Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
Does anyone know what the statute of limitiations in the state of
maryland is for filing a suit against a home seller and or a real estate agent for not disclosing a defect, and possibly making a fraudulent claim about the house's integrity? short story-- house was advertised to me as having waterproof basement. not so. half of the basement has a french drain. the other half has a trench to collect water and divert it to the drain.. I have consulted a few people about this.. they said "Oh, that's the old way of doing it." (the drain was installed in the 80's.) but, a water proofing company was here tonight, and flat out told me that whatever I was told was wrong-- that it is not a waterproofed basement.. and, I could bring this against the seller and the real estate agent. Only half of the basement is water proofed, the other half is some hodgepodge system that was probably done by the old owner. He only had the half that was a real problem done, and just fudged the rest (even putting up wood panelled walls up to hide the trench. I wasn't paying this any mind, because whatever this system was was working ok and I just thought it was the "old way", but I found an area that isn't, and it is getting worse.. and it was masked by the makeshift wall.. I have lived in the house for 2 1/4 years.. the guy here tonight thinks that the statute is 3 years. |
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
How exactly is the ad worded? How many "experts" not people selling
something can you get to testify? Did you get an inspection? Buying a used house is typically as is. Quit cryin and fix it. On Apr 19, 8:50 pm, Chris wrote: Does anyone know what the statute of limitiations in the state of maryland is for filing a suit against a home seller and or a real estate agent for not disclosing a defect, and possibly making a fraudulent claim about the house's integrity? short story-- house was advertised to me as having waterproof basement. not so. half of the basement has a french drain. the other half has a trench to collect water and divert it to the drain.. I have consulted a few people about this.. they said "Oh, that's the old way of doing it." (the drain was installed in the 80's.) but, a water proofing company was here tonight, and flat out told me that whatever I was told was wrong-- that it is not a waterproofed basement.. and, I could bring this against the seller and the real estate agent. Only half of the basement is water proofed, the other half is some hodgepodge system that was probably done by the old owner. He only had the half that was a real problem done, and just fudged the rest (even putting up wood panelled walls up to hide the trench. I wasn't paying this any mind, because whatever this system was was working ok and I just thought it was the "old way", but I found an area that isn't, and it is getting worse.. and it was masked by the makeshift wall.. I have lived in the house for 2 1/4 years.. the guy here tonight thinks that the statute is 3 years. |
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
Chris wrote:
Does anyone know what the statute of limitiations in the state of maryland is for filing a suit against a home seller and or a real estate agent for not disclosing a defect, and possibly making a fraudulent claim about the house's integrity? Three years. http://www.expertlaw.com/library/lim.../Maryland.html |
#4
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
On Apr 19, 9:18 pm, "HeyBub" wrote:
Chris wrote: Does anyone know what the statute of limitiations in the state of maryland is for filing a suit against a home seller and or a real estate agent for not disclosing a defect, and possibly making a fraudulent claim about the house's integrity? Three years. http://www.expertlaw.com/library/lim.../Maryland.html There is no such thing as a "wateproof" basement. There are a variety of solutions that will attempt to limit water and moisture intrusion into a basement, but from a practical standpoint, nothing can really guarantee that a basement is waterproof. And what exactly does waterproof mean? The seller could very well argue that whatever system he had in place, which you say was working so you paid it no mind for 2 1/2 years, was in fact, waterproofing, because it kept the basement floor dry. I think you're going to have a very difficult time prevailing in a basement water case when you didn't make any claim until 2 1/2 years after the sale. And from a practical standpoint, you're limited to small claims, because it isn't going to be worth the legal expense to pursue this, unless you want to throw good money after bad. |
#5
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
"Chris" wrote in message oups.com... Does anyone know what the statute of limitiations in the state of maryland is for filing a suit against a home seller and or a real estate agent for not disclosing a defect, and possibly making a fraudulent claim about the house's integrity? short story-- house was advertised to me as having waterproof basement. not so. half of the basement has a french drain. the other half has a trench to collect water and divert it to the drain.. I have consulted a few people about this.. they said "Oh, that's the old way of doing it." (the drain was installed in the 80's.) but, a water proofing company was here tonight, and flat out told me that whatever I was told was wrong-- that it is not a waterproofed basement.. and, I could bring this against the seller and the real estate agent. Only half of the basement is water proofed, the other half is some hodgepodge system that was probably done by the old owner. He only had the half that was a real problem done, and just fudged the rest (even putting up wood panelled walls up to hide the trench. I wasn't paying this any mind, because whatever this system was was working ok and I just thought it was the "old way", but I found an area that isn't, and it is getting worse.. and it was masked by the makeshift wall.. I have lived in the house for 2 1/4 years.. the guy here tonight thinks that the statute is 3 years. There's no such thing as a waterproof basement. Getting the home inspected prior to buying might have been a good idea. |
