Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#161
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. -- I thought the wife would be the ideal candidate for a new TV show. Turns out I got it all wrong and the program's called Fact Hunt. |
#162
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. Bull****. And they jacked up the minimum wage much more than Labour did. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. |
#163
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
|
#164
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:27:01 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 20:06:35 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:27:56 +0100, bert wrote: In article , Andrew Gabriel writes In article , The Natural Philosopher writes: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. I see where you're coming from, but I tend to think of it slightly differently. Prior to Thatcher, there was a large working class in the UK. The 1980's saw phenominal growth and improvement in living standards, and enabled a large number of working class to move into the middle class, with the middle class outnumbering the working class by 1990. However, in spite of this, there wasn't a significant political party for the middle class. They ended up voting for whichever left or right party was nearer the centre, and they had become large enough to carry the swing vote. It wasn't until Labour realised this that they got back into power, and then served their longest term ever. For now, voting is pretty much all about Brexit, and might even remain so for one more general election after Brexit. Even if Labour moved back more towards centre, I don't think it will help them at the moment, although it may do after Brexit. You should also include the demise of the heavy industrial base of the unions, coal mining, steel making, car manufacturing etc. The only unions left with any power are in the public sector. Unions do nobody any good, ever. They do arseholes like Scargill a lot of good. That's not what I meant. You did say nobody. Don't be so pedantic. -- Two blondes are racing down a bumpy back road in a pretty beat up car down to a bank they're going to rob. "Drive slower" pleads the one in the passenger seat, "I don't want all the nitro in the boot to explode." "Relax," the driver replies, "even if it did, I've got a spare box under the seat . . . " |
#165
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
On Thu, 04 May 2017 23:07:35 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. Bull****. And they jacked up the minimum wage much more than Labour did. It's on a very slow rise, barely over inflation. Just enough to appease the chav masses. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. -- I've never had a problem with drugs, I've had problems with the police. - Keith Richards |
#166
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 04 May 2017 23:07:35 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. Bull****. And they jacked up the minimum wage much more than Labour did. It's on a very slow rise, barely over inflation. That's a lie with the most recent change. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. |
#167
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
|
#168
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
|
#170
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
On Sat, 06 May 2017 02:59:55 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 04 May 2017 23:07:35 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. Bull****. And they jacked up the minimum wage much more than Labour did. It's on a very slow rise, barely over inflation. That's a lie with the most recent change. That's what I thought until I looked it up. It's hardly gone up at all. And it's spread over several years. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, and we all know she ****ed things up royally. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. I'd call them middle class. The class is a label as to whether you're a poor chav, doing fairly well, or minted. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. Thought he was in charge of underlings? He must get well over minimum wage. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS etc. Labour increase that spending. -- Engage brain before putting fingers in gear. |
#171
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
On Sat, 06 May 2017 12:08:43 +0100, tim... wrote:
"Andrew Gabriel" wrote in message news In article , (Andrew Gabriel) writes: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. So, the local government election results are exactly what I predicted above for the general election result. This is actually slightly surprising to me in the context of the local elections. I had expected Labour and LibDems to do better LDs got 18% of the vote, far beyond their current national polling that that did not result in more seats almost certainly can be attributed to Lack of proportional representation. the collapse of UKIP votes all going to the Tories Shire counties are not fertile territory for Labour. Whilst the result was undoubtedly bad, I don't think it can be extrapolated to a GE quite that simply -- Every time I sink ten pints, I turn into a woman. I start talking ******** and can't drive. |
#172
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 02:59:55 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 04 May 2017 23:07:35 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. Bull****. And they jacked up the minimum wage much more than Labour did. It's on a very slow rise, barely over inflation. That's a lie with the most recent change. That's what I thought until I looked it up. It's hardly gone up at all. That's bull****. Its gone up a lot more than Labour did. And it's spread over several years. It always is. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Hardly any of the chav masses bother to vote at all. Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? Corse they do, but it doesn't matter what they want, it isnt going to happen. I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, Yep, its only to toffs that vote tory in scotland and there are only enough of those to get a couple of torys elected. and we all know she ****ed things up royally. But you lot vote SNP anyway if you do bother to vote. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. I'd call them middle class. More fool you. A drill rigger isnt middle class. The class is a label as to whether you're a poor chav, doing fairly well, or minted. It isnt about how well you are paid. Drill riggers, welders etc arent middle class unless they work for themselves and most of them don't. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. Thought he was in charge of underlings? Foremen are still working class. And in the past most of the working class had apprentices and that's the only underlings he has. He must get well over minimum wage. Corse he does, but so does a hell of a lot of the working class. In spades with the oil and gas industry and mining etc. Someone driving one of these http://farm1.static.flickr.com/125/3...dd53122cd7.jpg would leave you and adam for dead income wise and would still be working class. Same with someone operating something like this. http://www.montgomerydesign.com/web_...oy_mining1.jpg They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS etc. Labour increase that spending. Irrelevant to whether labour got more money out of you or not. |
#173
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 12:08:43 +0100, tim... wrote: "Andrew Gabriel" wrote in message news In article , (Andrew Gabriel) writes: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. So, the local government election results are exactly what I predicted above for the general election result. This is actually slightly surprising to me in the context of the local elections. I had expected Labour and LibDems to do better LDs got 18% of the vote, far beyond their current national polling that that did not result in more seats almost certainly can be attributed to Lack of proportional representation. LDs usually manage ok on this percentage of the vote as their vote is more targeted towards winnable seats. But it didn't seem to work that way this time |
#174
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
On Sun, 07 May 2017 10:18:23 +0100, tim... wrote:
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 12:08:43 +0100, tim... wrote: "Andrew Gabriel" wrote in message news In article , (Andrew Gabriel) writes: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. So, the local government election results are exactly what I predicted above for the general election result. This is actually slightly surprising to me in the context of the local elections. I had expected Labour and LibDems to do better LDs got 18% of the vote, far beyond their current national polling that that did not result in more seats almost certainly can be attributed to Lack of proportional representation. LDs usually manage ok on this percentage of the vote as their vote is more targeted towards winnable seats. But it didn't seem to work that way this time I thought they were pretty much spread out, which is why the LDs are the ones in most favour of PR. -- "All you need is love, money, broadband, good health, satellite TV, a fast car, ......." - The Beatles |
#175
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
On Sat, 06 May 2017 23:10:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 02:59:55 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 04 May 2017 23:07:35 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. Bull****. And they jacked up the minimum wage much more than Labour did. It's on a very slow rise, barely over inflation. That's a lie with the most recent change. That's what I thought until I looked it up. It's hardly gone up at all. That's bull****. Its gone up a lot more than Labour did. And it's spread over several years. It always is. It's negligible. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Hardly any of the chav masses bother to vote at all. Cite. Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? Corse they do, but it doesn't matter what they want, it isnt going to happen. Giving them more money will help. I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, Yep, its only to toffs that vote tory in scotland and there are only enough of those to get a couple of torys elected. A lot of Scots are ****ed off with the SNP, hopefully they won't all vote SNP next time. and we all know she ****ed things up royally. But you lot vote SNP anyway if you do bother to vote. SNP are communist arseholes, hopefully most of us have realised this now. As for them wanting a SECOND independance referendum, that's ridiculous and has ****ed half of us off. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. I'd call them middle class. More fool you. A drill rigger isnt middle class. They make far more money than a dustman. The class is a label as to whether you're a poor chav, doing fairly well, or minted. It isnt about how well you are paid. Yes it is. Drill riggers, welders etc arent middle class unless they work for themselves and most of them don't. Bull****. Middle class people do not have to run their own business. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. Thought he was in charge of underlings? Foremen are still working class. And in the past most of the working class had apprentices and that's the only underlings he has. Depends what he gets paid. If he's double the minimum wage I'd call him middle class. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS etc. Labour increase that spending. Irrelevant to whether labour got more money out of you or not. It's very relevant. If they spend more they need more taxes to fund it. The only reason the Tories don't cut taxes is they're trying to get rid of the debt the Labour government put us in. -- Someday we'll look back on all this and plough into a parked car. |
#176
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
In article , James Wilkinson Sword
writes Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS No they are not. -- bert |
#177
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 23:10:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 02:59:55 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 04 May 2017 23:07:35 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. Bull****. And they jacked up the minimum wage much more than Labour did. It's on a very slow rise, barely over inflation. That's a lie with the most recent change. That's what I thought until I looked it up. It's hardly gone up at all. That's bull****. Its gone up a lot more than Labour did. And it's spread over several years. It always is. It's negligible. Bull****. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Hardly any of the chav masses bother to vote at all. Cite. Look at the voting stats where the chav masses 'live' Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? Corse they do, but it doesn't matter what they want, it isnt going to happen. Giving them more money will help. Nope, they don't bother to vote. I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, Yep, its only the toffs that vote tory in scotland and there are only enough of those to get a couple of torys elected. A lot of Scots are ****ed off with the SNP, But those don't vote tory, you watch. hopefully they won't all vote SNP next time. They are in fact much more likely to do that next time because most of them are actually stupid enough to want to stay in the EU and SNP wants that and the torys have noticed that the majority of voters who bothered to vote voted to leave and decided to do what they voted for. and we all know she ****ed things up royally. But you lot vote SNP anyway if you do bother to vote. SNP are communist arseholes, hopefully most of us have realised this now. Even if they have, they will vote for them anyway, you watch. As for them wanting a SECOND independance referendum, that's ridiculous and has ****ed half of us off. All irrelevant now Britain is leaving the EU. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. I'd call them middle class. More fool you. A drill rigger isnt middle class. They make far more money than a dustman. And are still working class anyway. The class is a label as to whether you're a poor chav, doing fairly well, or minted. It isnt about how well you are paid. Yes it is. Nope. Someone who was married to say a manager, doctor etc, whose spouse completely ****ed up their investments and lost the lot in the 2008 implosion of much of the world financial system, doesn't turn into a working person when they have **** all money to live on. They are still middle class, Drill riggers, welders etc arent middle class unless they work for themselves and most of them don't. Bull****. Fact. Middle class people do not have to run their own business. Yes, clearly anglican ministers, doctors employed by the NHS, managers working for a salary etc are all middle class. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. Thought he was in charge of underlings? Foremen are still working class. And in the past most of the working class had apprentices and that's the only underlings he has. Depends what he gets paid. Nope, there have always been some of the working class that get much better paid than the dregs of the working class. Its what they do that determine whether they are middle class or working class or a toff. If he's double the minimum wage I'd call him middle class. Yes, you are that pig ignorant. Plenty of small shopkeepers don't earn much, but they are still middle class even when they earn a lot less than the best paid of the working class like someone who drives a haulpak in the mining industry etc. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS etc. Labour increase that spending. Irrelevant to whether labour got more money out of you or not. It's very relevant. If they spend more they need more taxes to fund it. Nope, they just run up the deficit. And since you are a tax avoider, they don't get more money out of you anyway. The only reason the Tories don't cut taxes is they're trying to get rid of the debt the Labour government put us in. Mindlessly simplistic. |
#178
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:37:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 23:10:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 02:59:55 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 04 May 2017 23:07:35 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. Bull****. And they jacked up the minimum wage much more than Labour did. It's on a very slow rise, barely over inflation. That's a lie with the most recent change. That's what I thought until I looked it up. It's hardly gone up at all. That's bull****. Its gone up a lot more than Labour did. And it's spread over several years. It always is. It's negligible. Bull****. State how much you think it's risen. It's only a quid or two. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Hardly any of the chav masses bother to vote at all. Cite. Look at the voting stats where the chav masses 'live' They are evenly scattered, therefore there are no such stats. Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? Corse they do, but it doesn't matter what they want, it isnt going to happen. Giving them more money will help. Nope, they don't bother to vote. They will vote for whoever gives them the most benefits. I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, Yep, its only the toffs that vote tory in scotland and there are only enough of those to get a couple of torys elected. A lot of Scots are ****ed off with the SNP, But those don't vote tory, you watch. Nobody else to vote for. hopefully they won't all vote SNP next time. They are in fact much more likely to do that next time because most of them are actually stupid enough to want to stay in the EU and SNP wants that and the torys have noticed that the majority of voters who bothered to vote voted to leave and decided to do what they voted for. Actually most of the remoaners are in London, not Scotland. and we all know she ****ed things up royally. But you lot vote SNP anyway if you do bother to vote. SNP are communist arseholes, hopefully most of us have realised this now. Even if they have, they will vote for them anyway, you watch. Why would anyone vote for an arsehole? As for them wanting a SECOND independance referendum, that's ridiculous and has ****ed half of us off. All irrelevant now Britain is leaving the EU. Not if Scotland separates and rejoins it. Since I'm English by blood, I may just leave. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. I'd call them middle class. More fool you. A drill rigger isnt middle class. They make far more money than a dustman. And are still working class anyway. Money is what decides your class. The class is a label as to whether you're a poor chav, doing fairly well, or minted. It isnt about how well you are paid. Yes it is. Nope. Someone who was married to say a manager, doctor etc, whose spouse completely ****ed up their investments and lost the lot in the 2008 implosion of much of the world financial system, doesn't turn into a working person when they have **** all money to live on. They are still middle class, Money is what decides your class. Drill riggers, welders etc arent middle class unless they work for themselves and most of them don't. Bull****. Fact. Money is what decides your class. Middle class people do not have to run their own business. Yes, clearly anglican ministers, doctors employed by the NHS, managers working for a salary etc are all middle class. Correct. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. Thought he was in charge of underlings? Foremen are still working class. And in the past most of the working class had apprentices and that's the only underlings he has. Depends what he gets paid. Nope, there have always been some of the working class that get much better paid than the dregs of the working class. Its what they do that determine whether they are middle class or working class or a toff. If they get more money, they become snobbier. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS etc. Labour increase that spending. Irrelevant to whether labour got more money out of you or not. It's very relevant. If they spend more they need more taxes to fund it. Nope, they just run up the deficit. And since you are a tax avoider, they don't get more money out of you anyway. Labour run up the defecit then the tories have to try to fix it. The only reason the Tories don't cut taxes is they're trying to get rid of the debt the Labour government put us in. Mindlessly simplistic. But true. -- I have a photographic memory that was never developed. |
#179
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:06:19 +0100, bert wrote:
In article , James Wilkinson Sword writes Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS No they are not. Yes they are. That's what capitalists do. It's one of the reasons I vote for them. Why do you think people are up in arms and signing petitions to stop the cutbacks? -- My friend drowned in a bowl of muesli - a strong currant pulled him in. |
#180
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:37:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 23:10:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 02:59:55 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 04 May 2017 23:07:35 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. Bull****. And they jacked up the minimum wage much more than Labour did. It's on a very slow rise, barely over inflation. That's a lie with the most recent change. That's what I thought until I looked it up. It's hardly gone up at all. That's bull****. Its gone up a lot more than Labour did. And it's spread over several years. It always is. It's negligible. Bull****. State how much you think it's risen. It's only a quid or two. Still a lot more than Labour did. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Hardly any of the chav masses bother to vote at all. Cite. Look at the voting stats where the chav masses 'live' They are evenly scattered, Like hell they are. therefore there are no such stats. Even sillier than you usually manage. Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? Corse they do, but it doesn't matter what they want, it isnt going to happen. Giving them more money will help. Nope, they don't bother to vote. They will vote for whoever gives them the most benefits. They don't bother to vote. I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, Yep, its only the toffs that vote tory in scotland and there are only enough of those to get a couple of torys elected. A lot of Scots are ****ed off with the SNP, But those don't vote tory, you watch. Nobody else to vote for. They wont vote, you watch. hopefully they won't all vote SNP next time. They are in fact much more likely to do that next time because most of them are actually stupid enough to want to stay in the EU and SNP wants that and the torys have noticed that the majority of voters who bothered to vote voted to leave and decided to do what they voted for. Actually most of the remoaners are in London, not Scotland. Irrelevant to the fact that most in scotland don't want to leave the EU. and we all know she ****ed things up royally. But you lot vote SNP anyway if you do bother to vote. SNP are communist arseholes, hopefully most of us have realised this now. Even if they have, they will vote for them anyway, you watch. Why would anyone vote for an arsehole? Because they like the alternatives even less. There is no other possible explanation for why scotland has returned almost no one except the SNP. As for them wanting a SECOND independance referendum, that's ridiculous and has ****ed half of us off. All irrelevant now Britain is leaving the EU. Not if Scotland separates and rejoins it. I meant that May wont be having a second referendum now. Since I'm English by blood, I may just leave. I don't they care what you do. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. I'd call them middle class. More fool you. A drill rigger isnt middle class. They make far more money than a dustman. And are still working class anyway. Money is what decides your class. Wrong. The class is a label as to whether you're a poor chav, doing fairly well, or minted. It isnt about how well you are paid. Yes it is. Nope. Someone who was married to say a manager, doctor etc, whose spouse completely ****ed up their investments and lost the lot in the 2008 implosion of much of the world financial system, doesn't turn into a working person when they have **** all money to live on. They are still middle class, Money is what decides your class. Wrong. Drill riggers, welders etc arent middle class unless they work for themselves and most of them don't. Bull****. Fact. Money is what decides your class. Wrong. Middle class people do not have to run their own business. Yes, clearly anglican ministers, doctors employed by the NHS, managers working for a salary etc are all middle class. Correct. So money doesn't decide your class. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. Thought he was in charge of underlings? Foremen are still working class. And in the past most of the working class had apprentices and that's the only underlings he has. Depends what he gets paid. Nope, there have always been some of the working class that get much better paid than the dregs of the working class. Its what they do that determine whether they are middle class or working class or a toff. If they get more money, they become snobbier. Nope. They stay chavs. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS etc. Labour increase that spending. Irrelevant to whether labour got more money out of you or not. It's very relevant. If they spend more they need more taxes to fund it. Nope, they just run up the deficit. And since you are a tax avoider, they don't get more money out of you anyway. Labour run up the defecit then the tories have to try to fix it. And they cant fix it by getting more money out of you. The only reason the Tories don't cut taxes is they're trying to get rid of the debt the Labour government put us in. Mindlessly simplistic. But true. Nope. |
