Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
Don't know about toothbrushes by I'm 66 at present.
Brian -- ----- - This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please! "critcher" wrote in message news Would I be correct in assuming that most of the posters and readers on this ng are of a mature age. i.e. 55 - 80 yrs. It is difficult to guess age from a posting, but from the info given out, there seems to be an abundance of wisdom here. |
#42
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
In message , Bob Eager
writes On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:57:40 +0000, John Rumm wrote: On 21/03/2017 17:59, Roger Mills wrote: On 21/03/2017 16:46, www.GymRatZ.co.uk wrote: On 21/03/2017 15:54, Bill Wright wrote: The young are the ones with the cranky attitudes. The reason being that they're brainwashed. I'm 68. Is anyone here younger than me? Almost everyone I shouldn't wonder. Although there used to be an "older lady" here that used to gripe about her grumpy/useless husband and his DIY.... She was called Florence or Ethel, or Mildred or some such other. Last heard of chopping down a cherry tree and chasing her chickens around the yard IIRC... You mean Mary Fisher, aka "oldhenwife" - who always referred to her other half as "spouse". Haven't seen her lately. Bill is certainly not the oldest at 68 - I can give him 6 years - and I'm sure there are lots older than me. As others have said, usenet probably doesn't appeal to the younger generation. I have been posting here since I was in my 30's! I've been on Usenet since I was 31 (in 1982). Usenet arrived here because my children wanted to read and post about Eddie Izzard! I'm in the low '70's but can claim to have met 3 uk.d-i-y posters:-) -- Tim Lamb |
#43
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
John Rumm wrote:
(I think my first usenet posts must have been mid 90's) Me too. Currently 68. As I remarked the other day, if my planned redecoration of hall, stairs & landing last as long as the present stuff, I will be 85 by the next time it needs doing. I wonder if I will still be using ladders by then? Chris -- Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK Plant amazing Acers. |
#44
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
Hardly a regular poster, but I've been a regular reader for many years. I'm currently 47.
Been using usenet since the early 1990s (the FreeServe days). Via Google Groups these days because it remembers what I've read across the various half-dozen or so computers / tablets I regularly use at work / home. David |
#46
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On 21-Mar-17 8:13 PM, R D S wrote:
On 21/03/17 20:03, Chris Bartram wrote: Am I relatively young here, then, at 47? 43 here. I feel like a child. alt.paedophilia is that way - :-) -- -- Colin Bignell |
#47
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On 21/03/2017 20:26, Phil L wrote:
R D S wrote: On 21/03/17 20:03, Chris Bartram wrote: Am I relatively young here, then, at 47? 43 here. I feel like a child. 43? - have you just got off your skateboard? 50 and a half here and still able to out-skateboard/trampoline/dive/run/cycle/insert any physical activity here my 15 year old zombified son. |
#48
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
In message ,
writes 50 and a half here and still able to out-skateboard/trampoline/dive/run/cycle/insert any physical activity here my 15 year old zombified son. You have one of those too? Sits in front of multiple screens, in the dark, for 24 hours a day, if allowed. 'I'm revising!' Lying little ****ehound. -- Graeme |
#49
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:38:32 +0000, Chris J Dixon
wrote: As I remarked the other day, if my planned redecoration of hall, stairs & landing last as long as the present stuff, I will be 85 by the next time it needs doing. I wonder if I will still be using ladders by then? Chris By then you may be able to achieve the same result just by taking your glasses off. G.Harman |
#50
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
wrote:
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:38:32 +0000, Chris J Dixon wrote: As I remarked the other day, if my planned redecoration of hall, stairs & landing last as long as the present stuff, I will be 85 by the next time it needs doing. I wonder if I will still be using ladders by then? By then you may be able to achieve the same result just by taking your glasses off. :-) As the old adage says, if you can't face reality, adjust your perception. Chris -- Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK Plant amazing Acers. |
#51
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:29:20 +0000, Tim Lamb wrote:
In message , Bob Eager writes On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:57:40 +0000, John Rumm wrote: On 21/03/2017 17:59, Roger Mills wrote: On 21/03/2017 16:46, www.GymRatZ.co.uk wrote: On 21/03/2017 15:54, Bill Wright wrote: The young are the ones with the cranky attitudes. The reason being that they're brainwashed. I'm 68. Is anyone here younger than me? Almost everyone I shouldn't wonder. Although there used to be an "older lady" here that used to gripe about her grumpy/useless husband and his DIY.... She was called Florence or Ethel, or Mildred or some such other. Last heard of chopping down a cherry tree and chasing her chickens around the yard IIRC... You mean Mary Fisher, aka "oldhenwife" - who always referred to her other half as "spouse". Haven't seen her lately. Bill is certainly not the oldest at 68 - I can give him 6 years - and I'm sure there are lots older than me. As others have said, usenet probably doesn't appeal to the younger generation. I have been posting here since I was in my 30's! I've been on Usenet since I was 31 (in 1982). Usenet arrived here because my children wanted to read and post about Eddie Izzard! I'm in the low '70's but can claim to have met 3 uk.d-i-y posters:-) I've met two Tims, and probably one or two others. And some used to be students of mine... -- My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message. Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor |
#52
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On 21/03/2017 15:42, Jeff Layman wrote:
AFAIAA the only decent app for android which allows you to post as well as read is Piaohong. And that is not quite free Groundhog works OK, and is free. -- Reentrant |
#53
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:23:42 +0000, Graeme wrote:
my 15 year old zombified son. Only 'cause you let him... You have one of those too? Sits in front of multiple screens, in the dark, for 24 hours a day, if allowed. 'I'm revising!' Lying little ****ehound. The Lad used to sit in front of a screen most waking hours when not in lessons. Just started his A levels away from home, took his computer the first term, brought it home at Christmas, didn't take it back!! Too much of a distraction. He does have smart phone and laptop but he's not set up mail on either and keeps the laptop as a pure school work machine. -- Cheers Dave. |
#54
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 23:45:32 +0000, John Rumm wrote:
I have been posting here since I was in my 30's! I've been on Usenet since I was 31 (in 1982). I was still at school ;-) Been working 4 years but I didn't do the uni bit, just A levels. (I think my first usenet posts must have been mid 90's) Possibly late 80's, was CiX just it's own conferences or did it gateway to usenet as well? Failing that early 90's when I became a founder member of Demon Internet. -- Cheers Dave. |
#55
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On 22/03/17 09:02, David wrote:
Hardly a regular poster, but I've been a regular reader for many years. I'm currently 47. Been using usenet since the early 1990s (the FreeServe days). Via Google Groups these days because it remembers what I've read across the various half-dozen or so computers / tablets I regularly use at work / home. 51. -- Adrian C |
#56
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:58:32 +0000, John Rumm wrote:
(*) I once compared how much formating and "eye candy" came down with 10 1 kB of messages on a fairly plain web forum. Well over 100 kB... Much of the bulk is not only advertising, and analyic data for the forum owner, but huge complex tracking operations by google and others to link up your various online activities and log them. Running "NoScript" can reduce that quite a bit. Reduces the tracking but you still have to download it. -- Cheers Dave. |
#57
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On 21/03/2017 20:13, R D S wrote:
On 21/03/17 20:03, Chris Bartram wrote: Am I relatively young here, then, at 47? 43 here. I feel like a child. There was a disc jockey who said, "I feel like a 16 year old boy: but where would I find one this time of day?" -- Max Demian |
#58
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On 22/03/2017 09:23, Graeme wrote:
50 and a half here and still able to out-skateboard/trampoline/dive/run/cycle/insert any physical activity here my 15 year old zombified son. You have one of those too? Sits in front of multiple screens, in the dark, for 24 hours a day, if allowed. 'I'm revising!' Lying little ****ehound. I do indeed - you've described his actions exactly. All his "devices" IP addresses are disconnected from internet at 21:30 Sunday to Thursday after which he practices his piano. His bedroom has blackout curtains and he's got skype going on one device, snapchat on another, X-Box in the other ear whilst listening to his spotify playlists... but of course he's doing his homework! If nothing else at least he's developing the skill of multi-tasking.. Can't fault his aptitude for getting free stuff from Amazon in exchange for "reviews" and tracking down Amazon incorrectly priced items... Told him to set up a website called ScAmazon where pricing errors are posted. Providing he's only screwing Amazon and not Amazon re-sellers who are already being screwed by Amazon I don't have any issues with it. Apparently they grow out of it, no doubt when driving, chicks and alcohol become more interesting (not all at the same time hopefully) |
#59
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
In message l.net,
