On Feb 29, 9:34Â*am, " wrote:
On Feb 29, 9:31�am, Jim Redelfs wrote:





In article
,

" wrote:
maybe it would be better to build new nuke plants far away from
population centers and just accept the hit on transmission losses?

Even the most conservative regulator would not approve a NEW site NEAR any
significant population.

this compromiise would probably make everyone reasonably content.

Not a chance, hal.

Based on your words of late, I suspect you are of the same mindset as those
that subscribe to the [any nuke is a BAD nuke] prejudice.

hey why not put the plants in mexico? far away from the us border?

Oh, gawd. �There's nothing quite like an ethnic distraction from a legitimate
debate. �Way to go...
--
� � � � � � � �sigh
JR

not a distraction a honest suggestion.

we the people need to rise up demonstrarte, complain to congress to
stop the building of new reactors in the us..........

It's quite interesting that you don't see your proposal to place nukes
in Mexico for what it is.. You consider them lethal accidents
waiting to happen and don't want them here. Yet, you have no
problem suggesting that they be built in Mexico.

I'm not a big fan of playing the race card, but in this case, I'd sure
like to hear what makes Mexican lives worth less than American ones.

Oh, just for the record, I live about 25 miles from the oldest nuke in
the US and I sleep well every night.





let other countries find the troubles.........

note you failed to address my comments about bad wiring- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -