Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How reliable is non-magnetic test for Stainless Steel?
I've always found that MOST stainless steel has little or no attraction
to a magnet. How reliable is this test? Is there quality stainless steel that IS drawn to magnets? Why is most stainless steel not attracted to magnets? While we're on the subject of stainless steel, what are it's general properties aside from not rusting due to oxidation? Is or can it be as hard as tool grade steels? Are there some neat links where I can find out about different kinds of steel? This has always been a facinating topic to me. Dan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How reliable is non-magnetic test for Stainless Steel?
Dan Musicant wrote:
I've always found that MOST stainless steel has little or no attraction to a magnet. How reliable is this test? Is there quality stainless steel that IS drawn to magnets? Why is most stainless steel not attracted to magnets? While we're on the subject of stainless steel, what are it's general properties aside from not rusting due to oxidation? Is or can it be as hard as tool grade steels? Are there some neat links where I can find out about different kinds of steel? This has always been a facinating topic to me. Dan Austenitic stainless steel is not magnetic. It has to do with the grain structure. If you heat any steel up to its austenitic phase it will lose is attraction to magnets. Other grades of stainless like martensitic and precipitation hardening stainless are attracted to magnets. They are both hardenable by heat treatment too. Fred |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
How reliable is non-magnetic test for Stainless Steel?
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 17:36:54 GMT, Dan Musicant wrote:
I've always found that MOST stainless steel has little or no attraction to a magnet. How reliable is this test? Not very. Is there quality stainless steel that IS drawn to magnets? Yes. 400 series stainless is magnetic. 300 series is not. Why is most stainless steel not attracted to magnets? The 300 series has a different grain structure (austenitic) which won't form magnetic domains (this is the form regular steel takes when heated above the Curie point). The 400 series has a martensite grain structure which will allow magnetic domains to form. The 400 series is also heat treatable. It is what is used for stainless knife blades. While we're on the subject of stainless steel, what are it's general properties aside from not rusting due to oxidation? Is or can it be as hard as tool grade steels? Are there some neat links where I can find out about different kinds of steel? This has always been a facinating topic to me. The 400 series can be hardened, but it can't be hardened quite as much as plain carbon steel of the same carbon content because of the presence of chromium (the latter is what makes it stainless). Gary |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
How reliable is non-magnetic test for Stainless Steel?
mikee wrote:
The 300 Series stainless steels are non-magnetic. With one exception. Work hardened 300 series is slightly magnetic. Test a SS spring and see, or test a thin piece of sheet before and after bending. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
How reliable is non-magnetic test for Stainless Steel?
I get that all the time about 302 stainless wire brushes. The drawing
process will cause attraction to a magnet. I imagine work-hardening or other physical manipulation to the stainless will do the same. I always tell people to spark-test suspected stainless and compare the sparks to known carbon steel. "Dan Musicant" wrote in message ... I've always found that MOST stainless steel has little or no attraction to a magnet. How reliable is this test? Is there quality stainless steel that IS drawn to magnets? Why is most stainless steel not attracted to magnets? While we're on the subject of stainless steel, what are it's general properties aside from not rusting due to oxidation? Is or can it be as hard as tool grade steels? Are there some neat links where I can find out about different kinds of steel? This has always been a facinating topic to me. Dan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
How reliable is non-magnetic test for Stainless Steel?
Thee is only one problem wih all these answers. They are all wrong.
300 series can be quite magnetic if work hardened. Try a magnet on SS wire rope sometime. I know of a batch of 304 SS that could not be demagnitized despite the supplier's efforts. The supplier was Jorgenson Steel back before they chnaged their name to EJM. The general rule is that 300 series SS are not magnetic in the annealed condition. This is a general rule and the SS forgets to follow it sometimes. Lots of other metals like inconel are virtually impossible to tell from SS, with a magnet. Leigh@MarMachine |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
How reliable is non-magnetic test for Stainless Steel?
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 18:46:41 GMT, ff wrote:
an Musicant wrote: : :I've always found that MOST stainless steel has little or no attraction :to a magnet. How reliable is this test? : :Is there quality stainless steel that IS drawn to magnets? : :Why is most stainless steel not attracted to magnets? : :While we're on the subject of stainless steel, what are it's general :properties aside from not rusting due to oxidation? Is or can it be as :hard as tool grade steels? Are there some neat links where I can find :out about different kinds of steel? This has always been a facinating :topic to me. : :Dan : : :Austenitic stainless steel is not magnetic. It has to do with the grain :structure. If you heat :any steel up to its austenitic phase it will lose is attraction to :magnets. Other grades of :stainless like martensitic and precipitation hardening stainless are :attracted to magnets. :They are both hardenable by heat treatment too. : :Fred I assume, then, that when this austenitic phase steel cools below a threshhold temperature it will once again be attracted to magnets? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
How reliable is non-magnetic test for Stainless Steel?
mikee wrote:
The 300 Series stainless steels are non-magnetic. This includes 302, 304, 316, etc. Here is a link that talks about it: http://www.spiusa.com/Ref001/austenitic.html. If you have some stainless steel utensils or bowls that are not attracted to magnets, they are austenitic stainless and almost certainly one of the 300 series grade of stainless. Stainless steel gets its corrosion resistance from its chromium content (and to a lesser extent its nickel content). Deep draw operation products (sinks, bowls, etc.) are usually made from 300 series stainless steel. Knives, which need to maintain a sharp edge are made from a different composition that can be thermally heat treated (hardened). This kind of stainless is attracted to a magnet. Why are some stainless types attracted to magnets and not others? I've read the text books and know about the grain structures and the carbide types, but still think this is one of neater mysteries around. Personally, I think God just wanted to irritate mankind in trying to figure out why it works this way. Mike Eberlein For us speak slow and use small words types - Cutlery made from stainless sticks very well to the fridge magnet. The same magnet won't stick to a stanless sink or bowl. YMMV Some really are rustless iron, not stainless steel Dave. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What oil do I use to 'Temper' steel? | Metalworking | |||
Plastering onto steel | UK diy | |||
blue steel for carving tools? | Metalworking | |||
Knife Steel FAQ updated | Metalworking |