Dave Liquorice writes Failing that early 90's when I became a founder member of Demon Internet. Blimey. I was fairly early to Demon, but not that early. I did manage to get selected for early ADSL trials with Demon, and enjoyed a year of ADSL at tenner a month prices. Malcolm Muir was my hero :-) -- Graeme |
#60
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
In message , www.GymRatZ.co.uk
writes All his "devices" IP addresses are disconnected from internet at 21:30 Sunday to Thursday after which he practices his piano. His bedroom has blackout curtains and he's got skype going on one device, snapchat on another, X-Box in the other ear whilst listening to his spotify playlists... but of course he's doing his homework! If nothing else at least he's developing the skill of multi-tasking.. I just read that to my wife, who laughed knowingly ... -- Graeme |
#61
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On 22/03/2017 10:45, Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 23:45:32 +0000, John Rumm wrote: I have been posting here since I was in my 30's! I've been on Usenet since I was 31 (in 1982). I was still at school ;-) Been working 4 years but I didn't do the uni bit, just A levels. (I think my first usenet posts must have been mid 90's) Possibly late 80's, was CiX just it's own conferences or did it gateway to usenet as well? Failing that early 90's when I became a founder member of Demon Internet. Late 80's I was using BBS and posting messages on fidonet... I did not join demon until a couple of years after their formation. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#62
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On 22/03/2017 10:46, Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:58:32 +0000, John Rumm wrote: (*) I once compared how much formating and "eye candy" came down with 10 1 kB of messages on a fairly plain web forum. Well over 100 kB... Much of the bulk is not only advertising, and analyic data for the forum owner, but huge complex tracking operations by google and others to link up your various online activities and log them. Running "NoScript" can reduce that quite a bit. Reduces the tracking but you still have to download it. I get the impression it blocks some of the tracking scripts before download as well - so reduces the volume of stuff transferred. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#63
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On 22/03/2017 11:34, Huge wrote:
On 2017-03-22, Graeme wrote: In message l.net, Dave Liquorice writes Failing that early 90's when I became a founder member of Demon Internet. Blimey. I was fairly early to Demon, but not that early. I did manage to get selected for early ADSL trials with Demon, and enjoyed a year of ADSL at tenner a month prices. Malcolm Muir was my hero :-) I can't recall when I got my Demon account. I was certainly running KA9Q on MS-DOS on dialup. Shortly replaced by a SPARCstation 1+. I even wrote the FAQ on connecting it to Demon with dial-on-demand. Perhaps the "good old days" weren't that good after all. Now that is a blast from the past... I remember setting up an Amiga with a port of KA9Q when we first got a demon account. ISTR it was a bit awkward to use, and I ditched it as soon as I got a standalone TCP/IP stack setup and running (in the days where you had to pay real money to buy such things!) Also the joys of having no receive mail protocols supported on demon at the time, and needing to run a SMTP server to accept incoming email ;-) -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#64
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On 21/03/2017 15:54, Bill Wright wrote:
On 21/03/2017 15:42, Jeff Layman wrote: On 21/03/17 15:18, newshound wrote: On 3/21/2017 3:14 PM, critcher wrote: Would I be correct in assuming that most of the posters and readers on this ng are of a mature age. i.e. 55 - 80 yrs. It is difficult to guess age from a posting, but from the info given out, there seems to be an abundance of wisdom here. And a fair number of cranky attitudes too. The young are the ones with the cranky attitudes. The reason being that they're brainwashed. I'm 68. Is anyone here younger than me? Bill quite a few older I believe Bill. |
#65
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On 21/03/2017 16:52, PeterC wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:14:04 +0000, critcher wrote: Would I be correct in assuming that most of the posters and readers on this ng are of a mature age. i.e. 55 - 80 yrs. It is difficult to guess age from a posting, but from the info given out, there seems to be an abundance of wisdom here. I'm 70 on Article 50 day - I'd rather be 50 on Article 70 day! But it seems that your mind never grows old like your body does. When you attempt what was easy 10 years ago, the inability of your body to carry out the tasks asked of it reminds you of your real age. |
#66
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
In message , Huge
