Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
Hello,
Anyone know of any Links where there is information regarding how safe an Ionization type of Smoke Detector is in a youngster's room. Looked, but couldn't really find anything specific. Thanks, Bob --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com |
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On 9/29/2014 4:03 PM, Bob wrote:
Hello, Anyone know of any Links where there is information regarding how safe an Ionization type of Smoke Detector is in a youngster's room. Looked, but couldn't really find anything specific. Thanks, Bob In regards to what? Small pieces and choking hazard? Toxic vapors from the plastic? Batteries and shiny objects not to swollow? Radiation from the detector? .. Christopher A. Young Learn about Jesus www.lds.org .. |
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
"Bob" wrote in message
... Anyone know of any Links where there is information regarding how safe an Ionization type of Smoke Detector is in a youngster's room. If not satisfied with what the Underwriters' Laboratory publishes, ask your local Fire Service. -- Don Phillipson Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada) |
#4
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On 9/29/2014 6:17 PM, Don Phillipson wrote:
If not satisfied with what the Underwriters' Laboratory publishes, ask your local Fire Service. They should know about how many kids choke on small parts, ingest batteries, and lick the plastic covers. With toddlers, all those are serious concerns. .. Christopher A. Young Learn about Jesus www.lds.org .. |
#5
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 9/29/2014 6:17 PM, Don Phillipson wrote: If not satisfied with what the Underwriters' Laboratory publishes, ask your local Fire Service. They should know about how many kids choke on small parts, ingest batteries, and lick the plastic covers. With toddlers, all those are serious concerns. . Christopher A. Young Learn about Jesus www.lds.org . Hi, You mean detector is lying around on the floor? |
#6
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On 9/29/2014 8:37 PM, Tony Hwang wrote:
Stormin Mormon wrote: They should know about how many kids choke on small parts, ingest batteries, and lick the plastic covers. With toddlers, all those are serious concerns. . Christopher A. Young Learn about Jesus www.lds.org . Hi, You mean detector is lying around on the floor? Right! That's how the toddlers get radiation from the ionizer, and die by the age of five. .. Christopher A. Young Learn about Jesus www.lds.org .. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I believe that if there were any risk of radiation damage from the smoke detector, there would be warning signs on new detectors saying not to install them in the bedrooms of small children and pregnant women. However, the smoke detector shouldn't be in the bedroom, it should be outside the bedroom door, but within 4 feet of the bedroom door when looking down from space. That's because, unless the person is a smoker and is in the habit of smoking in bed, the chances of a fire starting in the bedroom are slim. So, putting a smoke detector in the bedroom, and then sleeping with the bedroom door closed is going to prevent that detector from detecting smoke. By the time it does, your bedroom door is burning and you're trapped in the bedroom with no escape except the bedroom window, if there is one. Better to put the smoke detector outside the bedroom but within 4 feet of the door. That way if a fire starts in the house at night, the smoke detector will detect the smoke much earlier, and will still be close enough to the bedroom to wake up anyone inside. And, never put a smoke detector closer than 4 inches to the corners where walls meet ceilings. In a fire, the air in those areas is relatively stagnant, and the smoke detector in those corner areas will be slow to detect smoke. So, I'd move the smoke detector, but not for the reason you were thinking. |
#8
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On 9/29/2014 10:18 PM, nestork wrote:
'Bob[_44_ Wrote: Anyone know of any Links where there is information regarding how safe an Ionization type of Smoke Detector is in a youngster's room. Thanks, Bob Bob: That's because, unless the person is a smoker and is in the habit of smoking in bed, the chances of a fire starting in the bedroom are slim. So, I'd move the smoke detector, but not for the reason you were thinking. I guess we don't have enough information. Does the OP toddler smoke in bed? Does the OP toddler have a television in bedroom? Those some times catch fire. Does the toddler cook on a hot plate, and use cooking oil? So much we need to know, to give a wise and considered answer. .. Christopher A. Young Learn about Jesus www.lds.org .. |
#9
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On 9/29/2014 9:18 PM, nestork wrote:
'Bob[_44_ Wrote: ;3290187']Hello, Anyone know of any Links where there is information regarding how safe an Ionization type of Smoke Detector is in a youngster's room. Looked, but couldn't really find anything specific. Thanks, Bob --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. 'AVAST 2014 | Antivirus Gratuit - Télécharger la meilleure protection anti-malware' (http://www.avast.com) Bob: I believe that if there were any risk of radiation damage from the smoke detector, there would be warning signs on new detectors saying not to install them in the bedrooms of small children and pregnant women. However, the smoke detector shouldn't be in the bedroom, it should be outside the bedroom door, but within 4 feet of the bedroom door when looking down from space. That's because, unless the person is a smoker and is in the habit of smoking in bed, the chances of a fire starting in the bedroom are slim. So, putting a smoke detector in the bedroom, and then sleeping with the bedroom door closed is going to prevent that detector from detecting smoke. By the time it does, your bedroom door is burning and you're trapped in the bedroom with no escape except the bedroom window, if there is one. Better to put the smoke detector outside the bedroom but within 4 feet of the door. That way if a fire starts in the house at night, the smoke detector will detect the smoke much earlier, and will still be close enough to the bedroom to wake up anyone inside. And, never put a smoke detector closer than 4 inches to the corners where walls meet ceilings. In a fire, the air in those areas is relatively stagnant, and the smoke detector in those corner areas will be slow to detect smoke. So, I'd move the smoke detector, but not for the reason you were thinking. Actually the better way is to put a smoke detector in each room. That way you have a much better chance of realizing there is a fire. I don't actually have a detector in each room, I have one for each ceiling area. The living room, kitchen, and dining room have a continuous ceiling, so I have just one for all 3 of them. The kitchen of course is the most likely place for a fire if there aren't any smokers around. And don't forget a Carbon Monoxide detector. Bill |
#10
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
'Bob[_44_ Wrote: Anyone know of any Links where there is information regarding how safe an Ionization type of Smoke Detector is in a youngster's room. I would not put one in the kids room. How about the hallway right outside the kids room? -- I kill-file all messages posted through Google Groups. |
#11
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On 9/29/2014 8:37 PM, Tony Hwang wrote:
Stormin Mormon wrote: On 9/29/2014 6:17 PM, Don Phillipson wrote: If not satisfied with what the Underwriters' Laboratory publishes, ask your local Fire Service. They should know about how many kids choke on small parts, ingest batteries, and lick the plastic covers. With toddlers, all those are serious concerns. . Christopher A. Young Learn about Jesus www.lds.org . Hi, You mean detector is lying around on the floor? Just what I was thinking. If you have a toddler that can leap 8 ft to the ceiling, you have a future Olympic champion. |
#12
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
"VinnyB" wrote in message ... 'Bob[_44_ Wrote: Anyone know of any Links where there is information regarding how safe an Ionization type of Smoke Detector is in a youngster's room. I would not put one in the kids room. How about the hallway right outside the kids room? -- I kill-file all messages posted through Google Groups. A guy I know lives alone, and when he had minor work done that required a building permit, he was required to install FOUR smoke detectors within about 10 feet of each other - one in each bedroom, by its door, and one in the hallway. The chirping when the batteries all went low at the same time drove him nuts, so now he has one smoke detector in the hall and three spares. |
#13
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On Monday, September 29, 2014 10:18:42 PM UTC-4, nestork wrote:
'Bob[_44_ Wrote: ;3290187']Hello, Anyone know of any Links where there is information regarding how safe an Ionization type of Smoke Detector is in a youngster's room. Looked, but couldn't really find anything specific. Thanks, Bob --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. 'AVAST 2014 | Antivirus Gratuit - Télécharger la meilleure protection anti-malware' (http://www.avast.com) Bob: I believe that if there were any risk of radiation damage from the smoke detector, there would be warning signs on new detectors saying not to install them in the bedrooms of small children and pregnant women. However, the smoke detector shouldn't be in the bedroom, it should be outside the bedroom door, but within 4 feet of the bedroom door when looking down from space. That's because, unless the person is a smoker and is in the habit of smoking in bed, the chances of a fire starting in the bedroom are slim. So, putting a smoke detector in the bedroom, and then sleeping with the bedroom door closed is going to prevent that detector from detecting smoke. By the time it does, your bedroom door is burning and you're trapped in the bedroom with no escape except the bedroom window, if there is one. Better to put the smoke detector outside the bedroom but within 4 feet of the door. That way if a fire starts in the house at night, the smoke detector will detect the smoke much earlier, and will still be close enough to the bedroom to wake up anyone inside. And, never put a smoke detector closer than 4 inches to the corners where walls meet ceilings. In a fire, the air in those areas is relatively stagnant, and the smoke detector in those corner areas will be slow to detect smoke. So, I'd move the smoke detector, but not for the reason you were thinking. -- nestork Current code requires smoke detectors to be installed both inside and outside all sleeping rooms, plus at least one detector to be installed on each floor. In new construction they would also be required to be 120VAC powered with battery backup in each detector and they are required to be connected in tandem. nate |
#14
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On 9/30/2014 9:06 AM, Bill Gill wrote:
And don't forget a Carbon Monoxide detector. Bill Instead of confusing us with double negatives, can you state that in a positive manner? .. Christopher A. Young Learn about Jesus www.lds.org .. |
#15
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On 9/30/2014 9:36 AM, N8N wrote:
Current code requires smoke detectors to be installed both inside and outside all sleeping rooms, plus at least one detector to be installed on each floor. In new construction they would also be required to be 120VAC powered with battery backup in each detector and they are required to be connected in tandem. nate For a two bedroom raised ranch, that adds up to 36 smoke detectors, 5 monoxide detectors, and 3 different power supplies? Why not just go live in the car, it's cheaper. .. Christopher A. Young Learn about Jesus www.lds.org .. |
#16
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 9:36:01 AM UTC-4, N8N wrote:
On Monday, September 29, 2014 10:18:42 PM UTC-4, nestork wrote: 'Bob[_44_ Wrote: ;3290187']Hello, Anyone know of any Links where there is information regarding how safe an Ionization type of Smoke Detector is in a youngster's room. Looked, but couldn't really find anything specific. Thanks, Bob --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. 'AVAST 2014 | Antivirus Gratuit - Télécharger la meilleure protection anti-malware' (http://www.avast.com) Bob: I believe that if there were any risk of radiation damage from the smoke detector, there would be warning signs on new detectors saying not to install them in the bedrooms of small children and pregnant women. However, the smoke detector shouldn't be in the bedroom, it should be outside the bedroom door, but within 4 feet of the bedroom door when looking down from space. That's because, unless the person is a smoker and is in the habit of smoking in bed, the chances of a fire starting in the bedroom are slim. So, putting a smoke detector in the bedroom, and then sleeping with the bedroom door closed is going to prevent that detector from detecting smoke. By the time it does, your bedroom door is burning and you're trapped in the bedroom with no escape except the bedroom window, if there is one. Better to put the smoke detector outside the bedroom but within 4 feet of the door. That way if a fire starts in the house at night, the smoke detector will detect the smoke much earlier, and will still be close enough to the bedroom to wake up anyone inside. And, never put a smoke detector closer than 4 inches to the corners where walls meet ceilings. In a fire, the air in those areas is relatively stagnant, and the smoke detector in those corner areas will be slow to detect smoke. So, I'd move the smoke detector, but not for the reason you were thinking. -- nestork Current code requires smoke detectors to be installed both inside and outside all sleeping rooms, plus at least one detector to be installed on each floor. In new construction they would also be required to be 120VAC powered with battery backup in each detector and they are required to be connected in tandem. nate What I'd like to know is why ones that are both AC and battery powered start beeping to change the battery in only a year or so? It's a royal pain in the ass. You would think the main power would be from the AC and the battery would last many years, ie more like the shelf life of the battery. Instead I have them needing battery changes just like ones powered only by battery. What's up with that? And these are about 7 years old, not 25 year old ones. PS: If it were up to me in my own house, I'd just have AC powered ones. The small additional protection just isn't worth it to me. |
#17
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 9:51:25 AM UTC-4, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 9/30/2014 9:36 AM, N8N wrote: Current code requires smoke detectors to be installed both inside and outside all sleeping rooms, plus at least one detector to be installed on each floor. In new construction they would also be required to be 120VAC powered with battery backup in each detector and they are required to be connected in tandem. nate For a two bedroom raised ranch, that adds up to 36 smoke detectors, 5 monoxide detectors, and 3 different power supplies? Nope... in the situation you describe there would be three detectors for the bedrooms and hallway between them (four if they are separated by a long distance) plus one on the other floor if present. I don't believe CO detectors are required but having at least one isn't a bad idea. Personally I don't think it's that onerous a requirement, I actually was going to upfit my last house but real life (and the lack of a willing partner to help me pull wire) intervened. nate |
#18
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On 09/29/2014 3:03 PM, Bob wrote:
Hello, Anyone know of any Links where there is information regarding how safe an Ionization type of Smoke Detector is in a youngster's room. Looked, but couldn't really find anything specific. .... You'd have difficulty in discerning its presence at any distance from natural background radiation without very good measurement technique. The 241Am isotope used is primarily an alpha emitter and the range of alpha particles is only a few inches in free air plus they can't even penetrate a single sheet of paper owing to their size and charge (they're a He atom w/o the two electrons so have +2 proton charge). There's a plethora of gammas, but the dominant is only about 60 keV which is pretty weak and the overall source intensity of a typical detector source is only about one microcurie, and the exposure as long as you don't remove the source from the device would be less than about 1/100 of a millirem per year. To put that in context, average background in the US is about 300 mrem/yr. In order to even know the device was in the room from any practical standpoint of concern you'd have to remove the source from the device itself and bring it near you and keep it there indefinitely. Even then your exposure would be under any occupational or general public limits. Annual Radiation Dose Limits Agency Radiation Worker – 5 rem (NRC, "occupationally" exposed) General Public – 100 mrem (NRC, member of the public) General Public – 10 mrem (EPA, air pathway) At roughly 0.01 mrem from the device, you can see the fractional relationship to established exposure limits is in the noise level. Upshot--don't worry about it; radon even with a mitigation system is likely _far_ higher than the amount given off by the smoke detector. Or, as another comparison -- would you not take a transcontinental air trip over concern for the extra radiation dose you'd give the infant? That would add from 0.1-0.5 mrem/hr depending on the route (higher on polar, higher elevation long-haul routes), roughly 10-50X the exposure rate from the smoke detector. -- |
#19
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On Monday, September 29, 2014 4:03:20 PM UTC-4, Bob wrote:
Hello, Anyone know of any Links where there is information regarding how safe an Ionization type of Smoke Detector is in a youngster's room. Looked, but couldn't really find anything specific. Thanks, Bob http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov/2...ave-your-life/ says that it's a fraction of a percent of what you're getting anyway from earth and space. If that still doesn't let you sleep nights, put in a photo-electric instead.. Assuming nobody's smoking in the room (which might deliver more radiation than a smoke detector: http://www.epa.gov/radiation/sources/tobacco.html) the most common source of fires in bedrooms is, I believe, electrical arcs from mis-wired outlets and plugs and cords getting crushed behind and under furniture. These can produce slow, smoky fires that overcome the room occupants as they sleep, before the smoke ever reaches the hallway, which is why smoke detectors are recommended for *inside* the bedrooms. But the risk of such fires can be greatly reduced with the use of arc-fault breakers, which have been mandated on bedroom circuits in the US & Canada for several years. Check to see if your place has them. Probably more common than any of the above are injuries from shoddy drop-sided cribs, suffocation under ill-fitting mattresses, and strangulation from nearby power or phone cables or drapery draw cords. Chip C Toronto |
#20
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On 9/30/2014 8:21 AM, Pico Rico wrote:
"VinnyB" wrote in message ... 'Bob[_44_ Wrote: Anyone know of any Links where there is information regarding how safe an Ionization type of Smoke Detector is in a youngster's room. I would not put one in the kids room. How about the hallway right outside the kids room? -- I kill-file all messages posted through Google Groups. A guy I know lives alone, and when he had minor work done that required a building permit, he was required to install FOUR smoke detectors within about 10 feet of each other - one in each bedroom, by its door, and one in the hallway. The chirping when the batteries all went low at the same time drove him nuts, so now he has one smoke detector in the hall and three spares. Thereby bypassing the safety codes that are imposed to protect us and our children. Bill |
#21
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 12:45:04 PM UTC-4, Bill Gill wrote:
On 9/30/2014 8:21 AM, Pico Rico wrote: "VinnyB" wrote in message ... 'Bob[_44_ Wrote: Anyone know of any Links where there is information regarding how safe an Ionization type of Smoke Detector is in a youngster's room. I would not put one in the kids room. How about the hallway right outside the kids room? -- I kill-file all messages posted through Google Groups. A guy I know lives alone, and when he had minor work done that required a building permit, he was required to install FOUR smoke detectors within about 10 feet of each other - one in each bedroom, by its door, and one in the hallway. The chirping when the batteries all went low at the same time drove him nuts, so now he has one smoke detector in the hall and three spares. Thereby bypassing the safety codes that are imposed to protect us and our children. Bill The children! Won't someone please think of the children?!!! I'd say when you have codes that go nuts and require crazy numbers of smoke detectors, you'd have to be an imbecile not to realize that it's going to lead to non-compliance. If the guy lives alone, who's children exactly is he supposed to protect? |
#22
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On 9/30/2014 12:07 PM, trader_4 wrote:
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 12:45:04 PM UTC-4, Bill Gill wrote: On 9/30/2014 8:21 AM, Pico Rico wrote: "VinnyB" wrote in message ... 'Bob[_44_ Wrote: Anyone know of any Links where there is information regarding how safe an Ionization type of Smoke Detector is in a youngster's room. I would not put one in the kids room. How about the hallway right outside the kids room? -- I kill-file all messages posted through Google Groups. A guy I know lives alone, and when he had minor work done that required a building permit, he was required to install FOUR smoke detectors within about 10 feet of each other - one in each bedroom, by its door, and one in the hallway. The chirping when the batteries all went low at the same time drove him nuts, so now he has one smoke detector in the hall and three spares. Thereby bypassing the safety codes that are imposed to protect us and our children. Bill The children! Won't someone please think of the children?!!! I'd say when you have codes that go nuts and require crazy numbers of smoke detectors, you'd have to be an imbecile not to realize that it's going to lead to non-compliance. If the guy lives alone, who's children exactly is he supposed to protect? And it is such a huge job keeping batteries in the smoke detectors. How can you expect any body to do that just to be safe. Of course you could simplify the battery problem in couple of ways. Replace the batteries Spring and Fall or replace all the batteries when one detector starts beeping. That is so difficult. Bill |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
I'm glad that at least in the USA, there doesn't seem to be the tendency to use public safety to support the economy.
Here in Manitoba, we have an NDP government, which is what Americans would probably call pro-socialist, or borderline communist. Whenever Manitoba falls on hard economic times, the government swings into action finding ways of making the rich provide jobs. And, the easiest way to do that is to pass laws requiring even higher safety standards than we already have. For example, you simply pass a city by-law requiring all apartment blocks to be retrofitted with sprinkler systems. That keeps all the plumbers busy fitting old buildings with water sprinklers. And, you pass a city by-law requiring smoke barrier doorways to be installed on every floor before the stairwells so that smoke can't get into the stair wells in the event of a fire. That keeps all the carpenter's busy. And, of course, you pass a city by-law requiring all smoke detectors to be hard wired rather than battery operated, and that keeps all the electricians busy. I'm all for safety, but from what I've seen, safety has been abused where I live, and it's purpose has been to create jobs rather than protect people, and it's a sickening situation where the government is looking for ways to make the rich waste their money on unnecessary improvements. Already Winnipeg has the highest fire safety standards for apartment blocks in North America, and come the next economic downturn, we will undoubtely have the highest earthquake safety standards for apartment blocks in all of North America too. The fact that Winnipeg is thousands of miles away from the nearest fault line and has never had an earthquake is no arguement against ensuring that people are safe if we do get one, and anyone who disagrees is just too greedy to realize that safety should come before profits. Last edited by nestork : October 1st 14 at 01:43 AM |
#24
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
dpb wrote:
On 09/29/2014 3:03 PM, Bob wrote: Hello, Anyone know of any Links where there is information regarding how safe an Ionization type of Smoke Detector is in a youngster's room. Looked, but couldn't really find anything specific. ... You'd have difficulty in discerning its presence at any distance from natural background radiation without very good measurement technique. The 241Am isotope used is primarily an alpha emitter and the range of alpha particles is only a few inches in free air plus they can't even penetrate a single sheet of paper owing to their size and charge (they're a He atom w/o the two electrons so have +2 proton charge). There's a plethora of gammas, but the dominant is only about 60 keV which is pretty weak and the overall source intensity of a typical detector source is only about one microcurie, and the exposure as long as you don't remove the source from the device would be less than about 1/100 of a millirem per year. To put that in context, average background in the US is about 300 mrem/yr. In order to even know the device was in the room from any practical standpoint of concern you'd have to remove the source from the device itself and bring it near you and keep it there indefinitely. Even then your exposure would be under any occupational or general public limits. Annual Radiation Dose Limits Agency Radiation Worker €“ 5 rem (NRC, "occupationally" exposed) General Public €“ 100 mrem (NRC, member of the public) General Public €“ 10 mrem (EPA, air pathway) At roughly 0.01 mrem from the device, you can see the fractional relationship to established exposure limits is in the noise level. Upshot--don't worry about it; radon even with a mitigation system is likely _far_ higher than the amount given off by the smoke detector. Or, as another comparison -- would you not take a transcontinental air trip over concern for the extra radiation dose you'd give the infant? That would add from 0.1-0.5 mrem/hr depending on the route (higher on polar, higher elevation long-haul routes), roughly 10-50X the exposure rate from the smoke detector. -- I have an old baby Ben clock I now use for a radiation calibrator. Used to sleep next to it. Second most powerful radiator in my house. An old pentax lens has the highest count with uranium oxide coating. Greg |
#25
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On 9/30/2014 9:13 AM, Frank wrote:
On 9/29/2014 8:37 PM, Tony Hwang wrote: Hi, You mean detector is lying around on the floor? Just what I was thinking. If you have a toddler that can leap 8 ft to the ceiling, you have a future Olympic champion. Need to change brands of sugar breakfast cereal. Cut back on the frosted sugar cubes. Try Cheerios or Life, and see if that helps. Hydrate the cereal with skim milk instead of Red Bull and Monster. Carry water bottles in the car instead of using five hour energy in the toddler's bottle. .. Christopher A. Young Learn about Jesus www.lds.org .. |
#26
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 6:46:27 PM UTC-4, Bill Gill wrote:
On 9/30/2014 12:07 PM, trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 12:45:04 PM UTC-4, Bill Gill wrote: On 9/30/2014 8:21 AM, Pico Rico wrote: "VinnyB" wrote in message ... 'Bob[_44_ Wrote: Anyone know of any Links where there is information regarding how safe an Ionization type of Smoke Detector is in a youngster's room. I would not put one in the kids room. How about the hallway right outside the kids room? -- I kill-file all messages posted through Google Groups. A guy I know lives alone, and when he had minor work done that required a building permit, he was required to install FOUR smoke detectors within about 10 feet of each other - one in each bedroom, by its door, and one in the hallway. The chirping when the batteries all went low at the same time drove him nuts, so now he has one smoke detector in the hall and three spares. Thereby bypassing the safety codes that are imposed to protect us and our children. Bill The children! Won't someone please think of the children?!!! I'd say when you have codes that go nuts and require crazy numbers of smoke detectors, you'd have to be an imbecile not to realize that it's going to lead to non-compliance. If the guy lives alone, who's children exactly is he supposed to protect? And it is such a huge job keeping batteries in the smoke detectors. How can you expect any body to do that just to be safe. It's not what I expect anybody else to do. It's what I would prefer to do. Of course you could simplify the battery problem in couple of ways. Replace the batteries Spring and Fall or replace all the batteries when one detector starts beeping. That is so difficult. Bill It is when you have 8 of them and some of them are in high ceilings that you can't reach with a small step ladder. I can see you're one of the guys that believes in big govt and more regulation, rather than personal choice. And obviously you have no explanation for the question I posed, which is that since these are both AC and battery powered, why does the battery go out in a year, just as fast or faster than battery only powered ones? How about thinking about that instead of what I should do? |
#27
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On 10/1/2014 7:47 AM, trader_4 wrote:
It is when you have 8 of them and some of them are in high ceilings that you can't reach with a small step ladder. I can see you're one of the guys that believes in big govt and more regulation, rather than personal choice. Actually I believe in safety. That seems to me to be a much more important point than whether there is some mild inconvenience. How many television reports have you see where somebody died in a fire and "there were not working smoke detectors"? Bill |
#28
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On 10/01/2014 7:47 AM, trader_4 wrote:
.... ... since these are both AC and battery powered, why does the battery go out in a year, just as fast or faster than battery only powered ones? .... 'Cuz they're a poorly designed (read "cheap to build") and don't actually cut the battery (completely) out when A/C is on nor use rechargeable batteries would be the likely cause... I've not looked, but I'd think such a unit would be readily available altho undoubtedly at a somewhat higher price point. There are just the minimal one each floor of the old battery-powered type here as nothing's been modified since all the recent Code changes. So, that's just three and the once't a year deal isn't so bad as there are no cathedral ceilings, etc., ... -- |
#29
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 9:31:39 AM UTC-4, Bill Gill wrote:
On 10/1/2014 7:47 AM, trader_4 wrote: It is when you have 8 of them and some of them are in high ceilings that you can't reach with a small step ladder. I can see you're one of the guys that believes in big govt and more regulation, rather than personal choice. Actually I believe in safety. That seems to me to be a much more important point than whether there is some mild inconvenience. How many television reports have you see where somebody died in a fire and "there were not working smoke detectors"? Bill I believe in personal freedom. It's a much more important concept than inconvenience and guys like you insisting that we all have to live by your rules in our own house. And the strawman nonsense is so typical. It's not an issue of not having smoke detectors. It's just that I said I'd prefer to just have AC powered ones that don't have battery backup. Is that so radical and unsafe? For the record, since you brought it up, despite all the laws and all the ruminating, there are still plenty of fires where people die where there aren't working smoke detectors. Evey one of them that I've seen, it was a case where there were either no smoke detectors, or battery smoke detectors with dead batteries. Not a single one where it was an AC only detector and the cause of the fatality was that it didn't have a battery backup. Since you have such strong opinions in favor of requiring battery backup you should be able to provide us with those numbers and examples where a battery backup would have made a difference. |
#30
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 9:33:57 AM UTC-4, dpb wrote:
On 10/01/2014 7:47 AM, trader_4 wrote: ... ... since these are both AC and battery powered, why does the battery go out in a year, just as fast or faster than battery only powered ones? ... 'Cuz they're a poorly designed (read "cheap to build") and don't actually cut the battery (completely) out when A/C is on nor use rechargeable batteries would be the likely cause... I've not looked, but I'd think such a unit would be readily available altho undoubtedly at a somewhat higher price point. There are just the minimal one each floor of the old battery-powered type here as nothing's been modified since all the recent Code changes. So, that's just three and the once't a year deal isn't so bad as there are no cathedral ceilings, etc., ... -- A diode that costs maybe 10 cents has a big impact on price? |
#31
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On 10/01/2014 8:51 AM, trader_4 wrote:
.... A diode that costs maybe 10 cents has a big impact on price? _Every_ component has an impact on price for consumer-priced goods when amplified by the numbers. I don't _know_ it's the case precisely with the particular units but I'd venture it's a reasonable conjecture. Do you have the actual vendor/model number handy? -- |
#32
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
"Bill Gill" wrote in message ... On 10/1/2014 7:47 AM, trader_4 wrote: It is when you have 8 of them and some of them are in high ceilings that you can't reach with a small step ladder. I can see you're one of the guys that believes in big govt and more regulation, rather than personal choice. Actually I believe in safety. That seems to me to be a much more important point than whether there is some mild inconvenience. How many television reports have you see where somebody died in a fire and "there were not working smoke detectors"? Then why stop at 8? Why not 15? Why not a personal one you carry on your belt? Four smoke detectors within 10 feet for a guy who lives alone, and has two bedrooms which are not capable of housing anyone (one is an office, the other is a storage room)? That has nothing to do with safety. It has to do with "one size fits all". I bet you report your neighbors who tear off their mattress tags. |
#33
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
"trader_4" wrote in message ... On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 9:33:57 AM UTC-4, dpb wrote: On 10/01/2014 7:47 AM, trader_4 wrote: ... ... since these are both AC and battery powered, why does the battery go out in a year, just as fast or faster than battery only powered ones? ... 'Cuz they're a poorly designed (read "cheap to build") and don't actually cut the battery (completely) out when A/C is on nor use rechargeable batteries would be the likely cause... I've not looked, but I'd think such a unit would be readily available altho undoubtedly at a somewhat higher price point. There are just the minimal one each floor of the old battery-powered type here as nothing's been modified since all the recent Code changes. So, that's just three and the once't a year deal isn't so bad as there are no cathedral ceilings, etc., ... -- A diode that costs maybe 10 cents has a big impact on price? think of the voltage drop, too. |
#34
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 11:12:28 AM UTC-4, Pico Rico wrote:
"trader_4" wrote in message ... On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 9:33:57 AM UTC-4, dpb wrote: On 10/01/2014 7:47 AM, trader_4 wrote: ... ... since these are both AC and battery powered, why does the battery go out in a year, just as fast or faster than battery only powered ones? ... 'Cuz they're a poorly designed (read "cheap to build") and don't actually cut the battery (completely) out when A/C is on nor use rechargeable batteries would be the likely cause... I've not looked, but I'd think such a unit would be readily available altho undoubtedly at a somewhat higher price point. There are just the minimal one each floor of the old battery-powered type here as nothing's been modified since all the recent Code changes. So, that's just three and the once't a year deal isn't so bad as there are no cathedral ceilings, etc., ... -- A diode that costs maybe 10 cents has a big impact on price? think of the voltage drop, too. I don't see .6V diode drop from a 9V battery being a design challenge. The electronics is going to work on 5V or 3V anyway. |
#35
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
"trader_4" wrote in message ... On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 11:12:28 AM UTC-4, Pico Rico wrote: "trader_4" wrote in message ... On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 9:33:57 AM UTC-4, dpb wrote: On 10/01/2014 7:47 AM, trader_4 wrote: ... ... since these are both AC and battery powered, why does the battery go out in a year, just as fast or faster than battery only powered ones? ... 'Cuz they're a poorly designed (read "cheap to build") and don't actually cut the battery (completely) out when A/C is on nor use rechargeable batteries would be the likely cause... I've not looked, but I'd think such a unit would be readily available altho undoubtedly at a somewhat higher price point. There are just the minimal one each floor of the old battery-powered type here as nothing's been modified since all the recent Code changes. So, that's just three and the once't a year deal isn't so bad as there are no cathedral ceilings, etc., ... -- A diode that costs maybe 10 cents has a big impact on price? think of the voltage drop, too. I don't see .6V diode drop from a 9V battery being a design challenge. The electronics is going to work on 5V or 3V anyway. but the battery will "die" sooner. |
#36
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 08:11:32 -0700, "Pico Rico"
wrote: I bet you report your neighbors who tear off their mattress tags. Which, of course, has *never* been illegal. "Except by the consumer" and all. I remember being 7 or 8, hearing someone "joke" about that on TV, and being very confused because it was clear to me that the tags meant that the manufacturer and retailer couldn't remove them, but we as the final purchaser could. This was in the late 70s/early 80s; perhaps sometime before then those words weren't on there? Or it just makes a better joke to pretend they aren't? |
#37
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 11:58:24 AM UTC-4, Pico Rico wrote:
"trader_4" wrote in message ... On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 11:12:28 AM UTC-4, Pico Rico wrote: "trader_4" wrote in message ... On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 9:33:57 AM UTC-4, dpb wrote: On 10/01/2014 7:47 AM, trader_4 wrote: ... ... since these are both AC and battery powered, why does the battery go out in a year, just as fast or faster than battery only powered ones? ... 'Cuz they're a poorly designed (read "cheap to build") and don't actually cut the battery (completely) out when A/C is on nor use rechargeable batteries would be the likely cause... I've not looked, but I'd think such a unit would be readily available altho undoubtedly at a somewhat higher price point. There are just the minimal one each floor of the old battery-powered type here as nothing's been modified since all the recent Code changes. So, that's just three and the once't a year deal isn't so bad as there are no cathedral ceilings, etc., ... -- A diode that costs maybe 10 cents has a big impact on price? think of the voltage drop, too. I don't see .6V diode drop from a 9V battery being a design challenge. The electronics is going to work on 5V or 3V anyway. but the battery will "die" sooner. How so? The battery is rated at X amphours. Whether it delivers it through a diode or not is mostly insignificant. Only a very small amount of power is lost in the diode. |
