On 31 Jan, 11:17, Hugo Nebula abuse@localhost wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:22:09 -0800 (PST), a certain chimpanzee, BusaC
randomly hit the keyboard and produced:

I am planning to extend a 1960’sGableended Bungalow. The height to
theroofof the Bungalow is just over 4m at a 30 degree angle. Ideally
I would like to make theextensionthe same height elongating the
Bungalow but when researching Extensions most seem to drop a metre and
have a step in theroofheight however this would reduce the ceiling
height.
So what are the problems of extending the existingGableendroofat
the same height?

Often the reason extensions as you describe are lower is due to
planning constraints. To avoid terracing (if all houses were extended,
a row of semis wouldendup looking like a terrace), they ask for the
extensions to be set back, usually by a metre. This has the knock-on
effect of reducing the ridge height if you keep theroofpitches the
same.

It may sound obvious, but check with Planning as to what would be
acceptable.
--
Hugo Nebula
*"If no-one on the internet wants a piece of this,
*just how far from the pack have you strayed"?

Thanks for the information
Chris