Virtue signalling JK Rowling to house "refugees" in one of her many mansions.
https://www.change.org/p/j-k-rowling...src-reason_msg

Has any celebrity making this promise actually kept it?

Actually, why should she?

I mean I have a spare room, but I'd not take anyone in unless there was a
national disaster. I feel it should be something organised by government
using willing individuals , not bits and pieces strung together this way
and that.


One of the main problems is that I've had experience of living with tenants
of the English kind, you get bad uns and good uns everywhere.
Brian

--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please!
"harry" wrote in message
...
Virtue signalling JK Rowling to house "refugees" in one of her many
mansions.
https://www.change.org/p/j-k-rowling...src-reason_msg

Has any celebrity making this promise actually kept it?

In article ,
harry writes:
Virtue signalling JK Rowling to house "refugees" in one of her many mansions.
https://www.change.org/p/j-k-rowling...src-reason_msg

How stupid.

"Since she is a sheltered member of the rich elite"...

Strange - she used to work for amnisty international, and she
was a broke single parent on benefits before writing Harry Potter.

She has said she has decided to stay in the UK (which costs her
loads in taxes she could easily save like many other celebrities
do by moving abroad), specifically to repay for the bad times UK
social security helped her through, and she is now also a
philanthropist.

Of all the people you might pick to moan about, Rowling is a
stunningly bad choice.

Has any celebrity making this promise actually kept it?

What promise?

How many homeless people are you putting up Harry?

-
Andrew Gabriel
[email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup]

On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 02:01:22 -0800, harry wrote:

Has any celebrity making this promise actually kept it?

These ****s really need to look at what's happening in places like Sweden
to see the real impact this kind of immigration is having on the host
country: https://www.rt.com/news/378142-swede...-rinkeby-fire/

On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:58:33 +0000, Huge wrote:

On 2017-02-21, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Brian Gaff
wrote:

Actually, why should she?

Lots of leftie luvvies were photographed with posters saying "refugees
welcome here". We're just asking them to put some of their copious
money where their mouths are.

They already do. It's called "tax".

You really are a prize ****ing idiot.

On Tuesday, 21 February 2017 17:23:21 UTC, Brian Gaff wrote:
Actually, why should she?

I mean I have a spare room, but I'd not take anyone in unless there was a
national disaster. I feel it should be something organised by government
using willing individuals , not bits and pieces strung together this way
and that.


One of the main problems is that I've had experience of living with tenants
of the English kind, you get bad uns and good uns everywhere.
Brian


The problem is she is advocating mass importation of these scroungers.
They won't be living anywhere near her.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHnj...ature=youtu.be

On Tuesday, 21 February 2017 18:42:24 UTC, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
In article ,
harry writes:
Virtue signalling JK Rowling to house "refugees" in one of her many mansions.
https://www.change.org/p/j-k-rowling...src-reason_msg

How stupid.

"Since she is a sheltered member of the rich elite"...

Strange - she used to work for amnisty international, and she
was a broke single parent on benefits before writing Harry Potter.

She has said she has decided to stay in the UK (which costs her
loads in taxes she could easily save like many other celebrities
do by moving abroad), specifically to repay for the bad times UK
social security helped her through, and she is now also a
philanthropist.

Of all the people you might pick to moan about, Rowling is a
stunningly bad choice.

Has any celebrity making this promise actually kept it?

What promise?
Several promised to house refugees in their own homes.
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/lat...ee-home-pledge

How many homeless people are you putting up Harry?

None.
Our own homeless are homeless as a result of decisions they took earlier.
eg Bunking off school and not doing homework.
I don't give a **** about them.
They made their own bed.

I'm not interested in housing foreign scroungers, rapists, murderers, muggers or terrorists I know nothing about.

In article ,
Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Brian Gaff
wrote:

Actually, why should she?

Lots of leftie luvvies were photographed with posters saying "refugees
welcome here". We're just asking them to put some of their copious
money where their mouths are.

See you've decided to speak for others again. A sign of gross insecurity.

--
*Where there's a will, I want to be in it.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

In article , Brian Gaff
writes
Actually, why should she?

Because she said she would..and so did Sturgeon.
I mean I have a spare room, but I'd not take anyone in unless there was a
national disaster. I feel it should be something organised by government
using willing individuals , not bits and pieces strung together this way
and that.


One of the main problems is that I've had experience of living with tenants
of the English kind, you get bad uns and good uns everywhere.
Brian


--
bert

On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:11:43 +0000, Huge wrote:

Someone told me she's dropped out of the "100 Richest in the UK" due to
the amount of it she's given away.

Tax dodge most likely.