#6
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
"Chris" wrote in message house was advertised to me as having waterproof basement. not so. half of the basement has a french drain. the other half has a trench to collect water and divert it to the drain.. I wasn't paying this any mind, because whatever this system was was working ok and I just thought it was the "old way", but I found an area that isn't, and it is getting worse.. and it was masked by the makeshift wall.. Have you had water in the basement? If no, then it must be waterproof. What is "getting worse" ? If yes, you may have a difficult time proving anything. Do you have copies of the advertisement? The seller may have been mis-led by a sleazy contractor. What damages have you had? What do you expect to get? I can see you ****ing away a lot of money and your lawyer buying a new car while you can't afford a scooter after paying him. Basing a lawsuite on what one "expert" told you is not very good as the other side will have plenty of experts also. And they all get paid to testify or give depositions. |
#7
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
|
#8
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
"Chris" wrote in message oups.com... Does anyone know what the statute of limitiations in the state of maryland is for filing a suit against a home seller and or a real estate agent for not disclosing a defect, and possibly making a fraudulent claim about the house's integrity? short story-- house was advertised to me as having waterproof basement. not so. half of the basement has a french drain. the other half has a trench to collect water and divert it to the drain.. I have consulted a few people about this.. they said "Oh, that's the old way of doing it." (the drain was installed in the 80's.) but, a water proofing company was here tonight, and flat out told me that whatever I was told was wrong-- that it is not a waterproofed basement.. and, I could bring this against the seller and the real estate agent. Only half of the basement is water proofed, the other half is some hodgepodge system that was probably done by the old owner. He only had the half that was a real problem done, and just fudged the rest (even putting up wood panelled walls up to hide the trench. I wasn't paying this any mind, because whatever this system was was working ok and I just thought it was the "old way", but I found an area that isn't, and it is getting worse.. and it was masked by the makeshift wall.. I have lived in the house for 2 1/4 years.. the guy here tonight thinks that the statute is 3 years. Get yourself to an attorney and very very soon. Steve |
#9
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
On Apr 19, 7:50 pm, Chris wrote:
Does anyone know what the statute of limitiations in the state of maryland is for filing a suit against a home seller and or a real estate agent for not disclosing a defect, and possibly making a fraudulent claim about the house's integrity? short story-- house was advertised to me as having waterproof basement. not so. half of the basement has a french drain. the other half has a trench to collect water and divert it to the drain.. I have consulted a few people about this.. they said "Oh, that's the old way of doing it." (the drain was installed in the 80's.) but, a water proofing company was here tonight, and flat out told me that whatever I was told was wrong-- that it is not a waterproofed basement.. and, I could bring this against the seller and the real estate agent. Only half of the basement is water proofed, the other half is some hodgepodge system that was probably done by the old owner. He only had the half that was a real problem done, and just fudged the rest (even putting up wood panelled walls up to hide the trench. I wasn't paying this any mind, because whatever this system was was working ok and I just thought it was the "old way", but I found an area that isn't, and it is getting worse.. and it was masked by the makeshift wall.. I have lived in the house for 2 1/4 years.. the guy here tonight thinks that the statute is 3 years. That it took over 2 years is a big strike against you, but if (as someone apparently found) it is 3 years under statute of limitations, your claim could still be valid. Steve B has the right answer on whether you have a claim or not -- you'll need to talk w/ an attorney and provide him w/ the facts of the representation. I'm presuming as in most states Maryland has a disclosure form that must be filled out that is supposed to itemize known issues. What that document says in its assertion is probably the only real representation made by the seller/agent that is sustainable as a claim. If it doesn't make excessive claims, then you probably don't sufficient evidence of misrepresentation and/or fraud to get a judgement. The finished wall would be hard on the existence only to prove as cover-up -- it may well be the previous owner was simply too optimistic (as many are). |
#10
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
Do you know whether there is an outside perimeter drain?