#181
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
Rod Speed wrote:
Nope. Fascinating -- Chris Green · |
#182
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:27:12 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:37:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 23:10:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 02:59:55 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 04 May 2017 23:07:35 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. Bull****. And they jacked up the minimum wage much more than Labour did. It's on a very slow rise, barely over inflation. That's a lie with the most recent change. That's what I thought until I looked it up. It's hardly gone up at all. That's bull****. Its gone up a lot more than Labour did. And it's spread over several years. It always is. It's negligible. Bull****. State how much you think it's risen. It's only a quid or two. Still a lot more than Labour did. Labour are stupid. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Hardly any of the chav masses bother to vote at all. Cite. Look at the voting stats where the chav masses 'live' They are evenly scattered, Like hell they are. I've looked on the internet, they are everywhere. Prove otherwise. therefore there are no such stats. Even sillier than you usually manage. Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? Corse they do, but it doesn't matter what they want, it isnt going to happen. Giving them more money will help. Nope, they don't bother to vote. They will vote for whoever gives them the most benefits. They don't bother to vote. Prove it. I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, Yep, its only the toffs that vote tory in scotland and there are only enough of those to get a couple of torys elected. A lot of Scots are ****ed off with the SNP, But those don't vote tory, you watch. Nobody else to vote for. They wont vote, you watch. hopefully they won't all vote SNP next time. They are in fact much more likely to do that next time because most of them are actually stupid enough to want to stay in the EU and SNP wants that and the torys have noticed that the majority of voters who bothered to vote voted to leave and decided to do what they voted for. Actually most of the remoaners are in London, not Scotland. Irrelevant to the fact that most in scotland don't want to leave the EU. Scots aren't that bright. They can't even talk properly. and we all know she ****ed things up royally. But you lot vote SNP anyway if you do bother to vote. SNP are communist arseholes, hopefully most of us have realised this now. Even if they have, they will vote for them anyway, you watch. Why would anyone vote for an arsehole? Because they like the alternatives even less. There is no other possible explanation for why scotland has returned almost no one except the SNP. Scots are so stupid as to vote for anyone who claims to make Scotland more important than the UK. Patriotic idiots.... As for them wanting a SECOND independance referendum, that's ridiculous and has ****ed half of us off. All irrelevant now Britain is leaving the EU. Not if Scotland separates and rejoins it. I meant that May wont be having a second referendum now. If Scotland gets independance, we might try to rejoin. Since I'm English by blood, I may just leave. I don't they care what you do. And I thought you loved me. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. I'd call them middle class. More fool you. A drill rigger isnt middle class. They make far more money than a dustman. And are still working class anyway. Money is what decides your class. Wrong. Nobody agrees: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class Middle class people do not have to run their own business. Yes, clearly anglican ministers, doctors employed by the NHS, managers working for a salary etc are all middle class. Correct. So money doesn't decide your class. Those people you listed have a medium amount of money. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. Thought he was in charge of underlings? Foremen are still working class. And in the past most of the working class had apprentices and that's the only underlings he has. Depends what he gets paid. Nope, there have always been some of the working class that get much better paid than the dregs of the working class. Its what they do that determine whether they are middle class or working class or a toff. If they get more money, they become snobbier. Nope. They stay chavs. Money corrupts. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS etc. Labour increase that spending. Irrelevant to whether labour got more money out of you or not. It's very relevant. If they spend more they need more taxes to fund it. Nope, they just run up the deficit. And since you are a tax avoider, they don't get more money out of you anyway. Labour run up the defecit then the tories have to try to fix it. And they cant fix it by getting more money out of you. They fix it by stopping wasting money on things like te NHS and child benefits. They've just stopped child benefits for more than two kids. The only reason the Tories don't cut taxes is they're trying to get rid of the debt the Labour government put us in. Mindlessly simplistic. But true. Nope. Prove it. -- A midget fortune-teller who escapes from prison is a small medium at large. |
#183
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:27:12 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:37:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 23:10:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 02:59:55 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 04 May 2017 23:07:35 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. Bull****. And they jacked up the minimum wage much more than Labour did. It's on a very slow rise, barely over inflation. That's a lie with the most recent change. That's what I thought until I looked it up. It's hardly gone up at all. That's bull****. Its gone up a lot more than Labour did. And it's spread over several years. It always is. It's negligible. Bull****. State how much you think it's risen. It's only a quid or two. Still a lot more than Labour did. Labour are stupid. All politicians are stupid. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Hardly any of the chav masses bother to vote at all. Cite. Look at the voting stats where the chav masses 'live' They are evenly scattered, Like hell they are. I've looked on the internet, they are everywhere. But not EVENLY SCATTERED. Prove otherwise. Look at the census data. therefore there are no such stats. Even sillier than you usually manage. Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? Corse they do, but it doesn't matter what they want, it isnt going to happen. Giving them more money will help. Nope, they don't bother to vote. They will vote for whoever gives them the most benefits. They don't bother to vote. Prove it. Look at the percentage who bother to vote. I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, Yep, its only the toffs that vote tory in scotland and there are only enough of those to get a couple of torys elected. A lot of Scots are ****ed off with the SNP, But those don't vote tory, you watch. Nobody else to vote for. They wont vote, you watch. hopefully they won't all vote SNP next time. They are in fact much more likely to do that next time because most of them are actually stupid enough to want to stay in the EU and SNP wants that and the torys have noticed that the majority of voters who bothered to vote voted to leave and decided to do what they voted for. Actually most of the remoaners are in London, not Scotland. Irrelevant to the fact that most in scotland don't want to leave the EU. Scots aren't that bright. They can't even talk properly. And didn't even manage to invent pants, or underware. and we all know she ****ed things up royally. But you lot vote SNP anyway if you do bother to vote. SNP are communist arseholes, hopefully most of us have realised this now. Even if they have, they will vote for them anyway, you watch. Why would anyone vote for an arsehole? Because they like the alternatives even less. There is no other possible explanation for why scotland has returned almost no one except the SNP. Scots are so stupid as to vote for anyone who claims to make Scotland more important than the UK. Patriotic idiots.... They did get a lot more out of the english that way. But never did work out how to stop the english stealing their oil and gas. As for them wanting a SECOND independance referendum, that's ridiculous and has ****ed half of us off. All irrelevant now Britain is leaving the EU. Not if Scotland separates and rejoins it. I meant that May wont be having a second referendum now. If Scotland gets independance, we might try to rejoin. No may about it, sure to do that, and will succeed in joining too. Since I'm English by blood, I may just leave. I don't they care what you do. And I thought you loved me. Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed psychotic fantasys. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. I'd call them middle class. More fool you. A drill rigger isnt middle class. They make far more money than a dustman. And are still working class anyway. Money is what decides your class. Wrong. Nobody agrees: Another lie. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class Doesn't say anything like your ****. Middle class people do not have to run their own business. Yes, clearly anglican ministers, doctors employed by the NHS, managers working for a salary etc are all middle class. Correct. So money doesn't decide your class. Those people you listed have a medium amount of money. Not those that end up with **** all because their ****ed up their investments. They are still middle class with **** all money. And a chav that wins the lotto doesn't become middle class, they are still chavs with lots of money, for a while. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. Thought he was in charge of underlings? Foremen are still working class. And in the past most of the working class had apprentices and that's the only underlings he has. Depends what he gets paid. Nope, there have always been some of the working class that get much better paid than the dregs of the working class. Its what they do that determine whether they are middle class or working class or a toff. If they get more money, they become snobbier. Nope. They stay chavs. Money corrupts. Hasn't corrupted me. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS etc. Labour increase that spending. Irrelevant to whether labour got more money out of you or not. It's very relevant. If they spend more they need more taxes to fund it. Nope, they just run up the deficit. And since you are a tax avoider, they don't get more money out of you anyway. Labour run up the defecit then the tories have to try to fix it. And they cant fix it by getting more money out of you. They fix it by stopping wasting money on things like te NHS and child benefits. Not possible, they'd be out of a job if they were stupid enough to do that. They've just stopped child benefits for more than two kids. And so they should. Completely stupid to be taxing everyone, pumping that money thru the system and then straight back to the same people the money was collected from in the first place. There shouldn't be any child benefits for anyone except those whose kids would starve without it. And it shouldn't be possible to spend the benefits on grog and cigarettes and gambling etc, just on what those kids eat and clothes for them to wear etc. The only reason the Tories don't cut taxes is they're trying to get rid of the debt the Labour government put us in. Mindlessly simplistic. But true. Nope. Prove it. No need, its obvious. |
#184
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
On Wed, 10 May 2017 23:47:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:27:12 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:37:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 23:10:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 02:59:55 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 04 May 2017 23:07:35 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. Bull****. And they jacked up the minimum wage much more than Labour did. It's on a very slow rise, barely over inflation. That's a lie with the most recent change. That's what I thought until I looked it up. It's hardly gone up at all. That's bull****. Its gone up a lot more than Labour did. And it's spread over several years. It always is. It's negligible. Bull****. State how much you think it's risen. It's only a quid or two. Still a lot more than Labour did. Labour are stupid. All politicians are stupid. Yes, which is why there should be a place to vote for "none" on the ballot papers. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Hardly any of the chav masses bother to vote at all. Cite. Look at the voting stats where the chav masses 'live' They are evenly scattered, Like hell they are. I've looked on the internet, they are everywhere. But not EVENLY SCATTERED. Pretty much so. Prove otherwise. Look at the census data. Gimme a link. therefore there are no such stats. Even sillier than you usually manage. Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? Corse they do, but it doesn't matter what they want, it isnt going to happen. Giving them more money will help. Nope, they don't bother to vote. They will vote for whoever gives them the most benefits. They don't bother to vote. Prove it. Look at the percentage who bother to vote. 2/3rds isn't it? I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, Yep, its only the toffs that vote tory in scotland and there are only enough of those to get a couple of torys elected. A lot of Scots are ****ed off with the SNP, But those don't vote tory, you watch. Nobody else to vote for. They wont vote, you watch. hopefully they won't all vote SNP next time. They are in fact much more likely to do that next time because most of them are actually stupid enough to want to stay in the EU and SNP wants that and the torys have noticed that the majority of voters who bothered to vote voted to leave and decided to do what they voted for. Actually most of the remoaners are in London, not Scotland. Irrelevant to the fact that most in scotland don't want to leave the EU. Scots aren't that bright. They can't even talk properly. And didn't even manage to invent pants, or underware. Underwear is pointless unless you have some kind of problem of being really smelly. and we all know she ****ed things up royally. But you lot vote SNP anyway if you do bother to vote. SNP are communist arseholes, hopefully most of us have realised this now. Even if they have, they will vote for them anyway, you watch. Why would anyone vote for an arsehole? Because they like the alternatives even less. There is no other possible explanation for why scotland has returned almost no one except the SNP. Scots are so stupid as to vote for anyone who claims to make Scotland more important than the UK. Patriotic idiots.... They did get a lot more out of the english that way. Yip, the English are quite gullible. But never did work out how to stop the english stealing their oil and gas. Most comes from the Arabs anyway now. As for them wanting a SECOND independance referendum, that's ridiculous and has ****ed half of us off. All irrelevant now Britain is leaving the EU. Not if Scotland separates and rejoins it. I meant that May wont be having a second referendum now. If Scotland gets independance, we might try to rejoin. No may about it, sure to do that, and will succeed in joining too. I doubt the EU will let us, and I hope they don't. Since I'm English by blood, I may just leave. I don't they care what you do. And I thought you loved me. Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed psychotic fantasys. Aren't I the only person who replies to your posts? And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. I'd call them middle class. More fool you. A drill rigger isnt middle class. They make far more money than a dustman. And are still working class anyway. Money is what decides your class. Wrong. Nobody agrees: Another lie. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class Doesn't say anything like your ****. Everybody knows that class is based on income. Snobs have huge mansions and speak like the Queen. Chavs live on benefits and live in council flats. Middle class people do not have to run their own business. Yes, clearly anglican ministers, doctors employed by the NHS, managers working for a salary etc are all middle class. Correct. So money doesn't decide your class. Those people you listed have a medium amount of money. Not those that end up with **** all because their ****ed up their investments. They are still middle class with **** all money. They become lower class when they live in a council flat. And a chav that wins the lotto doesn't become middle class, they are still chavs with lots of money, for a while. Depends if they keep the money. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. Thought he was in charge of underlings? Foremen are still working class. And in the past most of the working class had apprentices and that's the only underlings he has. Depends what he gets paid. Nope, there have always been some of the working class that get much better paid than the dregs of the working class. Its what they do that determine whether they are middle class or working class or a toff. If they get more money, they become snobbier. Nope. They stay chavs. Money corrupts. Hasn't corrupted me. What are your total assets? They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS etc. Labour increase that spending. Irrelevant to whether labour got more money out of you or not. It's very relevant. If they spend more they need more taxes to fund it. Nope, they just run up the deficit. And since you are a tax avoider, they don't get more money out of you anyway. Labour run up the defecit then the tories have to try to fix it. And they cant fix it by getting more money out of you. They fix it by stopping wasting money on things like te NHS and child benefits. Not possible, they'd be out of a job if they were stupid enough to do that. Lots of voters would love to pay way less taxes. They've just stopped child benefits for more than two kids. And so they should. Completely stupid to be taxing everyone, pumping that money thru the system and then straight back to the same people the money was collected from in the first place. There shouldn't be any child benefits for anyone except those whose kids would starve without it. And it shouldn't be possible to spend the benefits on grog and cigarettes and gambling etc, just on what those kids eat and clothes for them to wear etc. Should be no benefits at all. The only reason the Tories don't cut taxes is they're trying to get rid of the debt the Labour government put us in. Mindlessly simplistic. But true. Nope. Prove it. No need, its obvious. It's obvious you're wrong. -- Why do Italians hate Jehovah's Witnesses? Italians hate ALL witnesses. |
#185
