On Mar 13, 6:43 pm, Harry K wrote:
On Mar 13, 11:17 am, wrote:



On Mar 13, 4:06 am, wrote:

In misc.survivalism wrote:
WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
By Herman Schoenfeld
In this article we show that "top-down" controlled demolition
accurately accounts for the collapse times of the World Trade Center
towers.

Sorry, but that is far from good enough. You need to demonstrate much
more than that.

Giant pools of molten steel in the basements of all three building
that collapsed weeks later is all you need to prove they were
demolished with thermite/thermate..
It's called a "smoking gun."www.ae911truth.org

Well, it would be if they had ever existed. There is a total of zero
eyewitnesses to it.

Liar.
There are eyewitnesses, video, and photos.

Every so-called eyewitness is another "I know
somebody who said he saw..."

Liar.
http://youtube.com/results?search_qu...l&search_type=

Physics says the molten pool BS is just that _BS_.

Physics can deny or obfuscate physical evidence?

There is no source
of heat to keep metal molten for very long.

Theramte/Thermite.
If not that then what?
Even the heaet signature photos of the WTC complex shows the high
temps at WTC 7 too.
NASA thermal images.
http://governmentterror.com/#%5B%5BW...%20Spots%5D%5D
From:
http://governmentterror.com/#%5B%5BW...%20Spots%5D%5D

There was no source of
heat to being with hot tenough to turn iron molten to begin with.

Harry K