Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
My seller is a dual agent, and not a very good one
My house has been under a sale contract for over a month. My
realestate agent happened to be a "Dual Agent" in new jersey, because the buyer also used him as the buyer's agent. The original close date is already past, and apparently the buyer is having mortage problems. The very annoying fact is that my "dual agent" did not inform me of the buyer's mortgage delay until about a week before the closing date, which means I have already went through the trouble of hiring a moving company and completing the move. I was looking forward to be relieved of my responsibility of this house (mortgage+taxes+insurance, etc) in september, but now it seems that it won't happen. My question is, could I ask for any kind of compensation from either the buyer or my agent? I get the distinct impression that my agent knew long ago that the transcation was going to be delayed but he chose not to tell me until the last minute. Thanks in advance, Yan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
My seller is a dual agent, and not a very good one
Yan Liu wrote: My house has been under a sale contract for over a month. My realestate agent happened to be a "Dual Agent" in new jersey, because the buyer also used him as the buyer's agent. The original close date is already past, and apparently the buyer is having mortage problems. The very annoying fact is that my "dual agent" did not inform me of the buyer's mortgage delay until about a week before the closing date, which means I have already went through the trouble of hiring a moving company and completing the move. I was looking forward to be relieved of my responsibility of this house (mortgage+taxes+insurance, etc) in september, but now it seems that it won't happen. My question is, could I ask for any kind of compensation from either the buyer or my agent? I get the distinct impression that my agent knew long ago that the transcation was going to be delayed but he chose not to tell me until the last minute. Thanks in advance, Yan I am not in New Jersey. There could be variations in the laws there covering dual agency. Let's use the terms broker and agent. A salesperson (agent) works for the broker. The broker is where you focus. Some states do not allow dual agency. Some do and have very specific rules. If NJ allows it, it probably requires both the seller and the buyer to agree in writing to the dual agency. Did you have such an agreement? Did you have a written listing agreement to sell your house? Have you read it? Does it mention dual agency? Is the broker also a Realtor? One of the ways it works is for the broker to be the "dual agent" and then assign a salesperson to the seller and a different salesperson to the buyer. Each salesperson reports to the broker, but the broker has to maintain confidentiality with each. Neither salesperson should know the motivations and confidential info of the other party to the sale. NJ may have a different approach. Your case illustrates that "A servant cannot serve two masters". If you did not agree in writing to the dual agency situation, and if it is required in NJ, and if NJ even allows dual agency, then the broker has a problem. Have you talked directly with the broker at the firm? Is your agent actually the broker? If you want to do some personal investigation, you can call the NJ Real Estate Commission and ask them if dual agency is legal and what in general is the requirement for the parties to agree. This won't cost you anything. You do not have to reveal your identity or that of the broker until you want to. Depending on what you learn, you may want to consult an attorney. If you signed a listing agreement with a broker, and did not sign an agreement that the broker also could represent the buyer, and the buyer did not also sign such an agreement, if NJ has a good law on the subject, the lawyer can advise what your options are. Only a NJ attorney can give you legal advice. Dual agency is one of the tricky subjects in real estate. You need specific guidance for your specific situation. Good luck. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
My seller is a dual agent, and not a very good one
Yan Liu wrote in message om... My house has been under a sale contract for over a month. My realestate agent happened to be a "Dual Agent" in new jersey, because the buyer also used him as the buyer's agent. The original close date is already past, and apparently the buyer is having mortage problems. The very annoying fact is that my "dual agent" did not inform me of the buyer's mortgage delay until about a week before the closing date, which means I have already went through the trouble of hiring a moving company and completing the move. I was looking forward to be relieved of my responsibility of this house (mortgage+taxes+insurance, etc) in september, but now it seems that it won't happen. My question is, could I ask for any kind of compensation from either the buyer or my agent? I get the distinct impression that my agent knew long ago that the transcation was going to be delayed but he chose not to tell me until the last minute. What makes you think the agent knew? Have they told you what the problem is? It could be a low appraisal. Which means that the very agent you suspect of wrongdoing actually got you a good price -- maybe too good. Ask what the problemis and when a resolution is expected. This problem would have happened whether or not you had dual agency. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|