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Wed, 10 May 2017 23:47:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:27:12 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:37:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 23:10:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 02:59:55 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 04 May 2017 23:07:35 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. Bull****. And they jacked up the minimum wage much more than Labour did. It's on a very slow rise, barely over inflation. That's a lie with the most recent change. That's what I thought until I looked it up. It's hardly gone up at all. That's bull****. Its gone up a lot more than Labour did. And it's spread over several years. It always is. It's negligible. Bull****. State how much you think it's risen. It's only a quid or two. Still a lot more than Labour did. Labour are stupid. All politicians are stupid. Yes, which is why there should be a place to vote for "none" on the ballot papers. No point in farting around with a ballot paper, just don't vote. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Hardly any of the chav masses bother to vote at all. Cite. Look at the voting stats where the chav masses 'live' They are evenly scattered, Like hell they are. I've looked on the internet, they are everywhere. But not EVENLY SCATTERED. Pretty much so. Nothing even remotely. Prove otherwise. Look at the census data. Gimme a link. Even you should be able to find that yourself. therefore there are no such stats. Even sillier than you usually manage. Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? Corse they do, but it doesn't matter what they want, it isnt going to happen. Giving them more money will help. Nope, they don't bother to vote. They will vote for whoever gives them the most benefits. They don't bother to vote. Prove it. Look at the percentage who bother to vote. 2/3rds isn't it? Varys with what is going on politically. I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, Yep, its only the toffs that vote tory in scotland and there are only enough of those to get a couple of torys elected. A lot of Scots are ****ed off with the SNP, But those don't vote tory, you watch. Nobody else to vote for. They wont vote, you watch. hopefully they won't all vote SNP next time. They are in fact much more likely to do that next time because most of them are actually stupid enough to want to stay in the EU and SNP wants that and the torys have noticed that the majority of voters who bothered to vote voted to leave and decided to do what they voted for. Actually most of the remoaners are in London, not Scotland. Irrelevant to the fact that most in scotland don't want to leave the EU. Scots aren't that bright. They can't even talk properly. And didn't even manage to invent pants, or underware. Underwear is pointless unless you have some kind of problem of being really smelly. You run the same stupid line about clothes. and we all know she ****ed things up royally. But you lot vote SNP anyway if you do bother to vote. SNP are communist arseholes, hopefully most of us have realised this now. Even if they have, they will vote for them anyway, you watch. Why would anyone vote for an arsehole? Because they like the alternatives even less. There is no other possible explanation for why scotland has returned almost no one except the SNP. Scots are so stupid as to vote for anyone who claims to make Scotland more important than the UK. Patriotic idiots.... They did get a lot more out of the english that way. Yip, the English are quite gullible. Not gullible so much as that they didn't want Scotland to leave. Too stupid to do what the Romans did, have a wall to keep them out. Even that fool Trump worked that one out. But never did work out how to stop the english stealing their oil and gas. Most comes from the Arabs anyway now. Not the gas it doesn't. As for them wanting a SECOND independance referendum, that's ridiculous and has ****ed half of us off. All irrelevant now Britain is leaving the EU. Not if Scotland separates and rejoins it. I meant that May wont be having a second referendum now. If Scotland gets independance, we might try to rejoin. No might about it, sure to do that, and will succeed in joining too. I doubt the EU will let us, Corse they will when they let the dregs like Romania and Poland join. and I hope they don't. They will anyway, you watch. Essentially because they stupidly think that proves that the EU is a good thing, lots want to sign up. Since I'm English by blood, I may just leave. I don't they care what you do. And I thought you loved me. Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed psychotic fantasys. Aren't I the only person who replies to your posts? Nope. You're actually in a minority. And only Dave the sot and me reply to yours. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. I'd call them middle class. More fool you. A drill rigger isnt middle class. They make far more money than a dustman. And are still working class anyway. Money is what decides your class. Wrong. Nobody agrees: Another lie. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class Doesn't say anything like your ****. Everybody knows that class is based on income. Wota stunning line in rational argument you have there. Snobs have huge mansions and speak like the Queen. Chavs live on benefits and live in council flats. And a chav that wins lotto etc is still a chav. Middle class people do not have to run their own business. Yes, clearly anglican ministers, doctors employed by the NHS, managers working for a salary etc are all middle class. Correct. So money doesn't decide your class. Those people you listed have a medium amount of money. Not those that end up with **** all because their ****ed up their investments. They are still middle class with **** all money. They become lower class when they live in a council flat. Nope. And they don't live in council flats anyway. And a chav that wins the lotto doesn't become middle class, they are still chavs with lots of money, for a while. Depends if they keep the money. Nope, they are still chavs. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. Thought he was in charge of underlings? Foremen are still working class. And in the past most of the working class had apprentices and that's the only underlings he has. Depends what he gets paid. Nope, there have always been some of the working class that get much better paid than the dregs of the working class. Its what they do that determine whether they are middle class or working class or a toff. If they get more money, they become snobbier. Nope. They stay chavs. Money corrupts. Hasn't corrupted me. What are your total assets? Leaves yours for dead. I'm rolling in it. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS etc. Labour increase that spending. Irrelevant to whether labour got more money out of you or not. It's very relevant. If they spend more they need more taxes to fund it. Nope, they just run up the deficit. And since you are a tax avoider, they don't get more money out of you anyway. Labour run up the defecit then the tories have to try to fix it. And they cant fix it by getting more money out of you. They fix it by stopping wasting money on things like te NHS and child benefits. Not possible, they'd be out of a job if they were stupid enough to do that. Lots of voters would love to pay way less taxes. Sure, but any polly actually stupid enough to wind up the NHS and child benefits now would be out of a job so fast that its feet wouldn't even touch the ****ing ground. They've just stopped child benefits for more than two kids. And so they should. Completely stupid to be taxing everyone, pumping that money thru the system and then straight back to the same people the money was collected from in the first place. There shouldn't be any child benefits for anyone except those whose kids would starve without it. And it shouldn't be possible to spend the benefits on grog and cigarettes and gambling etc, just on what those kids eat and clothes for them to wear etc. Should be no benefits at all. Most of the voters don't like seeing dead little kids in the gutter. But then they arent psychopaths like you. The only reason the Tories don't cut taxes is they're trying to get rid of the debt the Labour government put us in. Mindlessly simplistic. But true. Nope. Prove it. No need, its obvious. It's obvious you're wrong. Whatever. |
#186
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:29:05 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Wed, 10 May 2017 23:47:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:27:12 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:37:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 23:10:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 02:59:55 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 04 May 2017 23:07:35 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. Bull****. And they jacked up the minimum wage much more than Labour did. It's on a very slow rise, barely over inflation. That's a lie with the most recent change. That's what I thought until I looked it up. It's hardly gone up at all. That's bull****. Its gone up a lot more than Labour did. And it's spread over several years. It always is. It's negligible. Bull****. State how much you think it's risen. It's only a quid or two. Still a lot more than Labour did. Labour are stupid. All politicians are stupid. Yes, which is why there should be a place to vote for "none" on the ballot papers. No point in farting around with a ballot paper, just don't vote. That supplies no information, and they simply act on the results from those who do vote. If we had a "none" entry, then there would be the possibility of no arsehole controlling us. What's wrong with freedom? Why should we have anyone in charge? Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Hardly any of the chav masses bother to vote at all. Cite. Look at the voting stats where the chav masses 'live' They are evenly scattered, Like hell they are. I've looked on the internet, they are everywhere. But not EVENLY SCATTERED. Pretty much so. Nothing even remotely. Cite. Prove otherwise. Look at the census data. Gimme a link. Even you should be able to find that yourself. Have done in the past and there are chavs everywhere. therefore there are no such stats. Even sillier than you usually manage. Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? Corse they do, but it doesn't matter what they want, it isnt going to happen. Giving them more money will help. Nope, they don't bother to vote. They will vote for whoever gives them the most benefits. They don't bother to vote. Prove it. Look at the percentage who bother to vote. 2/3rds isn't it? Varys with what is going on politically. Not by much. The same third are to lazy to vote. I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, Yep, its only the toffs that vote tory in scotland and there are only enough of those to get a couple of torys elected. A lot of Scots are ****ed off with the SNP, But those don't vote tory, you watch. Nobody else to vote for. They wont vote, you watch. hopefully they won't all vote SNP next time. They are in fact much more likely to do that next time because most of them are actually stupid enough to want to stay in the EU and SNP wants that and the torys have noticed that the majority of voters who bothered to vote voted to leave and decided to do what they voted for. Actually most of the remoaners are in London, not Scotland. Irrelevant to the fact that most in scotland don't want to leave the EU. Scots aren't that bright. They can't even talk properly. And didn't even manage to invent pants, or underware. Underwear is pointless unless you have some kind of problem of being really smelly. You run the same stupid line about clothes. Different reason. Clothes are not needed in warm blooded mammals. and we all know she ****ed things up royally. But you lot vote SNP anyway if you do bother to vote. SNP are communist arseholes, hopefully most of us have realised this now. Even if they have, they will vote for them anyway, you watch. Why would anyone vote for an arsehole? Because they like the alternatives even less. There is no other possible explanation for why scotland has returned almost no one except the SNP. Scots are so stupid as to vote for anyone who claims to make Scotland more important than the UK. Patriotic idiots.... They did get a lot more out of the english that way. Yip, the English are quite gullible. Not gullible so much as that they didn't want Scotland to leave. That;'s because they're stupid. They would have ended up losing a drain on their money. Too stupid to do what the Romans did, have a wall to keep them out. Even that fool Trump worked that one out. Trump is not a fool. But never did work out how to stop the english stealing their oil and gas. Most comes from the Arabs anyway now. Not the gas it doesn't. Says who? As for them wanting a SECOND independance referendum, that's ridiculous and has ****ed half of us off. All irrelevant now Britain is leaving the EU. Not if Scotland separates and rejoins it. I meant that May wont be having a second referendum now. If Scotland gets independance, we might try to rejoin. No might about it, sure to do that, and will succeed in joining too. I doubt the EU will let us, Corse they will when they let the dregs like Romania and Poland join. The EU will disappear in it's entirety soon anyway. Plenty countries are telling it to **** off. It's a silly little failure of a club. Since I'm English by blood, I may just leave. I don't they care what you do. And I thought you loved me. Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed psychotic fantasys. Aren't I the only person who replies to your posts? Nope. You're actually in a minority. That's what I just said, most people have you killfiled. And only Dave the sot and me reply to yours. Funny how I can't keep up with replies to me. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. I'd call them middle class. More fool you. A drill rigger isnt middle class. They make far more money than a dustman. And are still working class anyway. Money is what decides your class. Wrong. Nobody agrees: Another lie. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class Doesn't say anything like your ****. Everybody knows that class is based on income. Wota stunning line in rational argument you have there. What's wrong with it? Snobs have huge mansions and speak like the Queen. Chavs live on benefits and live in council flats. And a chav that wins lotto etc is still a chav. No, they get snobby and bigheaded. Middle class people do not have to run their own business. Yes, clearly anglican ministers, doctors employed by the NHS, managers working for a salary etc are all middle class. Correct. So money doesn't decide your class. Those people you listed have a medium amount of money. Not those that end up with **** all because their ****ed up their investments. They are still middle class with **** all money. They become lower class when they live in a council flat. Nope. And they don't live in council flats anyway. If you have **** all, where else would you live? Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. Thought he was in charge of underlings? Foremen are still working class. And in the past most of the working class had apprentices and that's the only underlings he has. Depends what he gets paid. Nope, there have always been some of the working class that get much better paid than the dregs of the working class. Its what they do that determine whether they are middle class or working class or a toff. If they get more money, they become snobbier. Nope. They stay chavs. Money corrupts. Hasn't corrupted me. What are your total assets? Leaves yours for dead. I'm rolling in it. I see, so you won't admit the number. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS etc. Labour increase that spending. Irrelevant to whether labour got more money out of you or not. It's very relevant. If they spend more they need more taxes to fund it. Nope, they just run up the deficit. And since you are a tax avoider, they don't get more money out of you anyway. Labour run up the defecit then the tories have to try to fix it. And they cant fix it by getting more money out of you. They fix it by stopping wasting money on things like te NHS and child benefits. Not possible, they'd be out of a job if they were stupid enough to do that. Lots of voters would love to pay way less taxes. Sure, but any polly actually stupid enough to wind up the NHS and child benefits now would be out of a job so fast that its feet wouldn't even touch the ****ing ground. ********. Loads would vote for such a change. Remove the drain on our money. They've just stopped child benefits for more than two kids. And so they should. Completely stupid to be taxing everyone, pumping that money thru the system and then straight back to the same people the money was collected from in the first place. There shouldn't be any child benefits for anyone except those whose kids would starve without it. And it shouldn't be possible to spend the benefits on grog and cigarettes and gambling etc, just on what those kids eat and clothes for them to wear etc. Should be no benefits at all. Most of the voters don't like seeing dead little kids in the gutter. Most of the voters don't care for chavs breeding 10 kids each. The only reason the Tories don't cut taxes is they're trying to get rid of the debt the Labour government put us in. Mindlessly simplistic. But true. Nope. Prove it. No need, its obvious. It's obvious you're wrong. Whatever. Try some research. -- In the 60's people took acid to make the world weird. Now the world is weird, people take prozac to make it normal. |
#187
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:29:05 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Wed, 10 May 2017 23:47:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:27:12 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:37:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 23:10:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 02:59:55 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 04 May 2017 23:07:35 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. Bull****. And they jacked up the minimum wage much more than Labour did. It's on a very slow rise, barely over inflation. That's a lie with the most recent change. That's what I thought until I looked it up. It's hardly gone up at all. That's bull****. Its gone up a lot more than Labour did. And it's spread over several years. It always is. It's negligible. Bull****. State how much you think it's risen. It's only a quid or two. Still a lot more than Labour did. Labour are stupid. All politicians are stupid. Yes, which is why there should be a place to vote for "none" on the ballot papers. No point in farting around with a ballot paper, just don't vote. That supplies no information, It supplys the information that you arent interest in voting. and they simply act on the results from those who do vote. They would do that even if there was a place to vote none on the ballot paper. If we had a "none" entry, then there would be the possibility of no arsehole controlling us. Nope, because even you should have noticed that no polly would ever be stupid enough to have a system where, if there were enough none votes in a particular seat, that seat would remain without a member. And pollys don't control us, we decide if they get the bums rush at the ballot box or not. What's wrong with freedom? Why should we have anyone in charge? No one is in charge. Govts don't control a damned thing. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Hardly any of the chav masses bother to vote at all. Cite. Look at the voting stats where the chav masses 'live' They are evenly scattered, Like hell they are. I've looked on the internet, they are everywhere. But not EVENLY SCATTERED. Pretty much so. Nothing even remotely. Cite. The census. Prove otherwise. Look at the census data. Gimme a link. Even you should be able to find that yourself. Have done in the past and there are chavs everywhere. But nothing even remotely like EVENLY SCATTERED. Even you should have noticed that there are a lot more in the council estates or the worst of the Glasgow slums than around Buck House etc. therefore there are no such stats. Even sillier than you usually manage. Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? Corse they do, but it doesn't matter what they want, it isnt going to happen. Giving them more money will help. Nope, they don't bother to vote. They will vote for whoever gives them the most benefits. They don't bother to vote. Prove it. Look at the percentage who bother to vote. 2/3rds isn't it? Varys with what is going on politically. Not by much. By a hell of a lot actually. The same third are to lazy to vote. Even sillier than you usually manage. They have no interest in politics and realise that who gets elected is almost completely irrelevant. I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, Yep, its only the toffs that vote tory in scotland and there are only enough of those to get a couple of torys elected. A lot of Scots are ****ed off with the SNP, But those don't vote tory, you watch. Nobody else to vote for. They wont vote, you watch. hopefully they won't all vote SNP next time. They are in fact much more likely to do that next time because most of them are actually stupid enough to want to stay in the EU and SNP wants that and the torys have noticed that the majority of voters who bothered to vote voted to leave and decided to do what they voted for. Actually most of the remoaners are in London, not Scotland. Irrelevant to the fact that most in scotland don't want to leave the EU. Scots aren't that bright. They can't even talk properly. And didn't even manage to invent pants, or underware. Underwear is pointless unless you have some kind of problem of being really smelly. You run the same stupid line about clothes. Different reason. Clothes are not needed in warm blooded mammals. You wouldn't last long in the artic or Antarctic without them. Try it. Please. and we all know she ****ed things up royally. But you lot vote SNP anyway if you do bother to vote. SNP are communist arseholes, hopefully most of us have realised this now. Even if they have, they will vote for them anyway, you watch. Why would anyone vote for an arsehole? Because they like the alternatives even less. There is no other possible explanation for why scotland has returned almost no one except the SNP. Scots are so stupid as to vote for anyone who claims to make Scotland more important than the UK. Patriotic idiots.... They did get a lot more out of the english that way. Yip, the English are quite gullible. Not gullible so much as that they didn't want Scotland to leave. That;'s because they're stupid. They would have ended up losing a drain on their money. Just as true of the dregs of any country. Hardly any of them are happy for them to leave tho. Too stupid to do what the Romans did, have a wall to keep them out. Even that fool Trump worked that one out. Trump is not a fool. Corse he is. He's never going to get Mexico to pay for that wall, you watch. But never did work out how to stop the english stealing their oil and gas. Most comes from the Arabs anyway now. Not the gas it doesn't. Says who? Anyone who has enough of a clue to look at the stats. As for them wanting a SECOND independance referendum, that's ridiculous and has ****ed half of us off. All irrelevant now Britain is leaving the EU. Not if Scotland separates and rejoins it. I meant that May wont be having a second referendum now. If Scotland gets independance, we might try to rejoin. No might about it, sure to do that, and will succeed in joining too. I doubt the EU will let us, Corse they will when they let the dregs like Romania and Poland join. The EU will disappear in it's entirety soon anyway. Bet it doesn't. It may well end up rather different than it is now, but its being doing that ever since it started anyway. Plenty countries are telling it to **** off. Only one has had a majority vote to leave. It's a silly little failure of a club. It has ensure that you stupid europeans don't try to rip each others throats out in every single generation at vast cost which bankrupts countrys stupid enough to try that. You stupid europeans have been doing that for millennia now and have finally come to your senses on that. And a free trade area over the whole of europe makes a lot of sense too. Since I'm English by blood, I may just leave. I don't they care what you do. And I thought you loved me. Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed psychotic fantasys. Aren't I the only person who replies to your posts? Nope. You're actually in a minority. That's what I just said, Nope. You are a minority of those who do reply to my posts. And only Dave the sot and me reply to yours. Funny how I can't keep up with replies to me. Yes, you are that stupid. And that's not funny, its pathetic. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. I'd call them middle class. More fool you. A drill rigger isnt middle class. They make far more money than a dustman. And are still working class anyway. Money is what decides your class. Wrong. Nobody agrees: Another lie. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class Doesn't say anything like your ****. Everybody knows that class is based on income. Wota stunning line in rational argument you have there. What's wrong with it? Everything. Snobs have huge mansions and speak like the Queen. Chavs live on benefits and live in council flats. And a chav that wins lotto etc is still a chav. No, Yep. they get snobby and bigheaded. Doesn't make them middle class. Middle class people do not have to run their own business. Yes, clearly anglican ministers, doctors employed by the NHS, managers working for a salary etc are all middle class. Correct. So money doesn't decide your class. Those people you listed have a medium amount of money. Not those that end up with **** all because their ****ed up their investments. They are still middle class with **** all money. They become lower class when they live in a council flat. Nope. And they don't live in council flats anyway. If you have **** all, where else would you live? Somewhere cheap, bludge off the relos usually with the middle class fallen on hard times. They wouldn't be seen dead in a council flat. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. Thought he was in charge of underlings? Foremen are still working class. And in the past most of the working class had apprentices and that's the only underlings he has. Depends what he gets paid. Nope, there have always been some of the working class that get much better paid than the dregs of the working class. Its what they do that determine whether they are middle class or working class or a toff. If they get more money, they become snobbier. Nope. They stay chavs. Money corrupts. Hasn't corrupted me. What are your total assets? Leaves yours for dead. I'm rolling in it. I see, so you won't admit the number. Yep, none of your business. And I don't want you chavs showing up and trying to grab it, the rotty would makes such a racket that it would wake the neighbours and using the shotty on you would be even worse in that regard. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS etc. Labour increase that spending. Irrelevant to whether labour got more money out of you or not. It's very relevant. If they spend more they need more taxes to fund it. Nope, they just run up the deficit. And since you are a tax avoider, they don't get more money out of you anyway. Labour run up the defecit then the tories have to try to fix it. And they cant fix it by getting more money out of you. They fix it by stopping wasting money on things like te NHS and child benefits. Not possible, they'd be out of a job if they were stupid enough to do that. Lots of voters would love to pay way less taxes. Sure, but any polly actually stupid enough to wind up the NHS and child benefits now would be out of a job so fast that its feet wouldn't even touch the ****ing ground. ********. Fact. Loads would vote for such a change. How odd that sweet **** all do for the libertarian partys that have that as their policy. Bet you can't even name them they are so completely politically irrelevant. Remove the drain on our money. Remove your benefits, bludger. They've just stopped child benefits for more than two kids. And so they should. Completely stupid to be taxing everyone, pumping that money thru the system and then straight back to the same people the money was collected from in the first place. There shouldn't be any child benefits for anyone except those whose kids would starve without it. And it shouldn't be possible to spend the benefits on grog and cigarettes and gambling etc, just on what those kids eat and clothes for them to wear etc. Should be no benefits at all. Most of the voters don't like seeing dead little kids in the gutter. Most of the voters don't care for chavs breeding 10 kids each. Which is why the torys eliminated the child benefits for more than 2 brats. The only reason the Tories don't cut taxes is they're trying to get rid of the debt the Labour government put us in. Mindlessly simplistic. But true. Nope. Prove it. No need, its obvious. It's obvious you're wrong. Whatever. Try some research. Been doing that since long before you were even born, thanks. |
#188
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:37:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:29:05 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Wed, 10 May 2017 23:47:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:27:12 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:37:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 23:10:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 02:59:55 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 04 May 2017 23:07:35 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. Bull****. And they jacked up the minimum wage much more than Labour did. It's on a very slow rise, barely over inflation. That's a lie with the most recent change. That's what I thought until I looked it up. It's hardly gone up at all. That's bull****. Its gone up a lot more than Labour did. And it's spread over several years. It always is. It's negligible. Bull****. State how much you think it's risen. It's only a quid or two. Still a lot more than Labour did. Labour are stupid. All politicians are stupid. Yes, which is why there should be a place to vote for "none" on the ballot papers. No point in farting around with a ballot paper, just don't vote. That supplies no information, It supplys the information that you arent interest in voting. They don't care. They just multiply the votes up to the population. and they simply act on the results from those who do vote. They would do that even if there was a place to vote none on the ballot paper. If we had a "none" entry, then there would be the possibility of no arsehole controlling us. Nope, because even you should have noticed that no polly would ever be stupid enough to have a system where, if there were enough none votes in a particular seat, that seat would remain without a member. And pollys don't control us, we decide if they get the bums rush at the ballot box or not. They do control us if what you say is true. Why shouldn't we be allowed to choose nobody to control us? What's wrong with freedom? Why should we have anyone in charge? No one is in charge. Govts don't control a damned thing. They create the laws we have to follow or their police come after us. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Hardly any of the chav masses bother to vote at all. Cite. Look at the voting stats where the chav masses 'live' They are evenly scattered, Like hell they are. I've looked on the internet, they are everywhere. But not EVENLY SCATTERED. Pretty much so. Nothing even remotely. Cite. The census. Link? Prove otherwise. Look at the census data. Gimme a link. Even you should be able to find that yourself. Have done in the past and there are chavs everywhere. But nothing even remotely like EVENLY SCATTERED. Even you should have noticed that there are a lot more in the council estates or the worst of the Glasgow slums than around Buck House etc. I've looked at stats on the internet, and was surprised to find they are everywhere. I thought there were a lot here, but apparently they're all over the place. therefore there are no such stats. Even sillier than you usually manage. Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? Corse they do, but it doesn't matter what they want, it isnt going to happen. Giving them more money will help. Nope, they don't bother to vote. They will vote for whoever gives them the most benefits. They don't bother to vote. Prove it. Look at the percentage who bother to vote. 2/3rds isn't it? Varys with what is going on politically. Not by much. By a hell of a lot actually. The same third are to lazy to vote. Even sillier than you usually manage. They have no interest in politics and realise that who gets elected is almost completely irrelevant. No, they're just thick or ignorant or lazy. I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, Yep, its only the toffs that vote tory in scotland and there are only enough of those to get a couple of torys elected. A lot of Scots are ****ed off with the SNP, But those don't vote tory, you watch. Nobody else to vote for. They wont vote, you watch. hopefully they won't all vote SNP next time. They are in fact much more likely to do that next time because most of them are actually stupid enough to want to stay in the EU and SNP wants that and the torys have noticed that the majority of voters who bothered to vote voted to leave and decided to do what they voted for. Actually most of the remoaners are in London, not Scotland. Irrelevant to the fact that most in scotland don't want to leave the EU. Scots aren't that bright. They can't even talk properly. And didn't even manage to invent pants, or underware. Underwear is pointless unless you have some kind of problem of being really smelly. You run the same stupid line about clothes. Different reason. Clothes are not needed in warm blooded mammals. You wouldn't last long in the artic or Antarctic without them. Try it. Please. Shivering won't kill me, as long as I have enough food to create that heat. and we all know she ****ed things up royally. But you lot vote SNP anyway if you do bother to vote. SNP are communist arseholes, hopefully most of us have realised this now. Even if they have, they will vote for them anyway, you watch. Why would anyone vote for an arsehole? Because they like the alternatives even less. There is no other possible explanation for why scotland has returned almost no one except the SNP. Scots are so stupid as to vote for anyone who claims to make Scotland more important than the UK. Patriotic idiots.... They did get a lot more out of the english that way. Yip, the English are quite gullible. Not gullible so much as that they didn't want Scotland to leave. That;'s because they're stupid. They would have ended up losing a drain on their money. Just as true of the dregs of any country. Hardly any of them are happy for them to leave tho. Scotland saps money form England. Why would England want to keep us? Too stupid to do what the Romans did, have a wall to keep them out. Even that fool Trump worked that one out. Trump is not a fool. Corse he is. He's never going to get Mexico to pay for that wall, you watch. So what? His ideas are far better than anyone else. But never did work out how to stop the english stealing their oil and gas. Most comes from the Arabs anyway now. Not the gas it doesn't. Says who? Anyone who has enough of a clue to look at the stats. Show me them. AFAIK where there's oil there's gas. As for them wanting a SECOND independance referendum, that's ridiculous and has ****ed half of us off. All irrelevant now Britain is leaving the EU. Not if Scotland separates and rejoins it. I meant that May wont be having a second referendum now. If Scotland gets independance, we might try to rejoin. No might about it, sure to do that, and will succeed in joining too. I doubt the EU will let us, Corse they will when they let the dregs like Romania and Poland join. The EU will disappear in it's entirety soon anyway. Bet it doesn't. It may well end up rather different than it is now, but its being doing that ever since it started anyway. Ever since Brexit, the other countries are thinking about leaving too. The **** is about to hit the fan. Plenty countries are telling it to **** off. Only one has had a majority vote to leave. Only one has had a referendum so far. It's a silly little failure of a club. It has ensure that you stupid europeans don't try to rip each others throats out in every single generation at vast cost which bankrupts countrys stupid enough to try that. You stupid europeans have been doing that for millennia now and have finally come to your senses on that. And a free trade area over the whole of europe makes a lot of sense too. You don't need a club for trade. And we don't want to be told what shape our bananas have to be, or what wattage our vacuum cleaners must be. Since I'm English by blood, I may just leave. I don't they care what you do. And I thought you loved me. Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed psychotic fantasys. Aren't I the only person who replies to your posts? Nope. You're actually in a minority. That's what I just said, Nope. You are a minority of those who do reply to my posts. Exactly, **** all people talk to you. And only Dave the sot and me reply to yours. Funny how I can't keep up with replies to me. Yes, you are that stupid. And that's not funny, its pathetic. You said hardly anyone replies to me, so why do I have hundreds of posts in my replies folder? And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. I'd call them middle class. More fool you. A drill rigger isnt middle class. They make far more money than a dustman. And are still working class anyway. Money is what decides your class. Wrong. Nobody agrees: Another lie. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class Doesn't say anything like your ****. Everybody knows that class is based on income. Wota stunning line in rational argument you have there. What's wrong with it? Everything. You have no substance to your argument. Snobs have huge mansions and speak like the Queen. Chavs live on benefits and live in council flats. And a chav that wins lotto etc is still a chav. No, Yep. they get snobby and bigheaded. Doesn't make them middle class. Yes it does. Money changes what you're like. Middle class people do not have to run their own business. Yes, clearly anglican ministers, doctors employed by the NHS, managers working for a salary etc are all middle class. Correct. So money doesn't decide your class. Those people you listed have a medium amount of money. Not those that end up with **** all because their ****ed up their investments. They are still middle class with **** all money. They become lower class when they live in a council flat. Nope. And they don't live in council flats anyway. If you have **** all, where else would you live? Somewhere cheap, bludge off the relos usually with the middle class fallen on hard times. They wouldn't be seen dead in a council flat. Might not have rich relos. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. Thought he was in charge of underlings? Foremen are still working class. And in the past most of the working class had apprentices and that's the only underlings he has. Depends what he gets paid. Nope, there have always been some of the working class that get much better paid than the dregs of the working class. Its what they do that determine whether they are middle class or working class or a toff. If they get more money, they become snobbier. Nope. They stay chavs. Money corrupts. Hasn't corrupted me. What are your total assets? Leaves yours for dead. I'm rolling in it. I see, so you won't admit the number. Yep, none of your business. And I don't want you chavs showing up and trying to grab it, the rotty would makes such a racket that it would wake the neighbours and using the shotty on you would be even worse in that regard. I can only assume that you aren't rich then. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS etc. Labour increase that spending. Irrelevant to whether labour got more money out of you or not. It's very relevant. If they spend more they need more taxes to fund it. Nope, they just run up the deficit. And since you are a tax avoider, they don't get more money out of you anyway. Labour run up the defecit then the tories have to try to fix it. And they cant fix it by getting more money out of you. They fix it by stopping wasting money on things like te NHS and child benefits. Not possible, they'd be out of a job if they were stupid enough to do that. Lots of voters would love to pay way less taxes. Sure, but any polly actually stupid enough to wind up the NHS and child benefits now would be out of a job so fast that its feet wouldn't even touch the ****ing ground. ********. Fact. Plenty of us are fed up of paying for chavs' medical expenses and kids. Loads would vote for such a change. How odd that sweet **** all do for the libertarian partys that have that as their policy. Bet you can't even name them they are so completely politically irrelevant. I once voted Libertarian. They rarely have an MP for me to vote for though. Remove the drain on our money. Remove your benefits, bludger. If there were no benefits, people wouldn't be made poor in the first place by huge taxes. They've just stopped child benefits for more than two kids. And so they should. Completely stupid to be taxing everyone, pumping that money thru the system and then straight back to the same people the money was collected from in the first place. There shouldn't be any child benefits for anyone except those whose kids would starve without it. And it shouldn't be possible to spend the benefits on grog and cigarettes and gambling etc, just on what those kids eat and clothes for them to wear etc. Should be no benefits at all. Most of the voters don't like seeing dead little kids in the gutter. Most of the voters don't care for chavs breeding 10 kids each. Which is why the torys eliminated the child benefits for more than 2 brats. At last. Hopefully that's only the first step. We've been waiting to get rid of those for several decades. The only reason the Tories don't cut taxes is they're trying to get rid of the debt the Labour government put us in. Mindlessly simplistic. But true. Nope. Prove it. No need, its obvious. It's obvious you're wrong. Whatever. Try some research. Been doing that since long before you were even born, thanks. Allegedly. -- Tell a man that there are 400 billion stars and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint and he has to touch it. |
#189
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:37:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:29:05 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Wed, 10 May 2017 23:47:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:27:12 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:37:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 23:10:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 06 May 2017 02:59:55 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 04 May 2017 23:07:35 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Tue, 02 May 2017 21:19:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 01 May 2017 21:59:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:42 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:58:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/04/17 21:47, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Bod writes: From what I've read and heard, most Labour voters ARE like sheep. I hear it all of the time "I vote labour because all my family have always voted for Labour". I think there's been a lot of truth in that, but a lot of people who had always voted Labour for decades have abandoned the party in last couple of years for two different reasons, Brexit, and the party's recent move towards the far left (popular with Labour members, but less so with the bulk of voters they need to attract). Both Conservative and Labour voters were split on Brexit - it wasn't a hard left/right issue. Now the Conservatives have come out heavily for Brexit, they've pulled in lots of Labour Brexiters, and I think they'll pull in all 5M UKIP voters (UKIP will be dead in 8 weeks). Conservatives will lose some Remainers to Lib/Dems, but that will be small compared with their gains from Labour and UKIP. I think the most significant thing historically will be the number of traditional left wing voters who've moved well to the right just to ensure Brexit goes through. They'll probably move back a few years after Brexit, but for now, they regard Brexit as more important than left/right politics. Labour hasn't been a party of the working class - the white working class for two decades or more. Not since Thatcher really. Its the party of the nouveau rich middle class, you know 'me grandad were a milkman but I am a sound engineer at the beeb, and own me own house' sort. Working class are way right of Labour. You mean way left. Nope, **** all of the working class is into the sort of Trotskyite **** that Corbyn and co are. That's why so many of them kept putting Maggie in. Every working class person I know does not vote Tory (right wing). Then you need to get out more. Why would a poor person not want handouts? Even the Torys do handouts. They continually reduce them as much as they can get away with. Bull****. And they jacked up the minimum wage much more than Labour did. It's on a very slow rise, barely over inflation. That's a lie with the most recent change. That's what I thought until I looked it up. It's hardly gone up at all. That's bull****. Its gone up a lot more than Labour did. And it's spread over several years. It always is. It's negligible. Bull****. State how much you think it's risen. It's only a quid or two. Still a lot more than Labour did. Labour are stupid. All politicians are stupid. Yes, which is why there should be a place to vote for "none" on the ballot papers. No point in farting around with a ballot paper, just don't vote. That supplies no information, It supplys the information that you arent interest in voting. They don't care. Neither would they with your stupid system, they'd just ignore the fools that tick your box. They just multiply the votes up to the population. Like hell they do. and they simply act on the results from those who do vote. They would do that even if there was a place to vote none on the ballot paper. If we had a "none" entry, then there would be the possibility of no arsehole controlling us. Nope, because even you should have noticed that no polly would ever be stupid enough to have a system where, if there were enough none votes in a particular seat, that seat would remain without a member. And pollys don't control us, we decide if they get the bums rush at the ballot box or not. They do control us if what you say is true. Even sillier than you usually manage. You don't even have compulsory voting so you are free to not vote whenever you like. Why shouldn't we be allowed to choose nobody to control us? Because not enough would be stupid enough to vote for that. And no one controls you anyway, we get to give them the bums rush at the ballot box if they **** up badly enough. Even you should have noticed what happened to Blair and Brown and their parasites. What's wrong with freedom? Why should we have anyone in charge? No one is in charge. Govts don't control a damned thing. They create the laws we have to follow Nope, we are free to change who the govt is and get the laws we want instead. or their police come after us. How odd that they don't when you flout the road laws. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Hardly any of the chav masses bother to vote at all. Cite. Look at the voting stats where the chav masses 'live' They are evenly scattered, Like hell they are. I've looked on the internet, they are everywhere. But not EVENLY SCATTERED. Pretty much so. Nothing even remotely. Cite. The census. Link? Even you should be able to use google to find that. I'm not going to do stuff as basic as that for you. Prove otherwise. Look at the census data. Gimme a link. Even you should be able to find that yourself. Have done in the past and there are chavs everywhere. But nothing even remotely like EVENLY SCATTERED. Even you should have noticed that there are a lot more in the council estates or the worst of the Glasgow slums than around Buck House etc. I've looked at stats on the internet, and was surprised to find they are everywhere. Not EVENLY DISTRIBUTED they arent. I thought there were a lot here, but apparently they're all over the place. Not EVENLY DISTRIBUTED they arent. therefore there are no such stats. Even sillier than you usually manage. Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? Corse they do, but it doesn't matter what they want, it isnt going to happen. Giving them more money will help. Nope, they don't bother to vote. They will vote for whoever gives them the most benefits. They don't bother to vote. Prove it. Look at the percentage who bother to vote. 2/3rds isn't it? Varys with what is going on politically. Not by much. By a hell of a lot actually. The same third are to lazy to vote. Even sillier than you usually manage. They have no interest in politics and realise that who gets elected is almost completely irrelevant. No, they're just thick or ignorant or lazy. Even sillier than you usually manage. They have no interest in politics and realise that who gets elected is almost completely irrelevant. I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, Yep, its only the toffs that vote tory in scotland and there are only enough of those to get a couple of torys elected. A lot of Scots are ****ed off with the SNP, But those don't vote tory, you watch. Nobody else to vote for. They wont vote, you watch. hopefully they won't all vote SNP next time. They are in fact much more likely to do that next time because most of them are actually stupid enough to want to stay in the EU and SNP wants that and the torys have noticed that the majority of voters who bothered to vote voted to leave and decided to do what they voted for. Actually most of the remoaners are in London, not Scotland. Irrelevant to the fact that most in scotland don't want to leave the EU. Scots aren't that bright. They can't even talk properly. And didn't even manage to invent pants, or underware. Underwear is pointless unless you have some kind of problem of being really smelly. You run the same stupid line about clothes. Different reason. Clothes are not needed in warm blooded mammals. You wouldn't last long in the artic or Antarctic without them. Try it. Please. Shivering won't kill me, No clothes outside in the Artic or Antarctic will. Try it. Please. as long as I have enough food to create that heat. Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage. and we all know she ****ed things up royally. But you lot vote SNP anyway if you do bother to vote. SNP are communist arseholes, hopefully most of us have realised this now. Even if they have, they will vote for them anyway, you watch. Why would anyone vote for an arsehole? Because they like the alternatives even less. There is no other possible explanation for why scotland has returned almost no one except the SNP. Scots are so stupid as to vote for anyone who claims to make Scotland more important than the UK. Patriotic idiots.... They did get a lot more out of the english that way. Yip, the English are quite gullible. Not gullible so much as that they didn't want Scotland to leave. That;'s because they're stupid. They would have ended up losing a drain on their money. Just as true of the dregs of any country. Hardly any of them are happy for them to leave tho. Scotland saps money form England. Why would England want to keep us? Because that is where quite a bit of the gas comes from, where they keep Trident, where Liz and Phil choose to posture quite a bit of the time, presumably because that is where her mum came from, etc etc etc. Too stupid to do what the Romans did, have a wall to keep them out. Even that fool Trump worked that one out. Trump is not a fool. Corse he is. He's never going to get Mexico to pay for that wall, you watch. So what? So he's that big of a fool. His ideas are far better than anyone else. Name 10 that are. But never did work out how to stop the english stealing their oil and gas. Most comes from the Arabs anyway now. Not the gas it doesn't. Says who? Anyone who has enough of a clue to look at the stats. Show me them. Go and find them for yourself. AFAIK where there's oil there's gas. Even more pig ignorant than you usually manage. We have vast amounts of gas in our NW and **** all oil there. As for them wanting a SECOND independance referendum, that's ridiculous and has ****ed half of us off. All irrelevant now Britain is leaving the EU. Not if Scotland separates and rejoins it. I meant that May wont be having a second referendum now. If Scotland gets independance, we might try to rejoin. No might about it, sure to do that, and will succeed in joining too. I doubt the EU will let us, Corse they will when they let the dregs like Romania and Poland join. The EU will disappear in it's entirety soon anyway. Bet it doesn't. It may well end up rather different than it is now, but its being doing that ever since it started anyway. Ever since Brexit, the other countries are thinking about leaving too. They were thinking about that long before BRexit. The **** is about to hit the fan. Nope, no one else will even get a referendum on leaving, you watch. Plenty countries are telling it to **** off. Only one has had a majority vote to leave. Only one has had a referendum so far. And no one else will have a referendum, you watch. It's a silly little failure of a club. It has ensure that you stupid europeans don't try to rip each others throats out in every single generation at vast cost which bankrupts countrys stupid enough to try that. You stupid europeans have been doing that for millennia now and have finally come to your senses on that. And a free trade area over the whole of europe makes a lot of sense too. You don't need a club for trade. But you do need a formal agreement to have a FREE TRADE area. And we don't want to be told what shape our bananas have to be, or what wattage our vacuum cleaners must be. No other free trade area has anything even remotely like that stupidity. Or anything like the EP either. Since I'm English by blood, I may just leave. I don't they care what you do. And I thought you loved me. Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed psychotic fantasys. Aren't I the only person who replies to your posts? Nope. You're actually in a minority. That's what I just said, Nope. You are a minority of those who do reply to my posts. Exactly, **** all people talk to you. Lot more talk to me than talk to you. And only Dave the sot and me reply to yours. Funny how I can't keep up with replies to me. Yes, you are that stupid. And that's not funny, its pathetic. You said hardly anyone replies to me, so why do I have hundreds of posts in my replies folder? Because you are so pathetic that you can't even manage to keep up with the few you do get. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. I'd call them middle class. More fool you. A drill rigger isnt middle class. They make far more money than a dustman. And are still working class anyway. Money is what decides your class. Wrong. Nobody agrees: Another lie. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class Doesn't say anything like your ****. Everybody knows that class is based on income. Wota stunning line in rational argument you have there. What's wrong with it? Everything. You have no substance to your argument. We all swooned at the substance in yours. Snobs have huge mansions and speak like the Queen. Chavs live on benefits and live in council flats. And a chav that wins lotto etc is still a chav. No, Yep. they get snobby and bigheaded. Doesn't make them middle class. Yes it does. Even sillier than you usually manage. Money changes what you're like. Didn't change me. Middle class people do not have to run their own business. Yes, clearly anglican ministers, doctors employed by the NHS, managers working for a salary etc are all middle class. Correct. So money doesn't decide your class. Those people you listed have a medium amount of money. Not those that end up with **** all because their ****ed up their investments. They are still middle class with **** all money. They become lower class when they live in a council flat. Nope. And they don't live in council flats anyway. If you have **** all, where else would you live? Somewhere cheap, bludge off the relos usually with the middle class fallen on hard times. They wouldn't be seen dead in a council flat. Might not have rich relos. Don't need to be rich. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. Thought he was in charge of underlings? Foremen are still working class. And in the past most of the working class had apprentices and that's the only underlings he has. Depends what he gets paid. Nope, there have always been some of the working class that get much better paid than the dregs of the working class. Its what they do that determine whether they are middle class or working class or a toff. If they get more money, they become snobbier. Nope. They stay chavs. Money corrupts. Hasn't corrupted me. What are your total assets? Leaves yours for dead. I'm rolling in it. I see, so you won't admit the number. Yep, none of your business. And I don't want you chavs showing up and trying to grab it, the rotty would makes such a racket that it would wake the neighbours and using the shotty on you would be even worse in that regard. I can only assume that you aren't rich then. Yes, you actually are that stupid. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS etc. Labour increase that spending. Irrelevant to whether labour got more money out of you or not. It's very relevant. If they spend more they need more taxes to fund it. Nope, they just run up the deficit. And since you are a tax avoider, they don't get more money out of you anyway. Labour run up the defecit then the tories have to try to fix it. And they cant fix it by getting more money out of you. They fix it by stopping wasting money on things like te NHS and child benefits. Not possible, they'd be out of a job if they were stupid enough to do that. Lots of voters would love to pay way less taxes. Sure, but any polly actually stupid enough to wind up the NHS and child benefits now would be out of a job so fast that its feet wouldn't even touch the ****ing ground. ********. Fact. Plenty of us are fed up of paying for chavs' medical expenses and kids. Sure, but nothing even remotely like enough to get the NHS and child benefits scrapped. Loads would vote for such a change. How odd that sweet **** all do for the libertarian partys that have that as their policy. Bet you can't even name them they are so completely politically irrelevant. I once voted Libertarian. They rarely have an MP for me to vote for though. Which should tell even someone as stupid as you what the electoral prospects are for them, even if you were too stupid to notice how few votes those too stupid to work that out actually got. Remove the drain on our money. Remove your benefits, bludger. If there were no benefits, people wouldn't be made poor in the first place by huge taxes. The real poor pay **** all in the way of taxes. They only pay the VAT and gambling taxes and grog and cigarette taxes. And even a 20% VAT isnt going to make anyone with a decent income poor, and isnt a huge tax. They've just stopped child benefits for more than two kids. And so they should. Completely stupid to be taxing everyone, pumping that money thru the system and then straight back to the same people the money was collected from in the first place. There shouldn't be any child benefits for anyone except those whose kids would starve without it. And it shouldn't be possible to spend the benefits on grog and cigarettes and gambling etc, just on what those kids eat and clothes for them to wear etc. Should be no benefits at all. Most of the voters don't like seeing dead little kids in the gutter. Most of the voters don't care for chavs breeding 10 kids each. Which is why the torys eliminated the child benefits for more than 2 brats. At last. Hopefully that's only the first step. Not a chance, you watch. We've been waiting to get rid of those for several decades. Getting rid of all child benefits aint gunna happen, you watch. The only reason the Tories don't cut taxes is they're trying to get rid of the debt the Labour government put us in. Mindlessly simplistic. But true. Nope. Prove it. No need, its obvious. It's obvious you're wrong. Whatever. Try some research. Been doing that since long before you were even born, thanks. Allegedly. Even you should be able to find it cited. |
#190
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
On Sat, 13 May 2017 02:30:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:37:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:29:05 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Wed, 10 May 2017 23:47:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news Labour are stupid. All politicians are stupid. Yes, which is why there should be a place to vote for "none" on the ballot papers. No point in farting around with a ballot paper, just don't vote. That supplies no information, It supplys the information that you arent interest in voting. They don't care. Neither would they with your stupid system, they'd just ignore the fools that tick your box. Not if it was made as valid a choice as any of the MPs. They just multiply the votes up to the population. Like hell they do. What on earth do you think they do? If 70% of the population vote, they just use those votes to decide the outcome of the election. They ignore the 30% who didn't bother. and they simply act on the results from those who do vote. They would do that even if there was a place to vote none on the ballot paper. If we had a "none" entry, then there would be the possibility of no arsehole controlling us. Nope, because even you should have noticed that no polly would ever be stupid enough to have a system where, if there were enough none votes in a particular seat, that seat would remain without a member. And pollys don't control us, we decide if they get the bums rush at the ballot box or not. They do control us if what you say is true. Even sillier than you usually manage. You don't even have compulsory voting so you are free to not vote whenever you like. But it has no effect. We are forced to have politicians. Why shouldn't we be allowed to choose nobody to control us? Because not enough would be stupid enough to vote for that. What's stupid about it? 99% of what politicians do hinders us not helps us. We'd be better off without them. And I'd say a very large number of people just hate all politicians equally and would sooner vote for nobody. And no one controls you anyway, we get to give them the bums rush at the ballot box if they **** up badly enough. And vote in someone equally ****. Brilliant.... Even you should have noticed what happened to Blair and Brown and their parasites. To be replaced with more morons. What's wrong with freedom? Why should we have anyone in charge? No one is in charge. Govts don't control a damned thing. They create the laws we have to follow Nope, we are free to change who the govt is and get the laws we want instead. To another equally **** government. or their police come after us. How odd that they don't when you flout the road laws. They do, I'm just good enough to avoid the ****s. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Hardly any of the chav masses bother to vote at all. Cite. Look at the voting stats where the chav masses 'live' They are evenly scattered, Like hell they are. I've looked on the internet, they are everywhere. But not EVENLY SCATTERED. Pretty much so. Nothing even remotely. Cite. The census. Link? Even you should be able to use google to find that. I'm not going to do stuff as basic as that for you. I've looked before. The census isn't that detailed. You want to prove your point, you show me the link. Prove otherwise. Look at the census data. Gimme a link. Even you should be able to find that yourself. Have done in the past and there are chavs everywhere. But nothing even remotely like EVENLY SCATTERED. Even you should have noticed that there are a lot more in the council estates or the worst of the Glasgow slums than around Buck House etc. I've looked at stats on the internet, and was surprised to find they are everywhere. Not EVENLY DISTRIBUTED they arent. Yes they are. I thought there were a lot here, but apparently they're all over the place. Not EVENLY DISTRIBUTED they arent. Yes they are. And stop repeating yourself. therefore there are no such stats. Even sillier than you usually manage. Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? Corse they do, but it doesn't matter what they want, it isnt going to happen. Giving them more money will help. Nope, they don't bother to vote. They will vote for whoever gives them the most benefits. They don't bother to vote. Prove it. Look at the percentage who bother to vote. 2/3rds isn't it? Varys with what is going on politically. Not by much. By a hell of a lot actually. The same third are to lazy to vote. Even sillier than you usually manage. They have no interest in politics and realise that who gets elected is almost completely irrelevant. No, they're just thick or ignorant or lazy. Even sillier than you usually manage. They have no interest in politics and realise that who gets elected is almost completely irrelevant. Precisely my point further up. Better off with no polys at all. I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, Yep, its only the toffs that vote tory in scotland and there are only enough of those to get a couple of torys elected. A lot of Scots are ****ed off with the SNP, But those don't vote tory, you watch. Nobody else to vote for. They wont vote, you watch. hopefully they won't all vote SNP next time. They are in fact much more likely to do that next time because most of them are actually stupid enough to want to stay in the EU and SNP wants that and the torys have noticed that the majority of voters who bothered to vote voted to leave and decided to do what they voted for. Actually most of the remoaners are in London, not Scotland. Irrelevant to the fact that most in scotland don't want to leave the EU. Scots aren't that bright. They can't even talk properly. And didn't even manage to invent pants, or underware. Underwear is pointless unless you have some kind of problem of being really smelly. You run the same stupid line about clothes. Different reason. Clothes are not needed in warm blooded mammals. You wouldn't last long in the artic or Antarctic without them. Try it. Please. Shivering won't kill me, No clothes outside in the Artic or Antarctic will. Try it. Please. Look up warm blooded you ignorant fool. as long as I have enough food to create that heat. Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage. Look up warm blooded you ignorant fool. and we all know she ****ed things up royally. But you lot vote SNP anyway if you do bother to vote. SNP are communist arseholes, hopefully most of us have realised this now. Even if they have, they will vote for them anyway, you watch. Why would anyone vote for an arsehole? Because they like the alternatives even less. There is no other possible explanation for why scotland has returned almost no one except the SNP. Scots are so stupid as to vote for anyone who claims to make Scotland more important than the UK. Patriotic idiots.... They did get a lot more out of the english that way. Yip, the English are quite gullible. Not gullible so much as that they didn't want Scotland to leave. That;'s because they're stupid. They would have ended up losing a drain on their money. Just as true of the dregs of any country. Hardly any of them are happy for them to leave tho. Scotland saps money form England. Why would England want to keep us? Because that is where quite a bit of the gas comes from, In the entire world?! where they keep Trident, Easy enough to move it. where Liz and Phil choose to posture quite a bit of the time, presumably because that is where her mum came from, etc etc etc. Hardly the end of the world if they can't. I'm sure they'd prefer the dryer English countryside. Too stupid to do what the Romans did, have a wall to keep them out. Even that fool Trump worked that one out. Trump is not a fool. Corse he is. He's never going to get Mexico to pay for that wall, you watch. So what? So he's that big of a fool. His ideas are far better than anyone else. Name 10 that are. Getting rid of immigrunts. That's worth 10. -- In 1977, researchers detected a strong radio signal from space that lasted 72 seconds. It hasn't been detected since. |
#191
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 13 May 2017 02:30:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:37:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:29:05 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Wed, 10 May 2017 23:47:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:27:12 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:37:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news As for them wanting a SECOND independance referendum, that's ridiculous and has ****ed half of us off. All irrelevant now Britain is leaving the EU. Not if Scotland separates and rejoins it. I meant that May wont be having a second referendum now. If Scotland gets independance, we might try to rejoin. No might about it, sure to do that, and will succeed in joining too. I doubt the EU will let us, Corse they will when they let the dregs like Romania and Poland join. The EU will disappear in it's entirety soon anyway. Bet it doesn't. It may well end up rather different than it is now, but its being doing that ever since it started anyway. Ever since Brexit, the other countries are thinking about leaving too. They were thinking about that long before BRexit. Not according to the media. The media is completely irrelevant and there was plenty of the media reporting that other countrys had some who wanted to leave line Marine Le Pen LONG before the BRexit result. Even you should have noticed UKIP and should even have noticed other MEPs who said that they wanted their country to leave the EU too and had go elected on that platform too. The **** is about to hit the fan. Nope, no one else will even get a referendum on leaving, you watch. Not according to the media. The media is completely irrelevant on that. Have fun listing even a single country where the politician that decides that that country has a referendum will happen has said that they should have a referendum on that or one that say has a constitution that says that there will be a referendum if say enough sign a petition to have one where there is any prospect of enough signing that to get that. Plenty countries are telling it to **** off. Only one has had a majority vote to leave. Only one has had a referendum so far. And no one else will have a referendum, you watch. Not according to the media. Record's stuck. It's a silly little failure of a club. It has ensure that you stupid europeans don't try to rip each others throats out in every single generation at vast cost which bankrupts countrys stupid enough to try that. You stupid europeans have been doing that for millennia now and have finally come to your senses on that. And a free trade area over the whole of europe makes a lot of sense too. You don't need a club for trade. But you do need a formal agreement to have a FREE TRADE area. No, you just need common sense. Free trade agreements don't work like that. There is no reason for any country in the entire world to charge any customs. Even sillier than you usually manage when a country chooses to protect a local industry that would otherwise not be able to compete very well with imports. Have fun listing even a single country that has a car industry that has no dutys or tariffs on any cars or car components except within a free trade areas which is a subset of the entire world. And we don't want to be told what shape our bananas have to be, or what wattage our vacuum cleaners must be. No other free trade area has anything even remotely like that stupidity. Or anything like the EP either. The EU does. The word OTHER was there for a reason. Since I'm English by blood, I may just leave. I don't they care what you do. And I thought you loved me. Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed psychotic fantasys. Aren't I the only person who replies to your posts? Nope. You're actually in a minority. That's what I just said, Nope. You are a minority of those who do reply to my posts. Exactly, **** all people talk to you. Lot more talk to me than talk to you. Incorrect. Nope. Only 3 people talk to you, me, Dave the sot and that other person with the 3 letter name. And which of us has a "Who or what is Rod Speed" page? That's there because I ****ed that fool over so very comprehensively that its still desperately licking its wounds quite literally DECADES after. And only Dave the sot and me reply to yours. Funny how I can't keep up with replies to me. Yes, you are that stupid. And that's not funny, its pathetic. You said hardly anyone replies to me, so why do I have hundreds of posts in my replies folder? Because you are so pathetic that you can't even manage to keep up with the few you do get. Maybe I have more of a life than you? Mowing lawns, hoovering, watering your indoor plants ? Yeah, right. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. I'd call them middle class. More fool you. A drill rigger isnt middle class. They make far more money than a dustman. And are still working class anyway. Money is what decides your class. Wrong. Nobody agrees: Another lie. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class Doesn't say anything like your ****. Everybody knows that class is based on income. Wota stunning line in rational argument you have there. What's wrong with it? Everything. You have no substance to your argument. We all swooned at the substance in yours. Now you're just contradicting instead of arguing. Corse you never ever do anything like that yourself, eh ? That's a sign of low intelligence that is. You shouldn't be so hard on yourself, you might end up topping yourself. Not that we'd mind if you did. Snobs have huge mansions and speak like the Queen. Chavs live on benefits and live in council flats. And a chav that wins lotto etc is still a chav. No, Yep. they get snobby and bigheaded. Doesn't make them middle class. Yes it does. Even sillier than you usually manage. Money changes what you're like. Didn't change me. Aussies aren't human. Any 2 year old could leave that for dead. Get one to help you before posting again. If anyone is actually stupid enough to let you anywhere near one. Middle class people do not have to run their own business. Yes, clearly anglican ministers, doctors employed by the NHS, managers working for a salary etc are all middle class. Correct. So money doesn't decide your class. Those people you listed have a medium amount of money. Not those that end up with **** all because their ****ed up their investments. They are still middle class with **** all money. They become lower class when they live in a council flat. Nope. And they don't live in council flats anyway. If you have **** all, where else would you live? Somewhere cheap, bludge off the relos usually with the middle class fallen on hard times. They wouldn't be seen dead in a council flat. Might not have rich relos. Don't need to be rich. Can't bludge of those who aren't rich. Corse you can. You can bludge of anyone who has more than you do. Even chavs bludge off each other. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. Thought he was in charge of underlings? Foremen are still working class. And in the past most of the working class had apprentices and that's the only underlings he has. Depends what he gets paid. Nope, there have always been some of the working class that get much better paid than the dregs of the working class. Its what they do that determine whether they are middle class or working class or a toff. If they get more money, they become snobbier. Nope. They stay chavs. Money corrupts. Hasn't corrupted me. What are your total assets? Leaves yours for dead. I'm rolling in it. I see, so you won't admit the number. Yep, none of your business. And I don't want you chavs showing up and trying to grab it, the rotty would makes such a racket that it would wake the neighbours and using the shotty on you would be even worse in that regard. I can only assume that you aren't rich then. Yes, you actually are that stupid. You're hiding your alleged riches, Nope. Everyone who knows me personally knows I am rolling in it. In spades with the kids who I told that if the bank wouldn't lend them the money to buy the house they wanted, that I would be happy to do a private mortgage instead. so you're a liar. Even you should be able to do better than that pathetic excuse for a troll. Obviously not. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS etc. Labour increase that spending. Irrelevant to whether labour got more money out of you or not. It's very relevant. If they spend more they need more taxes to fund it. Nope, they just run up the deficit. And since you are a tax avoider, they don't get more money out of you anyway. Labour run up the defecit then the tories have to try to fix it. And they cant fix it by getting more money out of you. They fix it by stopping wasting money on things like te NHS and child benefits. Not possible, they'd be out of a job if they were stupid enough to do that. Lots of voters would love to pay way less taxes. Sure, but any polly actually stupid enough to wind up the NHS and child benefits now would be out of a job so fast that its feet wouldn't even touch the ****ing ground. ********. Fact. Plenty of us are fed up of paying for chavs' medical expenses and kids. Sure, but nothing even remotely like enough to get the NHS and child benefits scrapped. They're on their way out. Like hell the NHS is. Loads would vote for such a change. How odd that sweet **** all do for the libertarian partys that have that as their policy. Bet you can't even name them they are so completely politically irrelevant. I once voted Libertarian. They rarely have an MP for me to vote for though. Which should tell even someone as stupid as you what the electoral prospects are for them, even if you were too stupid to notice how few votes those too stupid to work that out actually got. Everyone has to start somewhere. And even you have noticed that they have given up after that result. Remove the drain on our money. Remove your benefits, bludger. If there were no benefits, people wouldn't be made poor in the first place by huge taxes. The real poor pay **** all in the way of taxes. But they start out having a medium amount of money, Nope, the real poor are those whose entire income is benefits or less than that because they arent entitled to benefits. and are taxed to death Even a 20% VAT isnt taking them to death. making them poor. They are already poor if their entire income is benefits and those arent even taxed anyway. The govt just takes some of what it pays them in benefits back in tax. They only pay the VAT and gambling taxes and grog and cigarette taxes. And so on and so forth. There is no and so on and so forth with the real poor whose entire income is benefits and they don't actually pay any tax at all anyway, the govt just takes back part of what it hands them in benefits. Taxes at every corner. Even sillier than you usually manage. And even a 20% VAT isnt going to make anyone with a decent income poor, and isnt a huge tax. It is when combined with all the others. 400% petrol tax FFS! The real poor don't have cars so don't buy petrol. They've just stopped child benefits for more than two kids. And so they should. Completely stupid to be taxing everyone, pumping that money thru the system and then straight back to the same people the money was collected from in the first place. There shouldn't be any child benefits for anyone except those whose kids would starve without it. And it shouldn't be possible to spend the benefits on grog and cigarettes and gambling etc, just on what those kids eat and clothes for them to wear etc. Should be no benefits at all. Most of the voters don't like seeing dead little kids in the gutter. Most of the voters don't care for chavs breeding 10 kids each. Which is why the torys eliminated the child benefits for more than 2 brats. At last. Hopefully that's only the first step. Not a chance, you watch. First time it's reduced in my whole lifetime. Another lie. Maggie did quite a bit of reducing of that. We've been waiting to get rid of those for several decades. Getting rid of all child benefits aint gunna happen, you watch. First time it's reduced in my whole lifetime. Another lie. Maggie did quite a bit of reducing of that. The only reason the Tories don't cut taxes is they're trying to get rid of the debt the Labour government put us in. Mindlessly simplistic. But true. Nope. Prove it. No need, its obvious. It's obvious you're wrong. Whatever. Try some research. Been doing that since long before you were even born, thanks. Allegedly. Even you should be able to find it cited. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...rity_programme Irrelevant to what research I have been doing since before you were even born. |
#192
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 13 May 2017 02:30:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:37:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:29:05 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Wed, 10 May 2017 23:47:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news Labour are stupid. All politicians are stupid. Yes, which is why there should be a place to vote for "none" on the ballot papers. No point in farting around with a ballot paper, just don't vote. That supplies no information, It supplys the information that you arent interest in voting. They don't care. Neither would they with your stupid system, they'd just ignore the fools that tick your box. Not if it was made as valid a choice as any of the MPs. Corse they would just ignore that. They just multiply the votes up to the population. Like hell they do. What on earth do you think they do? Work out who got the most votes and that one gets to be the MP. Even you should have been able to work that out. Obviously not. If 70% of the population vote, they just use those votes to decide the outcome of the election. So there is no multiply involved. They ignore the 30% who didn't bother. Duh. and they simply act on the results from those who do vote. They would do that even if there was a place to vote none on the ballot paper. If we had a "none" entry, then there would be the possibility of no arsehole controlling us. Nope, because even you should have noticed that no polly would ever be stupid enough to have a system where, if there were enough none votes in a particular seat, that seat would remain without a member. And pollys don't control us, we decide if they get the bums rush at the ballot box or not. They do control us if what you say is true. Even sillier than you usually manage. You don't even have compulsory voting so you are free to not vote whenever you like. But it has no effect. We are forced to have politicians. Because that works better than mob rule. Why shouldn't we be allowed to choose nobody to control us? Because not enough would be stupid enough to vote for that. What's stupid about it? Mob rule doesn't work. 99% of what politicians do hinders us not helps us. You'd never have got any benefits without them and would have ended up dead. We'd be better off without them. We'd certainly be better off if you had ended up dead. And I'd say a very large number of people just hate all politicians equally **** all are that stupid. and would sooner vote for nobody. Makes more sense to not vote if you arent interest in politics or have decided that none of those you can vote for are any use. And no one controls you anyway, we get to give them the bums rush at the ballot box if they **** up badly enough. And vote in someone equally ****. You just said that the torys are doing better because they pulled the plug on child benefits for more than 2 brats. Can't even manage a consistent line in mindless silly bull****. Brilliant.... Even you should have noticed what happened to Blair and Brown and their parasites. To be replaced with more morons. You just said that the torys are doing better because they pulled the plug on child benefits for more than 2 brats. Can't even manage a consistent line in mindless silly bull****. What's wrong with freedom? Why should we have anyone in charge? No one is in charge. Govts don't control a damned thing. They create the laws we have to follow Nope, we are free to change who the govt is and get the laws we want instead. To another equally **** government. You just said that the torys are doing better because they pulled the plug on child benefits for more than 2 brats. Can't even manage a consistent line in mindless silly bull****. or their police come after us. How odd that they don't when you flout the road laws. They do, I'm just good enough to avoid the ****s. They clearly don't control even how you drive. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Hardly any of the chav masses bother to vote at all. Cite. Look at the voting stats where the chav masses 'live' They are evenly scattered, Like hell they are. I've looked on the internet, they are everywhere. But not EVENLY SCATTERED. Pretty much so. Nothing even remotely. Cite. The census. Link? Even you should be able to use google to find that. I'm not going to do stuff as basic as that for you. I've looked before. The census isn't that detailed. Bull**** it isnt. You want to prove your point, you show me the link. Go and **** yourself, again. Prove otherwise. Look at the census data. Gimme a link. Even you should be able to find that yourself. Have done in the past and there are chavs everywhere. But nothing even remotely like EVENLY SCATTERED. Even you should have noticed that there are a lot more in the council estates or the worst of the Glasgow slums than around Buck House etc. I've looked at stats on the internet, and was surprised to find they are everywhere. Not EVENLY DISTRIBUTED they arent. Yes they are. Then you wont have any trouble citing the evidence for that. I thought there were a lot here, but apparently they're all over the place. Not EVENLY DISTRIBUTED they arent. Yes they are. Then you wont have any trouble citing the evidence for that. And stop repeating yourself. Go and **** yourself, again. therefore there are no such stats. Even sillier than you usually manage. Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? Corse they do, but it doesn't matter what they want, it isnt going to happen. Giving them more money will help. Nope, they don't bother to vote. They will vote for whoever gives them the most benefits. They don't bother to vote. Prove it. Look at the percentage who bother to vote. 2/3rds isn't it? Varys with what is going on politically. Not by much. By a hell of a lot actually. The same third are to lazy to vote. Even sillier than you usually manage. They have no interest in politics and realise that who gets elected is almost completely irrelevant. No, they're just thick or ignorant or lazy. Even sillier than you usually manage. They have no interest in politics and realise that who gets elected is almost completely irrelevant. Precisely my point further up. Nope. Its only a minority that believe that. Better off with no polys at all. Wrong, as always. Mob rule is much worse. I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, Yep, its only the toffs that vote tory in scotland and there are only enough of those to get a couple of torys elected. A lot of Scots are ****ed off with the SNP, But those don't vote tory, you watch. Nobody else to vote for. They wont vote, you watch. hopefully they won't all vote SNP next time. They are in fact much more likely to do that next time because most of them are actually stupid enough to want to stay in the EU and SNP wants that and the torys have noticed that the majority of voters who bothered to vote voted to leave and decided to do what they voted for. Actually most of the remoaners are in London, not Scotland. Irrelevant to the fact that most in scotland don't want to leave the EU. Scots aren't that bright. They can't even talk properly. And didn't even manage to invent pants, or underware. Underwear is pointless unless you have some kind of problem of being really smelly. You run the same stupid line about clothes. Different reason. Clothes are not needed in warm blooded mammals. You wouldn't last long in the artic or Antarctic without them. Try it. Please. Shivering won't kill me, No clothes outside in the Artic or Antarctic will. Try it. Please. Look up warm blooded you ignorant fool. Look up all those who have died in the snow and after they have fallen into freezing water, ****wit. as long as I have enough food to create that heat. Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage. Look up warm blooded you ignorant fool. Look up all those who have died in the snow and after they have fallen into freezing water, ****wit. and we all know she ****ed things up royally. But you lot vote SNP anyway if you do bother to vote. SNP are communist arseholes, hopefully most of us have realised this now. Even if they have, they will vote for them anyway, you watch. Why would anyone vote for an arsehole? Because they like the alternatives even less. There is no other possible explanation for why scotland has returned almost no one except the SNP. Scots are so stupid as to vote for anyone who claims to make Scotland more important than the UK. Patriotic idiots.... They did get a lot more out of the english that way. Yip, the English are quite gullible. Not gullible so much as that they didn't want Scotland to leave. That;'s because they're stupid. They would have ended up losing a drain on their money. Just as true of the dregs of any country. Hardly any of them are happy for them to leave tho. Scotland saps money form England. Why would England want to keep us? Because that is where quite a bit of the gas comes from, In the entire world?! What england uses. where they keep Trident, Easy enough to move it. Nope, no one is actually stupid enough to want to live near what is absolutely certain to be the target of nukes if the **** ever does hit the fan. where Liz and Phil choose to posture quite a bit of the time, presumably because that is where her mum came from, etc etc etc. Hardly the end of the world if they can't. Sure, but hardly the end of the world if scotland stays in britain either. I'm sure they'd prefer the dryer English countryside. They don't. Too stupid to do what the Romans did, have a wall to keep them out. Even that fool Trump worked that one out. Trump is not a fool. Corse he is. He's never going to get Mexico to pay for that wall, you watch. So what? So he's that big of a fool. His ideas are far better than anyone else. Name 10 that are. Getting rid of immigrunts. Not even possible. And you are an immigrant. |
#193
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:46:42 +0100, Chris Green wrote:
Rod Speed wrote: Nope. Fascinating Little things please little minds. Is it his accent that turns you on? -- "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop |
#194
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
On Sat, 13 May 2017 20:15:09 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 13 May 2017 02:30:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:37:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:29:05 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Wed, 10 May 2017 23:47:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:27:12 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:37:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news As for them wanting a SECOND independance referendum, that's ridiculous and has ****ed half of us off. All irrelevant now Britain is leaving the EU. Not if Scotland separates and rejoins it. I meant that May wont be having a second referendum now. If Scotland gets independance, we might try to rejoin. No might about it, sure to do that, and will succeed in joining too. I doubt the EU will let us, Corse they will when they let the dregs like Romania and Poland join. The EU will disappear in it's entirety soon anyway. Bet it doesn't. It may well end up rather different than it is now, but its being doing that ever since it started anyway. Ever since Brexit, the other countries are thinking about leaving too. They were thinking about that long before BRexit. Not according to the media. The media is completely irrelevant and there was plenty of the media reporting that other countrys had some who wanted to leave line Marine Le Pen LONG before the BRexit result. Even you should have noticed UKIP and should even have noticed other MEPs who said that they wanted their country to leave the EU too and had go elected on that platform too. So everything in the papers is a lie? http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...-Frexit-Grexit The **** is about to hit the fan. Nope, no one else will even get a referendum on leaving, you watch. Not according to the media. The media is completely irrelevant on that. Have fun listing even a single country where the politician that decides that that country has a referendum will happen has said that they should have a referendum on that or one that say has a constitution that says that there will be a referendum if say enough sign a petition to have one where there is any prospect of enough signing that to get that. That's the longest sentence I've ever seen. Plenty countries are telling it to **** off. Only one has had a majority vote to leave. Only one has had a referendum so far. And no one else will have a referendum, you watch. Not according to the media. Record's stuck. You do it regularly. It's a silly little failure of a club. It has ensure that you stupid europeans don't try to rip each others throats out in every single generation at vast cost which bankrupts countrys stupid enough to try that. You stupid europeans have been doing that for millennia now and have finally come to your senses on that. And a free trade area over the whole of europe makes a lot of sense too. You don't need a club for trade. But you do need a formal agreement to have a FREE TRADE area. No, you just need common sense. Free trade agreements don't work like that. There is no reason for any country in the entire world to charge any customs. Even sillier than you usually manage when a country chooses to protect a local industry that would otherwise not be able to compete very well with imports. If the company can't compete, they should go under. Have fun listing even a single country that has a car industry that has no dutys or tariffs on any cars or car components except within a free trade areas which is a subset of the entire world. I never said they did, I said they should. Clearly free trade worked within the EU, so it could work worldwide. And we don't want to be told what shape our bananas have to be, or what wattage our vacuum cleaners must be. No other free trade area has anything even remotely like that stupidity. Or anything like the EP either. The EU does. The word OTHER was there for a reason. But it's the EU we want rid of. Since I'm English by blood, I may just leave. I don't they care what you do. And I thought you loved me. Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed psychotic fantasys. Aren't I the only person who replies to your posts? Nope. You're actually in a minority. That's what I just said, Nope. You are a minority of those who do reply to my posts. Exactly, **** all people talk to you. Lot more talk to me than talk to you. Incorrect. Nope. Only 3 people talk to you, me, Dave the sot and that other person with the 3 letter name. In my "replies to me" folder, I have (and this is only unread messages): Rod Speed Norman Wells Meanie Oren Janet Frank rbowman notbob vidcapper Peter Duncanson [BrE] cahrles GordonD Peter T. Daniels Tony Cooper Peter Young The Todal [can't be bothered looking further through it] And which of us has a "Who or what is Rod Speed" page? That's there because I ****ed that fool over so very comprehensively that its still desperately licking its wounds quite literally DECADES after. But so many people refer to that page. And only Dave the sot and me reply to yours. Funny how I can't keep up with replies to me. Yes, you are that stupid. And that's not funny, its pathetic. You said hardly anyone replies to me, so why do I have hundreds of posts in my replies folder? Because you are so pathetic that you can't even manage to keep up with the few you do get. Maybe I have more of a life than you? Mowing lawns, hoovering, watering your indoor plants ? Yeah, right. Those take up **** all time. Watering plants is 5 minutes every 3 days. Mowing lawns is half an hour every 2 weeks in the warmer half of the year. Hoovering is 10 minutes once a week. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. I'd call them middle class. More fool you. A drill rigger isnt middle class. They make far more money than a dustman. And are still working class anyway. Money is what decides your class. Wrong. Nobody agrees: Another lie. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class Doesn't say anything like your ****. Everybody knows that class is based on income. Wota stunning line in rational argument you have there. What's wrong with it? Everything. You have no substance to your argument. We all swooned at the substance in yours. Now you're just contradicting instead of arguing. Corse you never ever do anything like that yourself, eh ? I always make sure my argument has substance. That's a sign of low intelligence that is. You shouldn't be so hard on yourself, you might end up topping yourself. Not that we'd mind if you did. What a childish remark. I was clearly talking about you. Snobs have huge mansions and speak like the Queen. Chavs live on benefits and live in council flats. And a chav that wins lotto etc is still a chav. No, Yep. they get snobby and bigheaded. Doesn't make them middle class. Yes it does. Even sillier than you usually manage. Money changes what you're like. Didn't change me. Aussies aren't human. Any 2 year old could leave that for dead. Yer all descendants of convicts, and Americans are all descendants of people who fled the UK. Get one to help you before posting again. If anyone is actually stupid enough to let you anywhere near one. I can't understand what 2 year olds say. Middle class people do not have to run their own business. Yes, clearly anglican ministers, doctors employed by the NHS, managers working for a salary etc are all middle class. Correct. So money doesn't decide your class. Those people you listed have a medium amount of money. Not those that end up with **** all because their ****ed up their investments. They are still middle class with **** all money. They become lower class when they live in a council flat. Nope. And they don't live in council flats anyway. If you have **** all, where else would you live? Somewhere cheap, bludge off the relos usually with the middle class fallen on hard times. They wouldn't be seen dead in a council flat. Might not have rich relos. Don't need to be rich. Can't bludge of those who aren't rich. Corse you can. You can bludge of anyone who has more than you do. Even chavs bludge off each other. But you won't get much because they don't have much. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. Thought he was in charge of underlings? Foremen are still working class. And in the past most of the working class had apprentices and that's the only underlings he has. Depends what he gets paid. Nope, there have always been some of the working class that get much better paid than the dregs of the working class. Its what they do that determine whether they are middle class or working class or a toff. If they get more money, they become snobbier. Nope. They stay chavs. Money corrupts. Hasn't corrupted me. What are your total assets? Leaves yours for dead. I'm rolling in it. I see, so you won't admit the number. Yep, none of your business. And I don't want you chavs showing up and trying to grab it, the rotty would makes such a racket that it would wake the neighbours and using the shotty on you would be even worse in that regard. I can only assume that you aren't rich then. Yes, you actually are that stupid. You're hiding your alleged riches, Nope. Everyone who knows me personally knows I am rolling in it. But as I said, you hide it from the group. In spades with the kids who I told that if the bank wouldn't lend them the money to buy the house they wanted, that I would be happy to do a private mortgage instead. I don't know your kids so I can't confirm that. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS etc. Labour increase that spending. Irrelevant to whether labour got more money out of you or not. It's very relevant. If they spend more they need more taxes to fund it. Nope, they just run up the deficit. And since you are a tax avoider, they don't get more money out of you anyway. Labour run up the defecit then the tories have to try to fix it. And they cant fix it by getting more money out of you. They fix it by stopping wasting money on things like te NHS and child benefits. Not possible, they'd be out of a job if they were stupid enough to do that. Lots of voters would love to pay way less taxes. Sure, but any polly actually stupid enough to wind up the NHS and child benefits now would be out of a job so fast that its feet wouldn't even touch the ****ing ground. ********. Fact. Plenty of us are fed up of paying for chavs' medical expenses and kids. Sure, but nothing even remotely like enough to get the NHS and child benefits scrapped. They're on their way out. Like hell the NHS is. As long as we keep the Tories in, they will keep hacking away at it and reducing the money sucking system. Loads would vote for such a change. How odd that sweet **** all do for the libertarian partys that have that as their policy. Bet you can't even name them they are so completely politically irrelevant. I once voted Libertarian. They rarely have an MP for me to vote for though. Which should tell even someone as stupid as you what the electoral prospects are for them, even if you were too stupid to notice how few votes those too stupid to work that out actually got. Everyone has to start somewhere. And even you have noticed that they have given up after that result. Or just for this mini election that was called too early. Remove the drain on our money. Remove your benefits, bludger. If there were no benefits, people wouldn't be made poor in the first place by huge taxes. The real poor pay **** all in the way of taxes. But they start out having a medium amount of money, Nope, the real poor are those whose entire income is benefits or less than that because they arent entitled to benefits. and are taxed to death Even a 20% VAT isnt taking them to death. Its taking a fifth of their money. And plenty poor folk weren't always that poor. making them poor. They are already poor if their entire income is benefits and those arent even taxed anyway. The govt just takes some of what it pays them in benefits back in tax. Which is utterly pointless paperwork. They only pay the VAT and gambling taxes and grog and cigarette taxes. And so on and so forth. There is no and so on and so forth with the real poor whose entire income is benefits and they don't actually pay any tax at all anyway, the govt just takes back part of what it hands them in benefits. Taxes at every corner. Even sillier than you usually manage. And even a 20% VAT isnt going to make anyone with a decent income poor, and isnt a huge tax. It is when combined with all the others. 400% petrol tax FFS! The real poor don't have cars so don't buy petrol. Funny how the council estates round here are full of cars, parked on the street in the way. There was actually talk of providing cars to people on benefits as a human right! They've just stopped child benefits for more than two kids. And so they should. Completely stupid to be taxing everyone, pumping that money thru the system and then straight back to the same people the money was collected from in the first place. There shouldn't be any child benefits for anyone except those whose kids would starve without it. And it shouldn't be possible to spend the benefits on grog and cigarettes and gambling etc, just on what those kids eat and clothes for them to wear etc. Should be no benefits at all. Most of the voters don't like seeing dead little kids in the gutter. Most of the voters don't care for chavs breeding 10 kids each. Which is why the torys eliminated the child benefits for more than 2 brats. At last. Hopefully that's only the first step. Not a chance, you watch. First time it's reduced in my whole lifetime. Another lie. Maggie did quite a bit of reducing of that. Not that I noticed. The only reason the Tories don't cut taxes is they're trying to get rid of the debt the Labour government put us in. Mindlessly simplistic. But true. Nope. Prove it. No need, its obvious. It's obvious you're wrong. Whatever. Try some research. Been doing that since long before you were even born, thanks. Allegedly. Even you should be able to find it cited. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...rity_programme Irrelevant to what research I have been doing since before you were even born. Before I was born is not relevant to what the Tories are currently doing. -- Phone answering machine message: 'If you want to buy marijuana, press the hash key.' |
#195
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 13 May 2017 20:15:09 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 13 May 2017 02:30:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:37:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:29:05 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Wed, 10 May 2017 23:47:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:27:12 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:37:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news As for them wanting a SECOND independance referendum, that's ridiculous and has ****ed half of us off. All irrelevant now Britain is leaving the EU. Not if Scotland separates and rejoins it. I meant that May wont be having a second referendum now. If Scotland gets independance, we might try to rejoin. No might about it, sure to do that, and will succeed in joining too. I doubt the EU will let us, Corse they will when they let the dregs like Romania and Poland join. The EU will disappear in it's entirety soon anyway. Bet it doesn't. It may well end up rather different than it is now, but its being doing that ever since it started anyway. Ever since Brexit, the other countries are thinking about leaving too. They were thinking about that long before BRexit. Not according to the media. The media is completely irrelevant and there was plenty of the media reporting that other countrys had some who wanted to leave line Marine Le Pen LONG before the BRexit result. Even you should have noticed UKIP and should even have noticed other MEPs who said that they wanted their country to leave the EU too and had go elected on that platform too. So everything in the papers is a lie? Nope, there will be an election in Britain quite soon so the media did somehow manage to get that right. http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...-Frexit-Grexit Just some ****wit journo that doesn't have a ****ing clue. None of those will be leaving any time soon, you watch. The **** is about to hit the fan. Nope, no one else will even get a referendum on leaving, you watch. Not according to the media. The media is completely irrelevant on that. Have fun listing even a single country where the politician that decides that that country has a referendum will happen has said that they should have a referendum on that or one that say has a constitution that says that there will be a referendum if say enough sign a petition to have one where there is any prospect of enough signing that to get that. That's the longest sentence I've ever seen. Then you need to get out more. Plenty countries are telling it to **** off. Only one has had a majority vote to leave. Only one has had a referendum so far. And no one else will have a referendum, you watch. Not according to the media. Record's stuck. You do it regularly. It's a silly little failure of a club. It has ensure that you stupid europeans don't try to rip each others throats out in every single generation at vast cost which bankrupts countrys stupid enough to try that. You stupid europeans have been doing that for millennia now and have finally come to your senses on that. And a free trade area over the whole of europe makes a lot of sense too. You don't need a club for trade. But you do need a formal agreement to have a FREE TRADE area. No, you just need common sense. Free trade agreements don't work like that. There is no reason for any country in the entire world to charge any customs. Even sillier than you usually manage when a country chooses to protect a local industry that would otherwise not be able to compete very well with imports. If the company can't compete, they should go under. Plenty feel otherwise. You get to like that or lump it. Have fun listing even a single country that has a car industry that has no dutys or tariffs on any cars or car components except within a free trade areas which is a subset of the entire world. I never said they did, I said they should. Plenty feel otherwise. You get to like that or lump it. Clearly free trade worked within the EU, Which is nothing like a diverse as the entire world. so it could work worldwide. Using that mindlessly silly line, free movement of people worked within the EU and so would work world wide. Fraid not. And we don't want to be told what shape our bananas have to be, or what wattage our vacuum cleaners must be. No other free trade area has anything even remotely like that stupidity. Or anything like the EP either. The EU does. The word OTHER was there for a reason. But it's the EU we want rid of. Duh. Since I'm English by blood, I may just leave. I don't they care what you do. And I thought you loved me. Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed psychotic fantasys. Aren't I the only person who replies to your posts? Nope. You're actually in a minority. That's what I just said, Nope. You are a minority of those who do reply to my posts. Exactly, **** all people talk to you. Lot more talk to me than talk to you. Incorrect. Nope. Only 3 people talk to you, me, Dave the sot and that other person with the 3 letter name. And which of us has a "Who or what is Rod Speed" page? That's there because I ****ed that fool over so very comprehensively that its still desperately licking its wounds quite literally DECADES after. But so many people refer to that page. **** all do. And only Dave the sot and me reply to yours. Funny how I can't keep up with replies to me. Yes, you are that stupid. And that's not funny, its pathetic. You said hardly anyone replies to me, so why do I have hundreds of posts in my replies folder? Because you are so pathetic that you can't even manage to keep up with the few you do get. Maybe I have more of a life than you? Mowing lawns, hoovering, watering your indoor plants ? Yeah, right. Those take up **** all time. Plenty better things to do with that time. Watering plants is 5 minutes every 3 days. Mowing lawns is half an hour every 2 weeks in the warmer half of the year. Hoovering is 10 minutes once a week. All of them a complete waste of time. And working class people arent necessarily poor people anyway. That's what it means. Nope, it JUST means they do that sort of work. And that sort of work doesn't pay much. Irrelevant to what is working class. And quite a bit of working class work pays very well indeed, particularly in the oil and gas industry and mining etc. I'd call them middle class. More fool you. A drill rigger isnt middle class. They make far more money than a dustman. And are still working class anyway. Money is what decides your class. Wrong. Nobody agrees: Another lie. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class Doesn't say anything like your ****. Everybody knows that class is based on income. Wota stunning line in rational argument you have there. What's wrong with it? Everything. You have no substance to your argument. We all swooned at the substance in yours. Now you're just contradicting instead of arguing. Corse you never ever do anything like that yourself, eh ? I always make sure my argument has substance. It never does so you are a complete failure at that too. That's a sign of low intelligence that is. You shouldn't be so hard on yourself, you might end up topping yourself. Not that we'd mind if you did. Snobs have huge mansions and speak like the Queen. Chavs live on benefits and live in council flats. And a chav that wins lotto etc is still a chav. No, Yep. they get snobby and bigheaded. Doesn't make them middle class. Yes it does. Even sillier than you usually manage. Money changes what you're like. Didn't change me. Aussies aren't human. Any 2 year old could leave that for dead. Yer all descendants of convicts, and Americans are all descendants of people who fled the UK. Any 2 year old could leave that for dead. Get one to help you before posting again. If anyone is actually stupid enough to let you anywhere near one. I can't understand what 2 year olds say. Your problem, as always. Middle class people do not have to run their own business. Yes, clearly anglican ministers, doctors employed by the NHS, managers working for a salary etc are all middle class. Correct. So money doesn't decide your class. Those people you listed have a medium amount of money. Not those that end up with **** all because their ****ed up their investments. They are still middle class with **** all money. They become lower class when they live in a council flat. Nope. And they don't live in council flats anyway. If you have **** all, where else would you live? Somewhere cheap, bludge off the relos usually with the middle class fallen on hard times. They wouldn't be seen dead in a council flat. Might not have rich relos. Don't need to be rich. Can't bludge of those who aren't rich. Corse you can. You can bludge off anyone who has more than you do. Even chavs bludge off each other. But you won't get much because they don't have much. Your problem. Adam certainly isnt. Then he isn't working class. Corse an electrician is working class. There's an electrician three doors down from me. Hardly working class. He runs his own business and owns three properties. Adam doesn't do that. Thought he was in charge of underlings? Foremen are still working class. And in the past most of the working class had apprentices and that's the only underlings he has. Depends what he gets paid. Nope, there have always been some of the working class that get much better paid than the dregs of the working class. Its what they do that determine whether they are middle class or working class or a toff. If they get more money, they become snobbier. Nope. They stay chavs. Money corrupts. Hasn't corrupted me. What are your total assets? Leaves yours for dead. I'm rolling in it. I see, so you won't admit the number. Yep, none of your business. And I don't want you chavs showing up and trying to grab it, the rotty would makes such a racket that it would wake the neighbours and using the shotty on you would be even worse in that regard. I can only assume that you aren't rich then. Yes, you actually are that stupid. You're hiding your alleged riches, Nope. Everyone who knows me personally knows I am rolling in it. But as I said, you hide it from the group. Nope, just don't say anything about it. In spades with the kids who I told that if the bank wouldn't lend them the money to buy the house they wanted, that I would be happy to do a private mortgage instead. I don't know your kids so I can't confirm that. You have always been and always will be, completely and utterly irrelevant. They want handouts. Corse you never ever do that yourself, eh ? I take whatever's available, I'm a scrounger at heart. And yet you don't vote Labour. Because I don't want any money I earn to go to someone else. It does anyway. Moreso with Labour. Nope, they don't get any more tax out of you than the torys do. Tories are making cutbacks to the NHS etc. Labour increase that spending. Irrelevant to whether labour got more money out of you or not. It's very relevant. If they spend more they need more taxes to fund it. Nope, they just run up the deficit. And since you are a tax avoider, they don't get more money out of you anyway. Labour run up the defecit then the tories have to try to fix it. And they cant fix it by getting more money out of you. They fix it by stopping wasting money on things like te NHS and child benefits. Not possible, they'd be out of a job if they were stupid enough to do that. Lots of voters would love to pay way less taxes. Sure, but any polly actually stupid enough to wind up the NHS and child benefits now would be out of a job so fast that its feet wouldn't even touch the ****ing ground. ********. Fact. Plenty of us are fed up of paying for chavs' medical expenses and kids. Sure, but nothing even remotely like enough to get the NHS and child benefits scrapped. They're on their way out. Like hell the NHS is. As long as we keep the Tories in, they will keep hacking away at it and reducing the money sucking system. Even sillier than you usually manage. Loads would vote for such a change. How odd that sweet **** all do for the libertarian partys that have that as their policy. Bet you can't even name them they are so completely politically irrelevant. I once voted Libertarian. They rarely have an MP for me to vote for though. Which should tell even someone as stupid as you what the electoral prospects are for them, even if you were too stupid to notice how few votes those too stupid to work that out actually got. Everyone has to start somewhere. And even you have noticed that they have given up after that result. Or just for this mini election that was called too early. Nope, they wont be running in the next one either. And it only takes an hour or two to be a candidate this time, even you could manage it if someone was actually stupid enough to lend you a seeing eye dog and a white cane and you had had enough of a clue to realise that an election would happen sometime. Remove the drain on our money. Remove your benefits, bludger. If there were no benefits, people wouldn't be made poor in the first place by huge taxes. The real poor pay **** all in the way of taxes. But they start out having a medium amount of money, Nope, the real poor are those whose entire income is benefits or less than that because they arent entitled to benefits. and are taxed to death Even a 20% VAT isnt taking them to death. Its taking a fifth of their money. Nope, its taking back much less than a fifth of what the govt hands them because quite a bit of stuff doesn't have VAT to pay. And plenty poor folk weren't always that poor. Irrelevant. making them poor. They are already poor if their entire income is benefits and those arent even taxed anyway. The govt just takes some of what it pays them in benefits back in tax. Which is utterly pointless paperwork. Sure, but it would be even more pointless paperwork to not have those whose entire income is benefits not paying any VAT or any other govt charges. Lot simpler to increase what they get handed and have them pay what everyone else pays. They only pay the VAT and gambling taxes and grog and cigarette taxes. And so on and so forth. There is no and so on and so forth with the real poor whose entire income is benefits and they don't actually pay any tax at all anyway, the govt just takes back part of what it hands them in benefits. Taxes at every corner. Even sillier than you usually manage. And even a 20% VAT isnt going to make anyone with a decent income poor, and isnt a huge tax. It is when combined with all the others. 400% petrol tax FFS! The real poor don't have cars so don't buy petrol. Funny how the council estates round here are full of cars, parked on the street in the way. Because plenty of those in council estates arent poor people. There was actually talk of providing cars to people on benefits as a human right! Only by fools. They've just stopped child benefits for more than two kids. And so they should. Completely stupid to be taxing everyone, pumping that money thru the system and then straight back to the same people the money was collected from in the first place. There shouldn't be any child benefits for anyone except those whose kids would starve without it. And it shouldn't be possible to spend the benefits on grog and cigarettes and gambling etc, just on what those kids eat and clothes for them to wear etc. Should be no benefits at all. Most of the voters don't like seeing dead little kids in the gutter. Most of the voters don't care for chavs breeding 10 kids each. Which is why the torys eliminated the child benefits for more than 2 brats. At last. Hopefully that's only the first step. Not a chance, you watch. First time it's reduced in my whole lifetime. Another lie. Maggie did quite a bit of reducing of that. Not that I noticed. No surprises there. The only reason the Tories don't cut taxes is they're trying to get rid of the debt the Labour government put us in. Mindlessly simplistic. But true. Nope. Prove it. No need, its obvious. It's obvious you're wrong. Whatever. Try some research. Been doing that since long before you were even born, thanks. Allegedly. Even you should be able to find it cited. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...rity_programme Irrelevant to what research I have been doing since before you were even born. Before I was born is not relevant to what the Tories are currently doing. Irrelevant to what research I have done. |