#38
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On 10/01/2014 11:52 AM, trader_4 wrote:
.... How so? The battery is rated at X amphours. Whether it delivers it through a diode or not is mostly insignificant. Only a very small amount of power is lost in the diode. But what's significant is what _fraction_ of the power consumption any portion might be...if the overall is also pretty small as one would expect/it must be to have a long battery life to begin with, that "very small amount" may still be a decent fraction of the total and then the decrease in lifetime is proportional to that fraction. Again, this is all _purely_ hypothetical w/o any other data...but if the symptom exists that the battery life doesn't appear to be any longer w/ AC powered unit than non-, it's pretty clear there must not be any real power-saving circuitry inherent in the device design (or, the overall device power consumption is quite high and therefore drains the battery at about the same rate even though there is some extension over what it would have been w/o the AC). -- |
#39
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 1:09:40 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote:
On 10/01/2014 11:52 AM, trader_4 wrote: ... How so? The battery is rated at X amphours. Whether it delivers it through a diode or not is mostly insignificant. Only a very small amount of power is lost in the diode. But what's significant is what _fraction_ of the power consumption any portion might be...if the overall is also pretty small as one would expect/it must be to have a long battery life to begin with, that "very small amount" may still be a decent fraction of the total and then the decrease in lifetime is proportional to that fraction. Let's do the math. 9V battery. .6V drop across the diode. 8.4V goes to the load. That's 7% of the voltage across the diode and hence 7% of the power dissipated, because the same current is flowing through the load and the diode. And that 7% power dissipation would only come into play when the AC is out. The rest of the time, it would be zero. You'd have a design where if the AC is lost, the battery would diminish about 7% faster. But in return, you'd have a design where the battery lasts the shelf life, not just a year. I could come up with other designs that would perform better, but a diode is simple and cheap as an example. Again, this is all _purely_ hypothetical w/o any other data...but if the symptom exists that the battery life doesn't appear to be any longer w/ AC powered unit than non-, it's pretty clear there must not be any real power-saving circuitry inherent in the device design What's apparent is that somehow they are using the battery power as well as the AC. I can't think of other battery/AC powered devices that do that. Sump pump backup? Emergency lighting? Battery banks at the phone company? (or, the overall device power consumption is quite high and therefore drains the battery at about the same rate even though there is some extension over what it would have been w/o the AC). The point is there is no good reason to be drawing down the battery at all. And why not put in rechargeables? Duh! That's what they do in those other examples. |
#40
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Ionization Smoke Detector In Toddler's Room: How Safe ?
On 09/30/2014 9:37 AM, dpb wrote:
.... You'd have difficulty in discerning its presence at any distance from natural background radiation without very good measurement technique. The 241Am isotope used is primarily an alpha emitter and the range of alpha particles is only a few inches in free air plus they can't even penetrate a single sheet of paper owing to their size and charge (they're a He atom w/o the two electrons so have +2 proton charge). There's a plethora of gammas, but the dominant is only about 60 keV which is pretty weak and the overall source intensity of a typical detector source is only about one microcurie, and the exposure as long as you don't remove the source from the device would be less than about 1/100 of a millirem per year. To put that in context, average background in the US is about 300 mrem/yr. .... BTW, to get the above I took the easy way out and used the calculator at http://www.radprocalculator.com/Gamma.aspx Selecting Am-241 Gamma (the alpha as noted above can be discounted entirely as a contributor as long as the source is in the device), and an estimate of 10-ft average distance from a 1-uCi source, the dose rate is ~1.5E-6 mrem/hr. Multiplying by 24*364 and assuming an occupancy of 1/2 time in a given room, the annual dose works out at ~0.0066 mrem which I rounded to 0.01 mrem. This is still an upper estimate as there's no shielding at all from the source containment material nor the materials in the detector between the source itself and the exterior; only the 1/r-squared geometric factor is included. -- |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Smoke Detector | UK diy | |||
Smoke Detector Timing | Home Repair | |||
Smoke Detector ? | Home Repair | |||
smoke detector | Home Repair | |||
Smoke detector and CO detector installed next to each other? | Home Repair |