Is undercoat / sealer necessary for new plaster?
"somebody" wrote in message
...
In message , Steven Campbell
writes
After having some plaster work done I thought there would nothing else to
do
but give the walls a few coats of white emulsion. However after the 3rd
coat, I can still see a difference of colour from the old plaster to the
new
plaster.
I've still to do a couple of walls where there is old and new plaster on
the
same wall.
Is it worth putting undercoat on first? Would it make a big difference?
Also would it be worth while applying the undercoat to the walls I have
previously painted that the new plaster can still be seen?
Steven.
You should apply a "****" coat first. So called because the paint has been
watered down so much it is as thin as ****.
Basically, first coat, any cheap old emulsion mixed approx 50/50 with
water.
I've had luck with some rooms where one **** coat and one proper coat was
all that was needed, others needed a **** coat and two proper coats. (all
these rooms done by the same plasterer).
One thing I've never got away with though is plaster coving. Always seems
to need a gazillion coats regardless.
Hth
Someone
Think I heard mention a while ago about sealing the plaster first with a
50 - 50 mix of PVA and white emulsion.
|