"Chris" wrote in message oups.com... Does anyone know what the statute of limitiations in the state of maryland is for filing a suit against a home seller and or a real estate agent for not disclosing a defect, and possibly making a fraudulent claim about the house's integrity? short story-- house was advertised to me as having waterproof basement. not so. half of the basement has a french drain. the other half has a trench to collect water and divert it to the drain.. I have consulted a few people about this.. they said "Oh, that's the old way of doing it." (the drain was installed in the 80's.) but, a water proofing company was here tonight, and flat out told me that whatever I was told was wrong-- that it is not a waterproofed basement.. and, I could bring this against the seller and the real estate agent. Only half of the basement is water proofed, the other half is some hodgepodge system that was probably done by the old owner. He only had the half that was a real problem done, and just fudged the rest (even putting up wood panelled walls up to hide the trench. I wasn't paying this any mind, because whatever this system was was working ok and I just thought it was the "old way", but I found an area that isn't, and it is getting worse.. and it was masked by the makeshift wall.. I have lived in the house for 2 1/4 years.. the guy here tonight thinks that the statute is 3 years. |
#11
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
wrote in message oups.com... On Apr 19, 9:18 pm, "HeyBub" wrote: Chris wrote: Does anyone know what the statute of limitiations in the state of maryland is for filing a suit against a home seller and or a real estate agent for not disclosing a defect, and possibly making a fraudulent claim about the house's integrity? Three years. http://www.expertlaw.com/library/lim.../Maryland.html There is no such thing as a "wateproof" basement. There are a variety of solutions that will attempt to limit water and moisture intrusion into a basement, but from a practical standpoint, nothing can really guarantee that a basement is waterproof. And what exactly does waterproof mean? The seller could very well argue that whatever system he had in place, which you say was working so you paid it no mind for 2 1/2 years, was in fact, waterproofing, because it kept the basement floor dry. I think you're going to have a very difficult time prevailing in a basement water case when you didn't make any claim until 2 1/2 years after the sale. And from a practical standpoint, you're limited to small claims, because it isn't going to be worth the legal expense to pursue this, unless you want to throw good money after bad. I quite agree- money spent chasing this would be better spent saving up to get it fixed correctly, assuming the foundation is otherwise in good shape. Ie, dig up the outside of that half of basement, seal properly, add footer drains, backfill properly, etc. Lawyers ain't cheap. aem sends.... |
#12
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
wrote in message oups.com... On Apr 19, 9:18 pm, "HeyBub" wrote: Chris wrote: Does anyone know what the statute of limitiations in the state of maryland is for filing a suit against a home seller and or a real estate agent for not disclosing a defect, and possibly making a fraudulent claim about the house's integrity? Three years. http://www.expertlaw.com/library/lim.../Maryland.html There is no such thing as a "wateproof" basement. There are a variety of solutions that will attempt to limit water and moisture intrusion into a basement, but from a practical standpoint, nothing can really guarantee that a basement is waterproof. And what exactly does waterproof mean? The seller could very well argue that whatever system he had in place, which you say was working so you paid it no mind for 2 1/2 years, was in fact, waterproofing, because it kept the basement floor dry. I think you're going to have a very difficult time prevailing in a basement water case when you didn't make any claim until 2 1/2 years after the sale. And from a practical standpoint, you're limited to small claims, because it isn't going to be worth the legal expense to pursue this, unless you want to throw good money after bad. I agree, but it is worse than that. The law would only cover something that was not readily apparent. What he describes should be pretty obvious. And he does not seem to have been damaged. He hasn't suffered a loss, and can hardly demand the cost of making the basement "waterproof". So even if he could show they deceived him, he would still lose. |
#13
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
Yes false representation is an exception to as is. But we havent seen
the listing or anything in writing that ststes "waterproof". Plus the OP hasnt had any water in basement so it has effectively been "waterproof" so what are damages? He'd be better off saving for a professionaljob if it bothers him that much as hes not likely to get to far. I would not be too sympathetic as a juror to someone buying secondhand items On Apr 19, 10:05 pm, mm wrote: On 19 Apr 2007 18:01:55 -0700, wrote: Buying a used house is typically as is. His case may not be typical. Even with an 'as is' sale, the seller can be liable for false representations**. You'll be happy to know that if you ever get screwed. Whether the OP was screwed or not is another question. Basically I agree with Trader4 **Contracts for the sale of land have to be in writing. I don't remember if that would mean that a representation that something is waterproof, or has 200amp service, or whatever, would also have to be in writing. |
#14
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
i see you wasting lots of money on lawyers & winning nothing. what would
you like to accomplish? him refunding your money & taking the house back? that would probably be a sweet deal for him, unless your market has tanked. your mortgage payments would probably be considered "rent" for the time you have been there. JMO |
#15
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
On 19 Apr 2007 17:50:06 -0700, Chris wrote:
Does anyone know what the statute of limitiations in the state of maryland is for filing a suit against a home seller and or a real estate agent for not disclosing a defect, and possibly making a fraudulent claim about the house's integrity? short story-- house was advertised to me as having waterproof basement. not so. half of the basement has a french drain. the other half has a trench to collect water and divert it to the drain.. I have consulted a few people about this.. they said "Oh, that's the old way of doing it." (the drain was installed in the 80's.) but, a water proofing company was here tonight, and flat out told me that whatever I was told was wrong-- that it is not a waterproofed basement.. and, I could bring this against the seller and the real estate agent. Only half of the basement is water proofed, the other half is some hodgepodge system that was probably done by the old owner. He only had the half that was a real problem done, and just fudged the rest (even putting up wood panelled walls up to hide the trench. I wasn't paying this any mind, because whatever this system was was working ok and I just thought it was the "old way", but I found an area that isn't, and it is getting worse.. and it was masked by the makeshift wall.. I have lived in the house for 2 1/4 years.. the guy here tonight thinks that the statute is 3 years. When fraud is involved, the statute doesn't start to run until the fraud is discovered. You are in luck. Your title insurance will pay you 4 million dollars and you can still sue the owner and agent for 10 million and win every time. You can bank on it. |
#16
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
In article , J.A. Michel says...
"Chris" wrote in message roups.com... Does anyone know what the statute of limitiations in the state of maryland is for filing a suit against a home seller and or a real estate agent for not disclosing a defect, and possibly making a fraudulent claim about the house's integrity? short story-- house was advertised to me as having waterproof basement. not so. half of the basement has a french drain. the other half has a trench to collect water and divert it to the drain.. I have consulted a few people about this.. they said "Oh, that's the old way of doing it." (the drain was installed in the 80's.) but, a water proofing company was here tonight, and flat out told me that whatever I was told was wrong-- that it is not a waterproofed basement.. and, I could bring this against the seller and the real estate agent. Only half of the basement is water proofed, the other half is some hodgepodge system that was probably done by the old owner. He only had the half that was a real problem done, and just fudged the rest (even putting up wood panelled walls up to hide the trench. I wasn't paying this any mind, because whatever this system was was working ok and I just thought it was the "old way", but I found an area that isn't, and it is getting worse.. and it was masked by the makeshift wall.. I have lived in the house for 2 1/4 years.. the guy here tonight thinks that the statute is 3 years. There's no such thing as a waterproof basement. Getting the home inspected prior to buying might have been a good idea. The inspection likely would have missed it, it being on the other side of a wall. You're right that this all depends on the definition of "waterproofed". What I think he describes is an older-type "cove" system. That is one way of dealing with it. A waterproofing company saying it wasn't waterproofed is no more than a sales pitch to have their system put in instead, hoping you'd contract with them expecting some future settlement! So, in pursuing this legally, he faces: 1. What he or the owner meant by "waterproofed". He'd need an engineer, and a *disinterested* engineer, to make a statement on that. 2. If the previous owner intended to cover up. It isnt' known when the wall went up. Was the previous owner the first owner of the house?? And, again, there's the whole question if he truly honestly considered it waterproofed. And if that may possibly may *still* be said, only that the waterproofing system needs some repair. I agree with others here - best to put the money to a solution. The first thing I see that needs to be done is for him to consult an independant engineer. Banty |
#17
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
On Apr 20, 8:02�am, Banty wrote:
In article , J.A. Michel says... "Chris" wrote in message roups.com... Does anyone know what the statute of limitiations in the state of maryland is for filing a suit against a home seller and or a real estate agent for not disclosing a defect, and possibly making a fraudulent claim about the house's integrity? short story-- house was advertised to me as having waterproof basement. not so. half of the basement has a french drain. the other half has a trench to collect water and divert it to the drain.. I have consulted a few people about this.. they said "Oh, that's the old way of doing it." (the drain was installed in the 80's.) but, a water proofing company was here tonight, and flat out told me that whatever I was told was wrong-- that it is not a waterproofed basement.. and, I could bring this against the seller and the real estate agent. Only half of the basement is water proofed, the other half is some hodgepodge system that was probably done by the old owner. He only had the half that was a real problem done, and just fudged the rest (even putting up wood panelled walls up to hide the trench. I wasn't paying this any mind, because whatever this system was was working ok and I just thought it was the "old way", but I found an area that isn't, and it is getting worse.. *and it was masked by the makeshift wall.. I have lived in the house for 2 1/4 years.. the guy here tonight thinks that the statute is 3 years. There's no such thing as a waterproof basement. Getting the home inspected prior to buying might have been a good idea. The inspection likely would have missed it, it being on the other side of a wall. You're right that this all depends on the definition of "waterproofed". *What I think he describes is an older-type "cove" system. *That is one way of dealing with it. *A waterproofing company saying it wasn't waterproofed is no more than a sales pitch to have their system put in instead, hoping you'd contract with them expecting some future settlement! So, in pursuing this legally, he faces: 1. What he or the owner meant by "waterproofed". *He'd need an engineer, and a *disinterested* engineer, to make a statement on that. 2. *If the previous owner intended to cover up. *It isnt' known when the wall went up. *Was the previous owner the first owner of the house?? *And, again, there's the whole question if he truly honestly considered it waterproofed. *And if that may possibly may *still* be said, only that the waterproofing system needs some repair. I agree with others here - best to put the money to a solution. *The first thing I see that needs to be done is for him to consult an independant engineer. Banty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - lets say a neighbor was aware of water troubles but it wasnt disclosed on that form YOU WIN the seller pays for water control on the basement. fear of this keeps sellers honest. so how much $$ will fixing it cost? |
#18
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
|
#19
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
On 19 Apr 2007 17:50:06 -0700, Chris wrote:
Does anyone know what the statute of limitiations in the state of maryland is for filing a suit against a home seller and or a real estate agent for not disclosing a defect, and possibly making a fraudulent claim about the house's integrity? short story-- house was advertised to me as having waterproof basement. not so. half of the basement has a french drain. the other half has a trench to collect water and divert it to the drain.. I have consulted a few people about this.. they said "Oh, that's the old way of doing it." (the drain was installed in the 80's.) but, a water proofing company was here tonight, and flat out told me that whatever I was told was wrong-- that it is not a waterproofed basement.. and, I could bring this against the seller and the real estate agent. Only half of the basement is water proofed, the other half is some hodgepodge system that was probably done by the old owner. He only had the half that was a real problem done, and just fudged the rest (even putting up wood panelled walls up to hide the trench. I wasn't paying this any mind, because whatever this system was was working ok and I just thought it was the "old way", but I found an area that isn't, and it is getting worse.. and it was masked by the makeshift wall.. I have lived in the house for 2 1/4 years.. the guy here tonight thinks that the statute is 3 years. You got "waterproof" in writing? |
#21
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
On Apr 20, 8:43�am, Banty wrote:
In article .com, says... On Apr 20, 8:02=EF=BF=BDam, Banty wrote: In article , J.A. Michel says... "Chris" wrote in message roups.com... Does anyone know what the statute of limitiations in the state of maryland is for filing a suit against a home seller and or a real estate agent for not disclosing a defect, and possibly making a fraudulent claim about the house's integrity? short story-- house was advertised to me as having waterproof basement. not so. half of the basement has a french drain. the other half has a trench to collect water and divert it to the drain.. I have consulted a few people about this.. they said "Oh, that's the old way of doing it." (the drain was installed in the 80's.) but, a water proofing company was here tonight, and flat out told me that whatever I was told was wrong-- that it is not a waterproofed basement.. and, I could bring this against the seller and the real estate agent. Only half of the basement is water proofed, the other half is some hodgepodge system that was probably done by the old owner. He only had the half that was a real problem done, and just fudged the rest (even putting up wood panelled walls up to hide the trench. I wasn't paying this any mind, because whatever this system was was working ok and I just thought it was the "old way", but I found an area that isn't, and it is getting worse.. =A0and it was masked by the makeshift wall.. I have lived in the house for 2 1/4 years.. the guy here tonight thinks that the statute is 3 years. There's no such thing as a waterproof basement. Getting the home inspected prior to buying might have been a good idea. The inspection likely would have missed it, it being on the other side of= a wall. You're right that this all depends on the definition of "waterproofed".. = =A0What I think he describes is an older-type "cove" system. =A0That is one way of = dealing with it. =A0A waterproofing company saying it wasn't waterproofed is no m= ore than a sales pitch to have their system put in instead, hoping you'd contract = with them expecting some future settlement! So, in pursuing this legally, he faces: 1. What he or the owner meant by "waterproofed". =A0He'd need an engineer= , and a *disinterested* engineer, to make a statement on that. 2. =A0If the previous owner intended to cover up. =A0It isnt' known when = the wall went up. =A0Was the previous owner the first owner of the house?? =A0And,= again, there's the whole question if he truly honestly considered it waterproofe= d=2E =A0And if that may possibly may *still* be said, only that the waterproofing sys= tem needs some repair. I agree with others here - best to put the money to a solution. =A0The fi= rst thing I see that needs to be done is for him to consult an independant engineer. Banty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - lets say a neighbor was aware of water troubles but it wasnt disclosed on that form YOU WIN the seller pays for water control on the basement. Meaning - what. * The OP should talk to his neighbors about it? *OK, maybe. Would said neighbor care to get involved in a lawsuit, though? fear of this keeps sellers honest. so how much $$ will fixing it cost? Depends on the problem and the fix. Not sure about your points... Banty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - well he had a contractor visit, probably gave a estimate, 500 bucks or 5 grand? if its little money probably better to fix and forget. but talk to neighbors sure! they may have similiar troubles and cheaper solutions, many times they can recommend a contractor. one might remember water proofing contractors visits, or old owner talking of trouble. if theres any way to show old owner was aware of trouble, repairs are free,. |