writes . I even wrote the FAQ on connecting it to Demon with dial-on-demand. Perhaps the "good old days" weren't that good after all. Which rather brings the discussion full circle, at least in terms of Usenet, and the death thereof. Yes, we all remember dial up, typing replies, briefly connecting, uploading one's own replies, downloading everyone else's, reading then repeat all evening. Online forums and social media as youngsters know them now would just not work under those circumstances. Usenet and mailing lists were perfect for the circumstances. -- Graeme |
#67
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On Tuesday, 21 March 2017 20:13:02 UTC, R D S wrote:
On 21/03/17 20:03, Chris Bartram wrote: Am I relatively young here, then, at 47? 43 here. I feel like a child. You're being groomed ;-) |
#68
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 3:54:45 PM UTC, Bill Wright wrote:
On 21/03/2017 15:42, Jeff Layman wrote: On 21/03/17 15:18, newshound wrote: On 3/21/2017 3:14 PM, critcher wrote: Would I be correct in assuming that most of the posters and readers on this ng are of a mature age. i.e. 55 - 80 yrs. It is difficult to guess age from a posting, but from the info given out, there seems to be an abundance of wisdom here. And a fair number of cranky attitudes too. The young are the ones with the cranky attitudes. The reason being that they're brainwashed. I'm 68. Is anyone here younger than me? Bill Yes, 62 Robert |
#69
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 10:35:55 AM UTC, Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:23:42 +0000, Graeme wrote: my 15 year old zombified son. Only 'cause you let him... You have one of those too? Sits in front of multiple screens, in the dark, for 24 hours a day, if allowed. 'I'm revising!' Lying little ****ehound. The Lad used to sit in front of a screen most waking hours when not in lessons. Just started his A levels away from home, took his computer the first term, brought it home at Christmas, didn't take it back!! Too much of a distraction. He does have smart phone and laptop but he's not set up mail on either and keeps the laptop as a pure school work machine. -- Cheers Dave. A sign of the times: My 11 year old daughter has been given an iPad by her secondary school (the local comp) with all her intake. In fact all the pupils at the school have them (supplied by the school). The school uses it for sending out homework, lesson materials and general info. Also when she has done her homework she just photographs it and sends it in on the iPad. It also provides a 'social media' environment that is well-policed. Although itcan access the internet it does so via a closely controlled gateway. It seems to work pretty well. Robert |
#70
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 8:38:35 AM UTC, Chris J Dixon wrote:
John Rumm wrote: (I think my first usenet posts must have been mid 90's) Me too. Currently 68. As I remarked the other day, if my planned redecoration of hall, stairs & landing last as long as the present stuff, I will be 85 by the next time it needs doing. I wonder if I will still be using ladders by then? Was it Sophia Lauren who, at the age of 75, was asked by an interviewer "at what age do women lose interest in sex". She replied "I don't know, I'll ask my mother". Robert |
#71
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 12:35:38 PM UTC, Graeme wrote:
In message , Huge writes . I even wrote the FAQ on connecting it to Demon with dial-on-demand. Perhaps the "good old days" weren't that good after all. Which rather brings the discussion full circle, at least in terms of Usenet, and the death thereof. Yes, we all remember dial up, typing replies, briefly connecting, uploading one's own replies, downloading everyone else's, reading then repeat all evening. Online forums and social media as youngsters know them now would just not work under those circumstances. Usenet and mailing lists were perfect for the circumstances. and do people remember the days when you had to download 'artistic photographs' in lots of pieces and then cobble them together? I don't remember the name of the group but its subtitle was "gigabytes of copyright violations". Robert |
#72
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
Huge wrote:
On 2017-03-22, John Rumm wrote: [21 lines snipped] Also the joys of having no receive mail protocols supported on demon at the time, and needing to run a SMTP server to accept incoming email ;-) Arrrgh, 'sendmail'. Hideous, hideous, hideous. Although I switched to Postfix quite quickly. That was before Turnpike, then? -- Roger Hayter |
#73
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On 3/22/2017 8:52 AM, Huge wrote:
On 2017-03-22, Graeme wrote: In message , Huge writes . I even wrote the FAQ on connecting it to Demon with dial-on-demand. Perhaps the "good old days" weren't that good after all. Which rather brings the discussion full circle, at least in terms of Usenet, and the death thereof. Yes, we all remember dial up, typing replies, briefly connecting, uploading one's own replies, downloading everyone else's, reading then repeat all evening. Online forums and social media as youngsters know them now would just not work under those circumstances. Usenet and mailing lists were perfect for the circumstances. Facebook is Usenet with pictures. But the 'threading' is inadequate. |
#74
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On 22/03/2017 13:50, S Viemeister wrote:
