On 22 Jul 2003 07:44:46 -0700, jim rozen
wrote:

In article , Gunner says...

...liberals are Greatly offended when they find out
they are not only in the minority, but are held in distain. They look
at Bushs popularity ratings in bewildered confusion, tearing their
hair and bewailing their lack of comprehension of why.

Geeze, no kidding. How come everyone loves him when
the economy is in the ****ter so bad? Just a conundrum
I guess. Maybe the honeymoon is *just* about over.

The economy started into the ****ter in the last quarter of the
Clinton administration, and thats easily proven. Bush inherited a
failing economy and a government that the people had little respect
and no trust for. It was refreshing to the common man, to find someone
in office that was much like them, and they like what he has been
doing, and most trust him to do the right thing. Only on the rabid
Left, do they scream and attack.

Funny thing in the paper the other day, they plotted
the US deficit over the last 20 years or so. Goverment
ran a deficit the *entire* time, except during clinton's
administration. Those spendy republicans, somebody ought to
teach them some fiscal responsibility.

Chuckle.. who had control of the money during those years?
Hint..Democrat controlled Congress. Think Tax and Spend.
It wasnt until the 104th Congress did the Republicans get control. Not
that they are much better..but lets be truthful here, ok?

I enjoy watching the Dems/Iiberals only attack, never offering a
counter suggestion to a problem. Which is why the Bush thing about
Uranium ...

I don't really think this is about uranium, or those pesky
WMDs. I think it's a core value issue about simply telling
the truth. That 'not lying' thing.

Jim

Jim, if it was only about telling the Truth, the Dems would have
forced Clinton to resign............

Gunner

"What do you call someone in possesion of all the facts? Paranoid.-William Burroughs