View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
Posted to misc.kids,alt.music.monkees,rec.models.rockets,alt.home.repair,misc.survivalism
Harry K Harry K is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,044
Default WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition

On Mar 13, 11:37*am, wrote:
On Mar 13, 8:26 am, Harry K wrote:





On Mar 13, 1:17 am, wrote:


WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
By Herman Schoenfeld


In this article we show that "top-down" controlled demolition
accurately accounts for the collapse times of the World Trade Center
towers. A top-down controlled demolition can be simply characterized
as a "pancake collapse" of a building missing its support columns.
This demolition profile requires that the support columns holding a
floor be destroyed just before that floor is collided with by the
upper falling masses. The net effect is a pancake-style collapse at
near free fall speed.


snip


You are in the wrong newsgroup. *Take it to alt.conspiracy. *Prepare
to be laughed at.


For a CD you have to explain how months of work, entire crews,


So you know how many it took to do this?

walls
and coverings stripped out,


Not needed.
All access to critical components was available through the elevator
shafts.

charges placed, miles of fuse cord, etc.


Don't need cable if you have radio controlled charges.

were not noticed by the people working there.


All they had to do wa wear janitor outfits.
Power was shut down at the towers days before the "attack" and all
security cameras were off.

You might also find at
least one expert on CD that will agree that it is a sane proposition
to do a CD by starting at the top.


BTW the true times of the collapse are right at 16 seconds IIRC.


Harry K


You recall wrong.http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot...l-shermer-self...


snip

And thuis it is that the kooks have to rely on a few hours work to
install invisible charges, in invisible holes that were magically made
in a few hours by a handful of people.

Here is clue. Watch any documentary of the preparation for a building
for a CD and see how wild the CD theories are. Then you might spend a
moment wondering why any sane engineer would set up a CD to begin from
the top down.

Harry K