On 3/22/2017 8:52 AM, Huge wrote: On 2017-03-22, Graeme wrote: In message , Huge writes . I even wrote the FAQ on connecting it to Demon with dial-on-demand. Perhaps the "good old days" weren't that good after all. Which rather brings the discussion full circle, at least in terms of Usenet, and the death thereof. Yes, we all remember dial up, typing replies, briefly connecting, uploading one's own replies, downloading everyone else's, reading then repeat all evening. Online forums and social media as youngsters know them now would just not work under those circumstances. Usenet and mailing lists were perfect for the circumstances. Facebook is Usenet with pictures. But the 'threading' is inadequate. And the interface is incredibly ****. |
#75
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
In article ,
Huge wrote: On 2017-03-22, Graeme wrote: In message , Huge writes . I even wrote the FAQ on connecting it to Demon with dial-on-demand. Perhaps the "good old days" weren't that good after all. Which rather brings the discussion full circle, at least in terms of Usenet, and the death thereof. Yes, we all remember dial up, typing replies, briefly connecting, uploading one's own replies, downloading everyone else's, reading then repeat all evening. Online forums and social media as youngsters know them now would just not work under those circumstances. Usenet and mailing lists were perfect for the circumstances. Facebook is Usenet with pictures. Not really. You select the people and subjects you are interested in. No Facebook group I subscribe to would put up with the amount of OT stuff on here. Or any forum, come to that. -- *60-year-old, one owner - needs parts, make offer Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#76
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
newshound explained :
On 3/21/2017 3:14 PM, critcher wrote: Would I be correct in assuming that most of the posters and readers on this ng are of a mature age. i.e. 55 - 80 yrs. It is difficult to guess age from a posting, but from the info given out, there seems to be an abundance of wisdom here. And a fair number of cranky attitudes too. Usenet does not have the traffic it once did; my suspicion is that the younger element congregate to what might be perceived as the slightly more social environment of the web based bulletin boards, plus of course the social media. I didn't discover Usenet until the early 2000's, I had heard of it, but just couldn't work out how to get to actually make use of it. I had used email and some home Internet via Free something-or-other for many years. Now I have a raft of devices all making use of my broadband, but I am always left wondering if I might be missing out on something, like I missed out on Usenet for many years. One thing I really ought to do, is get my head around setting up an email server, rather than the mess I have at present of each system grabbing mail from my accounts when its turned on. |
#77
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
On 22/03/2017 15:43, Harry Bloomfield wrote:
Now I have a raft of devices all making use of my broadband, but I am always left wondering if I might be missing out on something, like I missed out on Usenet for many years. One thing I really ought to do, is get my head around setting up an email server, rather than the mess I have at present of each system grabbing mail from my accounts when its turned on. You don't need a server just set the clients to use IMAP. |
#78
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
Tim Streater expressed precisely :
Sounds like each device you have is configured to delete mail from server once downloaded. You don't have to do that. You can configure each client to leave mail on server (i.e. never delete it), and have a "main" device which controls when mail *is* deleted. That is what I presently do, but I am conscious of the amount of mail I receive and limited space on the ISP's mail server. |
#79
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
"Pet @ www.gymratz.co.uk ;¬)" wrote in message news On 21/03/2017 20:26, Phil L wrote: R D S wrote: On 21/03/17 20:03, Chris Bartram wrote: Am I relatively young here, then, at 47? 43 here. I feel like a child. 43? - have you just got off your skateboard? 50 and a half here and still able to out-skateboard/trampoline/dive/run/cycle/insert any physical activity here my 15 year old zombified son. Bet he doesn’t agree. One kid was so disgusted at how badly his mother did at shootemup computer games that he proclaimed that he could do a lot better than she could with his eyes closed and then proceeded to prove that he could too }-( |
#80
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
age
"Graeme" wrote in message ... In message , writes 50 and a half here and still able to out-skateboard/trampoline/dive/run/cycle/insert any physical activity here my 15 year old zombified son. You have one of those too? Sits in front of multiple screens, in the dark, for 24 hours a day, if allowed. 'I'm revising!' Lying little ****ehound. He'll be picking your nursing home... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|