#22
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
On 20 Apr 2007 05:43:34 -0700, Banty wrote:
lets say a neighbor was aware of water troubles but it wasnt disclosed on that form YOU WIN the seller pays for water control on the basement. Meaning - what. The OP should talk to his neighbors about it? OK, maybe. Would said neighbor care to get involved in a lawsuit, though? I'm not saying the OP should sue, but your last sentence bothers me. People have a duty to testify. What they would "care" to do shouldn't be the OP's concern. Except that for practical reasons he probab;y has to think about it, but the notion that people shouldn't participate in the state's criminal action or a plaintiff's civil action because they don't want to is antithetical to the concepts of "society" and "American". |
#23
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
"mm" wrote in message Meaning - what. The OP should talk to his neighbors about it? OK, maybe. Would said neighbor care to get involved in a lawsuit, though? I'm not saying the OP should sue, but your last sentence bothers me. People have a duty to testify. What they would "care" to do shouldn't be the OP's concern. Except that for practical reasons he probab;y has to think about it, but the notion that people shouldn't participate in the state's criminal action or a plaintiff's civil action because they don't want to is antithetical to the concepts of "society" and "American". While I agree with you in principle, reality has proven different. People have watch murders take place and stood by and did nothing. Most would just be forgetful. |
#24
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
In article , mm says...
On 20 Apr 2007 05:43:34 -0700, Banty wrote: lets say a neighbor was aware of water troubles but it wasnt disclosed on that form YOU WIN the seller pays for water control on the basement. Meaning - what. The OP should talk to his neighbors about it? OK, maybe. Would said neighbor care to get involved in a lawsuit, though? I'm not saying the OP should sue, but your last sentence bothers me. People have a duty to testify. What they would "care" to do shouldn't be the OP's concern. Except that for practical reasons he probab;y has to think about it, but the notion that people shouldn't participate in the state's criminal action or a plaintiff's civil action because they don't want to is antithetical to the concepts of "society" and "American". But in reality, they may not care to, or even be morally obliged to. It often happens. They may have been friends with the old owner; they may still have contact with the old owner. They may not have been so fond of the old owner, but have a mutual friend still in the neighborhood. They may have only heard a comment or two about the basement water, of limited use even if they testify (they don't know, for example, all the mitigations may have been applied by the owner since then). People only know so much. *Very* likely, the only time the old owner had water problems is when *they* had water problems as well(in the same storms)! They don't want to discuss that and put on record their *own* problems. Or, they view a certain level of problems to be ordinary ("everyone had water in the basement that September - you can't say from that storm"). After all, the OP hasn't even had actual water problems yet. He's only seen some signs of failure, behind a *wall* for goodness' sake. A lot of people (and neighborhoods) have kind of an ethos of "I look the other way, so you can look the other way", so as to avoid a big-brother atmosphere. This is both good and bad. My bet is that the OP is a first time home buyer, all upset that his product isn't perfect, falling for what a person *selling something* told him. He needs to think about it and get real opinions. From an engineer, and from a lawyer. Banty |
#25
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
On Apr 19, 8:29 pm, wrote:
On Apr 19, 9:18 pm, "HeyBub" wrote: Chris wrote: Does anyone know what the statute of limitiations in the state of maryland is for filing a suit against a home seller and or a real estate agent for not disclosing a defect, and possibly making a fraudulent claim about the house's integrity? Three years. http://www.expertlaw.com/library/lim.../Maryland.html There is no such thing as a "wateproof" basement. There are a variety of solutions that will attempt to limit water and moisture intrusion into a basement, but from a practical standpoint, nothing can really guarantee that a basement is waterproof. And what exactly does waterproof mean? The seller could very well argue that whatever system he had in place, which you say was working so you paid it no mind for 2 1/2 years, was in fact, waterproofing, because it kept the basement floor dry. I think you're going to have a very difficult time prevailing in a basement water case when you didn't make any claim until 2 1/2 years after the sale. And from a practical standpoint, you're limited to small claims, because it isn't going to be worth the legal expense to pursue this, unless you want to throw good money after bad. So it has flooded. Or you are dont know and everything might be fine its been 2.5 yrs. |
#26
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
first, thanks for all the replies and discussion--
I talked to a lawyer, and it will be cheaper for me to fix it than hiring a lawyer.. it will be around $4,500 to fix.. but I am still going to talk to my real estate agent anyway.. hopefully the real estate company, which handled the sale and the listing, and my title, will be able to help. This house WAS inspected.. the inspector said there was a french drain.. but, did not look behind the wall.. hell.. he even said that there was a drain line out to the street, which there wasn't.. just a pipe that ended under the beginning of the driveway, which caused a sink hole.. but that's another story! |
#27
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 00:35:20 -0400, mm
wrote: On 20 Apr 2007 05:43:34 -0700, Banty wrote: lets say a neighbor was aware of water troubles but it wasnt disclosed on that form YOU WIN the seller pays for water control on the basement. Meaning - what. The OP should talk to his neighbors about it? OK, maybe. Would said neighbor care to get involved in a lawsuit, though? I'm not saying the OP should sue, but your last sentence bothers me. People have a duty to testify. What they would "care" to do shouldn't be the OP's concern. Except that for practical reasons he probab;y has to think about it, but the notion that people shouldn't participate in the state's criminal action or a plaintiff's civil action because they don't want to is antithetical to the concepts of "society" and "American". You can supoena me and I will have to testify or face contempt of court charges. However, I can promise that you are NOT going to like what I have to say. |
#28
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
You can supoena me and I will have to testify or face contempt of court charges. However, I can promise that you are NOT going to like what I have to say. yeah, hopefully it would only cost you one day's pay to testify for this total stranger who is now your new neighbor. |
#29
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
On 21 Apr 2007 07:32:56 -0700, Chris wrote:
first, thanks for all the replies and discussion-- I talked to a lawyer, and it will be cheaper for me to fix it than hiring a lawyer.. it will be around $4,500 to fix.. but I am still going to talk to my real estate agent anyway.. hopefully the real estate company, which handled the sale and the listing, and my title, will be able to help. This house WAS inspected.. the inspector said there was a french drain.. but, did not look behind the wall.. hell.. he even said that there was a drain line out to the street, which there wasn't.. just a pipe that ended under the beginning of the driveway, which caused a sink hole.. but that's another story! Do you really think an inspector would dig up every line and see where it terminates during an inspection? |
#30
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
statute of limitations
On Apr 21, 11:08 am, "longshot" wrote:
You can supoena me and I will have to testify or face contempt of court charges. However, I can promise that you are NOT going to like what I have to say. yeah, hopefully it would only cost you one day's pay to testify for this total stranger who is now your new neighbor. Not to mention the cost of litigation, which, if he loses, the plantiff is going to pay the full cost of. Hallerb makes it sound like all you need is a neighbor who knows something about a water problem and bingo, it's a slam dunk case, you win. In reality, a neighbor's testimony, while very useful, is only one part of proving the case and recovering damages. How about after spending $xxxxx on legal fees, the seller produces receipts and witnesses that say the basement water problem was fixed 6 months prior to sale, that what the neighbor is saying is based on history prior to that and that the seller was having an affair with the testifying neighbor's wife? Or maybe you win and find out that the seller moves to another state and is judgement proof. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Velux window positioning limitations? | UK diy | |||
BasePump, was Space limitations on back up sump pump. | Home Repair | |||
Space limitations on back up sump pump. | Home Repair | |||
City fence limitations - how to overcome? | Home Repair | |||
What are the size limitations of mini mills? | Metalworking |