#196
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
On Sat, 13 May 2017 20:51:48 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 13 May 2017 02:30:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:37:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:29:05 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Wed, 10 May 2017 23:47:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news Labour are stupid. All politicians are stupid. Yes, which is why there should be a place to vote for "none" on the ballot papers. No point in farting around with a ballot paper, just don't vote. That supplies no information, It supplys the information that you arent interest in voting. They don't care. Neither would they with your stupid system, they'd just ignore the fools that tick your box. Not if it was made as valid a choice as any of the MPs. Corse they would just ignore that. Not if they'd put it there. They just multiply the votes up to the population. Like hell they do. What on earth do you think they do? Work out who got the most votes and that one gets to be the MP. Even you should have been able to work that out. Obviously not. Same thing. If 70% of the population vote, they just use those votes to decide the outcome of the election. So there is no multiply involved. It is if you think about it. and they simply act on the results from those who do vote. They would do that even if there was a place to vote none on the ballot paper. If we had a "none" entry, then there would be the possibility of no arsehole controlling us. Nope, because even you should have noticed that no polly would ever be stupid enough to have a system where, if there were enough none votes in a particular seat, that seat would remain without a member. And pollys don't control us, we decide if they get the bums rush at the ballot box or not. They do control us if what you say is true. Even sillier than you usually manage. You don't even have compulsory voting so you are free to not vote whenever you like. But it has no effect. We are forced to have politicians. Because that works better than mob rule. Says who? We never get to vote for mob rule. 99% of what politicians do hinders us not helps us. You'd never have got any benefits without them and would have ended up dead. I'd also have paid no ****ing taxes and be a lot better off. And I'd say a very large number of people just hate all politicians equally **** all are that stupid. A large number actually. Consider all those who don't vote. and would sooner vote for nobody. Makes more sense to not vote if you arent interest in politics or have decided that none of those you can vote for are any use. But that serves no purpose. You just end up with the politician that others vote for. And no one controls you anyway, we get to give them the bums rush at the ballot box if they **** up badly enough. And vote in someone equally ****. You just said that the torys are doing better because they pulled the plug on child benefits for more than 2 brats. Can't even manage a consistent line in mindless silly bull****. There's not that much difference between them. Brilliant.... Even you should have noticed what happened to Blair and Brown and their parasites. To be replaced with more morons. You just said that the torys are doing better because they pulled the plug on child benefits for more than 2 brats. Can't even manage a consistent line in mindless silly bull****. The record's stuck. What's wrong with freedom? Why should we have anyone in charge? No one is in charge. Govts don't control a damned thing. They create the laws we have to follow Nope, we are free to change who the govt is and get the laws we want instead. To another equally **** government. You just said that the torys are doing better because they pulled the plug on child benefits for more than 2 brats. Can't even manage a consistent line in mindless silly bull****. The record's still stuck. or their police come after us. How odd that they don't when you flout the road laws. They do, I'm just good enough to avoid the ****s. They clearly don't control even how you drive. They try. I'm just smarter than they are. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Hardly any of the chav masses bother to vote at all. Cite. Look at the voting stats where the chav masses 'live' They are evenly scattered, Like hell they are. I've looked on the internet, they are everywhere. But not EVENLY SCATTERED. Pretty much so. Nothing even remotely. Cite. The census. Link? Even you should be able to use google to find that. I'm not going to do stuff as basic as that for you. I've looked before. The census isn't that detailed. Bull**** it isnt. You want to prove your point, you show me the link. Go and **** yourself, again. Lazy. Prove otherwise. Look at the census data. Gimme a link. Even you should be able to find that yourself. Have done in the past and there are chavs everywhere. But nothing even remotely like EVENLY SCATTERED. Even you should have noticed that there are a lot more in the council estates or the worst of the Glasgow slums than around Buck House etc. I've looked at stats on the internet, and was surprised to find they are everywhere. Not EVENLY DISTRIBUTED they arent. Yes they are. Then you wont have any trouble citing the evidence for that. My experience. I thought there were a lot here, but apparently they're all over the place. Not EVENLY DISTRIBUTED they arent. Yes they are. Then you wont have any trouble citing the evidence for that. And stop repeating yourself. Go and **** yourself, again. Got nothing more interesting to say? therefore there are no such stats. Even sillier than you usually manage. Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? Corse they do, but it doesn't matter what they want, it isnt going to happen. Giving them more money will help. Nope, they don't bother to vote. They will vote for whoever gives them the most benefits. They don't bother to vote. Prove it. Look at the percentage who bother to vote. 2/3rds isn't it? Varys with what is going on politically. Not by much. By a hell of a lot actually. The same third are to lazy to vote. Even sillier than you usually manage. They have no interest in politics and realise that who gets elected is almost completely irrelevant. No, they're just thick or ignorant or lazy. Even sillier than you usually manage. They have no interest in politics and realise that who gets elected is almost completely irrelevant. Precisely my point further up. Nope. Its only a minority that believe that. All those who don't vote believe that. I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, Yep, its only the toffs that vote tory in scotland and there are only enough of those to get a couple of torys elected. A lot of Scots are ****ed off with the SNP, But those don't vote tory, you watch. Nobody else to vote for. They wont vote, you watch. hopefully they won't all vote SNP next time. They are in fact much more likely to do that next time because most of them are actually stupid enough to want to stay in the EU and SNP wants that and the torys have noticed that the majority of voters who bothered to vote voted to leave and decided to do what they voted for. Actually most of the remoaners are in London, not Scotland. Irrelevant to the fact that most in scotland don't want to leave the EU. Scots aren't that bright. They can't even talk properly. And didn't even manage to invent pants, or underware. Underwear is pointless unless you have some kind of problem of being really smelly. You run the same stupid line about clothes. Different reason. Clothes are not needed in warm blooded mammals. You wouldn't last long in the artic or Antarctic without them. Try it. Please. Shivering won't kill me, No clothes outside in the Artic or Antarctic will. Try it. Please. Look up warm blooded you ignorant fool. Look up all those who have died in the snow and after they have fallen into freezing water, ****wit. Probably drowned or eaten by bears. and we all know she ****ed things up royally. But you lot vote SNP anyway if you do bother to vote. SNP are communist arseholes, hopefully most of us have realised this now. Even if they have, they will vote for them anyway, you watch. Why would anyone vote for an arsehole? Because they like the alternatives even less. There is no other possible explanation for why scotland has returned almost no one except the SNP. Scots are so stupid as to vote for anyone who claims to make Scotland more important than the UK. Patriotic idiots.... They did get a lot more out of the english that way. Yip, the English are quite gullible. Not gullible so much as that they didn't want Scotland to leave. That;'s because they're stupid. They would have ended up losing a drain on their money. Just as true of the dregs of any country. Hardly any of them are happy for them to leave tho. Scotland saps money form England. Why would England want to keep us? Because that is where quite a bit of the gas comes from, In the entire world?! What england uses. They are free to buy from any other country. where they keep Trident, Easy enough to move it. Nope, no one is actually stupid enough to want to live near what is absolutely certain to be the target of nukes if the **** ever does hit the fan. Not my problem. where Liz and Phil choose to posture quite a bit of the time, presumably because that is where her mum came from, etc etc etc. Hardly the end of the world if they can't. Sure, but hardly the end of the world if scotland stays in britain either. We steal all their money. I'm sure they'd prefer the dryer English countryside. They don't. Probly because England is full of immigrunts, no countryside left. Too stupid to do what the Romans did, have a wall to keep them out. Even that fool Trump worked that one out. Trump is not a fool. Corse he is. He's never going to get Mexico to pay for that wall, you watch. So what? So he's that big of a fool. His ideas are far better than anyone else. Name 10 that are. Getting rid of immigrunts. Not even possible. Why not? And you are an immigrant. I was born here. -- The Official MBA Handbook on business cards: Avoid overly pretentious job titles such as "Lord of the Realm, Defender of the Faith, Emperor of India" or "Director of Corporate Planning." |
#197
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
General election
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 13 May 2017 20:51:48 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Sat, 13 May 2017 02:30:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:37:06 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:29:05 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news On Wed, 10 May 2017 23:47:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message news Labour are stupid. All politicians are stupid. Yes, which is why there should be a place to vote for "none" on the ballot papers. No point in farting around with a ballot paper, just don't vote. That supplies no information, It supplys the information that you arent interest in voting. They don't care. Neither would they with your stupid system, they'd just ignore the fools that tick your box. Not if it was made as valid a choice as any of the MPs. Corse they would just ignore that. Not if they'd put it there. Corse they would still just ignore it, just like they do with the loony partys that never have a hope in hell of getting elected. They just multiply the votes up to the population. Like hell they do. What on earth do you think they do? Work out who got the most votes and that one gets to be the MP. Even you should have been able to work that out. Obviously not. Same thing. Nope. Nothing even remotely like it. If 70% of the population vote, they just use those votes to decide the outcome of the election. So there is no multiply involved. It is if you think about it. Even sillier than you usually manage. and they simply act on the results from those who do vote. They would do that even if there was a place to vote none on the ballot paper. If we had a "none" entry, then there would be the possibility of no arsehole controlling us. Nope, because even you should have noticed that no polly would ever be stupid enough to have a system where, if there were enough none votes in a particular seat, that seat would remain without a member. And pollys don't control us, we decide if they get the bums rush at the ballot box or not. They do control us if what you say is true. Even sillier than you usually manage. You don't even have compulsory voting so you are free to not vote whenever you like. But it has no effect. We are forced to have politicians. Because that works better than mob rule. Says who? Anyone who has ever had a look at mob rule. We never get to vote for mob rule. It happens at times anyway. 99% of what politicians do hinders us not helps us. You'd never have got any benefits without them and would have ended up dead. I'd also have paid no ****ing taxes Corse you would have, those imposed by the mob. That's what happens with mob rule. and be a lot better off. We'd be a lot better off with you dead, certainly. And I'd say a very large number of people just hate all politicians equally **** all are that stupid. A large number actually. **** all hate all politicians EQUALLY. Even you have noticed that the Torys arent quite as bad as Labour. Consider all those who don't vote. Most of those arent interested in politics and plenty of them have enough of a clue to have noticed that their vote will not make the slightest difference and plenty more don't get who gets to be the govt because they have noticed that there isnt a huge difference between the result they get whoever wins. and would sooner vote for nobody. Makes more sense to not vote if you arent interest in politics or have decided that none of those you can vote for are any use. But that serves no purpose. Same with voting any way you vote. You just end up with the politician that others vote for. Just as true of voting for anyone. Your one vote is completely irrelevant to who gets to be your MP, let alone which party gets to be the govt. And no one controls you anyway, we get to give them the bums rush at the ballot box if they **** up badly enough. And vote in someone equally ****. You just said that the torys are doing better because they pulled the plug on child benefits for more than 2 brats. Can't even manage a consistent line in mindless silly bull****. There's not that much difference between them. Sure, and that's why so many don't bother to vote. Doesn't mean that they are actually stupid enough to prefer mob rule and no govt at all. Brilliant.... Even you should have noticed what happened to Blair and Brown and their parasites. To be replaced with more morons. You just said that the torys are doing better because they pulled the plug on child benefits for more than 2 brats. Can't even manage a consistent line in mindless silly bull****. The record's stuck. Can't even manage its own lines or to get a viable job either. What's wrong with freedom? Why should we have anyone in charge? No one is in charge. Govts don't control a damned thing. They create the laws we have to follow Nope, we are free to change who the govt is and get the laws we want instead. To another equally **** government. You just said that the torys are doing better because they pulled the plug on child benefits for more than 2 brats. Can't even manage a consistent line in mindless silly bull****. The record's still stuck. Can't even manage its own lines or to get a viable job either. or their police come after us. How odd that they don't when you flout the road laws. They do, I'm just good enough to avoid the ****s. They clearly don't control even how you drive. They try. I'm just smarter than they are. Nope, its impossible to stop all flouting of the road rules. Just enough to appease the chav masses. They don't vote tory anyway. Ok, the ones who are slightly better off than that, vote Tory, but still care for their chav relations. Hardly any of the chav masses bother to vote at all. Cite. Look at the voting stats where the chav masses 'live' They are evenly scattered, Like hell they are. I've looked on the internet, they are everywhere. But not EVENLY SCATTERED. Pretty much so. Nothing even remotely. Cite. The census. Link? Even you should be able to use google to find that. I'm not going to do stuff as basic as that for you. I've looked before. The census isn't that detailed. Bull**** it isnt. You want to prove your point, you show me the link. Go and **** yourself, again. Lazy. Any 2 year old could leave that for dead. Prove otherwise. Look at the census data. Gimme a link. Even you should be able to find that yourself. Have done in the past and there are chavs everywhere. But nothing even remotely like EVENLY SCATTERED. Even you should have noticed that there are a lot more in the council estates or the worst of the Glasgow slums than around Buck House etc. I've looked at stats on the internet, and was surprised to find they are everywhere. Not EVENLY DISTRIBUTED they arent. Yes they are. Then you wont have any trouble citing the evidence for that. My experience. You have no experience what so ever on that. I thought there were a lot here, but apparently they're all over the place. Not EVENLY DISTRIBUTED they arent. Yes they are. Then you wont have any trouble citing the evidence for that. And stop repeating yourself. Go and **** yourself, again. Got nothing more interesting to say? Pathetic excuses for trolls don't qualify. therefore there are no such stats. Even sillier than you usually manage. Or maybe the Tories want the chavs to start voting for them too? Corse they do, but it doesn't matter what they want, it isnt going to happen. Giving them more money will help. Nope, they don't bother to vote. They will vote for whoever gives them the most benefits. They don't bother to vote. Prove it. Look at the percentage who bother to vote. 2/3rds isn't it? Varys with what is going on politically. Not by much. By a hell of a lot actually. The same third are to lazy to vote. Even sillier than you usually manage. They have no interest in politics and realise that who gets elected is almost completely irrelevant. No, they're just thick or ignorant or lazy. Even sillier than you usually manage. They have no interest in politics and realise that who gets elected is almost completely irrelevant. Precisely my point further up. Nope. Its only a minority that believe that. All those who don't vote believe that. Even sillier than you usually manage. I mean the other alternative in Scotland is SNP, Yep, its only the toffs that vote tory in scotland and there are only enough of those to get a couple of torys elected. A lot of Scots are ****ed off with the SNP, But those don't vote tory, you watch. Nobody else to vote for. They wont vote, you watch. hopefully they won't all vote SNP next time. They are in fact much more likely to do that next time because most of them are actually stupid enough to want to stay in the EU and SNP wants that and the torys have noticed that the majority of voters who bothered to vote voted to leave and decided to do what they voted for. Actually most of the remoaners are in London, not Scotland. Irrelevant to the fact that most in scotland don't want to leave the EU. Scots aren't that bright. They can't even talk properly. And didn't even manage to invent pants, or underware. Underwear is pointless unless you have some kind of problem of being really smelly. You run the same stupid line about clothes. Different reason. Clothes are not needed in warm blooded mammals. You wouldn't last long in the artic or Antarctic without them. Try it. Please. Shivering won't kill me, No clothes outside in the Artic or Antarctic will. Try it. Please. Look up warm blooded you ignorant fool. Look up all those who have died in the snow and after they have fallen into freezing water, ****wit. Probably drowned or eaten by bears. No bears in the antarctic. and we all know she ****ed things up royally. But you lot vote SNP anyway if you do bother to vote. SNP are communist arseholes, hopefully most of us have realised this now. Even if they have, they will vote for them anyway, you watch. Why would anyone vote for an arsehole? Because they like the alternatives even less. There is no other possible explanation for why scotland has returned almost no one except the SNP. Scots are so stupid as to vote for anyone who claims to make Scotland more important than the UK. Patriotic idiots.... They did get a lot more out of the english that way. Yip, the English are quite gullible. Not gullible so much as that they didn't want Scotland to leave. That;'s because they're stupid. They would have ended up losing a drain on their money. Just as true of the dregs of any country. Hardly any of them are happy for them to leave tho. Scotland saps money form England. Why would England want to keep us? Because that is where quite a bit of the gas comes from, In the entire world?! What england uses. They are free to buy from any other country. Nope, most don't have any way to export gas. where they keep Trident, Easy enough to move it. Nope, no one is actually stupid enough to want to live near what is absolutely certain to be the target of nukes if the **** ever does hit the fan. Not my problem. But that means they cant move them there. where Liz and Phil choose to posture quite a bit of the time, presumably because that is where her mum came from, etc etc etc. Hardly the end of the world if they can't. Sure, but hardly the end of the world if scotland stays in britain either. We steal all their money. Not even possible. I'm sure they'd prefer the dryer English countryside. They don't. Probly because England is full of immigrunts, no countryside left. Even sillier than you usually manage. Too stupid to do what the Romans did, have a wall to keep them out. Even that fool Trump worked that one out. Trump is not a fool. Corse he is. He's never going to get Mexico to pay for that wall, you watch. So what? So he's that big of a fool. His ideas are far better than anyone else. Name 10 that are. Getting rid of immigrunts. Not even possible. Why not? The whole ****ing country is immigrants, just immigrated at different times. And you are an immigrant. I was born here. Not all your ancestors did, so you are the spawn of immigrants. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT election | Woodworking | |||
DIY and the election | UK diy | |||
Difference between General 50-250 and General 350 table saws? | Woodworking |