BTW the true times of the collapse are right at 16 seconds IIRC.


Harry K


You recall wrong.http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot...l-shermer-self...


snip


And thuis it is that the kooks have to rely on a few hours work to
install invisible charges, in invisible holes that were magically made
in a few hours by a handful of people.


Who said "hours."
It likely took months to install the charges.

Here is clue. *Watch any documentary of the preparation for a building
for a CD and see how wild the CD theories are.


Why would they do it identically?
But demolition experts say, "It was a demolition."
It is in many videos.

Then you might spend a
moment wondering why any sane engineer would set up a CD to begin from
the top down.


Because it had to look like it collapsed from the planes?
It isn't hard to change the sequence of the charges.
Eye witnesses saw and experienced blasts on the lower floors before
the collapses.



Harry K


Those building were white elephants that were going to cost billions
to dismantle.http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...e+wtc%22&btnG=...
Watch the video at:www.ae911truth.org- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Odd, in over 6 years there have been zero witnesses come forward and
say they saw explosions. What there is is "sounded like explosions"
which is exaclty what a collapsing building would sound like.

The sheer impossibility of preparing a building for a CD without
someone noticing should be your first clue that that is a kook theory.

I am constantly amazed that people will go all around a building
trying to ignore the evidence that is in plain site, i.e., the planes
caused fires which caused the collapse. You will find no _reputable_
engineer that will give any credence at all to a CD.

Harry K